La. delegation’s votes mixed on Sandy aid funds

This January 2013 file photo shows a beach front home that was severely damaged by Superstorm Sandy resting in the sand in Bay Head, N.J.  (AP Photo/Mel Evans) Show caption
This January 2013 file photo shows a beach front home that was severely damaged by Superstorm Sandy resting in the sand in Bay Head, N.J. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

Half of the Louisiana House delegation voted against the $50.4 billion Hurricane Sandy disaster aid package passed by the House on Tuesday after critics alleged it was hypocritical for representatives from hurricane-vulnerable Southern states to oppose the aid.

Reps. Bill Cassidy, R-Baton Rouge; Steve Scalise, R-Jefferson; and John Fleming, R-Minden, voted against the supplemental package while Reps. Rodney Alexander, R-Quitman; Charles Boustany, R-Lafayette; and Cedric Richmond, D-New Orleans, voted in favor of it.

The legislation to aid the Northeastern states was approved on a 241-180 vote, with a majority of Republicans opposing it.

Cassidy said he voted “nay” with “incredibly mixed emotions.”

“Sandy victims need relief, but taxpayers need transparency,” Cassidy said, arguing that he opposes the process that allocates many billions in funds even if that much money is not ultimately needed.

Cassidy and Richmond, who also represents a significant portion of the Baton Rouge area, tried and failed to tack in language to expedite U.S. Army Corps of Engineers mitigation projects in Louisiana in the aftermath of last year’s Hurricane Isaac, if there are any extra Sandy aid dollars left over.

Despite that defeated effort, Richmond still enthusiastically voted for the Sandy aid package.

“As someone who has witnessed the devastation of hurricanes firsthand, I know the road to recovery is long and challenging,” Richmond said in a prepared statement.

Although Boustany voted for some budget offsets for the bill, he ended up voting for the final package.

“Louisiana has been hit by hurricanes repeatedly and Congress has stepped up and helped,” Boustany said, arguing it was time to do the same for the Northeast.

Previously, Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., helped lead the $60 billion Senate-approved Sandy aid effort, which was passed with 62 votes, including that of Sen. David Vitter, R-La.

“Robust funding is important, but equally important is having the right tools to effectively and efficiently recover. I look forward to the Senate’s consideration and quick passage of this legislation,” Landrieu said.

Earlier Tuesday before the final vote, a Republican amendment was defeated in a 162-258 vote that would have required $17 billion in budget cuts in federal discretionary spending to offset a large portion of the Sandy aid package.

The first $17 billion base portion of the Sandy aid bill was approved on a 327-91 vote and the remaining roughly $33 billion was added in Tuesday evening on a 228-192 vote, with just 38 Republicans in support. The legislation now returns to the Senate for a vote.

The House was originally supposed to vote on the Sandy aid package two weeks ago under the previous Congress, but House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, delayed the votes because the aid package represented more spending as the “fiscal cliff” deal was struck.

When northeastern Republicans lashed out at Boehner, he set the Tuesday vote.

Rep. John Fleming, R-Minden, was the only member of the Louisiana delegation to vote against the nearly $10 billion in supplemental Sandy flood insurance funds that was approved earlier this month as the first part of the $60 billion total aid package.

Fleming also opposed the final aid package, arguing that it was too costly and included too many “long-term” projects.

Fleming did succeed in adding an amendment to cut nearly $10 million from the aid package that was dedicated to seawall and coastal restoration projects for the islands in the Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge that spans 70 miles of Connecticut coastline.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (6)


1) Comment by dday198 - 16/01/2013

if they stay on the same road the republican party will be holding their convention in a phone booth. if they can find one

2) Comment by nimby? - 16/01/2013

making deals to buy votes , laced with guilt/emotion aimed at those who did read the bill , the D.C. way . after all we're made of money , the end is near ....

3) Comment by TommyRucker - 16/01/2013

Remember Obama care-Pelosi even stated on TV that she never even read the bill as it needed to be 'passed' and it could be read later. The democratic party mob is telling you in no uncertain terms that they are corrupt, willing to exploit and will 'selectively' enforce certain laws and ignore others AND we are letting them get away with it. How pathetic we are in America today and how few real leaders we have!!!!! We need more people like Cassidy in congress and less Boustany types who lack conviction and will go with the flow in order to enhance their own careers and selves.

4) Comment by TommyRucker - 16/01/2013

This bill lacks transparency and the democratic party mob is using our compassion to exploit and accelerate the corruptive process in government. The democratic party mob lives by the motto ' never let a good crisis go by without exploiting it for OUR own personal gain and enrichment' and this bill is a very good example of this principle being put into action. They are doing the same thing with the Sandy school shooting. They have done it in the past and will do it in the future as it is the nature of the beast and we are going to get exactly what we deserve if we let them get away with it.

5) Comment by TommyRucker - 16/01/2013

The problem with this bill is that it is filled with pork and much of the damage estimate is inflated. Corruption has never gotten in the way of the democratic party mob as there motto has always been 'never let a crisis go by that you can't exploit" and we see them following this principle over and over again. The one democratic voted with his party, the other two congressman have strong democratic party ties as one was a democratic congressman in the past and the other one (Boustany) has strong democratic ties and caters to democrats in his district. We need to help people but it needs to be done in an honest and transparent way, especially when we DON'T HAVE THE MONEY and are living on borrowed money. These two so called 'republicans' have shown their true colors as they joined 49 other republicans to vote for this bill along with EVERY democratic congressman except one. 179 republican congressmen and 1 democratic congressman voted against it. Boustany needs to join the democratic party as he apparently has a dim future in the republican party. He is a light weight and not much of a factor in republican party politics, yet he speaks of being the House Speaker in the near future. He is living in a dream world and selling a bill of goods to the voters in his district. Edwards apparently is related to someone in his family and it looks like he is being mentored by Edwards.

6) Comment by dday198 - 16/01/2013

ice water fills their veins