Health exchange decisions loom

Show caption

Nineteen states, including Louisiana, have turned down the Obama administration’s invitation to run the new health insurance markets that will begin serving millions of uninsured Americans less than a year from now.

Friday is decision day for states to notify Washington if they will set up their own insurance exchanges under the federal health care law. Federal control of the new state markets where individuals, families and small businesses can shop for private insurance coverage initially was seen as a failsafe, not the standard for nearly half the country.

On the other side of the ledger, 17 states and Washington, D.C., say they want to set up and run their own markets. The administration already has started granting approvals. Eight other states have indicated they want to pursue a partnership with Washington, and more may do so. Only six remain undecided.

Monitoring by The Associated Press finds a divided nation moving ahead, despite the misgivings of some state officials. Half the states now say they will participate in some way.

All of the states refusing are led by Republicans.

“It is too risky for the state and too expensive for taxpayers,” Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals Secretary Bruce Greenstein wrote in an email Thursday night about the exchanges.

Greenstein notified U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius by letter on Nov. 17, saying that the exchanges have “severe legal problems, is bad policy and does not allow the state enough flexibility.”

Exchanges are the gateway to the new health care law for individuals and families who buy their own health insurance, as well as for small businesses.

Currently, it’s hard to tell what’s a good plan or a fair price. You can get turned down if you have a medical problem, charged more if you are older or a woman. The health care law forbids insurers from turning away the sick, limits what they can charge older people and bans gender-based surcharges. It also requires virtually all Americans to get coverage or face fines.

Exchanges are supposed to make picking health insurance like buying an airline ticket from an online travel site like Orbitz or Expedia.

There will be a website, and you’ll be able to put in your ZIP code and get a list of available health plans. There will be a section where you can find out if you qualify for subsidies, or for Medicaid. There will be cost calculators to allow you to compare different levels of coverage: platinum, gold, silver and bronze. There will be tools that allow you to see if your doctor or hospital is with a particular plan.

Middle-class consumers will be able to find out if they are eligible for government help with their premiums for private insurance. Initially, nearly 9 of every 10 taking part will get assistance.

Low-income people can use the exchanges to find out whether they are eligible for expanded Medicaid coverage under the law. In addition to deciding how to implement exchanges, states must also decide whether to accept the Medicaid expansion. There’s no deadline set for that decision, and most are still weighing options.

Open enrollment for exchange plans starts next Oct. 1, and coverage begins Jan. 1, 2014. Initially around 10 million people are expected to sign up, growing rapidly thereafter. California, New York and Kentucky are among the states that have opted to create their own exchanges. Among those passing are Texas, Georgia and Kansas. Partnership states include Illinois and West Virginia.

Republican governors rejecting state exchanges have cited a variety of reasons. Some say the administration has not provided enough information. Others say there’s too much federal regulation. Most have concerns about costs. But some Republican leaders have broken ranks, including governors in Idaho, Nevada and New Mexico, and the insurance commissioner in Mississippi.

In announcing his support for a state exchange this week, Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter said, “it would be irresponsible of me to simply abandon the field to federal bureaucrats. In the face of uncertainty we must assert our independence and our commitment to self-determination, while fulfilling our responsibility to the rule of law.”

Indeed, exchanges have a Republican pedigree. The idea was pioneered in Massachusetts under then-Gov. Mitt Romney’s health care overhaul.

Marsha Shuler of The Advocate’s Capitol news bureau and John Miller of The Associated Press in Boise, Idaho, contributed to this report.

“All this is full of irony,” said consultant Jon Kingsdale, who founded the Massachusetts exchange for Romney. “If you had asked many of those (Republican) governors four years ago before this got politicized, it would have been a no-brainer: ‘We want the states to do it.’”

The health care law increased the power of the federal government, but states that run their own exchanges retain important roles overseeing insurance plans, addressing consumer issues and coordinating between the new marketplace and their Medicaid plans. That last item may be the most important, since Medicaid is a major component of state budgets.

Critics of the law believe the Obama administration will be overwhelmed trying to set up so many exchanges in states that are hostile to the idea. Some say the president may have to accept delays, perhaps in the face-saving context of budget negotiations where a delay would count as savings. Publicly, administration officials are adamant that won’t happen, and independent observers are starting to believe them.

“It would be politically unwise for the president to delay the start of these benefits,” said Dan Mendelson, president of Avalere Health, a market analysis firm. “If this is going to be a legacy item, he’s got to move forward.”

The key to that will be something called the federal exchange, the fallback, which is on a tight development schedule overseen by Health and Human Services Secretary Sebelius.

The government has awarded two big technology contracts for exchanges. Virginia-based CGI Federal Inc. is building the federal exchange. Maryland-based Quality Software Services Inc. is building what’s called the federal data services hub, an electronic back office that will be used by the federal exchange and state exchanges to verify identity, income, citizenship and legal residence.

Estimated price tag for the federal exchange: at least $860 million.

“We are all keenly aware that open enrollment is coming quickly,” said Gary Cohen, who heads the HHS office overseeing the rollout. “And we will be ready to open our doors.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by Scrooge - 14/12/2012

hurricane protection and flood insurance and Medicare and social security are socialized contrivances phil. That's they way they work, duh. For the umpteenth time, you will pay for the uninsured regardless. ever wonder why your Louisiana car insurance premiums are so high?

2) Comment by phil - 14/12/2012

I am getting tired of paying so much extra for hurricane protection on my home insurance premium and the added costs of flood insurance since I happen to be in a flood plain. I can't wait until those are also socialized so I can get cheap insurance. Also long- term old age insurance needs to be socialized. Now that we have a precedent in place that forces everyone to buy insurance, let's just add those too. The government always does things cheaper in the long run, right? Yes this is sarcasm for those who did not figure it out..

3) Comment by caucajun - 14/12/2012

BRmoderate, obamacare will be expensive. Did you know that hospitals that re-admit sick patients in less than 30 days since they were discharged, they will be fined by the federal government. Not all sick patients, just Medicare. Why Medicaid isn't included? Mostly democrats on Medicaid?

4) Comment by BRmoderate - 14/12/2012

Caucajun, Did you ever think that those health companies may be looking for a way to raise rates just for the sake of increasing income and looking good in the eyes of their shareholders? Of Course, they are not going to like the ACA, it removes the discriminatory fees/denials that have long plagued our healthcare system. I am against national socialized healthcare but we certainly need to start pooling resources to lower costs. I think the ACA is a step in that direction.

5) Comment by nimby? - 14/12/2012

it's like buying a car , buyer beware . you need to read the fine print , which a lot of people either aren't reading or they're ignoring . don't worry , the payment book will arrive soon ....

6) Comment by caucajun - 14/12/2012

What the AP leaves out of the story is that the obama administration just released the requirements for the insurance exchange a few weeks ago. The states that agreed to start their own exchanges did that with no idea of the costs and regulations they would have to follow. Would you buy a new car without knowing what kind of car it is and how much it cost? This week the CEO of Aetna said this: Health insurance premiums may as much as double for some small businesses and individual buyers in the U.S. when the Affordable Care Act’s major provisions start in 2014, Aetna Inc. (AET)’s chief executive officer said. While subsidies in the law will shield some people, other consumers who make too much for assistance are in for “premium rate shock,” Mark Bertolini, who runs the third-biggest U.S. health-insurance company, told analysts yesterday at a conference in New York. The prospect has spurred discussion of having Congress delay or phase in parts of the law, he said. “We’ve shared it all with the people in Washington and I think it’s a big concern,” the CEO said. “We’re going to see some markets go up as much as as 100 percent.” Of course the liberal media ignored this just like they ignored the union thugs beating up conservatives Tuesday at the Michigan state capitol.

7) Comment by brwonk - 14/12/2012

You're forgetting about Mississippi and Idaho, which are led by Republican governors with enough sense to tailor the exchanges to their needs instead of accepting a cookie-cutter exchange set up by the federal government for the state. Even if you don't agree with the law, it is foolish to expect the federal government will set up an exchange for Louisiana that is unique to our needs in regard to the Affordable Care Act.

8) Comment by foldgers - 14/12/2012

And all of the states accepting are led by democrats - Shocker.

9) Comment by DMJ - 14/12/2012

"All of the states refusing are led by Republicans." Shocker.