January deadline set for plans to reduce gun violence

President Barack Obama stands with Vice President Joe Biden as he makes a statement Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2012, in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington, about policies he will pursue following the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Ct. Obama is tasking Vice President Joe Biden, a longtime gun control advocate, with spearheading the effort. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) Show caption
President Barack Obama stands with Vice President Joe Biden as he makes a statement Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2012, in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House in Washington, about policies he will pursue following the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Ct. Obama is tasking Vice President Joe Biden, a longtime gun control advocate, with spearheading the effort. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

Updated at

6:35 p.m.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Declaring the time for action overdue, President Barack Obama promised on Wednesday to send Congress broad proposals in January for tightening gun laws and curbing violence after last week’s schoolhouse massacre in Connecticut.

Even before those proposals are drafted, Obama pressed lawmakers to reinstate a ban on military-style assault weapons, close loopholes that allow gun buyers to skirt background checks and restrict high-capacity ammunition clips.

“The fact that this problem is complex can no longer be an excuse for doing nothing,” Obama said in his most detailed comments on guns since Friday’s killing of 20 schoolchildren and six adults in Newtown, Conn. “The fact that we can’t prevent every act of violence doesn’t mean we can’t steadily reduce the violence.”

Gun control measures have faced fierce resistance in Congress for years but that may be changing now because of last week’s violence. Since then, Obama has signaled for the first time in his presidency that he’s willing to spend political capital on the issue and some prominent gun-rights advocates on Capitol Hill — Democrats and Republicans alike — have expressed willingness to consider new measures.

Still, given the long history of opposition to tighter gun laws, there is no certainty the legislation Obama backed Wednesday or the proposals he will send to Congress next month will become law.

Obama tasked Vice President Joe Biden, a longtime gun control advocate, with overseeing the administration-wide process to create those proposals. Beyond firearms’ restrictions, officials will also look for ways to increase mental health resources and consider steps to keep society from glamorizing guns and violence.

Obama’s January deadline underscores the desire among White House officials to respond swiftly to the Newtown shooting. Obama aides worry that as the shock of the shooting fades, so, too, will the prospects that pro-gun lawmakers will work with the White House to tighten restrictions.

“I would hope that our memories aren’t so short that what we saw in Newtown isn’t lingering with us, that we don’t remain passionate about it only a month later,” said Obama. He pledged to talk about gun violence in his State of the Union address.

Emphasizing the need to take action, Obama said eight people have been killed by guns across the U.S. since the Newtown shooting. Among them were a 4-year-old boy and three law enforcement officers.

The president has called for a national dialogue on gun violence before, after other mass shootings during his presidency. But his rhetoric has not been backed up with concrete action. And some of the gun measures Obama has signed lessened restrictions on guns, allowing people to carry concealed weapons in national parks and in checked bags on Amtrak trains

The president bristled at suggestions that he had been silent on gun issues during his four years in office. But he acknowledged that the Newtown shooting had been “a wake-up call for all of us.”

The shooting appears to have had a similar impact on several longtime gun backers on Capitol Hill. West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, a conservative Democrat and avid hunter, has said “everything should be on the table” as Washington looks to prevent another tragedy, as has 10-term House Republican Jack Kingston of Georgia

There was little response from Republicans Wednesday following Obama’s statements. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, an independent who has been sharply critical of the president’s lack of action on gun issues, called the effort a step in the right direction.

Obama, seeking to ease the fears of gun owners, reiterated his support for the Second Amendment. And he said no effort to reduce gun violence would be successful without their participation.

“I am also betting that the majority, the vast majority, of responsible law-abiding gun owners would be some of the first to say that we should be able to keep an irresponsible, law-breaking few from buying a weapon of war,” he said.

He also challenged the National Rifle Association to do “some self-reflection.” The gun lobby is a powerful political force, particularly in Republican primaries, and previously has worked to unseat lawmakers who back gun control measures.

The NRA, in its first statements since the shooting, pledged Tuesday to offer “meaningful contributions to help make sure this never happens again.”

The Biden-led task force will also explore ways to improve mental health resources and address ways to create a culture that doesn’t promote violence. The departments of Justice, Education, Health and Human Services, and Homeland Security, along with outside groups and lawmakers, will all be part of the process.

Biden will start his discussions Thursday when he meets with law enforcement officers from around the country. He’ll be joined by Attorney General Eric Holder, Education Secretary Arne Duncan, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

Biden’s prominent role could be an asset for the White House in getting gun legislation through Congress. The vice president spent decades in the Senate and has been called on by Obama before to use his long-standing relationships with lawmakers to build support for White House measures.

The vice president also brings to the effort a long history of working on gun control issues, having chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee and leading the original effort to ban assault weapons. The ban expired in 2004, but Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., says she plans to bring it back for a vote early next year.

———

Follow Julie Pace at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (27)


1) Comment by Chucky - 20/12/2012

none of the above would have helped

2) Comment by localgal - 19/12/2012

@Tea_Slayer, I am not talking about restrictions, I am talking about banning certain weapons altogether. That's what many of the gun control advocates are proposing. There needs to be discussion, not highly volatile, in-your-face, emotional diatribes. You can't fix crazy in some instances. There are some in our society who, for whatever reason, simply cannot function in a normal community without extensive support and help. They are a danger to themselves and others. Various pieces of Lanza's life are coming together which appear to indicate that he was one of those. The kind of help he needed is almost impossible to get now because of massive budget cuts at both the federal and the state levels. Those kinds of individuals, when they snap, will carry out whatever murderous rage that's within them in whatever way they can. Lanza used an assault rifle. Someone else might make a homemade bomb. Someone else might use another deadly weapon. Those who are prone to violence will act with violence and, yes, they will kill people. People point to Australia and Great Britain as models for gun control. What

3) Comment by Being_Stupid - 19/12/2012

In other words... Jan 1st at midnight when you are out drunk and oblivious to what is going on, Congress will repeal the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution and turn this country into the Soviet Union. You will wake up in Communist Russia.

4) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 19/12/2012

Localgal, they did not ban fertilizer but they did enact restrictions in its sale. Research a little before you make such statements. You actually just made the gun regulation argument stronger. Thanks. ---http://www.dhs.gov/ammonium-nitrate-security-program-notice- proposed-rulemaking

5) Comment by Whatnow - 19/12/2012

Gun control is great when you are the one controlling the guns. I saw this coming when Fast and Furious was found out. In 1995, Eric Holder said the following to theWomen’s National Democratic Club: “One thing that I think is clear with young people and with adults as well, is that we just have to be repetitive about this. It’s not enough to simply have a catchy ad on a Monday and then only do it every Monday. We need to do this every day of the week and just really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.” Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/8600/eric-holder-admits-he-wants-to-brainwash-americans/comment-page-1/#comments#ixzz2FXnaVgxz

6) Comment by localgal - 19/12/2012

Over a decade ago, Timothy McVea blew up the Federal building in Oklahoma City. Did they ban fertilizer? No. The Mansons committed almost all of their mass murders with knives. Did they ban knives? No. Could those children have been saved if there had been more help for Lanza's mental issues? Maybe, maybe not. And I know that I am going to get creamed for this, but it is true that guns don't kill people, people do. Do we need better mental health services in this country? Absolutely. Do we need to quit trying to fix every mental health problem with a pill? Yes. Do we need to train psychiatrists to actually do psychotherapy instead of what they are being trained to do in medical school, which amounts to high priced pill dispensing? Yes. Do we need more affordable in-patient mental health facilities to deal with those like Lanza who are so severely deranged they are a danger to society? You betcha. Do we need to FULLY enforce the gun laws already on the books in this country? Of course. Should we trust Congress and President Obama to find a solution to this cultural and societal problem? Absolutely, positively, unequivocally no, no, and no again.

7) Comment by DMJ - 19/12/2012

"a criminal can just buy one off the street whenever they want." And just why is that, folgers? Also..."I promise you that almost all of them would still be sane enough to avoid a place if they knew someone was already there with a gun..." You're not going to be armed and alert all the time. It's simply not realistic. These kinds of attacks come by surprise. Also, they're suicidal. They don't care who might have a gun. Think about it. Also, think about the unintended effects of a lot of people having guns - accidental shootings, guns stolen from their bags, lockers, cars, offices, etc. Plus, like you said...some people snap. Do we really want to increase the likelihood that such people are packing??

8) Comment by CitizensArrest - 19/12/2012

So the government set a deadline? Phew. Glad that's settled. Moving on.

9) Comment by mcBR - 19/12/2012

@MEM. Please provide sources to us ignorant folks. No chain e- mails, please.

10) Comment by RUSerious - 19/12/2012

I'm no Obama fan but I applaude his efforts to try. Nothing proposed or enacted is going to cure us of all violence but to do nothing is a bigger crime. I think tracking ammo sales makes sense we do it for meds used to make crystal meth why not 1,000 rounds of ammo. Raise the price of those bad boys to pay for it and maybe it helps get some of those folks before they get us. I have to comment on the whole issue of criminals. The guy who shot all those kids was not a criminal until he commited those acts. He got the guns from where.... his own house the ones used for hunting. He did not need to buy them on the streets like a common criminal. I own guns and I do not support a complete ban. However this issue does not have to be all or nothing. I like where the President is trying to go and some of the other suggestions make sense. One thing is certain cahnge is a coming. I'm behind it and I am a gun owning, father of 3, Republican, etc, etc. Once you turn the moderates its all over but the crying.

11) Comment by mcBR - 19/12/2012

@foldgers. The idea that because we stop all guns we shouldn't do anything is tired. I have serious doubts that the shooter would have found it "easier" to obtain his weapon than going to a big box retailer or surfing the internet. We are talking about commonsense solutions: require registration of all gun sales (close the gun show loop hole), background checks for all weapons purchases, ban assault weapons, etc. People who want to own shotguns (the best weapon for home defense) and deer rifles (great for hunting, not shooting sprees) can have at it, as far as I'm concerned. Your idea about taxing guns to pay for schools security does not make any sense. Think about how many schools there are in Louisiana and multiply that by $50,000 per year. You won't be able to raise that much tax revenue.

12) Comment by foldgers - 19/12/2012

To those who blame the easy access to guns as the problem, I would have to disagree. I would need to wait a few days while they perform a background check on me to buy a new gun...on the other hand, a criminal can just buy one off the street whenever they want. So, not only is it easier for them to get a gun illegally, they are MORE willing to use it for crimes whereas I would just use it for protection of my family and for hunting. Just the other day, a store here was robbed by a guy with a knife. I have an idea here and I THINK it is a good one. Even though I am against more taxes, why not increase taxes on gun and ammo sales for "military type" weapons and use that money to pay for a security guard at every school or for police departments. Just like a "sin" tax. People who snap may have been good people in the past, but sometimes, things happen and they just, well, snap. But even in that frame of mind with a gun, I promise you that almost all of them would still be sane enough to avoid a place if they knew someone was already there with a gun willing to shoot them right away. Just a thought.

13) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 19/12/2012

THIS is a bigger problem to me than gun control......"Zachary police arrested a 31-year-old man Sunday on a fourth-offense DWI count, less than six months after he was accused of driving while intoxicated when his pickup crashed head-on into a car and killed the car’s driver". He could have just as well hit a school bus causing it to flip and kill every child in it. You can bet that within a couple months you will see another article about a repeat DWI that kills someone, but the odds are much slimmer that well see another story like the school shooting within that time. And what about the football player that was over double the legal limit and killed his teammate in a car crash. He was shown on TV standing on the sidelines laughing this past Sunday. I don't see Obama making any statements about him. What about the young kids that know the story and see him having a good time only days later?

14) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 19/12/2012

sagging pants.....The point I was trying to make is that this "fashion" was started in the prisons. You have to commit a crime to go to prison. The music videos showing guys with wads of cash and fancy cars also show people walking around in the same clothes. Young people want to be like them, but they don't have wads of cash. So they get a gun(usually stolen from someone that has it legally) and go rob others. It goes to Obama's statement about "creating a culture that doesn't promote violence". We have young people with no self respect(showing people their underwear and sometimes backside), so they sure aren't going to have respect for me or you.

15) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 19/12/2012

My wife begged me not to, but I am going to try and teach the intentionally-ignorant. Stop signs are not a federal issue. Since you people refuse to learn from others here, the only suggestion I can offer is go ask the guy who wrote those words, "general welfare," and ask HIM what he meant. You can't? He's dead? LOL, then read his very words when he lamented the instant misconstruction of his writings.

16) Comment by Buck - 19/12/2012

This has been interesting. I read the article and then went to the comments. I was shocked that I had missed so much in first reading after being enlightened by some of the commenters that I went back and reread the article several times to find what they are referencing. I can't find any relationship. Realize this may be a scary times for some as the sentiment from throughout the country is to challenge this long accepted perception that we are a society at risk and thus we must retain this culture of violence. We have gone thru several historical culture changes and, do not fear, we have survived and in most cases out society has become a more democratic community. One recently has been in regards to smoking. As I recall it stated in Mississippi when it was framed as a public health issue and a suit was filed against the tobacco industry. I see some similarities on this firearm subject especially in light of the number of suicides with guns and the tremendous number of gun wounds. The mass murders of course get out attention. Some get excited when they see that the Feds may get involved but as the article says there is not one easy answer to this public health issue of how to protect our children. This is especially relevant in Louisiana as once agin we have claimed fame as the State with highest incidents of domestic gun violence in the whole world. It would be interesting if our State policy makers would find the courage to address this subject and take some measures to protect our children with some common sense legislation that addresses this public health topic. Yeah, good luck with that. Gee I wonder what I could do as a individual?

17) Comment by gofigger - 19/12/2012

Handing out government issue bullet proof vests to every citizen would be less expensive than letting these bumbling fools handle this chore. What a joke!

18) Comment by DMJ - 19/12/2012

Last I checked, you can't kill 20 people with sagging pants...

19) Comment by DMJ - 19/12/2012

It's a parenting AND a gun problem. Problems as big and as serious as these often have many contributing factors- parenting, guns, poverty, poor schools, bad role models, TV, video games, etc.. I'm not so sure how much apparel has to do with anything.... And no, Obama won't have it figured out next month. He won't have it figured out next year...and probably not next decade. But we'll never make a dent in the epidemic of gun violence if we don't at least begin to try...

20) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 19/12/2012

"Obama also wants his team to consider ways to improve mental health resources and address ways to create a culture that doesn’t promote violence." If they try to enact even ONE gun control law, he better go shutdown BET and MTV, ban rap music from the radios, pickup every person showing their underwear in public, and pull every CD containing violent lyrics off the shelves FIRST. I have yet to see one gun walking down the street by itself looking to shoot someone. But I can go walk the mall and see 20-30 people with their pants "sagging" b/c it's a cool thing that started in the PRISONS. If they like it so much, give them a free ride to the place where it started and let them hang out with their role models. We have a PARENTING problem, not a GUN problem. We have people out on the streets that are repeat violent crime offenders. We have children learning that it is easier to steal than it is to WORK. But our great leader will have everything figured out by next month.

21) Comment by DMJ - 19/12/2012

Host, take your pill. Better? Now...just because we can't eliminate ALL gun violence doesn't mean we shouldn't try to eliminate ANY of it. You guys always resort to extremes, which is a sign of a lazy argument. Clearly, easy access to guns is a factor in gun violence. Surely, even the most ardent gun rights advocate at least admits this. We're not living in 2 realities with different facts, as much as we'd probably like to.

22) Comment by mcBR - 19/12/2012

@MEM: What's the constitutional basis for stop signs?. I seem to remember something about trying to "form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity."

23) Comment by Costanza - 19/12/2012

Let no crisis go to waste... The issue that should be addressed is the pathetic state of mental health services, not gun control.

24) Comment by The_Host - 19/12/2012

How about some deadlines for reductions in Federal spending? Thankfully after whatever nonsense Obama and company comes up we will never have another single tragedy in this country right DMJ? All hail Obama. DMJ just like I said you are a gun grabber through and through. It is to late and you will never get the guns out of criminals hands. They aren't called criminals for nothing. Thanks for getting me to order that case of ammo yesterday as prices are going up from all the purchasing of ARs and ammo for them now is getting short supply. Obama going on year 5 as the nations #1 seller of guns. You do realize more guns are sold under the pressure of potential restrictions than ever would have been sold without them right? I know this concept is probably to complex for you to comprehend but it is true. More threat of restrictions has always led to vast increases in the sale of guns. Effectively you have put even more guns on the street, congrats, that was your objective right? LMAO

25) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 19/12/2012

Would anyone care to cite any constitutional basis for such legislation? Or is this simply something you "think should be done?"

26) Comment by DMJ - 19/12/2012

About time. It's a shame it took another tragedy to get politicians to act. Still...better late than never.

27) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 19/12/2012

There is no constitutional basis for what's being proposed. None. Basically, your boy Obama is acting outside the law, making him a criminal Arrest him at once.