Unwavering NRA opposes any new gun restrictions

An unwavering National Rifle Association said Sunday that not a single new gun regulation would make children safer, “a media machine” relishes blaming the gun industry for each new attack like the one that occurred at a Connecticut elementary, and a White House task force on gun violence may try to undermine the Second Amendment.

“Look, a gun is a tool. The problem is the criminal,” said Wayne LaPierre, the CEO of the nation’s largest gun-rights lobby, in a television interview.

LaPierre hardly backed down from his comments Friday, when the NRA broke its silence on the shooting rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

LaPierre’s assertion that guns and police officers in all schools are what will stop the next killer drew widespread scorn, and even some NRA supporters in Congress are publicly disagreeing with the proposal. Rep. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., called it “the most revolting, tone- deaf statement I’ve ever seen.” A headline from the New York Post summarized LaPierre’s initial presentation before reporters with the headline: “Gun Nut! NRA loon in bizarre rant over Newtown.”

LaPierre told NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that only those armed guards and police would make kids safe.

“If it’s crazy to call for putting police and armed security in our schools to protect our children, then call me crazy,” LaPierre said. “I think the American people think it’s crazy not to do it. It’s the one thing that would keep people safe.”

He asked Congress for money to put a police officer in every school. He also said the NRA would coordinate a national effort to put former military and police officers in schools as volunteer guards.

The NRA leader dismissed efforts to revive the assault weapons ban as a “phony piece of legislation” that’s built on lies. He made clear it was highly unlikely that the NRA could support any new gun regulations.

“You want one more law on top of 20,000 laws, when most of the federal gun laws we don’t even enforce?” he said.

LaPierre said another focus in preventing shootings is to lock up violent criminals and get the mentally ill the treatment they need.

“The average guy in the country values his freedom, doesn’t believe the fact he can own a gun is part of the problem, and doesn’t like the media and all these high-profile politicians blaming him,” he said.

Some lawmakers acknowledged the political and fundraising might of the NRA would make President Barack Obama’s push for gun restrictions a struggle.

“I have found the statements by the NRA over the last couple of days to be really disheartening because the statements seem to not reflect any understanding about the slaughter of children” Sen. Joe Lieberman said.

He said the NRA is right in some of the points it makes about the causes of gun violence in America.

“But it’s obviously also true that the easy availability of guns, including military style assault weapons, is a contributing factor, and you can’t keep that off the table. I had hoped they’d come to the table and say, everything is on the table,” Lieberman said.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said LaPierre was “so extreme and so tone deaf” that he was making it easier to pass gun legislation.

“Look, he blames everything but guns: movies, the media, President Obama, gun-free school zones, you name it. And the video games, he blames them,” Schumer said.

But Lieberman didn’t seem to be buying it. He said the NRA’s stand on new gun rules means passing legislation next year won’t happen easily.

“It’s going to be a battle. But the president, I think, and vice president, are really ready to lead the fight,” he said.

Obama has said he wants proposals on reducing gun violence that he can take to Congress in January, and after the Dec. 14 shootings, he called on the NRA to join the effort. The president has asked Congress to reinstate an assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 and pass legislation that would end a provision that allows people to purchase firearms from private parties without a background check. Obama also has indicated that he wants Congress to pursue the possibility of limiting high-capacity magazines.

If Obama’s review is “just going to be made up of a bunch of people that, for the last 20 years, have been trying to destroy the Second Amendment, I’m not interested in sitting on that panel,” LaPierre said.

The NRA has tasked former Rep. Asa Hutchinson, R-Ark., to lead a program designed to use volunteers from the group’s 4.3 million members to help guard children.

Hutchinson said the NRA’s position was a “very reasonable approach” that he compared to the federal air marshal program that places armed guards on flights.

“Are our children less important to protect than our air transportation? I don’t think so,” said Hutchinson, who served as an undersecretary at the Department of Homeland Security when it was formed.

Hutchinson said schools should not be required to use armed security. LaPierre also argued that local law enforcement should have final say on how the security is put into place, such as where officers would be stationed.

Democratic lawmakers in Congress have become more adamant about the need for stricter gun laws since the shooting. Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California is promising to push for a renewal of expired legislation that banned certain weapons and limited the number of bullets a gun magazine could hold to 10. NRA officials made clear the legislation is a non-starter for them.

“It hasn’t worked,” LaPierre said. “Dianne Feinstein had her ban and Columbine occurred.”

There also has been little indication from Republican leaders that they’ll go along with any efforts to curb what kind of guns can be purchased or how much ammunition gun magazines can hold.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., noted that he had an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle in his home. He said America would not be made safer by preventing him from buying another one. As to gun magazine limits, he said he can quickly reload by putting in a new magazine.

“The best way to interrupt a shooter is to keep them out of the school, and if they get into the school, have somebody who can interrupt them through armed force,” Graham said.

LaPierre also addressed other factors that he said contribute to gun violence in America, but he would not concede that the types of weapons being used are part of the problem.

He was particularly critical of states, which he said are not placing the names of people into a national database designed to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and the dangerously mentally ill. He said some states are not entering names into the system and 23 others are only putting in a small number of records.

The American Psychiatric Association responded to LaPierre’s comments by saying that he seemed to conflate mental illness with evil at several points.

“People who are clearly not mentally ill commit violent crimes and perform terrible acts every day,” said Dr. James Scully, chief executive of the trade group. “Unfortunately, Mr. LaPierre’s statements serve only to increase the stigma around mental illness and further the misconception that those with mental disorders are likely to be dangerous.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (7)


1) Comment by james6024 - 24/12/2012

More people die from alcohol related motor vehicle accidents per year than guns. Difference is the alcohol related deaths, which likely include more children than from guns, occur day after day, month after month and year after year, unlike school shootings which are infrequent, i.e. they do not happen day in and day out. Why isn't Senator Feinstein calling for a ban on alcohol? If she was truly interested in public safety she would be calling for a ban on alcohol, but she isn't. Why? Because her interests are purely political and she thinks she has sniffed out a way to get her name in the spotlight once again. She senses guns are an easy target. This is the problem with most politicians. They do not want to spend the time and effort to fix problems, they just want a quick easy band aide, like the last time they banned assault weapons. Lets rewind to the last time they banned assault weapons. Timothy McVay blew up a Federal building in Oklahoma City which killed 168 people including 19 children under the age of 6. This heinous act occurred during the middle of Clinton and Feinstein's prior ban on assault weapons. A few years later, and during the last ban, the Columbine High School shooting occurred. The blind lead the blind in Washington. It is pityful. The reason these heinous acts occur is because the perpetrators do not care about the law, and that is something no law can change. Gun legislation won't protect from those who have a propensity to commit these crimes. But ... Lets fast forward to the Oregon Mall shooting. A concealed carry citizen, God Bless him, pulled his weapon. The mall shooter saw him and then shot himself. The concealed carry citizen saved a lot of lives that day. There have been numerous instances of children saving themselves during the past couple of years when a home invasion occurred while their parents were away. They did this by using their parent's weapon and shooting the intruder. These situations have occurred in Houston, Pheonix, Oklahoma City and other places. These kids are likely alive today and without suffering rape or bodily injury because their parents owned a gun. Interestingly the one in Houston used his father's AR 15 to protect his little sister from two intruders. He is a hero. He stood up for his little sister. Yup, take our guns Feinstein. The law abiding will give them up, but not the criminals. They don't care, and they will continue to rape, pillage and murder, but in Feinstein's world you will not be able to protect yourself.

2) Comment by KilgoreTrout - 24/12/2012

Oh Lord, won't you buy me a AR-15? My friends all have Uzi's I must make amends.

3) Comment by KilgoreTrout - 24/12/2012

Winder why more hand grenades don't kill people in the US? Seems like more criminals would use them, an added plus is that they would be much more efficient than a semiautomatic military rifle for mass murder in an enclosed space. Claymores in my front lawn would prevent a mass murderer from entering my house but the loons banned them and duels, too. Absurd.

4) Comment by old yat - 24/12/2012

Hey DMJ; Let me begin by saying that I am a responsible gun owner,a member of the NRA & DU, lifelong outdoorsman and have a CCP. Now for the sake of starting a dialog, could you please explain why you think or feel that the NRA is shameless. I know that is your opinion and I can respect that,I would just like to know why?Merry Christmas&Happy New Year to all.!!!!

5) Comment by Attila - 24/12/2012

Cars kill people, more than people with guns kill people...why don't we ban cars? Alcohol kills people; why don't we ban alcohol? Baseball bats, knives, bricks, stones, rope, wire, and electricity kill people; why don't we ban those. The NRA is offering a common sense proposal to help stop the gun violence in schools. All the left can do is wring their hands and call the NRA names. Banning so called assault weapons will only the the beginning of the looney lefts attempts to ban all firearms. Next they will come after ammunition, handguns, and sporting arms. I wouldn't be surprised if their hysteria did not even include bows and cross bows. The NRA is not shameless, but those who throw childish epithets at the law abiding gun owners of this country while attempting to abolish the right to bear arms are brainless. Symbolism over substance, hysteria, and feel good legislation that accomplishes absolutely nothing is all they have to offer.

6) Comment by DMJ - 24/12/2012

The NRA is absolutely shameless.

7) Comment by old yat - 24/12/2012

I have to disagree with Dr. James Scully,chief executive of the American Psychiatric Assn.who says"People who are clearly not mentally ill commit violent crimes and perform terrible acts every day." Yes those people may not have been clinically diagnosed as mentally ill but surely are not sane.As long as HIPAA is on the books like it is, getting the medical history of individuals is going to be difficult at best.That law was passed to insure individuals that their medical history could not be used by just anyone for any reason without their permission.Guns do not kill people,CRAZY people with guns kill people.That is not to say that all mentally ill people are violent but all people that take another human beings life,no matter how, unless their own life is in danger has to be mentally defective.Let me also say that Obama and Biden will give us all the necessary lip action due after this horrible incident,but will never change any laws aimed at Gun Control.They have avoided this issue for the past 6 years,knowing that coming out against guns would have cost them those landslide victories(LOL) that they have enjoyed.Watch,in 3or4 months,most folks will not even think about what happened to those innocent children and their teachers,a shame yes but also a fact.Merry Christmas&Happy Holidays to all. !!!