Court blocks Port Allen firing

City official back at job until hearing

A state district judge granted a temporary restraining order Thursday blocking Mayor Demetric “Deedy” Slaughter from firing the city’s chief financial officer and ordered Slaughter to show cause why his order should not become permanent.

Judge Alvin Batiste set a hearing regarding Slaughter’s firing of CFO Audrey McCain for 9 a.m. Wednesday in 18th Judicial District Court.

The mayor dismissed McCain on Monday from her jobs as city chief financial officer and municipal clerk. McCain had worked for the city of Port Allen since Oct. 1, 2011.

Slaughter informed City Council members of McCain’s firing in a letter, an action that stirred up negative responses among a majority of council members during their meeting Wednesday night.

Slaughter wrote that she dismissed McCain because of accounting deficiencies cited in an audit of the city’s financial records for fiscal year 2011.

“I’m disappointed she’s taking that role; please, go through the council to check things out,” Councilman R.J. Loupe said Thursday of Mayor Slaughter. “She’s been avoiding us as far as I can see.”

Loupe said the city’s financial records were in deplorable shape even before McCain was hired and that McCain had worked to correct the deficiencies.

“Audrey made a whole lot of difference,” Loupe said. “She was getting things back in order. The books were so bad, we had to hire outside contractors to help her out.”

McCain’s petition for the temporary restraining order, filed by attorney Cy J. D’Aquila Jr., of New Roads, asserts that McCain’s termination violates state law and city statute, both of which require City Council approval before a municipality such as Port Allen can dismiss a clerk or department head.

City Attorney Victor Woods argued during the council’s tumultuous meeting Wednesday night that Slaughter has authority to fire McCain because McCain’s chief financial officer post had not been designated as a department head position by city ordinance. Woods added, however, state law does not give the mayor authority to remove McCain from her job as a municipal clerk.

At City Hall on Thursday afternoon, McCain referred all questions regarding the injunction to her attorney.

“We took the position she was never terminated because it wasn’t done correctly,” D’Aquila said Thursday. “So, she went to work this morning and assumed her role as the municipal clerk. Now that we have the injunction, she’s back as the CFO as well.”

Slaughter said in an email Thursday she could not comment on Batiste’s temporary restraining order because it is a matter of pending litigation.

In response to Batiste’s granting of McCain’s request for a temporary restraining order, Woods filed a motion later Thursday on the mayor’s behalf objecting to the court’s decision granting the restraining order.

Woods’ motion claims McCain and her attorney failed to follow the state Code of Civil Procedure by contacting city officials about the petition for a restraining order before it was filed in court. The city’s motion further argues that McCain’s petition did not properly state what “irreparable injury, loss or damages” would require the court to issue the temporary restraining order.

D’Aquila said the question of whether his client’s job classifies her as a department head or not will be at the center of the arguments during next week’s court hearing.

Meanwhile, City Council members agreed unanimously Wednesday night to begin work on drafting a city ordinance that will settle the issue. Councilman Garry Hubble, chairman of the Personnel and Finance Committee, made the motion to begin work on the proposed ordinance clarifying the job status of employees such as McCain.

“We need a clear definition of the department heads and who they are so we can move on to the real issues of the city — and this isn’t one of them,” Hubble said Thursday. “I received so many phone calls expressing disgust with what happened at last night’s meeting. It’s shameful the way our city was portrayed.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by Attila - 15/02/2013

Looks like Mrs. Slaughter is going to get reparations for her and her bro in law...one way or the other.

2) Comment by clcvamp - 15/02/2013

What? Fire Audrey McCain...to hire her brother-in-law???? The mayor needs to be put in her place. Hope the Council takes care of this along the courts.

3) Comment by Bouncer - 15/02/2013

And twinkie1cat, yes, there are rules against such a hiring. Each state employee must either go to an ethics seminar yearly or take it online. The prohibition against nepotism in hiring is explicitly spelled out in the State Code of Ethics. She ought to be fired on the spot. For your convenience, here is a link to the online site: http://ethics.la.gov/SeminarRegistration/

4) Comment by Bouncer - 15/02/2013

The words "appearance of impropriety" have absolutely no meaning to anyone who presumes herself to be somehow exempt from following the rules. The best way to gauge the character of a person is to give that person just a taste of power and authority. Nepotism is perhaps the least of this woman's character flaws.

5) Comment by Ivy - 15/02/2013

@(W)RightWay: I have seen other articles blocked for comment on white American corruption articles, so I do believe to the best of their ability, they are being fair...as far as Port Allen not being the White House, you are absolutely right about that. I agree that Ms. Slaughter has made a mockery of her appointment as mayor, and she should have known that it was a horrible idea...didn't he have to fill out a job application???? If he did, some of those "yes" answers (have you ever been fired?, have you ever been involved in legal action with a former employer?) should have alerted the risk manager (if they had one) that hiring this guy wasn't such a smart move. She has set back women in politics (let's not even get into the race aspect) a hundred years at least.

6) Comment by twinkie1cat - 15/02/2013

Does Louisiana not have laws against hiring close relatives government jobs you supervise? Or is everyone related here.

7) Comment by simbatigercat - 15/02/2013

Go get em audrey!!

8) Comment by DennisBTR - 15/02/2013

Corruption at its finest - Louisiana style. The Mayor obviously does not understand the principle of avoiding any "appearance of impropriety." Firing someone so you can appoint a family member to the position is off the charts. That's even before you consider that the family member she wants to appoint has a cloud of suspicion over him from a previous public job. I can only hope that the good citizens of Port Allen don’t have to suffer much longer with her as Mayor.

9) Comment by RightWay - 15/02/2013

Comments on related articles to Mayor "Deedy" have been blocked, I guess we have a black American running the comment board at the Advocate. This lady is a bad joke. She now wants to appoint her brother-in-law as chief of staff. This is Port Allen not the White House. She brother-in-law was fired from Southern, and as he was walking out the door supposely stole all his office furnishing. This to is bad joke. Thank goodness for the people, such as Ms. McCain and others, which is standing in the gap for their city.

10) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 15/02/2013

I couldnt help but laugh when the news stated last night, "the Mayor has appointed her brother-in-law as CFO in the wake of the firing of the current CFO".. are you freaking kidding me? Has political corruption been around for so long that its just commonplace now for these pathetic officials? This completely idiotic mayor has got to go. WHAT IS GOING ON IN EAST AND WEST BATON ROUGE WITH THESE MAYORS?

11) Comment by Duckyluve - 15/02/2013

The Slaughters in charge and theres problems......go figure

12) Comment by simbatigercat - 15/02/2013

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****