Pumping station placement disputed

Advocate staff photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCK -- From left, Tooley Towns, Jennifer Melancon and Gehl Davis, president of the White Oak Landing Civic Association, gather Friday at the location in their neighborhood where an upgraded sewage pumping station is to be installed on a platform 10 feet above ground level. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCK -- From left, Tooley Towns, Jennifer Melancon and Gehl Davis, president of the White Oak Landing Civic Association, gather Friday at the location in their neighborhood where an upgraded sewage pumping station is to be installed on a platform 10 feet above ground level.

Residents of White Oak Landing subdivision in southeast Baton Rouge say they will fight plans to put a 16-foot-tall sewage pumping station at the entrance to their upscale neighborhood, a decision city-parish officials say is final.

To assist them in their fight, the White Oak Landing Civic Association has hired Alvin Fairburn & Associates LLC, a Denham Springs-based engineering firm, to help persuade the city-parish to choose an alternate site, said Gehl Davis, the president of the civic association.

The new pumping station is part of the city-parish’s Sanitary Sewer Overflow project, a $1.4 billion, federally mandated upgrade of the parish’s sewer system’s infrastructure.

As part of the project, the Department of Public Works plans to upgrade the current pumping station now operating near the south end of Woodlake Bridge on Woodlake Drive, DPW interim Director David Guillory said.

White Oak Landing experiences sewer overflows almost every time it gets a hard rain, Guillory said. When overflows occur, raw sewage runs into Jones Creek and the subdivision’s lakes, he said.

Because of federal regulations, the new pumping station must be elevated above ground level in order to protect it from potential floods. The new station is to be constructed on a platform standing 10 feet high, Guillory said.

Structures on the platform, including the pump and a generator, would add another 6 feet to the height of the installation, Guillory said.

But Davis, leader of the homeowners association, said the completed pumping station would ruin the look of the entrance.

“We call it a drilling rig,” he said, referring to the proposed structure.

“We are not unhappy if they put it on the ground,” Davis said. “Our problem is that they are going to put it in the air.”

Erecting the pumping station atop a 10-foot platform would dwarf the subdivision’s entrance sign and obscure the view of one of the neighborhood’s five lakes, he said.

Davis asked DPW to consider an alternate site for the pumping station adjacent to four homes near Beaconwoods Drive on a walking trail that is owned by the civic association.

However, the property owners near that proposed site have objected to having the new pumping station installed close to their houses, Guillory said.

In an attempt to ease community concerns, DPW personnel met with the homeowners and revised the design of the Woodlake pumping station, Guillory said. The original plans called for a structure about 20 feet high, he said.

Trees and bushes will be planted around the pump station to help obscure it from sight, Guillory said.

In a Dec. 7 report, the engineering firm CH2M Hill, which is the contractor overseeing the Sanitary Sewer Overflow project for the city-parish, analyzed the current location and the proposed location, concluding that building the station at the subdivision entrance would be the preferred solution, according to a copy of the report.

The report listed six disadvantages of the civic association’s proposed site, among them the finding that changing sites would require the addition of a pump station and force the city-parish to upgrade the pump station at the current location anyway.

Access to the Beaconwoods site would be difficult from Woodlake Drive, the report said. The report also said that the land for the site would have to be purchased and the site currently consisted of a “walking trail with many trees.”

In a Dec. 17 letter, Ted York, of Alvin Fairburn, urged DPW to reconsider.

Easy access to the homeowners’ preferred site is available from Beaconwoods Drive, York asserted.

“Since it has been stated that the recommended location for the new pump station is covered with trees,” York wrote, “it is clear that no one has actually been to the site to look at it. We suggest that we meet someone out there so that they can actually see the site.”

Further, the construction of a second pumping station would mean that the current one could be downsized when it is upgraded, and it may not have to be placed on a platform, York wrote.

The homeowners association has said it would be willing to donate the land for the pumping station and that the walking trail could easily be routed around the station, York said.

Joseph Young, of CH2M Hill, said engineers did examine the homeowners’ proposed site before they created their report on the issue.

The proposed project is one of 16 pumping stations to be upgraded during an 18-month phase of the Sanitary Sewer Overflow project, which is expected to begin in the summer, he said.

William Daniel, Mayor-President Kip Holden’s chief administrative officer, said in a written statement that a pumping station or a treatment plant had existed at the current location since the subdivision was accepted for city-parish maintenance in 1978.

“We have few options as to the location of the upgraded pump station,” Daniel wrote. “The original placement of both the pump station and treatment plant were sited so as not to be located among the subdivision homes and were placed at low points in the subdivision to take advantage of gravity.”

DPW had taken homeowners’ concerns into account and was working to build “a very attractive building,” Davis said in the statement.

The civic association is ready to bring the fight to the mayor and Metro Council, Davis said.

“If you think this will totally destroy our entrance,” Davis wrote in an email to the civic association’s members, “please begin making waves with all of the people listed below.”

The email included the names, email addresses and phone numbers of all 12 Metro Council members, as well as the numbers and email addresses for Guillory, Mayor-President Kip Holden and Daniel, the Holden administration’s CAO.

“Call and email more than once,” Davis wrote. “We need to make this into the bad idea it is with those who will make the final decision on this monstrous project.”

Davis’ email encouraged the residents to “get political help” to stop the project.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by Being_Stupid - 23/12/2012

Just because a self-appointed member of the Neighborhood Association claims to speak for the entire neighborhood, does not necessarily mean they speak for the entire neighborhood.

2) Comment by Being_Stupid - 23/12/2012

"twinkie1cat" and "Cousin Dave" hate rich people.

3) Comment by twinkie1cat - 23/12/2012

So what is this? The rich folks protest a simple pumping station and probably will get results. The poor folks in Scottlandville however, have a whole stinky sewer plant and the Parish won't buy out their neighborhood, especially not at prices that will allow them to get decent new homes. The love of money is the root of all evil. The love of and deference to those who have money, well that's how we ended up with the budget cuts and extremists in political office...... By the way, homeowners associations can do great good or great harm. Really depends on the ethics and goals of the leaders.

4) Comment by Woody - 23/12/2012

***** you sure have the right name.

5) Comment by Being_Stupid - 23/12/2012

Just because a mob represents the majority, does not mean they are in the right. These Civic Associations stand in the way of being able to build a better Baton Rouge. They do more harm, than good for Baton Rouge.

6) Comment by phil - 23/12/2012

I think this is total insanity and a lack of common sense. It is great to hear that when the water gets 10 feet high and all of the houses are totally under water - guess what, their commodes will still flush properly and the pumps will work. Since the primary original problem with the entire sewerage system was that the pipes leak and let rain water in during storms, I suppose that will solve that problem too. In addition the entire system will apparently be changed from partly a gravity fed system to a forced main type system, so now we have to have pumps all over the place. Also, since the Central treatment plant will be eliminated, all of that sewerage will be pumped about 6+ miles to the South treatment plant . Let's move the stink to the south? I think I know the best solution to fix the system. DPW needs to look into having a totally aerial sewerage system. Pipes could be strung 10 feet high on poles. That would eliminate most of the leaks in the sewer system when it rains which was much of the original problem to begin with. Ok so I am being sarcastic, but I think with good reason. BY the way, I keep saying this -the total amount of this project is listed at about $1.6 billion on the latest cost estimate. It's just another $200 MILLION so who cares? I think taxpayers should care and start asking some questions and ask for an investigation into this entire project. - and maybe follow the money!

7) Comment by Stephen - 23/12/2012

Democracy in action. I commend the neighbors. They may find allies in other neighborhoods who are dealing with similar issues. It is not a simple issue. Putting off the repair/building of the sewer system for years has led us to this point, so the current officials are not the ones who initially set the current situation in motion. The question is what to do now that we find ourselves here. One thing I caution is that we not spend a lot of money on projects that will quickly become obsolete. I am not saying that is the case, but when we rejected the Mayor's plans a couple of years ago, we have painted ourselves into a corner on potential solutions that are at a risk of really not getting the job done. The Mayor should have been listened to a little more closely. We need address this seriously as a community. The neighbors here are starting to look into the issues. Digging deeper than the issue of aesthetics will reveal that we have a serious problem which needs a lot of attention. William Daniel thankfully has the expertise to consider the issues, so we are not without hope in respect to public administration. Still, we need citizen involvement like we see in this article.

8) Comment by Cousin Dave - 23/12/2012

So replacing an existing sewage pump station is going to ruin their neighborhood? Those rich folks obviously don't think that their excrement stinks, so maybe they don't need one at all. Why should anyone who lives outside their posh little subdivion give a spit? This seems to a silly article to publish before Christmas, or any other time really.

9) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 23/12/2012

Seems like a lot of poop to me.