Shelter accused of cruelty

CAA chief says claims are false

The nonprofit group that took over the city-parish’s animal shelter 14 months ago to reduce the number of animals that are euthanized every year has come under fire by some of its own employees who are alleging animal cruelty and mismanagement at the shelter.

Complaints about the Companion Animal Alliance’s shelter operations, both from CAA employees and from the public, spurred the parish’s Animal Control and Rescue Center to conduct an investigation earlier this month, according to a report prepared by the Animal Control and Rescue Center.

The investigation, headed by Animal Control Director Hilton Cole, found a lack of qualified supervisors, lack of policy and organization throughout the CAA, and “frustration and lack of confidence/respect from the rank and file employees towards management.”

Animal Control and Rescue Center is a city-parish agency that used to handle enforcement and shelter operations. The CAA asked to take over the sheltering, adoptions and euthanasia of animals so the shelter could eventually become a no-kill facility.

This is the second investigation by the Animal Control and Rescue Center over cruelty complaints that the CAA has been subjected to since it took over control of shelter services.

CAA Board President Christel Slaughter said the claims of animal cruelty are “absolutely” false, but admitted management needs to do a better job of communicating policy changes to the staff and the public. She said miscommunication is the crux of the employees’ frustration and their allegations.

In late September, a CAA employee sent an email to CAA board members with 27 bullet points detailing the concerns of employees, many of which were aimed at Kimberly Sherlaw, the CAA executive director.

Among the complaints:

  • The agency is “incredibly short-handed because Sherlaw has fired or forced the resignation of many of our best and most well respected employees.” Among those who were let go were Dr. Amy Cangelosi, a veterinarian, and Debbie Pearson, the interim director who led the agency before Sherlaw took over.
  • Sick or injured animals being denied timely medical attention.
  • Lack of necessary vaccinations, and unvaccinated animals being placed in holding areas with other animals, exposing “the entire shelter to illness and disease.”
  • Lack of cleaning supplies, including “bleach, nozzles, cat litter, and many other things.”
  • Animals being denied adequate food, “causing them to become malnourished and sickly.”

The email containing the complaints was signed by “staff members of the Companion Animal Alliance.” No names were attached, although the email was sent to CAA board members by a staff member named Jaden Stafford.

“As employee morale and animal care has plummeted, the death toll has drastically increased,” the email states.

Slaughter said only eight of the 26 CAA staff members supported the email and she has received eight other letters from employees who disavowed the complaint letter. Slaughter said every complaint was investigated and those that alleged illegal operations or violations of regulations were found to be without merit.

The CAA saves about half of the animals that come into the facility, Slaughter said, which is an improvement over the 20 percent rate the shelter was able to save had when it was under city-parish control.

Sherlaw said the CAA is in a transitional phase and has implemented new policies and procedures in recent weeks that have not been received well by some employees.

“I was prepared for some resistance, but certainly, we want to make sure that the community feels like they’re getting the answers they need in terms of our animal care and adoption processes,” Sherlaw said.

Sherlaw, who took over in April, is the CAA’s third director since August 2011. The first director, Laura Hinze, resigned less than two months after she started, following complaints of animal overcrowding and inhumane conditions.

Pearson served as interim director until Sherlaw was selected. Pearson was let go about six weeks ago, Slaughter said.

“We thanked her for her services, but she was not able to adjust to the new model,” Slaughter said.

The investigative findings by the Animal Control and Rescue Center, which echo some of the complaints in the email sent by CAA employee letter, among other things cited “the lack of a licensed veterinarian being on staff and present when needed.”

Slaughter said the agency formerly had an inhouse veterinarian but recently contracted with the LSU School of Veterinary Medicine, with a veterinarian who conducts rounds once a day. Slaughter said not properly informing the CAA’s staff of the change led to the erroneous perception that animals weren’t being treated.

Slaughter acknowledged that Dr. Craig Alberty, the veterinarian under contract with the LSU veterinary school to work with the CAA, is being investigated by Louisiana Board of Veterinary Medicine because of a complaint that he allowed non-certified personnel to euthanize animals.

However, Slaughter said, neither Alberty nor Sherlaw has violated any laws.

Councilman Mike Walker, who serves as the council’s chairman, has placed an item on the council’s Nov. 14 agenda requesting a report from the CAA. The agenda item calls for “taking whatever action is deemed necessary” to address the problems at the shelter.

Walker said he’s disappointed in the group’s lack of progress and thinks shelter operations were run better when they were under city-parish control.

“Hilton Cole would have never let this situation get to like it is today,” Walker said.

Slaughter said a lack of funding contributes to the CAA’s woes. The CAA receives about $460,000 annually from the city-parish, and budgets about $40,000 in monthly private contributions but sometimes falls short of the monthly fundraising goals, Slaughter said.

She said next year they will budget more conservatively, banking on about $5,000 to $10,000 in monthly donations.

Slaughter also said the agency will likely ask the city-parish for more operating funds.

The CAA initially asked for about $700,000 to $1 million from the city-parish for taking over shelter services. Asked why they went forward with the takeover despite not receiving adequate funding, Slaughter said they were “convinced that we could do better.”

“We were convinced that with less resources we could still bring in more volunteers and more private dollars,” she said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (13)


1) Comment by Lynn210 - 05/11/2012

Schmatzo, you are aware that most of the animals you take in contract a deadly disease and die from it or euthanized? They should ALWAYS get your driver's license. I would not send my enemy's roach to any shelter, anywhere! I work hard at adopted them out...you should reach out for help with s/n programs!

2) Comment by Schmatzo - 31/10/2012

I have brought several stray animals to the shelter over the past five or more years. They do not appear to be very organized. They don't take animals in until 11:00 in the morning, I don't know what the weekend schedule is like. They want you to fill out all sorts of forms, I asked them if I could just have a photo of my drivers license "blown up" and just hung on their wall, so I wouldn't have to start from scratch each time. At times the service is so poor, you get the impression that they would rather not take the animal in. The last time I went, I saw drops of fresh blood on the floor near the intake office. I was afraid to ask..You get the general impression that no one is in charge. I hope that some how or other something can be done to straighten that place out. I've spent several hundred dollars spaying and neutering stray animals, not to mention vaccinations and food, they are worth every penny, but private individuals cannot do it all. It is heartbreaking that these animals have to be in the middle of an ongoing mess like this. The process actually discourages people from bringing in strays and pets, resulting in more of these poor animals being abandoned on every back road you can think of, where they starve or get killed by traffic, or worse.

3) Comment by catgirl - 31/10/2012

I'm not and never have been an employee nor am I a volunteer but I have visited on numerous occasions over the past 5 years before and after it became CAA. The kill rate was astronomical before. The difference now is many rescue groups are trying hard to help get the animals out and adopted. This is hard to do when disease is so widespread. These groups are scared to rescue from there and face the emotional and financial burden of a sick or dying animal. Many of these animals are healthy on intake but dead within days. With so many animals entering the shelter (approximately 30 EVERY DAY) you have to stay on top of things 24/7 and you have to practice sanitary conditions as if you work in a hosptial. Some of these diseases are highly transmittable and there will be cross contamination if you aren't extremely careful. Being in a hurry because the work day ends soon and there isn't enough staff OR the staff isn't properly trained spells disaster. The only clear answer is spay neuter or you are fighting an uphill battle. There is tons of information on the internet about low income spay/neuter. One website with research on this subject is http://firepaw.org/analysisprogramswebversion.pdf We had a great program in place called Spay Baton Rouge but without spay neuter funds through donations and grant money it can't continue www.spaybatonrouge.org

4) Comment by joyluck - 30/10/2012

I ALSO am a volunteer at CAA and the allegations may not have been proven, but all that means is that the investigating body (who is in the same building) has no stake in wanting to find anything. Of course Animal Control doesn't want the job back from CAA. Why would they? It's difficult, dirty, and sad. And I doubt that the City Council will do anything. The last time I saw CAA at a city council meeting, Mike Walker spoke to Christel Slaughter in a familiar and friendly tone, so I can't see him actually coming down on them. And that CAA board of ivory tower wanna-be do-gooders is not going to want to admit that they failed. An INDEPENDENT body needs to do an UNANNOUNCED investigation. And I MEAN independent and unannounced. The animal welfare community is small and they all know each other. They have always known when it was coming. And by the way, poor communication and lack of morale does lead to animal neglect and cruelty, because things that need to get done don't get done. Is it a money problem? Yes, I think that is a big part of it, but it doesn't mean the allegations aren't true. They ARE true, even if they are "unproven" by an "investigation." - from an insider

5) Comment by Lynn210 - 30/10/2012

Mike walker has do e ZERO to help the animals of ebr parish. And Hilton? Mass gassing done on his watch. This shelter has a long way to go, but Mr. Walker needs to keep his mouth shut...he is clueless and is only giving kudos to a man who did nothing to reduce the kill rate. Hilton also demanded a huge portion if city parish funds...who cares about the poor animals dumped by ignorant ebr citizens! This far from over.

6) Comment by spqr - 30/10/2012

Hilton Cole is someone volunteers are afraid of. Cole is not what many want to believe he is; vindictive. Many times volunteers pay for simple medical procedures for animals because they do not want them returning to the shelter where there is no vet to care for them, which ultimately, leads to death for animals who can be cured of simple things. The volunteers know it and do not wish to hand those animals over to Animal Control. No way.

7) Comment by hlj0520 - 30/10/2012

"I AM a volunteer at the shelter. And a bunch of unproven allegations by employees who have been terminated does not make a truth. Let's see in the past month they have called the news cameras, Animal Control and now the printed press. In all of this there has never been anything substantiated. I hope all those reading recognize what a disgruntled ex worker looks like if not here is a prime example. " I am a former employee and HAVE THE PICTURES SHOWING THESE ANIMALS laying in filth, screaming in pain for days on end WITH NO medical attention other than a "we'll take care of it today" Do NOT sit there and act like that shelter is the Marriott you know good and well it is worse than ANY condemned building! Shelters need to be held to a higher standard. Our job was to protect and care for these helpless animals and when we tried doing just that (going through the PROPER chain of command I might add) we were fired for doing OUR jobs. We were all there for ONE reason and ONE reason only our love of animals and to do right by them. Unproven allegations, we HAVE proof of EVERYTHING, everything is documented and backed up by fact.

8) Comment by Stephen - 30/10/2012

“We were convinced that with less resources we could still bring in more volunteers and more private dollars,” she said. That quote from the article says it all. When you hear people saying that volunteers and donations are going to fix a poverty or social services issue (including animal care like in this case), please realize what you are really hearing is that we do not value certain individuals and that they are going to be expected to live off the scraps leftover from the meals that valued individuals indulge in.

9) Comment by animaladvocate - 30/10/2012

The article states that CAA is being investigated for cruelty however animal control's findings were employee human resource issues. None of which had anything to do with animals nor cruelty. This article is a perfect example of journalism "hooking" their reader with a title and then spinning the story. I AM a volunteer at the shelter. And a bunch of unproven allegations by employees who have been terminated does not make a truth. Let's see in the past month they have called the news cameras, Animal Control and now the printed press. In all of this there has never been anything substantiated. I hope all those reading recognize what a disgruntled ex worker looks like if not here is a prime example. Lastly, Mike Walker stated "taking whatever action deemed necessary" to address the problems. Does this mean Mr. Walker is going to assist the shelter in capital improvements through better funding. The building is literally falling down around them. Mr. Walker made many bold statements I wonder has he ever volunteered his time there that would be an action toward improvements.

10) Comment by Being_Stupid - 30/10/2012

A no kill policy is impossible. There is no way it can happen. Sometimes the only humane option is to put an animal to sleep rather than have it suffer for 6 months before it dies anyway.

11) Comment by phil - 30/10/2012

I was against this from the beginning because of a person involved in the original board, and I felt like this was just another method to obtain tax funds. Please do not misunderstand. I hate the thought that any animal is euthanized, and I also support the "no Kill" concept. However, what appears to me is that taxpayers have basically established another organization with associated salaries and expenses, and now taxpayers will be faced with paying a lot more for Animal Control and sheltering with little improvement to go along with those added expenses.

12) Comment by spqr - 30/10/2012

The allegations are true. Vets have been fired and it has denied medical attention to animals. Cages are stacked with animals inside like books. Those responsible for delivering animals to big box stores for adoption are cruel and uncaring frustrating vokunteers who see simple solutions to problems, but whose voices are not heard. Talk to volunteers. I have. Those in charge need to be replaced. NOW.

13) Comment by localgal - 30/10/2012

When one sees statements from the chairman of a board overseeing the care of helpless animals that sound like something from a Gordon Gecco character in a movie, it's easy to see why the CAA has had 3 different directors in just over a year and why there are so many complaints and problems.