Judge: Middle finger display can go back on roof

Advocate staff photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCK -  Sarah Childs has reinstalled   holiday lights on the roof of her Denham Springs home, this time with two middle fingers and a new message asking Show caption
Advocate staff photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCK - Sarah Childs has reinstalled holiday lights on the roof of her Denham Springs home, this time with two middle fingers and a new message asking "Where's My Dog?" She has said thet he finger gestures are meant for neighbors. No information was available late Thursday on the reference to her dog..

A Baton Rouge federal judge granted a temporary restraining order Thursday to prohibit Denham Springs officials from interfering with a woman’s right to adorn her roof with a lighted image of a giant hand with its middle finger extended.

U.S. District Judge James J. Brady has scheduled a hearing in the case for Jan. 7. The woman, Sarah Childs, said in November that the lights were intended for neighbors with whom she’s had a yearlong disagreement over personal matters.

“I’m happy that Sarah Childs has the right to return her holiday lights to her roof,” Justin P. Harrison, an attorney with the ACLU Foundation of Louisiana, said after Brady’s ruling. “I believe that display is already back up.”

The ACLU filed the suit Thursday on behalf of Childs, who also is known as Sarah Henderson.

Since late November, Denham Springs police officers have gone to Childs’ Starlite Drive residence at least twice, according to the woman’s civil suit against the city.

On one occasion, Childs said in the suit, she was threatened with a fine if she didn’t remove the display from her rooftop. More recently, Childs alleged, she was threatened with arrest after she returned the display to its perch on Dec. 14. That display contained two images of hands extending their middle fingers.

Since then, according to Childs’ suit, neighbors complained to city officials that she walked down the street in a manner that was too close to traffic. Childs said city officials ticketed her for “obstructing the flow of traffic.”

Childs said in her suit that neighbors also complained to city officials that she sang and danced in her driveway and “made up an impromptu song about her neighborhood dispute.” Childs was then was ticketed “for disturbing the peace,” according to the lawsuit.

When neighbors alleged that the impromptu song contained obscenities directed at them, she was cited “for simple assault,” the suit said.

Childs said in the suit that she called the Denham Springs Police Department and complained “that her neighbors were making false allegations about her.”

The suit alleges that an officer then appeared at Child’s residence and “told her to take the lights down or she would go to jail.” Childs said in her suit that she “climbed onto the roof and removed the lights” as the officer watched.

In his order Thursday, Brady told Denham Springs officials that Childs “has demonstrated a likelihood of succeeding in her argument that this infringement” violates her constitutionally guaranteed rights to free speech.

Denham Springs City Attorney Paeton Burkett said city officials would not discuss the case Thursday.

“Right now, there’s just no comment,” Burkett said. “Probably next week, we’ll have more to say.”

Marjorie Esman, executive director of the ACLU of Louisiana, said in written statement Thursday: “We are gratified that (Sarah Childs) can express herself as the law permits without further risk of interference by the police. This is a victory for the First Amendment and for the rule of law.”

Esman said the case is about protecting law-abiding people from police overreaching.

“In a free society, we cannot allow law enforcement to invent ways to coerce people into conforming to their neighbors’ tastes or desires,” Esman said. “In fact, the police have a duty to protect the rights of dissenters, and the City of Denham Springs has failed in that obligation to Sarah Childs.”

Harrison said, in reference to the series of citations Childs received on unrelated matters after erecting her light display in November, “the city also does not have the right to retaliate against Ms. Childs collaterally for conduct it could not prohibit directly.”

The temporary restraining order Brady issued Thursday permits Childs to return her display to her roof immediately, Harrison said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (39)


1) Comment by Woody - 21/12/2012

man, the advocate is really sensitive to comments today. since you removed my comment below, can i give your editor the same thing that is on the display in question? assuming i have the right to do so.

2) Comment by Chucky - 21/12/2012

I am, and sorry, bad day, do like your insight and comments, not one for name calling so will just shut up and call it a day Bouncer .

3) Comment by Bouncer - 21/12/2012

NewsReader: I agree, and I have no problem with her First Amendment right. The problem is that her behavior is what causes some people to pull out their Bushmasters and start firing away. It is never a good idea to purposely antagonize others, as she has done and is doing, most particularly in this day and age. And Chucky.....I get it. You're not as stupid as you appear to be.....er......are you?

4) Comment by NewsReader - 21/12/2012

@MBW, the commenting system is apparently directly commensurate with the standard of comments normally posted here. Sadly, you're one of a few who made the correct observation that as tacky as her display is, it's protected by the Amendments others so often want to argue about. Personally I'd rather she put a middle finger light display up than started waving around a Bushmaster.

5) Comment by LSUtiger4507 - 21/12/2012

I know people of Livingston parish are proud of this. Just as proud as Baton Rouge should be of their failing public school systems, soaring crime rates, and wonderful spread rates of STDs. I'll sleep tight in LP knowing one absolute class act made national news for her 15 minutes of fame... which is her right, but a ridiculous and tasteless gesture. You sleep tight knowing that you just replaced the bars on your windows, and paying the monthly private school note required to educate your child in the area you are so proud of.

6) Comment by Chucky - 21/12/2012

“@Chucky....I do apologize.” Apology expected. Now apologize to the Lady you insulated .

7) Comment by fedupebr - 21/12/2012

No one can always be agreeable with the ideology or beliefs of clients represented by the ACLU. Why? Because they represent a large range of people. The ACLU does not look at what party you belong to, your ideological slant., your sexual orientation, the color of your skin, or your type of religion. It simply looks at whether or not your civil rights may have been violated, and then takes measures to protect those rights. So, while I may think that this lady's middle finger display is tasteless, I am glad that the ACLU stepped in and protected her civil right.

8) Comment by YardDog - 21/12/2012

Twinkie... What does being anti-oblama have to do with bigotry??? Or Racism??? Sounds like a baiter to me. Must be a democrat.

9) Comment by BRmoderate - 21/12/2012

ACLU defends 1st amendment...gets castrated.....NRA defends second amendment.....gets hero treatment

10) Comment by old yat - 21/12/2012

Well I have to say that at my age and being a cancer survivor just opening your eyes in the morning is a good thing! However I must thank all of you folks that comment on this website everyday. You guys really make my day,this is more amusing than the funnies papers ever were. So thanks again for the laughs( I am laughing with you not at you )I hope each and everyone of you have a blessed Christmas & Happy New Year.Remember as crazy and unpredictable as this country is, it is still in my opinion the greatest place on earth!!!!God Bless&Happy Holidays to all of you!!!!

11) Comment by MBW - 21/12/2012

Please, Advocate, get a better commenting system.

12) Comment by MBW - 21/12/2012

Very glad the ACLU exists. At least there is SOMEBODY defending 1st amendment rights in this country. And, despite the stereotyping, people of faith should be glad they exist too, as they have come to the defense of religious speech frequently as well.

13) Comment by Bouncer - 21/12/2012

@Chucky....I do apologize. Based on your most recent post, calling you a "moron" is an insult to morons everywhere. The fact of the matter is, you would need to get several promotions to reach the level of moron. You're sub-moronic. You have yourself a nice day now in that sub-moronic universe of one that you occupy.

14) Comment by MBW - 21/12/2012

I won't defend the wisdom of her display....but I will loudly defend her right to put it up. If only some people would defend the 1st Amendment as loudly as they defend the 2nd Amendment....

15) Comment by louisisanared - 21/12/2012

Woody. Are you one of her neighbors? Your comments about the dog and husband, sounds like you were pretty close to the situation.

16) Comment by Chucky - 21/12/2012

moron ? " as myself can be a racist against other white people." you have been, and are stay on point, it is a finger and not nothing to do with race or being trash so wipe the lip stick and turvy topsy.

17) Comment by Woody - 21/12/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

18) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 21/12/2012

Hey Denham Springs Police and neighborhood association..."Take these lights and shove it!" Simple assault for singing a song? These officers need to be fired!

19) Comment by Bouncer - 21/12/2012

Chucky....you're a moron, as usual, and I want to thank you for being so consistent in that regard and never disappointing. I suppose that in your topsy-turvy universe, a white person such as myself can be a racist against other white people. Alrighty then. You have yourself a terrific little holiday season. And may all your Christmases be white.

20) Comment by Chucky - 21/12/2012

Bouncer - your a racist and bigot calling people white and trash

21) Comment by Chucky - 21/12/2012

I hope the police learn from this

22) Comment by Bighug - 21/12/2012

I agree with twinkie and Herb on this one. The ACLU must love LP. Every time it attempts to regulate personal beliefs or taste, the ACLU lawyers end up winning and collecting thousands in fees. I'm surprised there isn't a law against exposed underwear in LP. My mother would have been in constant trouble with that. Seems like there was always a bit of her slip showing at the hem of her dress. And those bra straps! What we really need is a law making it illegal to wear a tie with an unbuttoned shirt collar.

23) Comment by Being_Stupid - 21/12/2012

People need to lighten up. Get it? LIGHTEN UP YOURS !!!

24) Comment by Widdy - 21/12/2012

Can we all be honest for once. First I think almost everyone is a racist, the blacks are for what white folk did to them 250 years ago. The whites are because 250 years later the black culture is overwhelmed with a lack of morals, rampet crime and a lack of respect for others property. They continue to destroy the areas they move in to.... but that should not bother anyone. There are people everywhere that do not want their daughter or son marrying someone of the opposite race, but they think and say they are not racist.......please!! They would be apalled if someone of another race moved in next door but their not racist either. Livinston parish is pretty much an anti-government, militia mentality parish and so are the cops. Kind of considered a "back woods red neck society" and for good reason among many surrounding parishes!! Obviously the police retaliated against this woman for exercising her constitutionally gaureented rights. I mean I would expect that from LP police. Most of them are from LP and grew up there. I dont agree with her, but it is her right. I dont agree with a lot of stuff there, but it is someones right to live like a hillbilly if they want to. I understand that, so I choise not to live there, just like I choise not to live Scotlandville.

25) Comment by spqr - 20/12/2012

Sorry, "Bouncer" got it right.

26) Comment by spqr - 20/12/2012

Bouncer got it right.

27) Comment by twinkie1cat - 20/12/2012

Not any worse than the dead Jesus decorated in strings of red Christmas lights surrounded by anti-Obama signs at Cajun Nomex on the corner of Evangeline and Airline. A crucifix at Christmas instead of a baby in a manger! Death instead of life surrounded by bigotry and hate.

28) Comment by twinkie1cat - 20/12/2012

Why doesn't Gov. Jindal be just as honest about how he feels about Louisiana and put this decoration on the roof of the Capitol.

29) Comment by HerbF - 20/12/2012

I think it's funny. And, expecially funny are the reactions of the "offended". LOL.

30) Comment by tradewinns - 20/12/2012

tacky, trashy and classy-all low class of course. i know her mom and dad are proud of her and her actions. she needs to set up her home way, way back in the bayou.

31) Comment by phil - 20/12/2012

it's so wonderful that a group like the ACLU will stand up and pay to get someone to have the ability to have the finger shown on their roof - especially in the spirit of Christmas. Society is much better for that in general. (sarcasm) Now if maybe someone would stand up and do something about unconstitutional taxes being passed and public record request violations taking place and property rights slowly being taken away, maybe we could really see some progress take place. Now that the home owner has that right established, I personally think they should do the right thing and take the finger down for the sake of the community in general and in the spirit of Christmas and love thy neighbor...

32) Comment by Bouncer - 20/12/2012

Actually, nothing says "white trash" like adorning your rooftop with something purposely calculated to annoy the neighbors. It's not as if this woman just has bad taste and doesn't know any better and can be corrected by taking a class or reading a book on etiquette. She knows that displaying what is symbolically recognized as a profane gesture will deliberately annoy everyone. That's just plain trashy, and it reveals a vulgar, mean heart and spirit.

33) Comment by dday198 - 20/12/2012

you are right raylan oh and meth labs exploding in back of a pick up trucks next door. shake n bake home boy.

34) Comment by Raylan - 20/12/2012

I guess it could be worse here in LP. We have a problem with a nut job flipping people off via Christmas lights and meth labs. At least we don't have to worry about being robbed at gunpoint and shot outside our homes as we are leaving for work in the mornings, unlike our discriminatory neighbors in EBR.

35) Comment by Lannonmac - 20/12/2012

Nothing says “Christmas” like being flipped off with holiday lights! At least she did not wish everyone Happy Holidays, now that would have really irritated Livingston Parish residents!

36) Comment by Stephen - 20/12/2012

Only a suggestion, but perhaps she could extend the index finger as well.

37) Comment by dday198 - 20/12/2012

better than a meth lab on the roof

38) Comment by Preppy6917 - 20/12/2012

The funny part about all this is that so many people in the LP are anti-gubmint....but apparently that's only the case in certain situations.

39) Comment by DMJ - 20/12/2012

Awesome.

40) Comment by holycow - 20/12/2012

What an outstanding decision for heavens sake ! Everyone in lovely Livingston Parish hurry out to redo your lights for the big show tonight. I know you all are so proud !