Study: Louisiana is saddest state in the U.S.

Louisiana, according to some math researchers, is the saddest state in the country. And, they claim, the saddest city in the saddest state is Shreveport.

Those are among the conclusions of “The Geography of Happiness,” a study released Wednesday by University of Vermont math researchers who determined the happiness and sadness of the states and cities by linking key words and geographic locations in tweets on the Twitter social media site.

According to the study, Hawaii is the happiest state in the nation, followed by Maine, Nevada, Utah and Vermont.

Joining Louisiana on the sad end of the spectrum are Mississippi, Maryland, Delaware and Georgia.

The researchers looked at more than 10 million geotagged tweets from 2011 as well as lists of words that they deemed either “happy” or “sad.” As an example, “rainbow” is a happy word while “earthquake” is a sad word, according to the study.

So how did Louisiana wind up as the saddest state in the study?

The answer is as profane as it is mundane: Louisianians like to curse.

“Louisiana is revealed as the saddest state primarily as a result of an abundance of profanity relative to the other states,” the researchers said in the study.

Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne isn’t buying it.

“Since when have isolated words without context in tweets become an acceptable standard for determining people’s attitudes? We still prefer Science magazine’s more scientific study from a few years ago that identifies Louisiana as the happiest state,” Dardenne wrote in an email response to The Advocate.

“I would encourage the University of Vermont to ask actual Louisianians what they would say about their own level of happiness.”

LSU demographer and sociology professor Troy Blanchard said the study is not very convincing.

“The biggest problem with this analysis is the assumption that words have a universal meaning across geographic areas,” Blanchard said. “There is no way to account for cultural variation in word meaning using this methodology.”

The study’s researchers used income and prevalence of obesity in an area to measure happiness.

And, they tracked key food words in tweets to determine happiness or sadness.

Key words such as “McDonald’s,” “wings,” “heartburn” and “ham” in tweets were considered a negative correlation to obesity while words such as “apple,” “sushi,” “tofu” and “grill” were considered a positive correlation to obesity.

Blanchard said some of the words coming out of the tweets are a reflection of culture.

“And the culture in Louisiana is rich but the culture also involves food that is not considered super healthy,” he said.

The study points out there are “legitimate concerns to be raised” about how well Twitter data can represent the happiness of the greater population. According to the study, only 15 percent of adults with access to the Internet use Twitter, and people ages 18 to 29 and minorities are more represented on Twitter than any other population group.

That said, no Louisiana cities landed among the study’s top 15 happiest cities, but four Louisiana cities — Shreveport, Monroe, Houma and Alexandria — are among the 15 saddest cities.

The saddest city of all, according to the study, is Beaumont, Texas.

The happiest city in the study: Napa, Calif.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (19)


1) Comment by Thurston_Howell_III - 18/06/2013

Shame on you Jindal Supporters. This is your fault. Now, all of a sudden, you want to blame him when you guys voted him. Oh the irony!

2) Comment by Thurston_Howell_III - 18/06/2013

It's not Bobby Jindal's fault. It's those supporters who elected him in, they are the ones to blame. Shame on your Jindal Advocates. Next time, make sure he uses Astro Glide on you.

3) Comment by liberalpatriot - 24/05/2013

If Bobby Jindal was Governor of Hawaii, they'd be sad, too.

4) Comment by wadep66 - 07/04/2013

Protean, maybe people curious about that weren't too lazy to look it up since a simple google search gives you the actual study. Yeah, if we don't like the results of a study it must be wrong! It makes sense to me. Reading the comments in this paper from time to time I see angy, sad, negative, racist comments all the time. Those are some unhappy people doing that. Also, all the politically polarized comments coming from people who are angry or sad over the outcome of an election. I'd say the study is spot on!

5) Comment by Protean - 05/03/2013

Interesting that not a single commenter is curious whether the "researchers" were students doing study work or were academics actually using public funds from a research grant. The article offers no clue. If the latter, then there probably should be more oversight by the grantee AND the grantor. If the former, then it's just a study project, merely a tool to teach math concepts, not solution the global economic crisis, just like the boundless numbers of silly homework assignments given to students since teaching began. And along comes at least one ultraparanoid wingnut with no doubts at all that wicked agents of the Obama One World Government team have carried out a sinister plan to hurt the widdle feewings of right-wing whacko throughout the state and by using government money that should be given to him or, at the very least, one of his authoritarian icons. Now THAT is sad!

6) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 21/02/2013

This supposed “study” is another example of pure, unmitigated “Yankee bias”. It conjures up images of “socially laden biases” substituted for “objective research”. Like a question on an elementary achievement test a number of years ago. This section of the test was aimed at “testing” the childrens “social skills”(third graders) and went something like this” Coffee is drank in the A)spring, B) summer, C)fall, D) winter E) all of the time. Of course, being from Louisiana, the children—and I mean 100% of them—all answered “E”(all the time) and 100% of the children got the answer wrong. Wrong! Why? Because the test was designed/developed by a company filled with Ivy League graduates(in particular Dartmouth) and, as such, the correct answer was “C”(winter). It also calls to mind a quote my quantitative business statistics professor made in my first courses: “the greatest liars in the world are statistics and statisticians, and that's a fact”! Anytime an article presents “statistics” as justification or "proof" of their particular agenda a loud warning goes off in my head, “warning Will Robinson/warning Will Robinson” at which point I proceed with “extreme” caution and “deliberate” due diligence. That warning has increased in occurrance and intensity since Jindal was first elect.

7) Comment by LouisCannon - 21/02/2013

Louisiana - and Baton Rouge in particular - is just too far f_cking gone.

8) Comment by bourbon-soda - 21/02/2013

@DMJ - it was an indirect way of saying federal dollars were probably involved, taken from people with actual productive jobs, to subsidize this PhD playpen project in Vermont.

9) Comment by jonbourg - 21/02/2013

I'm from Louisian and I say O*&&^%&^&_)(***(&&*&*(&&^&^%^ the study!

10) Comment by DMJ - 21/02/2013

I don't think this is political. I also don't think it's accurate. It's Twitter. Who cares? We're not staging an Arab Spring or anything. I think it's best to simply ignore this.

11) Comment by Bighug - 21/02/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

12) Comment by Whatnow - 21/02/2013

@bourbon-soda, since that's the case, no wonder our country is broke. Waste, waste and more waste.

13) Comment by twinkie1cat - 21/02/2013

Anybody would be sad in a state run by Republicans. Mississippi is so abominably poor it keeps Louisiana off the bottom. Georgia's only salvation is Atlanta and it looks like now, even that great city can't save it from going down.

14) Comment by DMJ - 21/02/2013

"People actually working on rigs in Louisiana almost certainle helped subsidize this." Uh.....what?

15) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/02/2013

Sounds like a study done by the Democrat Communist Party.

16) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/02/2013

What is the most bankrupt state? That is the saddest state.

17) Comment by bourbon-soda - 21/02/2013

The actual article seems to be at << http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.00 26752 >>. Like the polls that miscalled the 1948 election by polling only the comparatively affluent part of the electorate that owned telephones at the time, this one limits itself to people to tweet. Even within that sampling problem, there is no attempt to correlate the method with any established standard of happiness. There is a neat, to me at least, neologism: "hedonomics." Otherwise GIGO. @Whatnow - the authors are "employed" at a public university, so tax dollars were undoubtedly involved. I doubt that the source was limited to Vermont. People actually working on rigs in Louisiana almost certainle helped subsidize this.

18) Comment by Bouncer - 21/02/2013

Native Louisianans seem relatively happy, for the most part. I've often heard, "Ignorance is bliss." I suppose there's something to that.

19) Comment by Whatnow - 20/02/2013

I sure hope our taxes didn't pay for this silly study, although I wouldn't doubt it.

20) Comment by ScotB - 20/02/2013

According to a more authoritative source, a broader database, and more direct polling - the Center for Disease Control says Louisiana is the happiest state. http://www.examiner.com/article/what-are-the-happiest-states-america