Board, state reach accord

Advocate staff photo by PATRICK DENNIS -- East Baton Rouge School Board member Jerry Arbour asks questionsThursday about a new partnership agreement with the state on schools in the Baton Rouge Achievement Zone. Other board members are left to right, Evelyn-Ware Jackson, Craig Freeman, Connie Bernard, Arbour and Randy Lamana, Show caption
Advocate staff photo by PATRICK DENNIS -- East Baton Rouge School Board member Jerry Arbour asks questionsThursday about a new partnership agreement with the state on schools in the Baton Rouge Achievement Zone. Other board members are left to right, Evelyn-Ware Jackson, Craig Freeman, Connie Bernard, Arbour and Randy Lamana,

Common ground found on low performing schools plan

After months of negotiations, the East Baton Rouge Parish School Board reached an agreement Thursday with the state Department of Education that charts the future of 11 low-performing schools in north Baton Rouge and is likely to affect more schools in the future.

It marks the first major agreement between the school and the state agency since the state began in 2008 taking over low-performing schools in Baton Rouge and placing them under the control of the Recovery School District.

The 11 schools are the nucleus of what is collectively being called the Baton Rouge Achievement Zone. The creation of the special zone, which is likely to grow over time, was first floated publicly a year ago by state Superintendent John White.

Seven of the 11 zones schools are operated now by RSD. All seven are former East Baton Rouge Parish schools that operated briefly as charter schools. They are Dalton and Lanier elementary schools; Crestworth, Glen Oaks and Prescott middle schools; and Capitol and Istrouma high schools.

The state’s plan had been to find charter management groups to take over those seven schools, but the agreement approved on Thursday allows the East Baton Rouge Parish school system to conduct a simultaneous search for charter school groups. A third party evaluator, yet to be determined, would look at charter applicants and help determine which ones would be best suited for the job.

The other four schools joining the Achievement Zone — Capitol, Park and Winbourne elementary schools and Capitol Middle School — will remain under school system’s control until summer 2014. Superintendent Bernard Taylor earlier this month floated a proposal to reconfigure the grades at the schools, with the exception of Winbourne.

“The district is making a concerted effort to collaborate productively with the state,” Taylor said of the agreement.

Reached by phone late Thursday, Patrick Dobard, RSD superintendent, said he wants to reread the document one more time before signing it but is pleased the two sides have been able to find common ground.

“I’m trying to find a way to get us to work more in partnership in a way that works better for families,” Dobard said.

The School Board vote unanimously in favor of the RSD partnership after two hours of often testy debate. Some board members said were unhappy with the final document, particularly that it failed to list all schools that might be affected and the lack of a firm geographic boundary for the Achievement Zone.

Other board members sought additional safeguards for the school system.

Board member Randy Lamana said he didn’t trust the state because state leaders have misled the school system in the past. He said the system has done a much better job in his opinion trying to turn around low-performing schools than the charter schools the state has brought in.

Domoine Rutledge, general counsel for the school system, balked at making changes to the agreement, saying it would jeopardize hours upon hours of work.

“I can’t tell you how much of our time has been consumed, right up until we walked in here,” he said.

Rutledge reminded the board that it has limited leverage because “RSD has these schools now; they’re not ours.”

Rutledge also noted that for the first time the state has agreed to have any new charter schools pay for “legacy costs,” which is the cost of medical coverage for retirees. That is costing the school system about $866 per child now, and about $1.7 million for the more than 2,000 students in the RSD.

Board Vice President Tarvald Smith, long a critic of the RSD, said the agreement is step in the right direction and he hopes it will lead eventually the state to return schools it’s taken over.

“I have probably more reservations than Mr. Lamana about the RSD, but I offer an olive branch so that we can try and work things out.”

John Spain was happy that the two parties finally have reached an agreement.

“What I hope is that it creates an opportunity for the RSD and EBR to restore some trust,” the executive vice president of the Baton Rouge Area Foundation said.

A year ago, Spain helped form a group called New Schools for Baton Rouge.

The group, in which Spain serves on the board, has been raising money to support schools in the Achievement Zone and has set a fundraising goal of $30 million.

The group has also been courting charter school management groups from around the country to come to Baton Rouge.

“Are there quality charter groups that want to come to Baton Rouge?” Spain asked. “The answer is absolutely, yes.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by joey.esposito - 30/11/2012

School Performance Scores for Prescott Middle: 2008 38 EBR Placide 2010 39 ABR Spain 2011 42 ABR Spain 2012 46 ABR Spain

2) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 30/11/2012

John Spain. Now THERE is a joke! Never elected to anything, but plays this town like it was his own fiefdom. He sorta failed big-time with Advance Baton Rouge, so now we are going to give him MORE schools? Somehow the Baton Rouge Area Foundations has to find the new money to pay Spain the millions he has milked off Baton Rouge in recent years. And @Being_Stupid continues to be.

3) Comment by Being_Stupid - 30/11/2012

Vouchers are a better solution than Charters.

4) Comment by BacknBR - 30/11/2012

Until we get new blood, and new ideas, this silly little city will NEVER change.

5) Comment by BacknBR - 30/11/2012

John Spain is involved in this? Of course he is. Didn't he serve on the board of the now defunct Advance Baton Rouge group? A group that initially chartered some of the "failing" schools only to see the test scores at those schools nose dive under the direction of Advance Baton Rouge? This is a silly little city run by a handful of people who do not bother running for office because they can yield more power sitting on non-profit boards. Most were born and live in the same zip code, never knowing things are better in other cities were people actually work together for the betterment of all its citizens. Until we get new blood, and new ideas, this silly little city will change.

6) Comment by tball - 30/11/2012

Good points tradewinns - ask all those smart people how they are going to change 3, 4, and 5 generations of kids having kids with no parental responsibilities??? They have RSD, Charter schools, Magna Schools, etc. where is the improvements??

7) Comment by Being_Stupid - 30/11/2012

phil, you make a good point about non-profits in general. Nevertheless, if they steal our money to pay for public education regardless, wouldn't you rather those taxes be spent more efficiently on a system that works, than a system that has proven itself to be a total failure for well over 30 years? I am okay with a charters making profit, if they deliver on quality education and discipline (these kids living in these low-income, high-crime areas need discipline and education).

8) Comment by phil - 30/11/2012

Whenever I hear something about a nonprofit etc I go and check out their IRS 990 forms and see how much the organization is worth and how much the top people make in salaries and compensation. That information is available on the Internet. How about a news story on that?

9) Comment by tradewinns - 30/11/2012

who pays for the schools in the BR achievement zone? does the state run them but taxpayers in BR pay for them or what? it does anger me that millions upon millions of dollars are wasted while the main problem, parental responsibilities, are ignored. until the parents of the children are held responsibile for their childrens actions, nothing is really going to change.