Road project draws ire

3 trees believed at least 100 years old being cut

Residents are raising concerns about three trees at the intersection of Jones Creek and Tiger Bend roads in southeast Baton Rouge that they believe are more than 100 years old but will be cut down Thursday as part of a road-widening project in the area.

The project began Sept. 25 and is in the clearing phase, said David Guillory, director of the East Baton Rouge Parish Department of Public Works.

The widening of Jones Creek Road from Tiger Bend to Coursey Boulevard, from three to five lanes with a common turn lane in the middle, is not part of the parish’s Green Light Plan for roads and related infrastructure improvements, Guillory said.

The trees, which are on the east side of Jones Creek Road near Woodlawn Middle School, are set to be cut down by Thursday morning, Guillory said.

Foy Crary, who lives on Surrey Court Avenue in the Tiger Bend Acres and Carriagewood Estates area, said she was driving on Jones Creek on Monday when she saw workers preparing to cut the trees.

Crary said she thinks the city-parish did not properly notify residents about the project. She said she was not made aware of any public forums about it.

Crary said her Metro Council representative, Joel Boe, told her he was aware of the project as far back as 2009 and that it was “too late” to do anything about it.

“It’s typical backhanded, back door, government people doing what they want to do,” Crary said.

The city-parish could have chosen to further widen the other side of the street to avoid razing the trees, Crary said.

“They’re just casting them (the trees) aside arbitrarily,” Crary said.

Donna Laird said she lives off Millerville Road but she and her mother often use a walking trail near the trees slated to be downed.

Laird said she is certain the trees are 100 years old.

“You know a 100-year-old live oak when you see one,” Laird said.

Laird said she began trying to call her Metro Council representative, Mike Walker, on Tuesday but has yet to get in touch with him.

Walker, a longtime councilman, is running for mayor-president.

Laird said the tree cutting makes her want to move to St. Tammany Parish, where live oak trees of a certain size cannot be cut down without the parish’s approval.

“Baton Rouge is becoming such an ugly, generic city,” Laird said. “Great cities do not cut down their great live oaks.”

Laird said limbs on one of the trees were cut Wednesday.

Guillory, the Public Works director, said the city-parish must give public notice for things like rezoning, but not for taking down trees.

“We don’t like taking down the old, beautiful trees, but sometimes when you’re building roads, that’s just what we have to do,” Guillory said.

Guillory said he is not aware of any parish ordinances regarding tree protection.

Jim Ferguson, the city-parish’s chief engineer, said the city-parish chose not to further widen the other side of the road because there are major utilities underground, such as a sewer main.

“As unfortunate as it is, some trees do have to be cut down,” he said.

Guillory noted that a large number of trees have been taken down on Staring Lane as part of road-widening efforts there.

“Anytime we cut down old trees, you are going to have folks that are against that,” Guillory said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (17)


1) Comment by BayouPhilosopher - 04/10/2012

To the posts below who claim "this is the cost of progress" — you have a very crude and low bar for what constitutes progress. Like so many of our fellow Louisianians, you are too willing to accept an implied definition of progress that the trees MUST come down to have the street widened. That is NOT the case -- we know how to design roadways that are boulevards that can work around trees. Do you seriously think such 100+ year-old oak trees would be cut down in London or Paris -- or even Savannah ?? I got news for you: they would not. Baton Rouge is not going to climb into urban respectability with moronic engineers at DPW making decisions like this and elected officials saying "no comment". Wake the hell up Baton Rouge. People and businesses vote with their dollars and their feet— and they keep leaving Louisiana for places like Austin and Atlanta because of idiotic practices and comments like those from people like "newKINDofFEELIN" —who is an example of why the engineering profession is given such little real authority in our society. It's alway better to cut down trees that take two centuries to grow so we don't have to "open that can of worms" of moving ductile iron sewer pipes and plastic water lines. Idiotic.

2) Comment by Winkchance - 04/10/2012

I would like to know what terms of service I violated? There was no vulgarity or unacceptable language. Guess you didn't like the facts Advocate.

3) Comment by redavaw1 - 04/10/2012

I hate to see the trees go too, but progress is progress. If there were still trees that had a chance of growing healthy and beautiful again, I would be on your side. It think we have all learned some tough lessons about planting trees so close to roads and power lines. Hopefully this wont happen in the future.

4) Comment by redavaw1 - 04/10/2012

I don't think any of you have been by those trees in a long time. They have butchered, mangled and dying by mistreatment and neglect over the years. They were not the majestic trees some of you are talking about here. They needed to be cut down. The city can do it's street widening and then replant some beautiful live oaks in their place. They grow very fast. There is a new beautiful education center there that needs love. Prove you care by donating the time to making that area beautiful again.

5) Comment by Corvette Racer - 04/10/2012

If you are as old as I am, you remember that Airline Highway used to be lined with oak trees from Old Hammond all the way to EKL hospital. But these trees kept jumping out in front of the poor drunks that used Airline, so most of them were cut down. There are only a handful left now. The price of "progress".

6) Comment by Winkchance - 04/10/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

7) Comment by AnewKINDofFEELIN - 04/10/2012

As a matter of fact, I am a licensed engineer, but do not work for the parish or for a contractor in the parish. I have no horse in the race. As far as sewers being "dealt with all the time." Sure they are, but you don't do it unless necessary. In fact, please do a little research into the O'neal Lane project. It has been delayed time and again due to difficulties moving underground utilities. Again, you CAN move underground utilities, but it's better not to open that can of worms if you don't have to.

8) Comment by Brbengal - 04/10/2012

If you "read" the story then you would see that we talked to several engineers that said that the road widening could have very easily been diverted a few feet to save these beautiful trees. The engineers said that sewers area dealt with all the time so that is not an excuse. CIty Parish does not care about the quality of life in Baton Rouge.

9) Comment by mcBR - 04/10/2012

@imjussayin Actually, Louisiana is a net TAKER of federal money. It's incredible how much people complain about the federal government in LA when it's really a sweat heart deal. Same goes with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka "the stimulus") -- a large portion of that money simply went to fill the deficits in state budgets so that we could have teachers, police officers, and necessary government services. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_taxation_and_spending_by_sta te#Table_of_Federal_Taxation_and_Spending_by_State

10) Comment by AnewKINDofFEELIN - 04/10/2012

Okay, I grew up off of Antioch Road. I went to Woodlawn High at THAT location. I moved back to the area after graduating college. That said, the widening of that road is 15 years overdue. I admit that I frowned a little when I saw the trees being cut, but it has to happen. The area is no longer the little country outskirts. It was taken over by urban sprawl, which necessitates better, wider roads. Speaking of urban sprawl, Mrs. Laird, you are a hypocrite. How many trees were leveled to build your micromansions on Surrey Court? Congrats on getting in the newspaper, though.

11) Comment by Being_Stupid - 04/10/2012

They should just leave the trees in the middle of the new road. People are smart enough to drive around them. Perhaps put roundabouts around the trees.

12) Comment by Being_Stupid - 04/10/2012

BIG GOVERNMENT DOES NOT NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DICTATORSHIP OR THE APPROVAL OF EVERY SINGLE NEIGHBOR THAT LIVES IN A 10 MILE RADIUS TO CUT DOWN A TREE AND DO WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO, UNLIKE THE REST OF US.

13) Comment by Brbengal - 04/10/2012

I want everyone to know that Ted Rush, Joel Boe's opponent in the upcoming council race showed up at the site out of concern for the trees and the residents and he pledged to keep his community informed if he is elected. Watch out Joel Boe--the residents you represent are getting organized to oust you! Thanks for absolutely nothing Mr. Boe.

14) Comment by 8point6 - 04/10/2012

Looks like the people in the pics are posing for the camera.

15) Comment by Woody - 04/10/2012

nothing like support from your councilman. "too late" to do anything about it means don't bother me with this, right boe? remember this next month on election day.

16) Comment by spqr - 04/10/2012

Leave it to this hick town to do all the wrong things. No plan to work around such beautiful trees. Wednesday morning saw many already cut. In places much larger than BR like Seattle, Portland and San Diego they would have found a way to preserve them. Hillbillies in charge. Hillbilly execution of "progress".

17) Comment by imjussayin - 04/10/2012

Note - the final phase - CONSTRUCTION on this project is only STARTING. Realize - it may be 2 years of inconvenience before the project is completed .... but it will be nice when over!

18) Comment by imjussayin - 04/10/2012

This section of Jones Creek Road was part of road program using an 80% federal / 20% local funded program with the agreement signed over 10 years ago!!! So - you want more BIG GOVERNMENT - vote the incumbent back to the White House!! Federal dollars are OUR DOLLARS - yet the Feds place so many restrictions, impact studies and other delays - these projects should not take 10 years to complete!!! The reporter should have included this important tid bit of info in his report.