La. delegates divided over bill to prevent cliff

The so-called “fiscal cliff” was averted late Tuesday evening when the compromise Senate plan was approved by the House despite the opposition of most of the Republican members of the Louisiana delegation.

Although Louisiana’s two senators both voted for the deal early Tuesday with 87 other senators, the Republican House members from the state’s delegation expressed a lot more concern.

Reps. Bill Cassidy, R-Baton Rouge; Charles Boustany, R-Lafayette; Steve Scalise, R-Jefferson; Jeff Landry, R-New Iberia; and John Fleming, R-Minden, all voted against the plan.

Reps. Cedric Richmond, D-New Orleans, and Rodney Alexander, R-Quitman, backed the measure, as did Sens. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and David Vitter, R-La.

Cassidy said he voted against House Resolution 8 because the bill did not address the federal deficit and did not attempt to rein in or “preserve” Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

“We’ve done nothing for the other issues,” Cassidy said late Tuesday.

Alexander said he voted for HR8 because it makes permanent the tax cuts for more than 98 percent of Americans and includes other positives. “Not everyone can be happy with everything,” Alexander said of his willingness to compromise.

The compromise plan only increases taxes on households making more than $450,000 a year — although it is technically a tax cut for all but the wealthy because it occurred one day after falling off the cliff — but the agreement delays decisions on the debt ceiling and automatic spending cuts, called sequestration, for another two months.

The Republican House leadership debated whether to attempt to amend more budget cuts into the bill. Such attempts were never called because of a lack of support as they were considered potential deal breakers for the Senate.

“I don’t think America is in that mood right now,” Fleming said. “I think they’d rather see an imperfect bill passed than see it made a little better.”

Scalise, who will soon chair the conservative Republican Study Committee, argued earlier Tuesday afternoon though that there was “pretty broad support” in the House to amend the bill to add in more cuts.

Despite the concerns from House Republicans, Vitter and Landrieu were among the 89 senators voting for the compromise bill after 2 a.m. Tuesday.

The compromise plan would extend several tax credits and unemployment benefits, but both Republicans and Democrats are agreeing to let the payroll tax cut to expire. The agreement also would patch the Alternative Minimum Tax and increase estate taxes only for higher value properties. The bill also extends the federal farm bill to avert the so-called “milk cliff.”

“This is a much better tax outcome under Obama than I would have guessed,” Vitter said in an email response just prior to 3 a.m. Tuesday. “It preserves the Bush tax cuts for 99 percent of Americans, with good policy on the death tax, dividends and capital gains, so important to small business.

“Just as importantly, it makes it all permanent, which we could never do before,” Vitter added. “But of course we still must pass real and dramatic spending reform. For me, that’s a non-negotiable requirement of all budget or debt limit bills, due around March 1.”

In a prepared statement, Landrieu said the Senate vote proved that lawmakers can work out bipartisan compromises.

“In addition, we worked hard to extend the estate tax in a reasonable way that protects small businesses and farmers,” Landrieu stated.

“While this compromise did not do as much as we had hoped to reduce the deficit, I remain committed to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to find a balanced approach to deficit reduction that includes both spending cuts and new revenues,” she added.

Landry, whose time in Congress ends this week, said he was surprised the Senate vote received so much Republican support but that he does not begrudge Vitter for backing the plan.

“I’m not interested in giving the president a trophy to let him continue to conduct class warfare,” Landry said, adding, “The losers today is the American people.”

Fleming said that conservatives will get another chance or two for leverage in less than two months for the upcoming debates on the debt ceiling and sequestration that were temporarily punted.

“The president absolutely needs us for that,” Fleming said. “This is our opportunity to force spending cuts.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by tradewinns - 02/01/2013

also we need to start differentiating between welfare programs and social security/medicare. politicians are lumping them together and to me that is insulting. those on social security and medicare have at least worked and paid into the system (they also continue to pay monthly with money taken out of SS for medicare) while welfare and medicade are for the useless who have not worked to earn the right for SS and medicare nor do they continue monthly to pay. the young may think it doesn't matter now, but it will.

2) Comment by tradewinns - 02/01/2013

i think going over the cliff would have been better. all this has accomplished is to generate more money for the fed to spend while kicking the problem down the road for later. going over the cliff would have at least stopped the drain of unrestrained spending. politicians use the debt to continuing to purchase votes with everyone's money while the payment doesn't directly hit the taxpayer. which is cheaper, interest payments or the full amount borrowed? that's where people get into trouble with credit cards. everyone was horrified at the amount of tax increase they were looking at for next year, however, that increase still did not cover next years deficeit. and difinetly did not make a penny of a diference in the existing $16.4 trillion debt.

3) Comment by DMJ - 02/01/2013

Let's be clear about something....yes, this deal CAN add up to $4 trillion to the deficit, but this is $4 trillion compared to what would have happened had they simply done nothing and let cuts happen and tax rates expire (going over the cliff), which we wanted to avoid due to the struggling economy. It's a misleading figure (surprise, surprise) Also...this is not the end-all, be-all of budget deals. It's still a punt on entitlement reform. We'll see what happens with that down the road (ugh...). I think it's a step in the right direction. Personally, I'd like to see employment pick up another couple of points before we seriously tackle the deficit. I guess this would be the Keyensian approach, which seems the most rational.

4) Comment by HerbF - 02/01/2013

That's a good first step, and a big one. But, the Republicans are right about spending cuts. We now need to address them. And, medicare can't continue in it's present form. We really have to do something there.

5) Comment by Whatnow - 02/01/2013

Our government is a sick joke! And Vitter let me down. He's a Charlie Brown thinking that Lucy will let him kick that football. Again. Nothing will be done on March 1 and Mary, if you want people to believe your statement, put your money where your mouth is this time. Cut the spending!

6) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 02/01/2013

Cassidy said he voted against House Resolution 8 because the bill did not address the federal deficit and did not attempt to rein in or “preserve” Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. “We’ve done nothing for the other issues,” Cassidy said late Tuesday. CONG. CASSIDY IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. Thanks for the vote of conscience Congressman Cassidy!

7) Comment by jdk944 - 02/01/2013

So the House and Senate have voted, SUPPOSEDLY averting a "fiscal cliff" situation. And they are saying it will raise taxes by $41 for every $1 in tax cuts. Why am I feeling like this is a good cop, bad cop situation when in reality, THEY ARE BOTH BAD COPS???

8) Comment by JohnRingaux - 02/01/2013

tball, I noticed that Proud Mary was joined by David Vitter in voting for this bill that was crafted by two men - Mitch McConnell and the idiot Joe Biden. Rodney Alexander, who pretends to be a Republican, joined Cedric Richmond as the only members of the Louisiana delegation in the House to vote for this bill that adds almost $4 trillion to the national debt. If the dollar lasts past July of this year, your great-grandchildren's great-grandchildren will be paying off this debt. What's to be proud of? You can continue to put off paying your credit card bill only so long. There is a day of reckoning coming.

9) Comment by tball - 02/01/2013

What would we do without Proud Mary, she is almost as good as Obama!

10) Comment by Pakistani - 02/01/2013

Tell Billy to save the government money on his own and close his Livingston parish office. Only purpose is for his own political gain. Sincerely, Livingston parish federal taxpayer. Also, forego your federal salary.

11) Comment by Stephen - 02/01/2013

Well, Cassidy has proven he is a joke.