Sheriff seeks garage entrance for inmates

Advocate file photo by LIZ CONDOThe 19th Judicial District Courthouse on North Boulevard in downtown Baton Rouge is seen in this January 2011 photo. Officials on Wednesday discussed  inmate access to the courthouse. Show caption
Advocate file photo by LIZ CONDOThe 19th Judicial District Courthouse on North Boulevard in downtown Baton Rouge is seen in this January 2011 photo. Officials on Wednesday discussed inmate access to the courthouse.

East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff Sid Gautreaux said Wednesday he would like to see a new garage built in the rear of the 19th Judicial District Courthouse to better handle the coming and going of buses and vans that transport inmates to the downtown facility.

The existing garage, or sallyport as court and law enforcement personnel call it, is located on St. Louis Street — the west side of the court building. The garage opens and closes so deputies can secure the inmates once inside the garage and then process them to holding cells inside the courthouse.

Several times a day, sheriff’s personnel are forced to block traffic on St. Louis Street in both directions for several minutes as the buses and vans enter and depart the sallyport, Gautreaux told members of the 19th JDC Building Commission on Wednesday.

“Not the best situation,” he added.

Gautreaux said he realizes the sallyport had to be placed either on the west side of the courthouse, along St. Louis Street, or on the east side, along St. Ferdinand Street, when the building was constructed. The south side at the rear of the courthouse wasn’t an option because it was blocked by the Municipal Building, he said.

But now that the Sheriff’s Office is in the process of moving from the Municipal Building courthouse into leased space at the Metro Airport’s campus, and plans are calling for the eventual demolition of the Municipal Building, it’s time to seriously consider building a new sallyport on the courthouse’s south side, Gautreaux said.

“There wouldn’t be a flow of traffic there,” the sheriff said during the 19th JDC Building Commission meeting, noting that buses and vans would access the new sallyport from St. Louis side of the courthouse and exit onto St. Ferdinand.

“It’s something that can be done. It’s feasible,” Skipper Post, the courthouse architect, said during the meeting.

The new courthouse building, which opened in the fall of 2010, cost in excess of $100 million to build.

State District Judge Janice Clark, who chairs the Building Commission, wondered who would pay for a new garage.

“The issue’s going to come down to who’s going to spend the money,” she said during the meeting.

No cost figures were discussed.

After the meeting, Clark said, “We would certainly be interested in having some discussions about that (a new sallyport). It should be a top priority for the Sheriff’s Office and the city-parish.”

Gautreaux sent a letter in early January to Mayor Pro Tem Chandler Loupe, other Metro Council members, and state District Judge Mike Erwin, chief judge of the 19th JDC. In the letter, the sheriff said his personnel transport 80-100 inmates a day to the courthouse. In addition, 20-30 East Baton Rouge Parish inmates housed out-of-parish are delivered to the court building, he said.

Gautreaux noted in his letter that plans call for the Municipal Building and the surrounding area of the building to be designated as green space once the Municipal Building is torn down.

“As you continue to plan for changes to this area of downtown, I would like to suggest that to avoid the continuing gridlock on St. Louis as a result of inmate court appearances and better ensure the safety to the public, that you consider construction of a new sallyport in the rear of the building,” he wrote.

The sheriff said a new garage would “significantly minimize the blockages on St. Louis Street” and also “allow for additional working space for the demolition and rebuilding” of the downtown library.

In an interview before Wednesday’s meeting, Gautreaux said there have not been any security-related incidents at the current sallyport.

“It’s not really a security issue with us. It’s not an issue of somebody escaping,” he said. “It’s the inconvenience to the public.”

The Sheriff’s Office hopes to be in its leased quarters on General Chennault Drive by March 1, the sheriff said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (15)


1) Comment by Chucky - 31/01/2013

The only way Janet Clark got a seat on the bench was she was able to carve out a small minority majority area in EBR not for any talent or smarts. “State Court” if it can even be called that any more, as it is more like neighborhood court, in EBR has diminished in respectability and judicial quality.

2) Comment by Chucky - 31/01/2013

Duckyluve- expansion, the digs at the airport will become prison administration like for the Warden and staff, just a guess.

3) Comment by Duckyluve - 31/01/2013

Why is the sheriff spending tens of thousands of dollars to remodel the building at the airport when he knows he is moving to the old Womans building?

4) Comment by phil - 31/01/2013

Interesting comments. How about move the courthouse to the old Women's Hospital or the Earl K long. Then move the new downtown Library to the new courthouse building, and keep the old library building for whatever was going to be moved to the Women's hospital. (Or something similar). If they can play the planning shell game, then so can I.

5) Comment by foldgers - 31/01/2013

And how much would it cost to build this little garage? And so the sheriff has airport space AND going to have space at the old Woman's hospital? Why don't they just take over EKL??? It already looks like a prison from the outside and sell or lease the Woman's hospital to a corporation?? Seems logical that building be used to make the city money, considering its location or save the city money by not even buying it. And the state could sell EKL to the city at a "family" discount since I can not imagine ANYONE buying that place.

6) Comment by tradewinns - 31/01/2013

all these complaints. shouldn't we be happy for whoever made all the money off of this and is now set for life? not to mention the "re-dos", adding new wants, etc. the whoever's kids can live well also. God i'm happy for them.

7) Comment by Chucky - 31/01/2013

Never ever should have been built downtown so all i can say about this new courthouse is oops ( a blunder, or mistake)

8) Comment by rockynoggin - 30/01/2013

@MrVPP I wholly agree with your complaints. The elevators are used to ferry jurors - why wasn't a separate and secure elevator added for them? In general, the courthouse could use double the elevators available. Not sure how you fix that after the fact. Also, I agree on the ingress issues - the single entrance leading into a lobby that clearly was not designed for security check points? MAJOR oversight.

9) Comment by Mr. T - 30/01/2013

What idiot designs a courthouse without providing a secure way to get inmates in and out of the building? This should have been designed so the buses could drive in on one side of the courtouse, drop off the inmates and then go out the other side. Whover heard of backing busloads of orisoners out into a busy street. Everybody connected with this fiasco should lose their jobs, incluing the judges who thought it was okay to build a new courthouse without any public parking.

10) Comment by Woody - 30/01/2013

sid, why are you moving offices from the municipal building to leased space at the airport?

11) Comment by Duckyluve - 30/01/2013

Why should the city parish have to pay to fix this problem? The city parish didn't pay to build the courthouse. Worthless judge Clark needs to raise the filing fees again to pay for it.

12) Comment by Being_Stupid - 30/01/2013

I'll pay for it, just put it on my tab.

13) Comment by MrVPP - 30/01/2013

In my opinion, I cannot see spending one more penny on the new courthouse until the elevator problem is sorted out, and another door is opened during peak times for the poor public to get into the courthouse. My work means that I am in and out of this building frequently, and many times in the morning it is nearly impossible to get an elevator up to the 7th or 8th floor. And there is only one door to get in and out of the building. The line to pass through the door and security station backs up for some distance. This building was not designed to accommodate the public. I think the inmates have it much better than the poor taxpayers that have to actually attend court or the clerk's office.

14) Comment by phil - 30/01/2013

Let's build a gigantic new courthouse facility spend $millions and not include enough parking in the original plan. Great "smart growth" planning. How many planners does it take to change a light bulb? The statement in the article "“The issue’s going to come down to who’s going to spend the money,” she said during the meeting." I think the short simple answer is - taxpayers will pay one way or the other. Now how about let's also build a gigantic library downtown that does not have sufficient off-street parking in the same approximate area. Do you possibly see a trend here like maybe this was all planned from the very beginning? Get smart folks and know when you are possibly being played is all I can say right now..

15) Comment by MissCotillion - 30/01/2013

Oh I call ***** on this one. The sheriff is makIng a greedy grab for the old municipal building and that is the end of the story. Traffic is a mess in these few blocks downtown and has been for years. Blocked off for this, closed for that, under construction over there. The garage/sally port was fine when the new courthouse was finished a year or two ago and it is fine now. The problem is the size od the Sheriff's ego.