Obama unveils gun plan, concedes tough fight ahead

Updated at

7:20 p.m.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Conceding “this will be difficult,” President Barack Obama urged a reluctant Congress on Wednesday to require background checks for all gun sales and ban both military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines in an emotion-laden plea to curb gun violence in America.

The president’s sweeping, $500 million plan, coming one month after the school massacre in Connecticut, marks the most comprehensive effort to tighten gun laws in nearly two decades. But his proposals, most of which are opposed by the National Rifle Association, face a doubtful future in a divided Congress where Republicans control the House.

Seeking to circumvent at least some opposition, Obama signed 23 executive actions on Wednesday, including orders to make more federal data available for background checks and end a freeze on government research on gun violence. But he acknowledged that the steps he took on his own would have less impact than the broad measures requiring approval from Capitol Hill.

“To make a real and lasting difference, Congress, too, must act,” Obama said, speaking at a White House ceremony with school children and their parents. “And Congress must act soon.”

The president’s announcements capped a swift and wide-ranging effort, led by Vice President Joe Biden, to respond to the deaths of 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. But Obama’s gun control proposals set him up for a tough political fight with Congress as he starts his second term, when he’ll need Republican support to meet three looming fiscal deadlines and pass comprehensive immigration reform.

“I will put everything I’ve got into this, and so will Joe,” the president said. “But I tell you, the only way we can change is if the American people demand it.”

Key congressional leaders were tepid in their response to the White House proposals.

Republican House Speaker John Boehner’s office signaled no urgency to act, with spokesman Michael Steel saying only that “House committees of jurisdiction will review these recommendations. And if the Senate passes a bill, we will also take a look at that.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he was committed to ensuring that the Senate will consider gun violence legislation “early this year.” But he did not endorse any of Obama’s specific proposals.

The president vowed to use “whatever weight this office holds” to fight for his recommendations. He’s likely to travel around the country in the coming weeks to rally public support and could engage his still-active presidential campaign operation in the effort. But he’ll have to overcome a well-financed counter-effort by the NRA.

“This will be difficult,” Obama acknowledged. “There will be pundits and politicians and special interest lobbyists publicly warning of a tyrannical, all-out assault on liberty — not because that’s true, but because they want to gin up fear or higher ratings or revenue for themselves.”

The president, speaking in front of an audience that included families of some of those killed in Newtown, said 900 Americans had lost their lives to gun violence in the four weeks since the school shootings.

“We can’t put this off any longer,” Obama declared. “Every day we wait, the number will keep growing.”

Many Democrats say an assault weapons ban faces the toughest road in Congress. Obama wants lawmakers to reinstate the expired 1994 ban on the high-grade weapons, and strengthen the measure to prevent manufacturers from circumventing the prohibition by making cosmetic changes to banned guns.

The president is also likely to face opposition to his call for Congress to limit ammunition magazines to 10 rounds.

But Democrats are hopeful they can build consensus around the president’s call for universal background checks. The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence says 40 percent of gun sales are conducted with no criminal background checks, such as in some instances at gun shows or by private sellers over the Internet or through classified ads.

The NRA is opposed to all three measures. In a statement Wednesday, the gun lobby said, “Only honest, law-abiding gun owners will be affected” by Obama’s efforts and the nation’s children “will remain vulnerable to the inevitability of more tragedy.”

And on the eve of Obama’s announcement, the NRA released an online video accusing him of being an “elitist hypocrite” for sending his daughters to school with armed Secret Service agents while opposing having guards with guns at all U.S. schools.

White House spokesman Jay Carney called the video “repugnant and cowardly.”

The president’s proposals did include a $150 million request to Congress that would allow schools to hire 1,000 new police officers, counselors and psychologists. The White House plan also includes legislative and executive action to increase mental health services, including boosting funding for training aimed at getting young people into treatment more quickly.

A lopsided 84 percent of Americans back broader background checks, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll. Nearly six in 10 Americans want stricter gun laws, the same poll showed, with majorities favoring a nationwide ban on military-style weapons and limits on gun violence depicted in video games, movies and TV shows.

The NRA and pro-gun lawmakers have long suggested that violent images in video games and entertainment are more to blame for mass shootings than the availability of guns. But Obama’s proposals do little to address that concern, other than calling on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to research links between violent images and gun attacks.

Government scientists have been prohibited from researching the causes and prevention of gun violence since 1996, when a budget amendment was passed that barred researchers from spending taxpayer money on such studies.

The administration is calling on Congress to provide $10 million for expanded research.

Obama also wants lawmakers to ban armor-piercing ammunition, except for use by the military and law enforcement. And he’s asking them to create stiffer penalties for gun trafficking, to provide $14 million to help train police officers and others to respond to shootings, and to approve his nominee to run the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

One of the president’s executive actions on Wednesday was to nominate B. Todd Jones to head the ATF, which has been without a permanent director since 2006. Jones has served as the bureau’s acting director since 2011.

Other steps Obama took through his presidential powers include:

— Ordering tougher penalties for people who lie on background checks.

— Requiring federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.

— Ordering a review of safety standards for gun locks and gun safes.

———

Associated Press writers Erica Werner, Ken Thomas, Jim Kuhnhenn and Josh Lederman contributed to this report.

———

Follow Julie Pace at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (53)


1) Comment by HRoark - 17/01/2013

Agagent, so for your open minded readers, please share your sources for unbiased assessment. You need to convince more than the brain washed liberals that you have a legitimate argument.

2) Comment by agagent - 17/01/2013

I am just writing for those who have an open mind, not for brain washed liberals. I can write a thesis with pages of references and the libs would still refuse to believe the truth. It is hopeless convincing liberals who believe a community organizer/agitator-in-chief knows more about economics than a proven business leader.

3) Comment by nimby? - 17/01/2013

not that diverse a society either .

4) Comment by DMJ - 17/01/2013

Exactly. Different culture. In theirs, they don't have guns...so they don't have gun deaths.

5) Comment by nimby? - 17/01/2013

different culture , demographics , see cause and effect .

6) Comment by DMJ - 17/01/2013

Nimby, you're right...most murders are committed with handguns. However, it's impossible to know how many had extended magazines. Call me crazy, but if someone's shooting at me, I'd rather them have to reload after 10 then after 30... I think the assault weapons and high capacity magazines ban is aimed more at random mass shootings rather than at every day street violence. But just to put it in perspective.... last year, there were more shooting deaths from assault weapons in Louisiana than there were gun deaths (from any type of gun) in all of Japan. Crazy, huh?

7) Comment by nimby? - 17/01/2013

how ironic ; at the top of the Advocates web page ; play Tom Clancys Ghost Recon on line , free . carry on ...

8) Comment by nimby? - 17/01/2013

question ; 83 murders were committed in B.R. last year , how many with "assault" weapons ? supposedly BRAVE has identified the major culprits in the area . instead of carrying on a dialogue with them why not round them up , take their weapons ? problem , unless they are caught in the act there could be a possible violation of their rights , ACLU territory . certain laws restrict those who obey while other laws protect those who don't , therein lies the rub ...

9) Comment by HerbF - 17/01/2013

The President's 23 executive orders yesterday are a good start, but we need Congress to pass legislation concerning assault type weapons. A good sized majority of Americans are FOR gun control. Obviously, not many are on this thread, but that's probably just because Louisiana is a poor southern state. Conservatives have a tendency to listen to "god" rather than logic.

10) Comment by gman70726 - 17/01/2013

I wonder if Obama feels bad about hte debt he is leaving for the kids standing behind him to pay. They may or may not ever be involved in another gun statistic, very few of us are, but they sure as heck will have to pay his bill. The Hammer & Club statistic came form 2011 FBI release. Again I ask, what caliber of weapon did Cain use to kill Abel?

11) Comment by Scrooge - 17/01/2013

Agagent posits,"One survey of criminals showed that 34% had been “scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim.” Forty percent decided not to commit a crime because they “knew or believed that the victim was carrying a gun,” and 69% knew other criminals who had been “scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim.” A survey of criminals? I suspect that 99% of agagents "surveys" are confidential and he cannot reveal his sources for fear of the truth being revealed, the other 1% are funded and posted on NRA, and Heritage foundation, etc. websites. That looks to the faux conservative way, if the reality doesn't match the ideology, just make it up or divert attention by manufacturing a non-issue or non-sequiter. . In other words, con 'em.

12) Comment by MBW - 17/01/2013

Get a grip gun nuts, none of these regulations that Obama is proposing "take your guns". Your cries of "tyranny" sound more than a little melodramatic, frankly. OMG a background check!! Next thing you know there will be concentration camps!.... LOL gimme a break guys.

13) Comment by MBW - 17/01/2013

If I want to drive a car, the government makes me get a license. The government also makes me have insurance...and wear a seatbelt. They make me follow speed limits and obey traffic signals. Yet I still get to drive my car. Amazing how that works!

14) Comment by MBW - 17/01/2013

@The_Host- You're right, someone could break into my home. I could also be struck by lightning or hit by a bus. Maybe a tree will fall on my car. Sure, all of these things can (and do) sometimes happen, but at some point you just need live your life. Life is too short to be looking for a would-be assailant around every corner.

15) Comment by The_Host - 17/01/2013

MBW- Here is YOUR logic. You are safer at home without a gun than with a gun. Yet of someone breaks into your home in the middle of the night the first thing you are going to do is........................ CALL SOMEONE WITH A GUN! You are a special kind of stupid to think criminals will follow even more laws or that any law will stop crazy people from being crazy. Why not just pass a Zero Tolerance on being Crazy law if a law is all we need?

16) Comment by localgal - 17/01/2013

As I have pointed out on other gun control discussions, if there is someone crazy enough and smart enough (Adam Lanza), they will find a way to carry out their rampage. Lanza shot his way through a locked security door to get to his victims. The security system did not stop him. Tim McVea used fertilizer. The shooter in Aurora also made his own homemade napalm and had 16 one-gallon buckets of it on the floor of his apartment, along with a triggering mechanism, hoping that anyone who opened the door to complain about the loud music would be almost instantly incinerated by the flames, not to mention the explosion that would have probably killed about 100 more people who were alseep in their beds at that apt. complex at 1:00 in the morning. Suppose some common cooking oil or lard or car anti-freeze had been used in the concoction. Would we then ban cooking oil or anti-freeze or have to sign a ledger to buy it and then only in limited quantities, complete with our driver's license number, etc., like we do if we want to buy cold medicine? There are all sorts of websites on how to build bombs, grenades, and other weapons and devices designed to to maximum damage. Do you want to censor the Internet now? That's going to come too if things keep going the way they are. And to MBW, other countries may have lower gun violence rates, but their murder rates are right on a par with the U.S. If someone is dead, they are dead, whether someone used a gun, a knife or a sledge hammer. Dead is dead.

17) Comment by ScotB - 16/01/2013

Chicago has some of the strictest gun control laws in the country. So does Conneticutt. Worked great, huh? While we're banning guns, let's ban heroin, cocaine, and marijuana too, so we can make that problem go away. There's too many deaths each year from drug abuse.

18) Comment by MBW - 16/01/2013

3000 people die on 9/11 and we practically lock down every airport in the country and impose drastic security measures.....but 11,000 people die EVERY YEAR from guns and nothing happens. How effed up is that?

19) Comment by MBW - 16/01/2013

Let's use the gun-lovers' logic: If we just had more cars on the road, we would have fewer accidents!

20) Comment by MBW - 16/01/2013

Agagent- Then how do you explain how nearly every industrialized country has lower gun violence rates than the US?? How 'bout those stats instead of your anecdotal stuff? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm- related_death_rate

21) Comment by HRoark - 16/01/2013

Agagent, unless you can cite legitimate sources, your stats are subject to some doubt. Possibly they are completely fabricated. Also, learn about type 1 and type 2 mistakes in interpreting data. Citations please.

22) Comment by agagent - 16/01/2013

After D.C. banned handguns their murder rate rose 73% while the national murder rate dropped 11%. One survey of criminals showed that 34% had been “scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim.” Forty percent decided not to commit a crime because they “knew or believed that the victim was carrying a gun,” and 69% knew other criminals who had been “scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim.” Guns in the hands of law abiding citizens can make a difference. I would rather not have the victim out-gunned by criminals or face a criminal with a smaller magazine.

23) Comment by Attila - 16/01/2013

@nimby: "both sides seem to agree this will have little effect on those who don't obey the law . it will require further restrictions on those who do play by the rules , such is the price for "freedom" ? Great tongue in cheek reply nimby...but sadly, too many lemmings believe it is the way to go.,

24) Comment by agagent - 16/01/2013

Plenty of liberal rules were already in play at Sandy Hook: guns banned from school, a state with very strict gun control laws, no armed guards at school, and a state that does not mandate treatment or confinement of the mentally ill as a preventative. Those parents supporting Obama’s ban on guns may have voted for him. Obama is using this tragedy to push an agenda which otherwise could not pass. Obama’s playbook: Never let a crisis go to waste.

25) Comment by Attila - 16/01/2013

I thought that we fought the bloodiest war ever waged on American soil 150 years ago.

26) Comment by gofigger - 16/01/2013

Is he trying to impress the age group that voted for him?

27) Comment by nimby? - 16/01/2013

Chicago , D.C. , Oakland , Detroit , etc . not that gun laws matter to those who don't care for them , correct ?

28) Comment by MBW - 16/01/2013

Agagent-- Care to provide some real examples? I just moved here from NYC a couple of years ago....and NYC has LOWER violent crime (per capita) than Baton Rouge, but much stricter gun laws.

29) Comment by agagent - 16/01/2013

In recent years gun ownership has increased and violent crimes have declined. Some urban areas have bucked that trend. Some cities with the strictest gun control laws have higher rates of violent crimes.

30) Comment by agagent - 16/01/2013

Ban assault hammers and clubs. National crime statistics show that more people are killed with hammers and clubs than with rifles. If you want to ban assault weapons start with the hammer. Any short, semi-automatic rifle performs like the so called “assault rifle.” The anti-gun crowd must have coined the word to gin up fear of firearms.

31) Comment by nimby? - 16/01/2013

both sides seem to agree this will have little effect on those who don't obey the law . it will require further restrictions on those who do play by the rules , such is the price for "freedom" ?

32) Comment by Buck - 16/01/2013

"Time to Lock & Load, boys." Is this the rallying call of the current NRA to begin an attack on the US government? If so, bring it on and let's see how many of our young people will be killed for a lobbying organization goal, that tries to sell the myth based on fear that firearms or like mom and apple pie. Latest count there are a little outnumbered say 4M+ against 250M+. I miss the original NRA.

33) Comment by MBW - 16/01/2013

The far-right freaks out over gun regulations....but warrantless wiretapping? No problem! Indefinite detainment? No problem! What hypocrites. You can eavesdrop on my conversations, but just don't take my guns! LOL

34) Comment by Chucky - 16/01/2013

If there is even one life we can save by going around the USA constitution should we do it? Or have the lives lost mean nothing in defending the rights of the people ?

35) Comment by TommyRucker - 16/01/2013

Another exploitation of a crisis as that is the way of democrats. It is interesting that Obama can't and is not interested in enforcing laws on immigration and pot smoking but wants more laws concerning guns when we can't even enforce the ones we have. The real issue is the political correct people who are members of the democratic party mob chose to label the Sandy Hook shooter a person of little value and to be avoided, etc. as they are real good at determining who is valuable and who is not, who should live and who should not. This led to this shooter being severely isolated and ignored until he developed a severe mental illness. If society would have followed Christian values in dealing with this young man rather than the secular pathways, this would have never happened. People in this much pain who develop mental illness will find a way to lash out at society's ignoring them as they relate their pain to society and want society to experience some of the pain they are feeling. They will use something else if guns are not available. Why isn't the lack of attention this young man failed to receive from society discussed, why isn't society's responsibility in this mess addressed? Obama is giving secular society a scapegoat and it is guns as he ignores the real problem because it is not politically in his best interest to call it like it is.

36) Comment by Frustrated - 16/01/2013

How bout we just admit those kids didn't write those letters.

37) Comment by TommyRucker - 16/01/2013

The champion of murdering kids thru abortion needs to apply some of his 'thoughts and statements' about saving kids to the problem of abortion where millions are murdered in this country. The democratic mob has never had a 'crisis' that they would not try to exploit. They have done it for decades and will continue to do it as that is the nature of the beast. Who's going to stop the home invaders when they come into my home to harm my family??? It sure isn't going to be Obama. The criminals are more afraid of guns in the hands of citizens than they are of going to jail as they know they will be pampered in jail and serve very little time.

38) Comment by BRmoderate - 16/01/2013

My point about guns being interwoven is that you can no more successfully ban guns from our society as you can ban alcohol in the 1920's. There will always be a demand for guns. The more guns you ban, the more go on the black market becoming harder to track and regulate.

39) Comment by BRmoderate - 16/01/2013

photo-ops are a part of politics. Before you bash Obama for a photo-op with kids...remember GWB once used an aircraft carrier and the infamous "Mission Accomplished" banner. This is what politicians of all creeds do

40) Comment by nimby? - 16/01/2013

a few questions , if anyone can answer please do . were the guns in the Lanza home legally purchased according to Connecticut law ? were there any records he had been professionally diagnosed as mentally unstable ? were there any criminal records , anything a background check could have provided that would have prevented Mr. Lanza , had he been of age , from purchasing a gun ? the idea is to keep guns out of the hands of those who would do harm . so how do we identify who's bad and who isn't ?

41) Comment by Whatnow - 16/01/2013

Nice prop, the kids. Are you worried about the Mexican children that are still being killed everyday by the U.S. guns from Fast and Furious, Obama? Obama voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act four times, horrifyingly voting against protecting babies who survived abortion and voting in favor of leaving them to die or killing them at birth. I suppose this farce today will make him the Patron Saint of all Children. Yeah, you care about the children.

42) Comment by 8point6 - 16/01/2013

"But the president, speaking at White House ceremony, focused his attention on the divided Congress" Hey, hussein. You're the one who divided Congress in your first term. From this day forward, BR will no longer have homicides attributed to guns. Praise de lawd! The "police report" tomorrow should be very short.

43) Comment by slye753 - 16/01/2013

Except for the assault rifle ban,which I don't own and don't care to own, this is nothing new and nothing in here would have saved the children. This is nothing more than Obama pleasing the left wing loonies that voted for him. It made Obama and Biden look so immature standing there with the little children. But nothing new there also

44) Comment by ABayouBoy - 16/01/2013

While I'm not clear on what the $500 million will be spent on, I do believe that his plan is a reasonable compromise. Assault weapons truly don't have any place in the general public's hands. Nothing against privately owned firearms for self defense though.

45) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 16/01/2013

I'm sure Billynurse's god is rolling his eyes... "I done showed ya ten times, Billynurse. You're just not listening."

46) Comment by HRoark - 16/01/2013

Confronting the progun minority's stupid obsession with firearms is a great first step! I only wish the "lock and load" boys would take a cue from Billynurse and limit their efforts to fervent prayers for help. Then we could seriously address gun regulation. Maybe we can anyway.

47) Comment by Ordell5267 - 16/01/2013

...and that ban did nothing . Time to Lock and Load, boys!!

48) Comment by DMJ - 16/01/2013

Even Ronald Regan supported an assault weapons ban, folks. Something to think about...

49) Comment by DMJ - 16/01/2013

Yes, guns are interwoven in our society....and that's the problem. It'll take time. Lots of time. But we can reduce gun violence and we should try. Say what you will about Obama, but at least he cares, and at least he's trying. Gradually limiting the availability of guns, especially the most lethal ones, is a huge piece of the puzzle of reducing shootings.

50) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 16/01/2013

Just to make the counterpoint, you do not know that this isn't going to make anyone safer. I think it will make us safer. I think the thing making all of us less safe is the fire that has been lit, unnecessarily, under the gun enthusiasts to start acting like yahoos out in the Wild West. Every time the President speaks, I am reminded that the entire nation is not necessarily like Louisiana, and I feel calmer and safer.

51) Comment by BRmoderate - 16/01/2013

This is not going to make anyone anymore safe. Guns are as interwoven in our society as baseball and apple pie. I think all Obama did today was lose the democratic majority in the Senate just like Clinton did with the Brady Bill. We will see in the mid term elections

52) Comment by phil - 16/01/2013

Gee here we go again with an increase in expenses. Why does it cost a half of a $billion to implement something like this? Is the President trying to bankrupt this country with needless additional spending? Whatever is done, there should be a much more economical way to do it. We already are paying Congress to do their job, there already have been plenty of studies performed in the past, etc. While there are ongoing discussions going on in Congress about our existing $16 TRILLION debt and how to fix it, here we go again with even more wasted spending.

53) Comment by billynurse - 16/01/2013

Every time I hear his words, I instinctually pray "God help us". I wish I could just be like many ; blissfully ignorant, watching ESPN, MTV, and "dancing w/ the stars, etc.