Jindal touts vouchers as RSD schools get high marks

Gov. Bobby Jindal touted his embattled school voucher program Tuesday with a Washington, D.C.-based, pro-school choice think tank that had named the Louisiana Recovery School District as the nation’s best for educational “choice and competition.”

The Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution awarded its only “A” letter grade to the Recovery School District — made up of traditional and charter schools in the New Orleans, Baton Rouge and Shreveport areas — for the combination of school voucher scholarships, charter schools, online education and affordable private schools in the regions, but mostly in New Orleans.

The 2012 Education Choice and Competition Index also rated Orleans Parish schools at sixth nationally, after New York City, Washington, D.C., Minneapolis, Houston and the RSD.

As the keynote speaker for the release of the report, Jindal praised his school voucher, also called scholarship, program that became law this summer and criticized teacher unions.

“The United States of America does not provide, does not provide, equal opportunity in education,” Jindal said.

“If you’re a low-income parent residing in an urban area of America, there’s more likely than not your child is attending a failing school,” Jindal said. “Unless you’re fortunate enough to live in New Orleans, Milwaukee or Cleveland, you have no options or recourse.”

The teachers’ unions are the “one entity” making a “herculean effort,” Jindal said, and spending “millions of dollars every year to make sure you don’t ever get the opportunity to get your child out of a failing school and into a different school.”

Jindal’s school voucher program that allows taxpayer funds to send children to private schools was partially shot down in court last month under the grounds that the program was unconstitutionally financed.

However, the governor reiterated his plans to appeal. The court ruling also could allow for the voucher program to be funded with state general fund dollars outside of the state’s public school funding formula, called the Minimum Foundation Program.

“We’re taking our fight to the state Supreme Court. I’m confident we’ll prevail,” Jindal said, later adding, “We’ve got to put reform into the system, not on top of it.”

Critics allege the voucher program takes away dollars from already struggling public schools only to put the funds toward private schools that are not subject to the same accountability levels.

The voucher program also has faced criticism because many of the participating schools are religious-based institutions, some of which are fledgling schools that openly oppose evolution and instead teach creationism.

The Recovery School District was created after Hurricane Katrina under former Gov. Kathleen Blanco to take over failing schools in the New Orleans area and to transition many of them into charter schools, which are run by nongovernmental boards using taxpayer funds.

Jindal’s voucher program was started on a pilot basis in 2008 to give parents options beyond the “incremental progress” of public schools, Jindal said. This year the program spread statewide as the governor’s signature legislative package.

Russ Whitehurst, director of the Brown Center on Education Policy that led the report, said the RSD “has most, if not all, of the desirable characteristics.”

School districts were scored on several variables but that it essentially came down to four measures:

  • Offering lots of choice through charter schools, voucher programs, virtual learning, affordable private schools and more.
  • Providing good information to help parents compare and shop around.
  • Setting up an easy “architecture” for parents to navigate, transfer and apply, ideally through a “common application.”
  • Ensuring that the taxpayer funds follow the students into the schools and courses of their choosing.

The RSD and Orleans Parish schools should still do a better job though of showing individual school performance gains, data on teachers and principals, and the popularity of schools based on parental preference, according to the report.

“It is an honor to be recognized by such as reputable organization,’’ RSD Superintendent Patrick Dobard said in an interview later Tuesday.

While Dobard said he had not delved into the survey deeply enough to determine what areas the RSD needs to strengthen, the goal is to continue to improve. “We want to make sure that we are making options for families that are not determined by ZIP code,’’ Dobard said.

When Jindal took questions, he said he actually agrees with President Barack Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan on their support of charter schools and teacher accountability.

But Jindal argued that they do not go far enough and that they should embrace school vouchers more.

Jindal and Obama agree on moving away from the bureaucratic “No Child Left Behind” policies of former President George W. Bush.

Sara Pagones of The Advocate’s New Orleans bureau contributed to this report.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (17)


1) Comment by Scrooge - 13/12/2012

If the intent of vouchers is to help those " low-income' persons who cannot help themselves, why concurrently drastically cut charity medical care and low income subsidies? Doesn't that ethically debase the helping the low income segment argument? Evidently, since there is apparently no data to support the superiority of RSD schools, it was necessary to manufacture it. This is like the oft made statement that Louisiana is #1 in education accountability, which really means that Louisiana is very good at reporting that it is last? Sadow's statements seem to emulate the Goebbel's model that if ideology is contradicted by reality, one should attack opponents, casting them as a scapegoat. Instead of viable solutions, we get fog and mirrors or more aptly, "nacht und nebeln".

2) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 12/12/2012

@jeffsadow: Proving once again that he has not a clue about public education, Jeff Sadow again attempts, in a rambling, discombobulated piece of rhetorical garbage with not a whit of evidence, to muddy the waters of educational discourse. I was fully aware that the "award" (it was not a "study" at all) had nothing to do with the quality of the schools, but only with their warped sense of choice. On the other hand, Jindal tried to make some points in his speech, and we all know that Jeff Sadow has his nose inserted deep within the hinter regions of Jindal's posterior orifice, so I guess he missed the points we were all making, and decided to say something. The CRDO study did put the New Orleans Charters in a good light, but of course, it was based on disingenuous data provided by, drumroll please, the same Recovery School Distrtict that is currently being lauded. I notice that Jeff Sadow does not attempt to deal with the facts I presented, but instead chose to build a straw man. Not the first time. Again, let me see if I can make this clear enough even for JS. The Recovery School District throughout the state is the lowest performing district in the state. Although the state places a couple of districts lower, it is only because the Department of Educaiton is lying about the data. In fact, the Louisiana Department of Education lied to researchers and to the courts, when claiming that the data we sought was "unavailable" and in fact, didn't exist. Fact is, it was the same data CREDO was, and is currently using as part of their on-going study. DOE caught in another lie. They cannot let the truth get out about the poor performance of the RSD because that would destroy their "reform" efforts, which as we all have figured out, have little to do with students and have a lot to do with profits for a few! Now, the other point I made, which JS alluded to with his quote, but failed to actually address at all, is the FACT that there is no relationship between the School Performance Scores/Letter Grades and the quality of teaching in those schools. None. And JS therefore was unable to challenge it. As to his claims about my "failures" he has no clue. He is too busy with Jindal's posterior to make sense. Sorry Sadow, you again are simply proving your ignorance.

3) Comment by 1ryben - 12/12/2012

Oh, and this wasn't much of a study. It is some cooked up award to further an agenda.

4) Comment by 1ryben - 12/12/2012

Are we reading the same CREDO study? From the summary. 17% of charter schools outperformed their public school equivalents, while 37% of charter schools performed worse than regular local schools, and the rest were about the same as local schools. http://credo.stanford.edu/reports/MULTIPLE_CHOICE_CREDO.pdf I bet if we gave public schools the same freedoms as these charters you'd see at least 17% of them improve. Freedom of curricula, freedom to discipline, freedom to demand parental evolvement. Freedom to release any student not found in compliance.

5) Comment by jeffsadow - 12/12/2012

This study does not claim that NORSD produces great results, just that it creates an environment that promises great potential of improvement from the abysmal state it had been in (after taking the cream of the crop schools and leaving them in the OPSD). And, as the Stanford CREDO reports show, it has been succeeding in this regard. Unfortunately, some commenters who accuse "not one" of the media of telling the "truth" themselves can't handle the truth: school choice does cut through some of the very things that these Luddites, who invested their careers in following failed ideas, claim prevent academic success. A number of studies put their claims to lie (start with Jay Greene's work and go from there). They refuse to take responsibility for the disservice they did to our children, and so blame their failures on imagined uncontrollable demographic causes that they claim only more money, lots more money, will fix. And when they run up against facts they find inconvenient, they shape them to fit their warped worldview, i.e. saying measurement of academic gains don't do that because they measured the imagined uncontrollables. It would be funny if it weren't so pitiable.

6) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 12/12/2012

“If you’re a low-income parent residing in an urban area of America, there’s more likely than not your child is attending a failing school,” ......So, if the school is located in a failing ENVIRONMENT it is more likely to fail. But somehow, if we open a charter school in the same environment, it will be successful b/c Jindal and White say it will. Not b/c we will have proobf but b/c they will only present whatever information they want you to hear. How much money did this trip cost the taxpayers for Jindal to go receive this bogus "honor"?

7) Comment by 8point6 - 12/12/2012

Wow! My "progressive" friends are REALLY whining today. I feel your pain.

8) Comment by phil - 12/12/2012

I seem to always get confused between the word "tout" and the word "pout".

9) Comment by KilgoreTrout - 12/12/2012

Either Jindal is not as intelligent as he is purported to be or he is willing to sacrifice his integrity for ambition. By the way, while Jindal is out of state telling everyone how the federal budget should be managed, Louisiana's is a disaster. Reality doesn't matter evidently, but in the real world the competency of a CEO of a failing company might be suspect if he were to question the fiscal management of other companies and promote his failed company and products as a model with irrelevant manufactured data. . This is extremely surreal and justifies the status of of Louisiana and its voters as a continuing laughingstock. Louisiana citizens should not be so amused, but bemused may be a better word.

10) Comment by crabby - 12/12/2012

"...best for educational “choice and competition.” Yes, it's true, we do have a lot of them (I guess you could say the same thing about chemical refineries). Now, where are these schools on the list of academic success?

11) Comment by cbarnett - 12/12/2012

Education in Louisiana is a joke. Does Jindal believe the lies that come from his mouth? I heard him speak recently about "Sons and Daughters will finally come back home," he is out of touch with reality most of us with a decent education can't move out fast enough!

12) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 12/12/2012

Two important facts that Jindal carefully omitted. First is that the Recovery School District (RSD) is the lowest performing district in the state, BASED ON THE "REFORMERS'" OWN SCORES. I know some will say that that is not true, that St. Helena scores lower (Of course, Patrick Dobard and the RSD run the only middle school there, and in fact when the local district wanted to offer choice, by offering middle school grades in its remaining schools, the state went to court to stop THAT PARENTAL SCHOICE!), but the fact is that the state refuses to come clean and show ALL SCORES, for ALL STUDENTS in the Recovery School District. If they did, they would be dead last, even if ONLY looking at schools they have had for ever three years! Secondly, now that the RSD is hung on its own scoring petards, we come to the real truth that not one so-called "reformer" can ever admit to, though many know it is true. What is this truth which has driven ALL of the ill-fated "reforms?" All of their claims about students being in failing schools. Total ***** Totally bogus. The BIG LIE. The state's accountability system tells us NOTHING about the quality of the school, and NOTHING about the quality of the teachers and teaching within the school. Not one darn thing can be honestly said about the school and its teachers based on letter grades, or based on the School Performance Scores. What DO these scores represent? They represent the underlying conditions which impact student academic performance, and nothing else. Not one media outlet seems to care enough about the truth to actually publish this truth. But I notice that not once has the administration EVER been willing to counter this truth. Not once. They lie instead and claim these are failing schools. Shame on them, and shame on the media.

13) Comment by conglo - 12/12/2012

Dear Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst Brookings Institution After reading Bobby Jindal touting his embattled school voucher program Tuesday with the Washington, D.C.-based, pro-school choice think tank that had named the Louisiana Recovery School District as the nation’s best for educational “choice and competition”, you might want to check into the facts Mr. Whitehurst. Check out RSD grades 2010 - 2011, Check out the number of closed RSD schools. Check out LA SPS & letter grades. Either Jindal does not know the facts, or someone is not telling the truth.

14) Comment by 1ryben - 11/12/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

15) Comment by 1ryben - 11/12/2012

Utter nonsense! So a think tank devoted to school choice awards RSD it's award for the most choices? That's a bit ridiculous. Is it much of a choice if all the choices are terrible. What good does that do? What choice do these kids get in the 47 D and F rated schools? This is so stupid. Why is the Advocate so scared to print the truth or anything that'll offend Lord Jindal?

16) Comment by morellok2 - 11/12/2012

Wonder if this think tank is smoking something funny. Jindal will be making the circuit telling the country what a wonderful difference his educational reforms have made. Brings back memories of his visit to all the talk shows after his first legislative session touting how wonderful his ethics and transparency reforms were. Obviously, the national press might do well to look a bit closer at what is reality here in LA rather than just listening to someone who is all about self promotion.

17) Comment by spqr - 11/12/2012

And I am certain Piyush Jindal failed to mention, as did the Advocate, that 47 schools in the New Orleans RSD had grades od D or F last year.