School Board to get mileage reimbursement

Advocate staff photo by LIBBY ISENHOWEREast Baton Rouge Parish School Board Vice President Tarvald Smith on Thursday objects to proposed changes to School Board's travel rules, saying it's not fair for School Board members to receive more in travel reimbursement than teachers and other district employees. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by LIBBY ISENHOWEREast Baton Rouge Parish School Board Vice President Tarvald Smith on Thursday objects to proposed changes to School Board's travel rules, saying it's not fair for School Board members to receive more in travel reimbursement than teachers and other district employees.

The East Baton Rouge Parish School Board on Thursday opted not to increase per diem for board members’ travel, but agreed to reimburse board members mileage for driving to School Board meetings from work and perhaps from home as well.

Also Thursday, the School Board voted unanimously and without discussion to rebuild the recently reopened Lee High School, 1105 Lee Drive, in Baton Rouge. It was closed in 2009 to avert state takeover.

The change in the travel rules for School Board members caused a lot of debate because it will treat board members differently from other employees in the school district.

Employees can get reimbursed for mileage on their personal vehicles only for approved travel undertaken after they arrive at their school or work site. With the change, School Board members will be able to get reimbursement — the current rate is 50 cents a mile — when they travel to a meeting from work. They also can get reimbursement from home if they work from home or are unemployed.

The board, however, stopped short of changing the per diem. The proposal had been to increase it from the current range of $40 to $55, in keeping with IRS per diem guidelines, to the higher range of $46 to $65 that is used by state employees. This daily allowance covers the cost of meals when board members travel, primarily to in-state and out-of-state conferences.

Board member Jerry Arbour made the motion to approve the mileage reimbursement but not the increased per diem. The vote was 10-1 in favor.

School Board members are legally considered part-time employees of the schools, but they are hired, or fired, by the voters.

Superintendent Bernard Taylor said the change will cost a little more and defended treating board members differently from other employees.

“Board members are not staff,” Taylor said. “There is not one of you here who contractually I am responsible for.”

Still, Taylor said he is being asked to referee disputes over rules that apply to elected officials, suggesting that the board set up a special committee to handle such matters.

“I do not like being put in this position,” he said. “I respectfully ask that I not be put in this position.”

School Board Vice President Tarvald Smith was the only no vote. He said he will not seek reimbursement for travel to board meetings and would have rejected the increased per diem in favor of the rate all employees receive.

Smith said it’s hard to justify paying School Board members more even, just a little bit, when employees have not seen a pay raise in years.

“As elected board members, we need to show some leadership in saying we’re not going to take another crumb out of the cookie jar when we haven’t done for our employees,” Smith said.

Board member David Tatman said he does not seek reimbursement for mileage now, but said some board members live and work far away from the School Board office and the cost of traveling to meetings adds up.

“I want to make sure that you don’t have a board that you have to be well to-do to sit on,” Tatman said.

Thursday’s vote to rebuild Lee High on its current site, estimated to cost $58.5 million, allows the school system to hire an architect to start drawing up plans so that it can open for during the 2015-16 school year. Rebuilding the school will involve tearing down the one-story structure and, beginning in spring 2014, rebuilding it as a two-story building that would house about 1,200 students.

Building a similar school in a new location would have meant spending $3 million to pay for land and expected wetlands mitigation, which would likely delay construction for a year, school officials have said. However, students could remain at the current site while construction occurred elsewhere.

Rebuilding Lee High at its current location, however, also means that in fall 2013, just a year after reopening, students could have to move to another location for two years. That swing space would have to house the 226 freshman and sophomores at Lee High, as well as the hundreds more expected there as the school expands and adds grade each year in the next two years. A magnet program is planned in fall 2013.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (12)


1) Comment by concernedandangry - 18/11/2012

Good for you Mr. Smith! I appreciate your attitude. No one every gave regular employees the option to vote on whether or not we could get reimburesed for our travel to and from work from our homes (FYI mine is 36 miles round trip each day, not counting trips to central office or meetings we are required to attend). Furthermore, no one gave us the option to vote on whether or not we would not recieve a pay raise in 3 years or increase the cost of our health insurance either. I as well as many others in the EBRPSS are in serious financial straights because of the board members voting patterns. Again, I thank you Mr. Smith for "getting it".

2) Comment by spqr - 17/11/2012

Over $58 million to build a new school. Better keep that money in the bank. When Woodlawn breaks away (and they will) no one wants to hear the remarks about budget shortfalls. Be careful...

3) Comment by WhoCares - 16/11/2012

If David Tatman considers "well to do"being able to buy your own gas once a month than he is an idiot. This is laughable.

4) Comment by Get Real - 16/11/2012

This is shameful absolutely SHAMEFUL

5) Comment by Doll2000 - 16/11/2012

It should be a law that the board members are educators! Most of them are just Mothers or lawyers that know nothing about what goes on inside a classroom! It is a waste of money to send all these people anywhere unless they work with a group of children in a classroom wouldn't that be great. The test scores just might improve!

6) Comment by Frustrated - 16/11/2012

I commend Mr. Smith for taking the high road on the matter. There is no justification for raising the reimbursement rate when the budget is so tight. Maybe the amount is not significant compared to the total but it is really is the principle of the thing.

7) Comment by Concerned_Parent - 16/11/2012

This is absolutely shameful. As an elected official, you made the decision to run knowing where your house is and where the school board office was located. If you thought you could not afford to drive to meetings, you shouldn't run. These board members should go find out how much personal money their teachers spend in their classrooms every year and then consider whether or not it is justifiable to want to collect on mileage to drive to meetings they CHOSE to be a part of. I can understand getting reimbursed for driving 2 hrs to attend a function/meeting to benefit the school system, but not for regularly scheduled board meetings. Why don't we start reimbursing parents that drive their kids to school everyday? They do it EVERYDAY, not once or twice a month.

8) Comment by Being_Stupid - 16/11/2012

Once the voucher system is in place, the only duties of the school board will be to operate a few government schools for the lowest of low students that cannot enroll into private schools because of their bad behavior, oversee standardized testing to ensure the schools receiving vouchers are turning out good students and meeting the grade, and well that is about it. The rest will be handled by the Private Sector and good ole American Capitalism. Our crime rate will drop too, once these kids trapped in the inner city start receiving a real education and discipline via vouchers in private schools.

9) Comment by Being_Stupid - 16/11/2012

Please don't waste taxpayer money on rebuilding Confederate E. Lee High School. Once the Voucher System takes over there will be no need for that school anymore. Give the campus over to BREC and let them turn it into a park with some trees and maybe a pond with some ducks.

10) Comment by Being_Stupid - 16/11/2012

Another typical school board meeting. A lot of talk about nothing.

11) Comment by tradewinns - 16/11/2012

want to stop the stupidity? recall whoever proposed this change. that'll get all their attentions and remind them they are "servants of the people". once they feel they are better than those they serve, they will continue to pay themselves more and more. why? cause they will feel they are worth it.

12) Comment by Bouncer - 16/11/2012

Absolutely shameless. Hogs at the trough.