Pregnant woman stabbed; fetus killed

Baby dies; husband allegedly on bath salts

Deputies arrested a man after he allegedly cut a fetus from his 28-year-old pregnant wife’s abdomen, Livingston Parish authorities confirmed Tuesday afternoon.

The unborn child died, but hospital personnel stabilized the woman’s condition, Sheriff Jason Ard said.

Neighbor Julie Collins, who is an emergency room nurse, said she and paramedics aided the woman at the scene, where she heard the victim’s husband say he had ingested bath salts.

Bath salts are a type of synthetic drugs banned a year ago by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

The effects of bath salts on users may resemble those of LSD, cocaine and methamphetamines, according to reports.

Ard said that while using bath salts may cause erratic behavior, drug testing would have to determine what might have been in the system of suspect Jeffery Reynolds when he attacked his pregnant wife.

Collins said Reynolds is normally a nice man, but he was “howling like a wolf,” after law enforcement officers restrained him.

She said the fetus appeared to have been stabbed in the head.

Ard said the cause of death has not been determined and he could not say whether the fetus had been stabbed.

That will be determined by an autopsy, the sheriff said.

“In my 20 years (of law enforcement), I have never seen anything more gruesome,” Ard said.

He said deputies took Reynolds, 31, 30259 Milton Road, into custody and obtained warrants alleging he committed feticide and attempted second-degree murder.

Deputies transported Reynolds to a hospital, where he was being tested for drugs, Ard said.

After the tests, Reynolds would be booked at the Livingston Parish Detention Center, Sheriff’s Office, spokeswoman Lori Steele said.

Collins said she had never seen any evidence of abusive behavior or drug use by Reynolds in the past.

She said Reynolds, an electrician, had fixed things for her family without charge and had even fed her children meals on occasion.

“They’ve been wonderful neighbors,” Collins said of the couple. “I’ve never even heard them fight.”

The victim, Paula Reynolds, “is the nicest woman you have ever met,” Collins said.

Collins said Paula Reynolds’ greatest concern as she was being given first-aid in her home Tuesday was that her 6-year-old son would not get off his school bus and see her with the stab wounds.

A relative picked up the boy at school, authorities said.

The school bus later drove past the Reynolds’ two-story home, which is surrounded by trees, without stopping.

Neighbors said Jeffery Reynolds put the boy on the school bus Tuesday morning.

Neighbor Tim Teal said the Reynoldses had been friendly, but they never “get in anybody else’s business.”

Walker police went to the scene in response to a 911 call, which initially was classified as a medical emergency, but officers found they had to subdue the suspect, Ard said,

It took several officers to restrain and “strap down” Jeffery Reynolds, Ard said.

The Sheriff’s Office took over the case from the Walker Police Department once it was determined that the Reynolds residence is outside of Walker’s city limits.

Officials with the Sheriff’s Office said they didn’t immediately know who made the 911 call.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (47)


1) Comment by DMJ - 25/10/2012

Yeah, some liberal lawyer like E. Eric Guirard who was disbarred and is now a rapper whose debut album is called "Tea Party Anthem." Gimme a break. The U.S. Constitution guarantees everyone a lawyer. And that lawyer is sworn to provide the best defense as he/she can. Everyone hates lawyers...until they need one. Suddenly, they become real liberal.

2) Comment by CitizensArrest - 25/10/2012

Implicating lawyers for performing their sworn duties and trying to insult them with the tag "liberal"? HMaltravers, maybe one day you or one of your loved ones will be falsely accused and you can waive off the lawyers. Careful the hands you bite.

3) Comment by HMaltravers - 24/10/2012

Oh, he'll get some liberal lawyer who'll say he wasn't responsible. That the devil made him do it.

4) Comment by vanessacc11 - 24/10/2012

===【Agelesscupid ☆com】===-COOL for older men dating young women which has gained a widespread popularity to feel young and energetic in life for men,,and for women ,they may have a strong sense of security from older men. older men dating younger women/older women dating youger men.

5) Comment by Bouncer - 24/10/2012

This sort of heinous act is inexcusable, no matter what side of the political or religious fence you're sitting on.

6) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

Hey I only counted 20. well 21 now

7) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

I got 30 comments? let me go for 31. noone ever changes anyones mind in forums like this thats not the point.

8) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

a story about feticide has much to do with abortion, which is a literal feticide. abortion has much to do with religion and both exist as prominent political issues. all conversations evolve beyond the inital triggering topic. a teacher should know that. but then not all teachers are good teachers. do i need to find examples of instances where your own comments have nothing to do with the story? youre not a teacher anymore so enough with the finger wagging

9) Comment by CitizensArrest - 24/10/2012

Jed, lay off the bath salts brother. Step away from the keyboard. You aren't changing any minds despite your 30 comments out of 39 here.

10) Comment by nimby? - 24/10/2012

this story has nothing to do with abortion , religion or the election . I hope the mother recovers . there is no excuse for what the father did .

11) Comment by unitedstates1 - 24/10/2012

Pump the brakes, jedleland. I wouldn't be surprised if the husband/suspect had been involuntarily admitted into a mental hospital in the past. Perhaps, Mark, you could shed some light on this topic with which you have first-hand experience? LOL, didn't think so.

12) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

Take your pick

13) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

“As we mark the 39th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we must remember that this Supreme Court decision not only protects a woman’s health and reproductive freedom, but also affirms a broader principle: that government should not intrude on private family matters, I remain committed to protecting a woman’s right to choose and this fundamental constitutional right." Barack Obama

14) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

"I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my Mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a U.S. Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it." Mitt Romney

15) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

vote for who you like abortion isnt going anywhere. this fool in walker will get no judicial sympathy cause he took bath salts in fact that will only aggravate his circumstance. if youve ever known someone in a real state of involuntary pychosis maybe schizophrenic then they have no idea what theyre doing and cant be held responsible no matter how egregious or violent. this fool was voluntarily psychotic if that turns out to be his defence and no jury will make an allowance based on that.

16) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

reminds me of when they asked the first george bush who was one of the first rinos about abortion. he was playing up tot he anti abortion right wing at the time even though they didnt trust him he was telling them everything they wanted to hear about his pro life stance. a reporter asked waht he would do if his daughter ever came to him about an unwanted pregnancy and he blurted out that he hoped she would make the best decision. and he'd been trying so hard to placate the prolifers before that slip up. not that the gop could ever nominate a pro choice north eastern moderate blue blood republican who changed his positions at the last minute to please the bible and pitchfork rabble, could they? nah they wouldnt be that gullbile not again.

17) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

i got that stat wrong its actually 50% pro life and 41 % pro choice at present according to gallup

18) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

i should point out that gallup has the pro life margin as 50% pro chocie and 41% pro life as of may 2012 which is as large a margin as has been seen in a few years. the highest gap was 51% pro life in 2009 and the largest swing the other way was 56% pro choice in the 1990s. it ebbs and flows without consistency except in the fact that it changes. thats why there is no consensus legally or legistlatively. compare to gay marriage and the steady move toward emancipation over the last 20 years, and the progress made in states and large cities reflecting that. antiabortion movements simply dont have that momentum and never have and one reason is they just cant decouple themselves from the religious zealot element and that as i said repels as many as it attracts. if they can ever make it a larger secular humanistic cause rather than a sectarian one then things might change. as it is a bunch of people clutching bibles and screaming at you about how evil you are and how your going to hell aint going to cut it. just turns regular people off. a good case can be made but they have to get the religious right monkey iff their backs.

19) Comment by DMJ - 24/10/2012

People tend to be "pro-life" when it comes to other people's bodies. When it's their own, they are pro-choice. And in cases of feticide....when a fetus is born (not before) is when it ceases to be a fetus. Until then, it's legally and literally part of the woman and she can do with it what she chooses. Is it moral? It's not for us to say. That's between her and her conscience or her god or whatever. Abortion must always be legal so that it can be safe. We'd cease to be a civilized country otherwise. That being said...why are we even talking about abortion? This piece of trash didn't get an abortion; he stabbed somebody else. To even have to point out the distinction seems unnecessary.

20) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

i dont like abortions and i dont know of anyone thats ever had one. im a dude so its not much of apersonal issue but i cant imagine ever having one myself if I were not a dude. back to the central question does that mean i can make everyone elses mind up for them? look back on gay marriage and you see the same problem people who are convinced that all should be subject to their version of what is right and wrong via the law which is supposed to be secular. its that zealotry of religious absolutism that cripples the anti abortion movememnt and has left it making little progress in 30 some years you see it repels just as many as it attracts. and funnily enough even the god they cite as the moral underpinning for their cause is an abortionist and a gleeful one at that. as an atheist im often reminded that i cant be moral as i dont have a god or gods and deem them childish. and yet i can function as a moral being without that underpinning and i dont know how. what i really dont understand is a person claiming to be a christain and then claiming to be antiabortion when the christian god is clearly an abortionist and a good one at that. see my citations below.

21) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

you can live at 24 weeks and be viable and that number will probably drop but you miss the point your mistaking what is legal as a consensus and what is legal but maybe shouldnt be from what you find morally objectionable. if you cant separate the two then you just assign yourself the zealot label. how crazy is that?

22) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

so dont read them, what do i care?

23) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

polls are always a problem when they dont agree with what you want them to agree with and they do fluctuate but ask yourself why there has been no move to get abortion outlawed by the S Court? R v W was over 30 years ago and if most americans are religious and most are pro life and most are conservative then whats the holdup? two options one is that the cynical religous right likes to use the issue to get bible thumpers to the polls every 4 years before dropping the subject once more. another explanation is that there just isnt a consensus and even on a conervative s court the votes arent there and there simply arent enough people behind it. ask why obama keeps mentioning romneys anti abortion stance when he woos women voters? most women are pro choice and more vote than do men and any clever politician knows this. its not an overwhelming majority but its enough and in politics all you need is 50% and 1.

24) Comment by CitizensArrest - 24/10/2012

Jedleland, tl;dr. Learn to shorten up your thoughts if you want me to read them. I'm not religious, but I have seen 27 week old babies delivered and survive to be viable people. You sound like a crazy person that should seek help.

25) Comment by Whatnow - 24/10/2012

Most Americans are pro choice? Depends on who does the polls. I don't believe that for one second. Politicians make those decisions, unfortunately and not all politicians vote with their constituency.

26) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

as for religion, ask anti abortion people if its nothing to do with religion and they will disagree strongly. humanity mercy and religion are far from the same thing and if people really claim to believe that stuff in the bible then they need to own it and realise the character they grovel to every sunday is as much an inhuman abortionist as any doctor or planned parenthood clinic or fool high on bath salts. your god didnt think those babies had a right to life or their mothers and they all died only for having fathers and husbands on the losing team in a battle they ahd nothing to do with. if you want to gripe about abortion then cool its not a nice thing but dont go preaching the sanctity of your religion of life cause the facts just arent there. if you REALLY REALLY believe this stuff then you have to admit that you worship a practiced profligate and bloodthirsty baby killer. but i dont think most people believe it really. they just say they do when its convenient. like when gay people or nonwhites get a bit uppity.

27) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

there is absolutetly an inconsistency with why feticide is even a crime if a fetus is unviable why not just make it assaualt on the mother or attempted murder or whatever? why create a new victim whcih is not accorded the same right via the legal process of abortion? but thats down to the pressures on local and state law makers to adhere to the wishes of vocal lobbying groups. laws are riddled with thousands of inconsistencies and exceptions that make no sense and only put there becuase a lawmaker was under pressure from a group and so were enough of his colleagues to pass a bill. not all laws are good ideas you know and not all lawmakers are that smart. abortion laws have been wighed and given the highest constitutional vindication while these feticide laws have not at least not yet. a law must be challenged before it gets its day in court. a legislature can pass whatever the heck it wants and a court may never get around to reviwing it. thats why mississippi still had segregation and miscegany laws on the books until very recently. thats why you can have a legal abortion but commit the crime of feticide. democracy is a messy business oftentimes.

28) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

the difference is what is legal and what is not, at present the law decrees that abortion is legal and feticide is not. now you might consider that splitting hairs but all of law is concerned with drawing a boundary somwhere so 0.7 on your blood alcohol is OK but 0.8 is jail, 69 mph is OK but 71 is a ticket, 17 years and 364 days and you cant vote or smoke who knows what else but wait 24 hours and you can. law has to create these limits or treat every case on its own merits and no legal system can do that. we gripe about the limtis and they can be changed and often are but they still dtermine what is legal and what aint, not what is moral or what is not. they reflect a larger consensus and like it or not most americans are pro choice and dont favor illegality of abortion. if its majority rule youre after then thats something you have to accept like it or not. rights are legal constructs and determiend by general consensus in any culture and ours has decreed abortion legal and more women than men agree with that and more peopel agree with it than dont. when it comes to law reflecting the will of the people you have to take the rough with the smooth

29) Comment by Whatnow - 24/10/2012

@CitizensArrest, I agree. And then to be able legally to stick scissors in the back of the head of a newborn at birth or allowing it to just die is just as bad. How come it's not feticide? Just because the woman didn't want it? What is the difference? Inconvenience? It has nothing to do with religion, jedleland. It has everything to do with humanity and the right to life.

30) Comment by CitizensArrest - 24/10/2012

I hate to say it but how is this different from an abortion at 27 weeks? Is the trauma any greater to a baby being cut out than a baby being sucked out? A woman has the right to choose...the right to choose whether or not to engage in unprotected sex. The fact that anyone believes some woman can arbitrarily decide to kill a 27 week old baby versus a deranged man's decision to kill his 27 week old baby is ridiculous.

31) Comment by tradewinns - 24/10/2012

perhaps i am the only one but, i am tired of people trying to justify one illegal act because they perpetrated another illegal act prior. he ingested bath salts and then stabbed his pregnant wife? so somehow that reduces his responsibility for his actions? in my awkward way of thinking, it should compound the responsibilty of his actions. try telling the cop when next stopped for speeding that you had to speed, you are late for the group armed robbery at a bank. yeah, that'll work out well for you.

32) Comment by Chucky - 24/10/2012

Bath Salt Bad

33) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

cruelty toward infants babies and children is nothing new and will happen again unfortunately. but dont pretend your god has nothing to do with it the record is clear if you believe that sort of nonsense.

34) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

your god wasnt too crazy about inocent babies after they were born either : God commands the killing of infants and nursing babies. Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them. But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey. (1 Samuel 15:3) God repays your enemies by destroying their babies. Happy is he who repays you for what you have done to us. He who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks. (Psalms 137:8-9)

35) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

man another blocked one marchifava msut have complained again well here is the gist of it without taking him to task. really pointing out the idiocy of claiming to be on gods side in condeming this. sure its a terrible act we can all agree but its very isolated and uncommon and been going on for as long as there have been humans to calm the talk of end of times or eves of destruction even your god himself was happy to comitt such crimes so who would you pray to anyway? seems like he was a practitioner. loving and merciful you pretend? no way he was as bloodthirsty and cruel as any human which is about right as humans made him up. God will punish women by aborting their fetus through a miscarriage. “Give them, O LORD–what will You give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts.” (Hosea 9:14) God teaches the use of a bizarre ritual using cursed “bitter water” to abort a fetus who was conceived through infidelity. (Numbers 5:11-21) God orders Moses to kill every Midianite woman who was no longer a virgin. (many of these women would obviously have been pregnant) (Numbers 31:15-18) God promises to destroy the infants of Samaria and rip open the stomachs of pregnant women. The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open. (Hosea 13:16) God allows the pregnant women of Tappuah to be ripped open. At that time Menahem, starting out from Tirzah, attacked Tiphsah and everyone in the city and its vicinity, because they refused to open their gates. He sacked Tiphsah and ripped open all the pregnant women. (2 Kings 15:16)

36) Comment by BRmoderate - 24/10/2012

I am Pro-Life but I am also "Pro-Common Sense". If you all had a common sense of civility, you would not hijack this article and make it a platform for your beliefs on abortion. There is a mother fighting for her life right now. Spend your time praying for herhealth so that her 6 year old son does not have to go through life without a mom.

37) Comment by jedleland - 24/10/2012

A very nasty event for sure but anomalous and tagging it to perceived end of days or ungodliness is foolish at a marchiafava level. Strange cause marchiafava was 100% for killing children when Tim McVeigh did it. 19 of them. This kind of thing is fantastically rare and has been going on for millennia so don’t get all excited about end of days quite yet. Indeed your christian god has done this himself many times as described below (patheos.com) God will punish women by aborting their fetus through a miscarriage. “Give them, O LORD–what will You give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts.” (Hosea 9:14) God orders Moses to kill every Midianite woman who was no longer a virgin. (many of these women would obviously have been pregnant) (Numbers 31:15-18) God promises to destroy the infants of Samaria and rip open the stomachs of pregnant women. “The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open. (Hosea 13:16)” God allows the pregnant women of Tappuah to be ripped open. “At that time Menahem, starting out from Tirzah, attacked Tiphsah and everyone in the city and its vicinity, because they refused to open their gates. He sacked Tiphsah and ripped open all the pregnant women. (2 Kings 15:16)” did those unborn babies deserve it? i guess so but its ok thats one of the bits inthe bible you can ignore as inconvenient. if god did it cant we do it too? arent we supposed to be more like god? guess not.

38) Comment by Chucky - 24/10/2012

and you don't think we are on the eve of destruction.

39) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 24/10/2012

Thank you, A Reader, glad to know there's at least one reader who isn't brain dead and gets it.

40) Comment by A Reader - 24/10/2012

Horrendous headline and subheadline. Barbarous act. Sadly the same act has happened over 53 million times in our country since 1973 and the media turns a blind eye. The perpetrators of those crimes of abortion were not on drugs, though. Greed and misogyny are their demons. For women and men whose lives have been wounded by the abortion of their child or granchild or sibling, there is help at silentnomoreawareness.org God help our country!

41) Comment by BRmoderate - 24/10/2012

I applaud the efforts of all those involved. This had to be a very troubling event. Kudos to the mom for thinking about her other child and making sure he would not witness such a horrifying tragedy.

42) Comment by keith1966 - 24/10/2012

@markedwardmarchiafava: Time and place! This story is neither of the 2 for your argument!.

43) Comment by pseudonymous - 24/10/2012

@MEM, you're a sad, lonely, bitter person... I'd be concerned if you were my neighbor...

44) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 24/10/2012

Okay, the man may be charged with feticide. An abortionist achieves the same results daily, he gets paid, often with tax dollars.

45) Comment by spqr - 24/10/2012

@Mark...a women is near death and her baby cut from from the womb and you are concerned about the legalization of certain drugs?! Seriously? Same boring arguement.

46) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 24/10/2012

How can the DEA ban anything? Where can their authority be found in the constitution?

47) Comment by BoiledCrabs - 24/10/2012

Since he enjoys ingesting unique and exciting chemicals I say give him more.