Pharmacists: Plan is ‘horrible’

Community pharmacists remained upset Monday about Medicaid reimbursement changes, which they claim that even in an altered form would lead to financial losses and jeopardize their ability to remain open.

The state’s health chief said last week that revisions made in response to pharmacies’ complaints should quell the backlash.

But it didn’t happen, with Louisiana Independent Pharmacies Association President Randal Johnson dubbing as “horrible” the amended plan that begins Thursday. The roughly 500 members of the association are not affiliated with the big chain store pharmacies.

“What we are seeing is where it was a 19 percent cut, it’s rolled back to about a 16.5 percent cut,” Johnson said.

The average net income of community pharmacies is 2.9 percent, he said.

Johnson said the Medicaid cut creates a deep financial hole for the pharmacies, threatening their ability to stay open to serve all customers, not just those on Medicaid.

State Department of Health and Hospitals Secretary Bruce Greenstein disputed the pharmacies’ claim of the extent of the cut. “We don’t see that in our data. We think it is overstated. We are looking at in the ballpark of a 3 percent,” Greenstein said.

Greenstein said the agency will continue to monitor claims payments to see if the impact is greater than anticipated. The extent of the cut will depend on each pharmacy’s volume of Medicaid business, he said.

The community pharmacists strongly opposed new reimbursement rules that went into effect in early September that changed the basis on which they would be reimbursed for prescription drugs they purchase. Now, the group is opposing altered rules aimed at quieting the opposition.

The pharmacists and their legislative allies claimed that cuts associated with the changes would yield far more than the $32.5 million Medicaid budget savings projected.

For the past two months, DHH has been reimbursing for the average acquisition cost plus $10.13 per prescription. The independent pharmacists said they have to pay far more than the average cost that DHH has affixed to the drugs included in the program.

The pharmacists said officials relied on bad information from their financial advisers in setting the policy as well as average acquisition costs of drugs.

In response, DHH altered the new reimbursement rules effective Thursday providing for a markup of 10 percent on the average acquisition cost for generic drugs and 1 percent markup for brand name generics.

The dispensing fee paid will increase from $10.13 to $10.51 per prescription to cover more costs.

In addition, certain classes of specialty drugs which are more expensive and complex to stock and dispense than mass-market prescription drugs will be reimbursed on the higher average wholesale cost price plus 5 percent.

Johnson said the community pharmacies want to work with DHH but “we have got to question this untested, untried average acquisition cost methodology ... It’s like building a house on a bad foundation.”

“We have got to continue to plead with the department to recognize the actual numbers” for purchase of prescription drugs, Johnson said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (2)


1) Comment by TommyRucker - 30/10/2012

Unfortunately this is what happens when the economy goes bad. This is what happens as we move more into socialism and away from a prosperous economy. Jindal has no choice, there is less and less tax money and the state cannot print or borrow money like the feds. The only alternate is to pay more taxes and eventually the economy will totally collapse or work harder, make sacrifices and vote for people who will encourage policies that will lessen the burden that government entitlements have on our society. The poor economy is making it difficult for small businesses like these pharmacies to operate as they can't easily compete with the mega pharmacies and this has been a problem for years. The state unfortunately cannot afford to continue to subsidize these smaller pharmacies because the economy is bad and taxes are NOT coming in. Do you want to increase your taxes to subsidize these smaller pharmacies or do you want them to tough it out like the rest of us. We are ALL suffering from this Obama induced poor economy and it is going to get worse if he is re-elected. These pharmacies are the first of many casualties of the Obama economy and this thing is not going to be turned around fast. The weakest businesses are going to go down first and that is what is happening to these small pharmacies. You rely on the government for anything and you will be more disappointed than satisfied. The government gives and it can take away just as easily. The only solution is a return to a strong free enterprise system and that will not happen under Obama as he is the real socialist, not Jindal. Jindal is trying to hold down our taxes, so we can have enough money to buy medicine, food, gas, etc. Unfortunately as bad as he might want to, Jindal cannot come up with money the state does NOT have and I don't hear a lot of people asking to pay more taxes.

2) Comment by Pakistani - 30/10/2012

I'm sure most of these pharmacist voted for Pakistani boy and now don't like the Socialized way he is setting prices for their product. Not sure if I should feel sorry for them. Should have voted for someone who would have put the State of Louisiana first and his own ambitions second.