‘Bird’ may fly again over roof,  ACLU says

The American Civil Liberties Union weighed in Tuesday on the side of a woman whose holiday lights in the shape of an extended middle finger upset neighbors.

Sarah Henderson took the lights down from the roof of her house Monday after a visit from Denham Springs police prompted by neighborhood complaints, but she said Tuesday evening she is considering putting them back up after getting support from the ACLU.

“I hope the lady would be a good neighbor,” Denham Springs Police Chief Scott Jones said.

If Henderson puts the lights back up, Jones said, he will see if there is a city ordinance, such as the one on obscenity, that applies.

“A threatening letter from the ACLU doesn’t mean anything to me,” the police chief said. “I don’t give them any consideration at all.”

But he said he won’t put the city in legal jeopardy.

“If there is nothing we can do legally, there is nothing we can do,” he said.

If Henderson puts the symbol back up, Jones said, he would consult with the city attorney.

“I’d have to look at all of the ordinances” before providing advice on the next step, City Attorney Paeton Burkett said Tuesday.

Burkett said she did discuss the matter with police officials Monday after the Mayor’s Office received the complaints, and an officer went to see if Henderson would remove the lights “in the spirit of Christmas” and neighborhood harmony.

Henderson said she was told she could be fined if she didn’t remove the display.

“I wish now I had never taken it down,” Henderson said late Tuesday.

She said she hopes to talk to an ACLU lawyer and she might put the unique decoration back on her roof.

In an open letter to the police chief Tuesday, Marjorie R. Esman, executive director of the ACLU of Louisiana, said Henderson has the right to display her holiday lights “as she sees fit, without interference from the city of Denham Springs.

“Rather than pressuring Ms. Henderson to remove a display that is protected under the U.S. Constitution and Louisiana law, the Denham Springs Police Department should have defended her right of free expression,” the letter states. “We therefore assume that should she choose to reinstall her display, she will receive appropriate police protection as the law requires.”

The letter cites court cases, including one from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal in New Orleans, that Esman says “specifically commented on the protected expressive nature of a middle finger extended in defiance or protest.”

Denham Springs Mayor Jimmy Durbin said that if Henderson puts the decoration back up he will ask the city attorney to research the matter “and see if what the ACLU said is correct.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (35)


1) Comment by Chucky - 29/11/2012

Thanks, kind of agree with the ACLU on this one.

2) Comment by Maria - 29/11/2012

This story has made it to the front page in the U.S. section on Fox News website.

3) Comment by jedleland - 29/11/2012

it is not a crime to light up a noose or put the n word on your roof in big letters or a swastika or a burning cross any other tea party emblem. you cant do it on another persons property for instance hanging a noose on a black persons house or yard or vehicle as that would constitute assualt and/or intimidation directed at a specific person but as it stands no none of those things you mentioned are hate crimes under statute. by the way the aclu also opposes 'hate crime' legislation in all its forms and believes that all laws should be applied equally to all citizens

4) Comment by Chucky - 29/11/2012

It seems that the people who think it is her 'right' to light up the 'bird' are OK as long as it is directed to an individual or family, but would be wrong if it targeted a group such a Homosexuals, Blacks, or any other minority (becomes a hate crime ,and this is not). Is it my 'right' to light up a noose or the n-word on my roof ?

5) Comment by chem - 28/11/2012

I was sorry to read that Sarah Henderson was intimidated by some lackey cop in Denham Springs and pulled her exhibit down. Hope she puts it back up.

6) Comment by spqr - 28/11/2012

@Countryboy...you feel sorry for me? No thanks. I will take my chances. Skip down your fictional yellow brick road of life and tell Toto I said hi.

7) Comment by BRmoderate - 28/11/2012

Good for you Gemma!

8) Comment by Emmarld - 28/11/2012

First of all I am Gemma Rachal, and i want to clear up a few things, The 6 yr old is a foster child, and he has been raised different then most children, We love him very much and i am trying to shield him from things that he may have seen to much of already. No I am NOT the neighbor she has issues with, I live over a football field away from Sarah. I barely know her, but I have seen a lot of drama down at that end of the street. and at times it has gotten so loud we could hear the yelling at the end the road. The drama has not always been with Sarah, there was other neighbors involved in disputes, I don't know the details and I don't care to know. The few conversations I have had with Sarah have always been nice, i have nothing against her, and to me this is not a matter of *freedom of speech*. it a matter of seeing the world thru the eyes of a child at Christmas. and the image on her roof in is the first time that "X"-mas light really applies. It's about morals and doing whats right. It should be about seeing the wonder and joy in a childs eyes as the lights go up all over the neighbor hood. We have a lot of young children in our neighborhood, I don't want them to see that. Let them be children as long as possible. I just happened to be the neighbor at home when the paper came by and asked to talk to me. So I guess I get all the blame? What about the other neighbors who was all out Sunday night when the police came by, Jason & Hillari, Mrs Gayle, Amy, Hunter & Kayla, Liz & Linda, Kelly, Marlene & Felix, Cord & Hope, Shantel and and many others. We all agreed this was an ugly thing to do for the childrens sake, if it was meant for 1 person it totally went above and beyond that. I wish Sarah well, I Thank her for taking the lights down, I pray she doesnt put them back up, for all the children in the neighborhood... mine, hers, & all the neighbors children. I hope she can find new ways to express herself, I wish that her and whatever neighbor she has personal issues with, can work out their problems, and that it does not involve the whole neighborhood. Thank you Gemma Rachal

9) Comment by ebbette - 28/11/2012

Funny, the ACLU only cares to get involved if it is the civil rights of certain groups that are allegedly being violated. If the ACLU was truly what they claim, they'd be for ALL who have their civil rights violated. As an adopted person, my civil right to have access, as an adult, to my original birth certificate is violated yet the ACLU doesn't care one bit. We are the only group which has a document that is stamped with the raised seal claiming "This is a true and correct copy" when much of it is lies. My adoptive father did NOT sign my birth certificate two days after I was born - he didn't know me until I was three months of age. The doctor's name is typed, not handwritten and the name of the hospital is not named. There are several other things as well but as the mother of four and grandmother of four and the friend of many who have both, I don't know ANY father who filled out and signed the birth certificate paper work. So until the ACLU is willing to fight for the civil rights of ALL who have their rights dismissed and not just their CHOSEN select group of people, I will always consider them a bunch of (in keeping with the holiday season) fruitcakes. By the way, adoptees ARE members of a minority group so that argument is a moot one. As for the "N" word, how ridiculous the group of people that word refers to use it all the time. A friend of mine asked of one in a group using that word loudly and often to each other, a word that I hate to hear (even as a CRACKER), we were told when THEY use it as a "term of endearment". I find the word offensive but don't tell ME you use it in a "loving manner" yet be ready to fight or even kill a white person who uses it. You can't have it both ways - or shouldn't be able to anyway. PATHETIC. As for the "finger" on the roof seems to fit the same idea that freedom of speech is fine until it has the ability to hurt others - you can't yell FIRE in a crowded theater - so at the point young children see it and as most young children are naturally curious so ask questions, the line has been WELL crossed.

10) Comment by BRmoderate - 28/11/2012

Just because you "Can" doesn't mean you "Should"......I think I might do this in my neighborhood in the hopes that the police fine me. I can then sue the pants off them to pay off my Christmas gift debt... win/win for me!!!

11) Comment by Chucky - 28/11/2012

Well twinkie1cat - if I put the N word on my roof would it be a different tune you sing ? And I must say when I did my Halloween decorations I made sure I did not use any nooses for hanging Goules. If you are OK with nooses and N Word displayed then your more open-minded than me.

12) Comment by mcarter - 28/11/2012

Sure "the kids will be okay" but I like to see what hers are up to in a few years. @Twinkie1cat, you know or you are assumming the police chief is a conservative?

13) Comment by twinkie1cat - 28/11/2012

Y'all better pray this does not make the national news. Louisiana is already at the top of ALL the bad lists. And now Livingston Parish is at the top of the bad of the bad list. Santa might hear about this. All you Republicans had better be good for the next month or so.

14) Comment by twinkie1cat - 28/11/2012

"A threatening letter from the ACLU doesn't mean anything to me", the police chief said. Why do conservatives always puff up at the ACLU. They defend EVERYONE'S right to free speech, conservative and liberal and may be keeping Denham Springs from having a huge lawsuit that will cost them a lot of money. The ACLU is not your enemy, Denham. Listen to them for a change. America is a free country and you cannot tread on someone else's free speech no matter what KIND of speech and how offensive it is. Don't you think the liberals would shut up the hate preachers if they could? And if they did, the ACLU would be down on them just like on you. Don't puff up. Listen.

15) Comment by Being_Stupid - 28/11/2012

The apes at the zoo give kids the middle finger all the time. The kids will be okay.

16) Comment by Chucky - 28/11/2012

If she spelled the meaning of the finger out in lights on top of her roof would that be illegal ?

17) Comment by Stephen - 28/11/2012

The First Amendment protects us all from expressing ourselves. If the neighbors think that her expression is wrong, then they can say something opposing it. They do not get to have her arrested or intimidated. Period.

18) Comment by DMJ - 28/11/2012

Wait...you can flip off a cop?? Now that's freedom.

19) Comment by mrsladyface - 28/11/2012

People these days really need to regain moral sense. While I do agree that it is her house and if she chooses to portray herself in such an immature, trashy manner, that's her decision. It doesn't make anyone look bad but herself. The only thing that bothers me about it is children seeing it and mimicking it. There are enough issues with children these days with people's lack of proper parenting skills they don't need that sort of filth flashing on rooftops during the supposed most cheerful time of the year.

20) Comment by JayGreen78 - 28/11/2012

If I remember correctly, a woman mad at how traffic was being handled at an intersection, shot the traffic cop the bird. The cop gave her a ticket for public obscenity. The case went to the Supreme Court, who stated that 1) the action was an expression of free speech & 2) that the gesture was interpretive. The ACLU is only reminding public entities that we do have laws that have been upheld in a court of law, not the court of public opinion.

21) Comment by DMJ - 28/11/2012

It's her house. She should be able to put whatever she wants on it. Besides, in a country where the Supreme Court says its legal for Westboro Baptists to yell at military funerals, certainly it's legal for someone to put the Bird on their own roof. Love or hate the ACLU, they're absolutely correct on this one. And look at the bright side....Denham Springs will make the news for something other than exploding meth labs and Klan rallies.

22) Comment by HerbF - 28/11/2012

The CL in ACLU is Civil Liberties, and they are very important to America in defending them. The rights they protect belong to everyone. The abuses of those rights are inevitably against minorities. Thus, they will never win a popularity contest, but I am very, very grateful that they are here.

23) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 28/11/2012

It's odd the ACLU takes on this issue, but when an armed government thugs assaults you, they're nowhere to be found.

24) Comment by Chucky - 28/11/2012

Diversity, it's only OK if you agree with the diverse, and I thought the middle finger was used for driving directions.

25) Comment by nimby? - 28/11/2012

the ACLU did defend the KKK in their bid in northern Georgia to adopt a section of highway for clean-up ...

26) Comment by leftbr - 28/11/2012

The ACLU should be concentrating on more important Civil Liberties issues, ie, Sid Geautreaux and his thugs violating the rights of citizens, Sid, Captain Harris, Captain Young, Officers Pitre, Jenkins, Lilly, Bush, !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Many violations to protect the captains step-daughter and all her hidden issues from the Riverdale Common HOA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

27) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 28/11/2012

Ha, the police are scrambling to remove the egg from their face. There is no such law that cover someone putting a "You're Number 1" on your roof or anywhere else. I agree that it is tasteless but not unlawful. And 2 spqr you really amaze me I feel sorry for you. You take this stuff so personal, but I forgive you, for your attacks.

28) Comment by lovemykids - 28/11/2012

Spqr I felt the same way when the ACLU defended Rush Limbaugh.

29) Comment by barmart - 28/11/2012

Traveler is right on regarding this lady's character. She must be one unhappy person, and to expend such effort to dis her neighbors... WOW! I feel for her children and worry for their futures.

30) Comment by spqr - 28/11/2012

The ACLU continues to go against the majority and good taste in its continued efforts to dismantle American culture and barbarize the nation into we are all numb to what is left that is decent. A real anti-American organization. They represent intellectual trash.

31) Comment by dday198 - 28/11/2012

the bad thing is it got this far and this bad between neighbors

32) Comment by dday198 - 28/11/2012

the bad thing is it got this far and this bad between neighbors

33) Comment by dday198 - 28/11/2012

i thought the middle finger meant "hello my friend ."

34) Comment by Traveler - 28/11/2012

The ACLU is correct. The Constitution gives Ms. Henderson the right to be rude, tasteless, vulgar, and mean-spirited in her self-expression, if she so chooses. Her neighbors will just have to look away while she vents.

35) Comment by Bighug - 28/11/2012

Typical Livingston Parish politicians. They don't seem to have learned their lesson after paying thousands of dollars to ACLU lawyers in the past when they tried to restrict people's Constitutional rights. Oh, well, it isn't like it was their own money.