Jindal asked to reconsider

Advocacy groups want state to expand Medicaid coverage

Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal is being urged by Louisiana Democratic leaders and advocacy groups to reconsider his opposition to expanding the state’s Medicaid coverage, now that the presidential campaign is over.

President Barack Obama’s re-election is expected to stall efforts to repeal the national health care overhaul, which includes the Medicaid expansion.

“It’s time for Gov. Jindal to start governing Louisiana and stop politicking,” said Amite state Rep. John Bel Edwards, who chairs the caucus of House Democrats.

“He could just say, ‘I disagree with it. I think it’s unconstitutional. But I have to make a decision and I can’t not otherwise provide for 400,000 uninsured.’”

The head of the Louisiana Democratic Party, state Sen. Karen Carter Peterson, said families, businesses and health care providers can benefit from the law’s provisions.

“The Louisiana health care provider community — from private practices to community hospitals to our public hospital system — needs access to the resources that this law provides and that other states will receive the benefit of, regardless of whatever political gains Gov. Jindal believes his obstruction gains him,” Carter said in a prepared statement.

Jindal hadn’t responded Thursday to multiple requests for comment about whether he’d change his stance.

Jan Moller, leader of the Louisiana Budget Project, which advocates for low- and moderate-income families, also is pushing Jindal to take another look at the possibility of expanding the government-run health insurance program to give more people access to care.

The Medicaid expansion would cover adults up to 133 percent of the poverty level — $14,856 for an individual or $30,656 for a family of four, according to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation.

Estimates are that as many as 400,000 Louisiana residents would be eligible to get insurance under the expansion.

Jindal has said he won’t allow Louisiana to participate in the expansion, though the federal government will cover the full costs from 2014 through 2016 and pick up most of the price tag after that.

The governor described the program as too expensive, citing estimates the Medicaid expansion would cost Louisiana $3.7 billion over 10 years.

He’s also philosophically opposed to the growth of the federal government health care program, saying that insurance is better handled by private companies.

Considered a possible 2016 presidential contender, Jindal campaigned for Republican Mitt Romney’s failed presidential bid and supported the repeal of the health care law.

But with Obama’s win and Democrats’ retention of U.S. Senate control, repeal is considered a dead idea by many.

“Failing to expand Medicaid would leave 400,000 Louisianans out in the cold. And it would squander an opportunity to pump hundreds of millions of dollars into our state economy,” Moller said.

Moller and Peterson both referred to cuts that Jindal has made to the university-run public hospital system that cares for the poor and uninsured, saying that the Medicaid expansion is even more necessary because Louisiana’s safety-net health care system is offering fewer services.

Jindal didn’t respond to an interview request, and his office didn’t answer questions about the Medicaid expansion.

The governor’s health secretary, Bruce Greenstein, also didn’t respond to questions about the issue.

In a statement about Obama’s victory, however, Jindal did suggest that the president’s re-election wouldn’t alter decisions for his home state.

“Here in Louisiana, we will continue to do what we have always done, and that means standing up for our people and doing what we think is right no matter who is president,” Jindal said in the statement.

The Advocate Capitol news bureau contributed to this report.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (10)


1) Comment by beabea - 09/11/2012

The Jindal administration loves to talk about how much this program will cost. Of course it costs something; nothing is free. But what they don't talk about is how much MORE it will cost us, both economically and in terms of lives needlessly cut short, to continue to have so many uninsured people. Jindal will never be president. His legacy will instead be the people who suffered and died for lack of health care they could have had if not for Piyush Jindal and his delusions of grandeur.

2) Comment by Stephen - 09/11/2012

“Here in Louisiana, we will continue to do what we have always done, and that means standing up for our people and doing what we think is right no matter who is president,” Jindal said in the statement. Jindal does not seem to notice that we are last or second to the last in nearly all the health measures tracked nationally. So, doing 'what we have always done' is stating that we will continue to fail. Jindal is a failure as Governor and he is ready to jump ship the first chance he gets. He lied to our faces by suggesting that he was not lobbying to get the vice presidential nod. This is not funny. Jindal is endangering our health. I cannot wait for a real Louisianan, like Jay Dardene (R) or John Bel Edwards (D), to be governor and trying to fix our problems rather than run for higher office at all times. Please note I am bi-partisan with my potential replacements.

3) Comment by shills85 - 09/11/2012

First of all, Louisiana is going to be in a jam over the next 10 years anyway. Look at the situations here with the cost of living and the pay a lot of us are making. Look at the cuts that were made, and the salaries that were given to those whose jobs were replaced. If Governor Jindal was interested in really saving money in Louisiana, why did he approve such large salaries with certain positions. You're correct Sandy about one thing, and that is the election surely will not change anything especially in LOUISIANA! Some folks don't care about what happens to the ederly, so what makes anybody think folks will care about our future here in Louisiana. I don't blame any young adults for leaving here after college. What will their education be worth here? Nothing but STRUGLES AND STRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

4) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 09/11/2012

Hey Sandy...How about reinstating the (partially) repealed Stelly Plan? We have lost BILLIONS in revenue because the income tax rates were lowered back to pre-Stelly rates but the sales tax rates remained lowered. "Stelly passed out a chart showing a more than $2 billion reduction in state revenue over five years because of the [partial] repeals [of the Stelly Plan]. At the same time, state government is struggling to pay for basic public services." --- http://theadvocate.com/news/3208321-123/stelly-tax-deals-cost-la

5) Comment by Sandy - 09/11/2012

This part bears repeating: "Medicaid expansion would cost Louisiana $3.7 billion over 10 years." Which of you do-gooders will write the check to cover that? Despite the re-election of Obama, we are still broke and getting broker. That is one thing the election did not change.

6) Comment by IH8Mud - 09/11/2012

Maui, this is a pattern that has taken on speed with this administration in that when they (or the people that they appoint or hire) cannot get rid of an entity or service in one way, they find ways to make it painful or unsuccessful and then they have still achieved their goals. This is not dissimilar to how the IT department at DHH was run into the ground and will end up costing the state much more through contracts. They were unsuccessful in eliminating the positions because the Civil Service Commission saw through the magically creative "cost savings" that were presented to them and rejected the proposal. Of course, that didn't stop the persons in charge of the IT department from scaring everyone, lying to them, and making their work so miserable that they left on their own, thereby achieving the same goal without having to get Civil Service approval.

7) Comment by DMJ - 09/11/2012

Remember years ago, when people were saying "You shouldn't vote for Bobby Jindal"? Well...this is what they were talking about.

8) Comment by anonomous - 09/11/2012

News elsewhere:WASHINGTON - Top Republican lawmaker John Boehner said on Thursday he would not make it his mission to repeal the Obama administration's healthcare reform law following the re-election of President Barack Obama. "The election changes that," Boehner, speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, told ABC news anchor Diane Sawyer when asked if repealing the law was "still your mission." "It's pretty clear that the president was re-elected," Boehner added. "Obamacare is the law of the land."

9) Comment by Maui09 - 09/11/2012

Little Bobby's goal is to close all the state's hospital. He cannot close the hospitals without legislative approval. He cannot cut their budget by more than 34.5%. This is medicaid money essentally -that Litttle Bobby will not accept. So Little Bobby isn't exactly closing these hospitals that care for our poor, He is just taking their life-breath funding so the hospitals cannot operate -and close on their own. Little Bobby can sit back and say " I did not close these hospitals!" Sneaky little devil-- isn't he.

10) Comment by beabea - 09/11/2012

This part bears repeating: “Failing to expand Medicaid would leave 400,000 Louisianans out in the cold. And it would squander an opportunity to pump hundreds of millions of dollars into our state economy,” Moller said. All of that health care that would be paid for by the ACA's Medicaid expansion, wouldn't just magically fall from the sky. That care is provided by people--people doing JOBS for which they get a paycheck, which they can then spend into the economy. Surely even those who don't think the government ought to provide health care for the poor, can agree that this much health care spending positively impacts our state's economy and therefore all of us. Not to mention, people who are finally able to get decent basic health care, won't be adding to the wait times in the shrinking number of emergency rooms. Again, something that benefits all of us.