Costco could be in BR by 2014

Wholesale store to locate at old Coca-Cola bottling facility

Costco Wholesale received site plan approval and a sign waiver Tuesday night from the East Baton Rouge city-parish Planning Commission after company officials answered questions about proposed changes to Dawnadele Avenue.

The commission voted 7-0 for the plan, which involves realigning Dawnadele so it’s closer to the proposed 144,807-square-foot warehouse and gas station in the former Coca-Cola bottling facility southwest of Interstate 12 near Airline Highway.

The property has one-acre, three-acre and six-acre outparcels that will be approved and developed later, said Ted Johnson, development director for the Issaquah, Wash.-based food club warehouse chain.

Johnson said that while the 28-acre property is still under contract, Costco is hoping to open the store on a 15-acre plat there by the summer of 2014, pending the final sale and further design and engineering approvals from the city-parish and the state.

Johnson said Dawnadele, which runs alongside Airline, is currently not well-suited for retail use. He said plans call for new turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic, allowing delivery trucks to get in and out of the site.

The sign waiver allows Costco to put four signs on its building that are properly scaled to the building’s three-acre footprint and height of more than 30 feet.

Commissioners W.T. Winfield and James Gilmore were not present at the meeting.

Other items discussed during the meeting included:

MALLARD TRAILS: The commission deferred for 60 days its consideration of Mallard Trails, 90 single-family residential lots on 57 acres zoned rural on the south side of Hoo Shoo Too Road, east of Wood Duck Drive.

Residents complained about heavy traffic on Hoo Shoo Too and that nearby homes already have water that backs up to their homes.

Hoo Shoo Too resident Fred Mathews said acres of land behind his house flood during rainstorms.

Commissioner John Price took issue with the fact that the board basically had to take developer George W. Robinson at his word that the development would not affect drainage because no drainage impact study has been conducted.

Attorney Pepper Allgood, who spoke out against the project, said only the Planning Commission — not the city-parish Department of Public Works — has the right to waive a drainage impact study. He also said Mallard Trails cannot use cluster development to increase the overall density of the project from one home per acre, just concentrate homes in specific clusters.

At the request of Commissioner Steven Perret, Robinson said he would conduct a drainage impact study that goes beyond what is required to help put commissioners’ minds at ease, though engineer Wayne Sledge of GWS Engineering said it will ultimately show there will be no impact.

PLANS APPROVED: Myrtle Bluff subdivision was approved over the objections of nearby residents about the traffic along Madeira Drive and Samoa Avenue because the 10-acre, 39-lot subdivision connects through three different streets.

Also approved were Lexington Estates, the Cottages at Southfork and LaFleur Oaks.

Three other planned unit developments were approved. LaFleur Oaks got concept plan approval, while The Cottages at Southfork and Lexington Estates got the final development plan approval.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 24/01/2013

danielf, I am saying that NOWHERE in this article does it state that Costco is getting tax subsidies. Your "attitude" is not based on fact since Costco will actually GENERATE taxes...try to keep up and lay off the TP Koolaid.

2) Comment by danielf - 23/01/2013

tea slayer: are you really saying that i shouldnt complain about my tax dollars being spent to subsidize stores, so long as they build turning lanes, in exchange? If so, that's a weird attitude to have.

3) Comment by Woody - 23/01/2013

good comments, yardeggs. it affects more than one persons backyard.

4) Comment by Being_Stupid - 23/01/2013

If you folks have a problem with BIG BOX stores, you can always move to a Communist Country where the store shelves are empty and the line wraps around the block for a half of chicken and 2 eggs which will cost you about 1 week of ration stamps.

5) Comment by Being_Stupid - 23/01/2013

Costco sells hot dogs for $1.50 and that includes a 20 ounce fountain soda.

6) Comment by yardeggs - 23/01/2013

According to the City-Parish, Hoo Shoo Too has 3 times as many accidents as other 2-lane rural roads. Three. Times. It is substandard. There are no shoulders. There are no streetlights. Continuing to increase the traffic volume will only increase the accidents and fatalities. Not to mention it's a dead-end, so when one of these accidents closes the road there is no other way in or out. Additionally, we are sandwiched between Bayou Manchac and the Amite. We do flood. What this developer wants to do will absolutely cause increased water flow to the adjoining properties. And he wanted approval of the subdivision while waiving the Drainage Impact Study. No each new development doesn't bring in 100,000 more people. And each new development individually does not cause a huge impact on the flood plain. But collectively, if they continue to be approved, the traffic volume, the increased population, and the continued increase in impervious surface in the flood plain will have a definite impact. And for the record, no one said anything about noise.

7) Comment by Woody - 23/01/2013

i guess some people are too stupid to understand why other people voice concerns over traffic, noise and drainage when a development may have a direct impact on them.

8) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 23/01/2013

danielf, Quit whining. NONE of your tax dollars will go into the traffic improvements. These big box stores pay for these improvements. ever notice that whenever a Walmart is built, new turn lanes and traffic lights go up. Walmart pays for that.

9) Comment by Being_Stupid - 23/01/2013

Traffic, Noise, and Drainage. Everytime a NIMBY opposes a Property Owner building a development on their own property, the typical NIMBY complains about the same thing over and over again. The new development will somehow give birth to 100,000 new people that will now crowd the entire area and create lots of noise until about 3am in the morning. Also the new development will create a flood like we haven't seen since the biblical days of Noah's Flood.

10) Comment by danielf - 22/01/2013

So, how much of our tax dollars will be sent bending over backwards to have a corporation come in and sell us junk?

11) Comment by Woody - 22/01/2013

has an engineering firm ever admitted or affirmed that a proposed development would impact drainage or traffic?