Vitter to become top GOP senator on environment panel

From the global warming debate, to reform efforts in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sen. David Vitter, R-La., is set to become the top GOP member of the Senate’s primary environmental committee.

Vitter, one of the Senate’s staunchest conservatives, becomes the ranking GOP member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in January, when he will have to work closely with Sen. and committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.

“I’m very excited about the new challenge and the new opportunity,” Vitter said. “It’s very well suited to me and the issues in Louisiana.”

Vitter is moving up on the committee because his predecessor, Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., is becoming the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. In doing so, Vitter for the first time will become the top Republican in a major Senate committee.

While Vitter said he fully expects to butt heads with Boxer on environmental and industry regulations issues, he said they actually have a solid working relationship already, and that they are partnering on the next Water Development Resources Act bill that is expected to be filed in the coming months.

“I think I’ve developed a good working relationship with her,” Vitter said.

One of the top priorities, Vitter said, he is pushing for in the WRDA bill is an effort to streamline the Corps of Engineers bureaucracy for flood protection project and to reduce the corps’ massive backlog in Louisiana and nationwide.

Vitter said he also wants to ensure that the RAMP Act, originally by Rep. Charles Boustany, R-Lafayette, is included in the WRDA bill to direct more federal funds to river dredging and port projects in Louisiana and the rest of the nation. Such funds are typically raided for other government spending.

The model for working on the WRDA bill with Boxer, Vitter said, is the federal transportation bill that was signed into law this summer.

Because the committee covers infrastructure, Boxer headed the bill, and Vitter and Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and others contributed to it. Vitter also served on the bill’s conference committee.

The transportation bill included Vitter’s extension of the National Flood Insurance Program and Landrieu’s RESTORE Act to direct billions of dollars in BP oil disaster fine dollars to Louisiana and other Gulf Coast states.

“That’s very much the same model and approach we’re taking (for WRDA),” Vitter said.

Of course, the federal transportation bill only lasts two years, so Vitter said a new bill also will quickly become a priority.

Boxer agrees that she and Vitter are working well, thus far in the bill drafting process. “I think we’ve made a very good start on working together on the (WRDA) bill,” Boxer said.

Boxer said she hopes the legislation is filed within the first few months of the year.

Of course, on environmental matters, Boxer knows she will have opposition just as she did with Inhofe.

“I think he (Vitter) will be difficult on that,” Boxer said. “But you’ll have to ask him.”

In that same spirit of cooperation, Vitter agrees they will disagree, especially when it comes to Environmental Protection Agency regulation on industries.

“I have a very different view than Sen. Boxer, so we’re going to be pushing back on that,” Vitter said. “We’re going to have clearly different viewpoints.”

Vitter said he will make every effort to fight “clear over-regulations by the EPA.”

Despite mounting scientific evidence to the contrary, Inhofe is maybe the Senate’s loudest voice in arguing that humans do not contribute to global warming, or climate change.

While Vitter said he “shares the skepticism” with Inhofe, Vitter added that he does not plan to be as vocal on the issue.

“I don’t think I’m going to spend the same amount of time … debating the theoretics,” Vitter said.

While he knows climate change is occurring, Vitter said, he continues to question the human impact on such changes.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (15)


1) Comment by crabby - 02/01/2013

we're being scammed . . . this is an Onion headline

2) Comment by DMJ - 02/01/2013

BRModerate, we had an approach like that once. It was called Cap and Trade; it used to be the Republican approach to global warming, pollution and renewable energy. It uses market mechanisms to gradually increase the cost of pollution, while making it cheaper to produce cleaner energy. That was back when the GOP was rational...before Vitter.

3) Comment by potkcalb - 02/01/2013

Vitter on an environmental committee is an oxymoron if ever there was one .You can kiss the environment goodbye if he has any input on environmental preservation.

4) Comment by BRmoderate - 02/01/2013

Whether GW exists or not, we should try to find ways to power our world using less pollution than previous generations. I am not asking for regulations that suffocate industry, just a gradual, push in that direction because corporations will not do so on their own due to profitability concerns. Smart, Incremental improvements...

5) Comment by BRmoderate - 02/01/2013

@JeffSadow. I wrote a research paper on Global Warming in 2008 as an undergrad. While I make no claims to be an expert, I will share my experience doing the research. For every report that GW exists, I found one counter report denying it. Using the links you referred to as the "end all, be all" to the GW debate is not responsible.

6) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 02/01/2013

you mean like Maxine Waters who was CLEARED of any wrongdoing after a lengthy investigation? -- http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/09/2 1/maxine-waters-ethics/70000851/1#.UORcqG8815A

7) Comment by Whatnow - 02/01/2013

DMJ, you mean like Maxine Waters being appointed Senior Democrat on Financial Services even though she was involved in an unethical financial scandal?

8) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 02/01/2013

“According to Lean, the combination of multiple La Niñas and the solar minimum, bottoming out for an unusually extended time in 2008 from its peak in 2001, are all that’s needed to cancel out the increased warming from rising greenhouse gases. Now that the sun has begun to gain in activity again, Lean suspects that temperatures will rise in parallel as the sun peaks around 2014.” -- http://www.eenews.net/public/Greenwire/2011/10/25/1

9) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 02/01/2013

".. a willingness to put political agendas ahead of scientific analysis." says the Republican shill masquerading as an associate poli sci professor. --- http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather- gang/post/behind-the-present-pause-in-global- warming/2012/04/25/gIQAgWtAhT_blog.html

10) Comment by jeffsadow - 02/01/2013

Blum -- and perhaps some commenters -- need to do their homework. In fact, "mounting scientific evidence" is pointing in the opposite direction -- that if any warming, from whatever cause, is occurring at all (none over the last 15 years), it will be minimal at best until at least the middle of the century. See, for example, http://www.appinsys.com/globalwarming/GW_TemperatureProjections.htm and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2217286/Global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago-reveals-Met-Office-report-quietly-released--chart-prove-it.html. To argue the opposite demonstrates a willingness to put political agendas ahead of scientific analysis.

11) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 02/01/2013

Mygulfbleedsforu, 8.6 never offers anything substantive to the comments. Just jabs at his fictional friends... and morellok2, you beat me to the punch. That was the exact phrase that came to my mind when I saw the headline.

12) Comment by DMJ - 02/01/2013

Why does the GOP always put the least appropriate people in such positions? They put young-earthers on the science committees, climate change deniers on the energy committees.. I know government is supposed to be the problem, but isnt' that supposed to be an accident?

13) Comment by morellok2 - 02/01/2013

Fox guarding the hen house comes to mind.

14) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 02/01/2013

8point6, don't "(your) progressive friends" chime in on nearly every political article? Like you do? Your comment is old and stale. Like David Vitter's environmental positions.

15) Comment by 8point6 - 02/01/2013

Time for my "progressive" friends to chime in.....