State decides against widening I-10 between split and bridge

Show caption

The state has dropped plans to seek ways to widen Interstate 10 between the Mississippi River Bridge and the I-10/12 split, a top state official said Friday.

“It would be a very expensive endeavor,” said Sherri LeBas, secretary of the state Department of Transportation and Development.

The issue has sparked controversy for years.

An earlier bid to widen the corridor died amid criticism from Perkins Road overpass business owners, neighborhood leaders and others.

LeBas said in November 2011 that the state would solicit public input on ways to improve traffic along the 4-mile route, which is the site of daily tie-ups.

She reiterated that view in July and said she hoped to hold public hearings late this year or in early 2013.

“My personal and professional opinion is we need to look at doing something between the bridge and the split,” LeBas said then.

A $1.2 million study, which was already under way, will be recast.

“It is still a good project,” LeBas said. “It is one for the future.”

The new focus, she said, will be to look at surface streets in Baton Rouge for improvements that can be made more quickly, especially in light of recent backups on I-10 and I-12 after major accidents.

One such example, LeBas said, is the state’s announcement in September to add a northbound lane to the 1-mile section of Essen Lane between Perkins Road and I-10, another stretch of daily traffic tie-ups.

The cost is $12 million.

“We have been in discussions with the city-parish of Baton Rouge,” she said. “We are in this together.”

LeBas said the state’s “economic situation” — Louisiana already has a $12.1 billion backlog of road and bridge needs — was another factor in dropping efforts to tackle the work.

About a decade ago, the state wanted to spend $200 million to widen I-10 from the foot of the bridge to Essen Lane before that plan died.

Any new effort to do something similar would have cost considerably more, officials said.

Legislative attempts to find more money for roads and bridges have gone nowhere in recent years.

Perkins Road overpass business owners Friday praised the decision, especially amid what they called robust times among the restaurants, bars and shops that dot the area.

“I am pleased to know it is off the drawing boards,” said Danny Plaisance, the longtime owner of Cottonwood Books and a critic of widening efforts.

Troy Menier, whose family has operated Troy’s Barber Shop since 1969, echoed that view.

“I didn’t want it,” Menier said. “My building would be taken out.”

Steve Yellot, the owner of Bolton’s Pharmacy, which has been in operation since the 1950s, said most any project would have devastated his and other businesses, including those along Perkins Road.

LeBas downplayed the role that criticism had in the state’s decision.

“I actually received comments on both sides of this,” she said.

Critics note that eastbound traffic funnels off the bridge into one lane, which they say is the only such spot on the coast-to-coast interstate.

At the same time, I-10 motorists trying to reach the Washington Street exit often come to a near halt on the interstate while motorists leaving the bridge are trying to merge into the center and left lanes.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (19)


1) Comment by mcdonaat - 11/11/2012

So Baton Rouge, a city with about 600,000 people, has two bridges. St. Louis, a city on the same river with 300,000 people, has seven. Why not just extend La 415 south and across the river at Gourrier/Nicholson area, and send truck traffic south along La 1 to Donaldsonville? Take I-10's exit only ramp for Washington and remove it (you can move Washington's exit from 110 instead of 10), and make 10 East four lanes until Dalrymple. Trucks slowing down from 60 MPH to 35 around the one-lane curve is why traffic backs up daily. I-10 was an afterthought in the 60's. The Baton Rouge Expressway was already built, and most traffic in BR used 110 instead of 10. It's why 10 has two lanes exiting at the 10/110 split, while 110 has three.

2) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 11/11/2012

2 Attila ....wasn't comparing populations. I was referring to the traffic boondoggle.

3) Comment by Attila - 10/11/2012

You are right Hello Baton Rouge. The Washington St. exit is about as useless as teats on a catfish, but to close it will take an act of Congress, the legislature, the DOTD, and divine intervention. Oh, and don't forget about the Justice Department because everyone knows that closing that exit would only be done because of racial reasons. Closing that exit would discriminate against the 10 cars that use it daily...but it sure would help the congestion coming off of the bridge...not to mention lower the accident rate in that stretch, but when did common sense ever enter an equation when race is involved.

4) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 10/11/2012

They should do this in legs. The first leg should be widening it from the curve all the way across the lakes. Lets face it, maybe 10 cars a day get off at Washington Street. That needs to be closed and that lane should continue over the lakes and merge before the Perkins overpass. I understand the dismay of the local business owners, but do we really want to remain the bottleneck of the country (literally) east to west based on not wanting to close a barber shop? I'm more than positive there are ample spots to relocate very close to that area where the patronage would certainly continue. I'd look at this as an opportunity to land myself a brand new building on the state's dime instead of not wanting to lose my asbestos infested relic of a building. The longer this is put off the more it will cost. Just the study alone hit us for a million dollars. I'd have done it for about $100,000 personally. We need to act now before the cost continues to grow. Traffic isn't getting any better, just worse.

5) Comment by Attila - 10/11/2012

All of you loop proponents need to do your homework before betting the house that a loop will solve our traffic problems. If you take the time to peruse the information that is out there you will conclude that the only thing that will alleviate traffic congestion in the B R area is to GET THE LOCALS OFF OF THE INTERSTATE AND ON TO SURFACE STREETS. A public private partnership to build Kip Holden Boulevard will NEVER pay for itself with tolls. The taxpayers of the state will have to pony up hundreds of millions every year to meet the financial obligations to the Chinese "investors". The 610 loop in Houston is 38 miles in circumference. Kip's Folly is proposed as an 85 - 105 mile TOLL rd. Comparing the population of the B. R. metro area to that of Houston is absurd.

6) Comment by tball - 10/11/2012

Who was the genious that created the I-10 one lane mess going East?? If you fix this problem, the Feds and State would lose all the extra gas tax dollars that is burned-up, do to the traffic nightmare!!

7) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 10/11/2012

We are becoming Houston East, very rapidly.

8) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 10/11/2012

Why not just teach people how to drive, quit clogging traffic? How much would THAT cost?

9) Comment by spqr - 10/11/2012

Old bridge. New bridge. Old mall. New mall. Old state capitol. New state capitol. New governor's mansion. Old governor's mansion. New Women's hospital. Old Women's hospital. New Alex Box stadium. Old Alex Box stadium. New Bluebonnet Road. Old Jefferson Highway. Old Perkins Road. Old Hammond Highway. The new tiger cage. New Staring Road. LOL!

10) Comment by mj6338 - 10/11/2012

A few parochial minded/selfish individuals keep Baton Rouge in the previous century once again. This is why Smokie Bourgeois is in City Government: he owns that dumpy "restaurant" he calls "George's" which would be eliminated by the project. Other dumps which would also be gone would be "Ivar's" and "ZZ Gardens". Newer/cleaner more functional businesses would be taking their place. Besides, does BR really need an "Ivar's" that has its wait staff pushing excessive alcohol sales onto its clientele of mostly twenty somethings who don't really know their limits?? This is a missed opportunity to improve BR.

11) Comment by Whatchange - 09/11/2012

Tie hwy 3127 into the interstate before the bridge around hwy 415, a lot of the big truck traffic would take this route. Seams the best thing to do since apparently Perkins Roads overpass business owners own Baton Rouge.

12) Comment by nouveaurouge - 09/11/2012

Put a commuter lane down the middle--westbound in the morning, eastbound in the afternoon. Pay a toll to use it.

13) Comment by NewsReader - 09/11/2012

Tea_Slayer, the problem is the people in the outer-Parishes aren't getting a say on whether we want it or not. Parish Presidents are making up their minds without voter input. Believe it or not there are MANY out here who do want a loop. You really think those sitting in traffic aren't for a loop? But you can't widen I-12 and I-10 and then have nothing change from the split to the bridge. That's just dumb. And btw obviously you fail to comprehend sarcasm.

14) Comment by Being_Stupid - 09/11/2012

Did a NIMBY with political connections put a stop to this transportation improvement project?

15) Comment by Being_Stupid - 09/11/2012

The State Government will need to widen I-10 between College and the New Bridge sooner rather than later. Also need a loop and bypass Interstate along the west side of the river that reconnects via 2nd Bridge over Mississippi River with I-10 between South EBR and North Ascension. Do it now rather than later. Cut all these stupid welfare and social projects to the Takers and build roads. The Function of Government is to build roads. Let the expropriations begin!

16) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 09/11/2012

NewsReader, try living up to your moniker. The NIMBYs have killed it numerous times in the past. No one has said that widening from the bridge to the 10/12 split is the cure-all. A loop is still needed but the “outer-Parish” NIMBYs have killed that

17) Comment by NewsReader - 09/11/2012

Must be those darned nimby's in BR with some clout who just want loops and widening through outer-Parish areas instead of comprehending the concept of a bottleneck... Progress again.

18) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 09/11/2012

phil, probably less than the Audubon bridge linking rich folks to their camps...

19) Comment by phil - 09/11/2012

How expensive?