State poverty ranks grow

Median income drops

“Last year our dining room had a record year with more than 223,000 hot meals served, and right now we are already ahead of that by more than 10 percent.” Michael Acaldo, chief executive officer of the Baton Rouge Society of St. Vincent de Paul

There were more Louisiana residents living in poverty in 2011 than the year before, growing from 18.7 percent of the state’s population in 2010 to 20.4 percent in 2011, according to recent U.S. Census Bureau data.

That increase means 83,231 more Louisiana residents were living in poverty last year than in 2010.

Of the people living in poverty, 28.8 percent of those Louisiana residents in 2011 were under the age of 18, up from 27.3 percent in 2010, according to the data included in the Census Bureau’s 2011 American Community Survey.

Only two other states had a higher percentage of the population living in poverty in 2011, New Mexico at 21.5 percent and Mississippi at 22.6 percent, well above the 15.9 percent of people nationwide living in poverty.

The same data show that the median household income, or midpoint income, in Louisiana declined from $43,804 in 2010 to $41,734 in 2011, a decrease of 4.7 percent.

Despite the decline in income and increase in poverty, Gov. Bobby Jindal’s administration continues to tout the state’s prowess when it comes to job growth and economic development.

“Over the last four years, poverty in the U.S. has grown more than twice as fast as poverty in Louisiana with 22 percent growth in the U.S. versus 10 percent growth in Louisiana. That is a direct result of Louisiana’s relative economic performance, as Louisiana is one of only a few states in the U.S. with more jobs today than in January 2008,” State Department Economic Development Director Stephen Moret said in an email response to The Advocate.

Moret wrote that unemployment has declined in Louisiana over the past few years and Louisiana’s job growth was the seventh fastest in the United States over the last 12 months through August.

Moret said although the job growth alone cannot drastically reduce poverty, the most important tool the state can use to address the problem is “to cultivate as many good jobs as possible.”

When asked to explain how high poverty and expansive job growth can coexist, Moret said the national economy is a factor.

“One of the factors negatively impacting our poverty levels is that some employees are not able to get the same number of hours as they had a few years ago when the national economy was in better shape. While they may still be employed, they often aren’t getting the overtime hours that they used to get, which obviously negatively impacts household income,” Moret wrote.

Additionally, Moret wrote, good jobs in Louisiana and in the nation increasingly require some kind of post-secondary education.

“And compared to other states, we still have too many people who either haven’t graduated from high school or who elect not to pursue additional education beyond high school,” he wrote. “In some cases, there is a mismatch between available jobs in Louisiana, such as software programmers, marine electronics, chemists, welders and engineers and the skill sets of the out-of-work population.”

Troy Blanchard, an LSU demographer and sociology professor, said the poverty trend in Louisiana is difficult to pinpoint because of the state’s declining unemployment.

However, the data shows some employment increases in areas such as arts, entertainment, recreation, social assistance and food services, employment categories with, in some cases, lower paying jobs.

Mayor-President Kip Holden agrees with Moret about adding employment opportunities while training the workforce to fill those jobs.

The census data shows that 20 percent of the East Baton Rouge Parish population was living in poverty in 2011, compared to 17 percent in 2010.

“I think the (parish numbers) reflect layoffs and cut backs in higher education and the state government side,” Holden said Friday afternoon.

Holden said relying on traditional forms of the economy, such as oil and gas, should be supplemented with trying to diversify the economy.

Holden also said the state and the parish have to continue to find ways to keep students in high school through graduation and train them for the workforce.

Michael Acaldo, chief executive officer of the Baton Rouge Society of St. Vincent de Paul, said the Catholic charity organization sees poverty up close daily in the community.

“Last year our dining room had a record year with more than 223,000 hot meals served, and right now we are already ahead of that by more than 10 percent,” Acaldo said.

Acaldo said the group’s homeless shelters are always full.

“People are leaning on us harder than in past years,” Acaldo said.

The recent poverty data was also no surprise to Ann Williamson, director of the Louisiana Association of Nonprofit Organizations, or LANO.

“Unfortunately, this (poverty) is a trend going in a negative direction. Our member organizations have seen an increase in demand for services,” Williamson said.

Williamson said poverty won’t be solved by government alone or the nonprofit sector.

“Those are just elements needed in solving the problem. This is something where everyone has to come together for the solution,” Williamson said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (51)


1) Comment by ex-louisianian - 24/09/2012

Kathleen Blanco is a deeply conservative Democrat, but even she managed to see the main problem afflicting this state, unlike the peabrains who have followed her. And, as a (not-so) polite reminder: I am an American. I can make informed commentary on any political topic salient within the United States that I chose (and my commentary is better informed than anything that you can manage), from anyplace I live, for any reason whatsoever. Now run along and thank your great-grandfather for keeping you from being poor.

2) Comment by Loki - 23/09/2012

All you people acting like Republicans aren't to blame for this (blocking the jobs bill, blocking the veterans jobs bill, cutting state and local government, ad infinitum), think about this: your guy wants to raise taxes on the poor and middle class to give tax cuts to wealthy people. You think that's going to help?

3) Comment by chem - 23/09/2012

The right-wing kooks said that all you have to do is cut the budget and lower taxes and the jobs will come rolling in. The economy will turn around and all will be rosy. So what happened. The budget was slashed in louisiana and taxes at the national level are about the lowest they have been. So where are all the jobs? Seems like a big oops by the right-wing fascists. What's the next excuse? All of you people running your mouths about how the poor should do this or that don't have a clue of what it is like to be poor. What you should be is ashamed of your heartless attitudes towards people that were put in this position by no fault of their own. And I'll bet that all of those trashing the unfortunate call themselves "christians". What a bunch of hypocrites.

4) Comment by The_Host - 23/09/2012

Ah yes Kathleen Blankstare is a real Prophet let me tell ya. If your Ex-La. isn't there a local issue your should be shilling your liberal tripe on that actually affects you? I don't comment on local issues in places I don't live why do you? Then you come on talking about Blanco like that gives you some credibility. FAIL!

5) Comment by phil - 23/09/2012

More local taxes = more local poverty. How is that new bus ride going for you?

6) Comment by ex-louisianian - 23/09/2012

Kathleen Blanco, after her defeat, said that reducing the 30% poverty rate among children was the most important task of Louisiana government. She pointed out that indigent children will almost certainly grow up to become impoverished adults (LA has little economic mobility, and economic mobility in the US at large is at multi-decade lows, so spare us your "pull yourselves up by the bootstraps" cant), who then have poor children, thus continuing the tradition of multi-generational poverty that has afflicted this state for over a century. Suffice to say, her successor cares not a whit for poor children, or anything else, beyond his own presidential ambitions.

7) Comment by The_Host - 23/09/2012

Twinkie- The reason so many conservatives are up so early is because our normal sleep clocks wake us up around that time everyday. You see that is when people with drive and ambition actually get up to go to work most days. If you actually do it for enough years you automatically start to wake up at that same time everyday. Imagine that! As for the poor and re-training them that would imply they were trained to do something in the first place. How many times does the public have to come up with programs and ways to pay for them for people that ignored all the ones already in place that everyone else used when they were young to get an education or some skill set that pays? How is it my fault they need something more because they did less than they should have done? Why should I have to pay for it? Whats the point of paying for them to go to school in their youth if they don't use it and then come back 25 years later asking for some education. Sorry but you maybe should have been paying attention when everyone else was getting educated to begin with. Every losers lack of ambition or desire does not suddenly my emergency create as far as I am concerned. We live with our decisions. Unless we are liberals than we whine and moan till someone gives us something else we didn't earn to make us feel better about ourselves.

8) Comment by Whatnow - 23/09/2012

Yeah, and Reid said Romney didn't pay any taxes at all. Well, that proved to be a lie didn't it. How many of Obama's friends and cabinet members owe taxes, huh? Even Buffet still owes taxes and he's hollering that he doesn't pay enough. Well, seems like the House just voted on a bill that would give all those whiners a little box to check on their taxes to be able to donate more. Think it will pass the Senate? Fat chance.

9) Comment by mcarter - 22/09/2012

1- Romney gave his inheritance to BYU. 2-Romney looks down on people that are not rich? I guess that's why He gives 30% of his income to charity. 3-"right wingers" don't think the stimulus didn't work, no, they know it didn't.

10) Comment by Duckyluve - 22/09/2012

So the poverty level went up since last year under Nobama? I'm sure what happened in the last 12 months was somebody else's fault.

11) Comment by chem - 22/09/2012

The Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday that President Obama’s 2009 stimulus package continues to have a significant effect. The bill raised fourth-quarter 2011 gross domestic product by as much as 1.5 percent, it states, and lowered the unemployment rate by as much as 1.1 percentage points. The only people that think the stimulus did not help are 1) right-wingers, and 2) those that hate Obama (right-wingers).

12) Comment by agagent - 22/09/2012

It is not logical to say that government action saved us from a depression. The recession was going to end without any action (The official end of the recession was June, 2009). You cannot not credit the stimulus because it was a huge failure. Anyway only 11% had been spent by June, 2009. If you want to credit TARP with saving the economy that might be plausible. I don’t think so because it was not even spent on it intended purpose: to rid the financial system of toxic assets (bad mortgage loans). Many major problems remain: under water mortgages and low home values, home foreclosures, bank failures, Fannie & Freddie holding trillions of dollars in bad mortgages, not enough revenues at all levels of government to sustain services, etc. Now we are burdened with an additional $5.2 trillion in debt, unemployment is higher, and the average household income is lower by more than $4,000. By many measures we are in worst shape than in 2009.

13) Comment by chem - 22/09/2012

What about the trillions thrown down the black hole of the "war on drugs"? Yes, there are jobs available, but very low paying ones, hence people are having to work 2 and 3 jobs just to make ends meet. So all of the millions out there that have been out of work for a year or more, lost everything, their homes, cars, and lives are doing that so they can be dependent on government? That's doesn't make any sense. I despise Romney not because he is rich, but because he looks down on those that are not rich. He views working class people with disdain. As far as Romney being successful, if his father had not given him millions, he may have turned out like those that he looks down on.

14) Comment by Attila - 22/09/2012

@DMJ: I am not referring to the demographics that you cited and you know it. Romney is right. There is an entitlement mentality that was born in 1964 under the worst President in our history, LBJ. Since the birth of the "Great Society" we have thrown trillions down a black hole. What have we to show except more people in poverty than we had before this debacle started. I lost my dad when I was 6, cut grass, rounded up soda bottles for the 2 cent refund, threw the Advocate 7 days a week before school on a bike, rain or shine, bagged groceries, sold blood, worked at Sears while going to school. Joined the service and upon discharge managed to make a living and provide for my family. There ARE jobs available. They may not be the ones that a person wants, may not be in the location that people like, and may not pay as much as one wants....but there are jobs. South Dakota is begging for people to work in their oil patch at a good wage and cannot fill the jobs. A person who wants to work can, if they are willing to do what is necessary. Sometimes it takes two jobs to make ends meet....I've done that too. I have said it before, you folks that hate Romney because he is wealthy and successful need to get over it. Y'all are consumed with jealousy of his success, and spend way too much time obsessing over his rate of taxation. Some people give 110% and will always be poor. That is not my fault, Romney's fault, or anyone else's. It is a FACT of life. Everyone cannot achieve at the same level although that is what the left would like to legislate.

15) Comment by chem - 22/09/2012

The world has not fully recovered from the debacle in 2007 that sent the U.S., and the world, into a deep recession. Only by quick action by governments around the world, including the Obama administration, did we not enter a full-blown depression. There are many people out there that are working two and three jobs, but still live below the poverty line. People who lost their jobs because of greedy businesses cannot find equivalent employment in today's market. There simply are not that many good-paying jobs out there. As others have already stated, there are children, the elderly, the working poor, and those who have always been economically disadvantaged because of generational and institutional prejudice. I noticed today that Oracle is paying Ellison $96 million. That is outrageous. Pay should be limited to a percent of the average pay of all people working for a company. In that way, a company will have more money to pay everyone or for improvements in the business. We need to get past this ridiculous "free market" mind-set and start to do things that will lift everyone. Unfettered markets are a disaster.

16) Comment by DMJ - 22/09/2012

" Let's continue to redistribute the wealth from those who produce to those who refuse to produce." Yeah, like the elderly, the disabled, veterans on active duty, children who don't work yet, people who've been laid off, people who want to work but can't find jobs. Yeah....those moochers. What's ironic and strange is that a lot of these people will vote Republican anyway, despite having Mitt Romney and those who agree with him insult them at every turn. Strange, indeed.

17) Comment by agagent - 22/09/2012

You must distinguish between “living in poverty” of today to growing up poor before the “war on poverty.” Back then almost everyone was poor. There were no TVs, no cars, only a wood stove for heat, an outhouse, hand-me-down clothes, clothes drying on the clothesline, etc. Without those material things we take for granted today families were stronger, more citizens learned values, a work ethic, community service, and a spirit of community. Our society has created tremendous wealth since then but those “living in poverty” have suffered. One study calculated that someone living on public assistance would consume more goods and services than someone with an average wage so it is not that we spend to little on government social programs. Since the war on poverty many people living in poverty have gained much more material things but have lost a lot in the process: families and communities destroyed, more crime, less educational achievement, and the loss of work ethics, civic duty, and community spirit. We should be able to reform ineffective and wasteful government social programs which never seem to achieved their stated goals. We should know how people become happy, productive, and responsible citizens and avoid citizens becoming totaly dependent on government.

18) Comment by SuzanneMS - 22/09/2012

Don't let the facts interfere with your opinions, Attila, et al. What part of "the poor are working" can't you understand? Working -- at jobs. Bringing home a paycheck. It isn't enough to live on. Louisiana is facing a decline in income and an increase in poverty even as unemployment decreases. More people are working for less money. The poor who aren't working are, by and large, children and the elderly. Yes, we do have too many people who either did not finish high school or did not go to college and do not have the skills for higher paying jobs. They are still working. Bounce is right. Your Louisiana education and upbringing are showing and it isn't pretty. We all know what you mean by "demographics" -- and it isn't demographics.

19) Comment by Bouncer - 22/09/2012

Your story exemplifies what I am talking about, serenade. I will simply reiterate the point of my initial post: unless you have been poor and walked in those shoes, you have no right to judge or condemn. And "Attilla" or whoever you are....I have never said anything to you personally or about you personally. Therefore, your snarky jab at me (and others) is completely out of line. I'll tell you like I told bourbon-soda. Part of the problem with public forums such as this is that any dweeb can log on, attack someone without any direct provocation (as you have done to me), and then slither back under his rock. I've never pretended to be "learned," and your singling that out as one of my attributes says more about how YOU see me than it might say about how I see myself. How like people of your ilk to make a sarcastic, disparaging remark when someone shows a tendency to actually think about an issue, as opposed to taking the predictable, provincial, and popular knee jerk response to it. Your Louisiana education and upbringing are showing....and it isn't pretty. That's about all I have to say on the issue. You and your podnuhs can have the last word, since that's evidently very important to you. Just remember that having the last word means nothing....except that you have the last word. I make it a habit to not even attempt to engage in productive dialogue with a fence post.

20) Comment by serenade - 22/09/2012

You know, I grew up poor. My family got food stamps from time to time. We didn't have medical insurance. We shopped at the Goodwill for clothes and other things. I got free lunches at school. I didn't get my driver's license until I was in my 20s and could pay for the insurance myself because my family couldn't afford it. I never went to concerts, we didn't have cable, and movies were a special treat. My dad worked 10-12 hours a day, 7 days a week driving a cab for that. Things got particularly bad after his company broke the union (thanks to the precedent set by Ronald Reagan with the air traffic controllers), and the switched the drivers from commission to leasing. To all of you pontificating about the lazy, drug-addicted, criminal poor, you have no idea what you are talking about. I'm glad you never had to struggle, or if you did, that you were able to catch a break to get you to where you are today. Not everyone is that lucky.

21) Comment by bourbon-soda - 22/09/2012

It's OK, the progressives are reposting their mantras on purpose, not even accidental.

22) Comment by Attila - 22/09/2012

Sorry for the double post...computer is whipping my butt today.

23) Comment by Attila - 22/09/2012

Benefits to "those less fortunate" are way too high. The amount of money a person can get from the federal and state governments gives those who prefer a handout to a hand up no incentive to find work. Menial job, minimum wage, working hours that are not the best is not what these people want. Want to know why the poverty rate is Louisiana is so "high". The first reason is demographics. I am sure that all of you "progressives" can figure that one out. The second reason is that the threshold to receive financial assistance is too low. People who do not want to work won't because they can collect more on government assistance than they would be paid for an entry level job or a job that fits their mental acumen. We are obligated as a society to provide food for the hungry, shelter for those without it, and average medical care. We are not obligated to pay exorbitant amounts so that a person can live in a Section 8 house paying $12 a month while the taxpayers pay the other $1,000. I do not see the so called "poor" stealing bread because they are hungry. I do see them stealing electronic gear, cars, camera's, clothing, cigarettes, alcohol, and any other items that are not nailed down so that they can buy dope.

24) Comment by mcarter - 22/09/2012

Oh and yes this is a great country. Our president managed to acquire the "American Dream".

25) Comment by mcarter - 22/09/2012

Amen, Attila. You are right, the children in the countries I mentioned before are truly scraping for something to eat. If they only had shoes, much less expensive tennis shoes, they would probably trade for food.

26) Comment by Attila - 22/09/2012

If you really want to know the major reason for poverty in this state just look around you...it is called demographics. I am sure that the learned Suzanne, TwinkiCat, Bouncer, and DMJ can figure it out. The criteria for receiving financial assistance is too LOW. People will not take a low paying job because they can make more by just collecting their government checks. I do not see any of the so called poor stealing bread to put on their table. I do see them stealing HDTV's, microwaves, cars and other motorized machines, clothing, cigarettes, alcohol, and any other thing of value that they can sell or exchange for dope. Now, I know that statement is going to P O a lot of you, but it is the truth and you know it. The fact is that people of little means no longer want a level playing field where they can compete and rise as far as their intelligence, values, and work ethic allows. No, they now demand equal outcomes. So let's continue to penalize success, hard work, and wealth. Let's continue to redistribute the wealth from those who produce to those who refuse to produce...Is this a great country or what?

27) Comment by mcarter - 22/09/2012

What is the common denominator of the 30% of children living in poverty? Just wondering.

28) Comment by Loki - 22/09/2012

high bar you're setting there mcarter...

29) Comment by DMJ - 22/09/2012

I'm just going to repost SuzanneMS's post because it's just that good- "Who are the poor in Louisiana? 30% of the children in this state live in poverty. Shall we tell them to just "get a job?" Then there are the elderly; 13% of the elderly in Louisiana live in poverty. You want them to "get a job?" Minimum wage in Louisiana is $7.25 an hour. Working full time, That's $15,080 a year, before any deductions for SSN and Medicare -- taxes everyone pays. The Federal poverty level is about $23,000 for a family of four -- that's more than $11.00 an hour just to live in poverty. This means that practically everyone you see working in WalMart is living in poverty. It means that most of the people you see working in any retail setting are living at or below the poverty level. They have a job. Some of them have two. Unemployment is down in this state; so is income. Work that out -- the jobs that your beloved governor has brought to this state pay poverty-level wages. But you go ahead and write off the poor as lazy drug addicts; it's so much easier than facing the reality and trying to do something about it. " Yeah.

30) Comment by mcarter - 22/09/2012

I have been poor. Growing up we were probably way below today's standard, but you know we didn't know it. I look back now and I realize why one summer we didn't have a car, why we never had air conditioning and we wore hand me downs from "well to do" families. My husband growing had "Santa" delivered from a charity. There were no free or reduced lunch at schools, we didnt get food stamps, no ssi or welfare check. We made do with what my parents could earn. We were always taught to take care of ourselves, no mentality that the government or someone else was going to do it. Fast forward today, working hard, no illegitimate children, no drugs, finished high school (couldn't afford college), life is good. So when abled bodied people get off their behinds and go to work and yes there are jobs out there. You might have to work two or three. Done that myself. Absent fathers need to be held accountable. Blame Bobby, blame whoever you want but maybe it time for some to blame themselves. One ps, if want to see "real" poor, look at children in Haiti, Sudan, etc.

31) Comment by tradewinns - 22/09/2012

today's dropouts become parents early and create new census figures increasing poverty. parents of the current crop MUST do more to educate their children whether they want to or not.

32) Comment by 8point6 - 22/09/2012

So much for "hope and change". Yes we CAN boot him out in November!

33) Comment by TommyRucker - 22/09/2012

It is only going to get worse if we remain on the road championed by the democratic party MOB. Any society dominated by socialism in the history of the world has been a complete failure. People in South America are trying to escape their socialistic dominated societies, yet we keep voting for people who are champions of socialism. There is only one conclusion and that is that many of the people who maintained a closed mind and continue to vote for these democratic party principles are determined to drag everyone else down to their level and Obama is leading them in this effort. If you want higher unemployment, less opportunities, more crime and more poverty than continue to support the democratic party MOB as it has proven it can deliver on these points.

34) Comment by agagent - 22/09/2012

Any poverty is too much, but I am relieved that the poverty rate is not higher. Louisiana’s economy has not escaped the impact of restrictions on energy exploration and production in federal areas, the cancellation of the Keystone pipeline, the higher energy cost of closing coal mines and generating plants, the 11,000 additional pages of federal red tape businesses must face, the tighter credit markets, the higher unemployment insurance rates and the negative impact of extending unemployment benefits, the fear and uncertainty cause by adding some $5.2 trillion to the national debt and no plan to solve the problem, the looming trillion dollar Obamacare taxes, and the increase in the marginal tax rate beginning on January1st. Louisiana’s economy would be much better off without the policies of the Obama administration.

35) Comment by bourbon-soda - 22/09/2012

I did not call you anything. "Redistributionists was a reference to a third party. If I don't know anything about the poor, the redistributionists don't know anything about me or what I can afford for them to give away.

36) Comment by Bouncer - 22/09/2012

And for the record, I unequivocally stick by what I originally said. Unless you have been in someone's shoes, don't be so quick to pass judgment.

37) Comment by Bouncer - 22/09/2012

@bourbon-soda....I didn't have you in mind when I made my comment. But if the shoe fits, wear it. By the way, I am hardly what you would call a "redistributionist" and for you to come to that conclusion about me, a total stranger, from one comment that I made on this page is, quite frankly, laughable. You don't know me, you don't know anything about me, and, as with your holding forth about the "problems" faced by the poor, you are not qualified to draw any sort of conclusions about me. One problem with a public forum such as this is that any self-styled keyboard warrior such as yourself can log in, personally go after someone (as you did to me), and then crawl back under his rock. In the future, watch what you say before you stick your foot in your mouth again and make an even bigger idiot out of yourself. Thanks, and you have a SUPER day1

38) Comment by bourbon-soda - 22/09/2012

Bouncer, that's great. When are redistributionists going to quit pontificating about responsibility of middle class and well-to-do to transfer funds to the poor?

39) Comment by Bouncer - 22/09/2012

Unless you have ever been poor, then you simply do not have the firsthand knowledge and experience that qualifies you to pontificate about their situation. Every poor family is different and has varying circumstances accounting for why they are in the position they are in, just as every middle class or well-to-do family is different. It's a shame that those for whom the lines of life have fallen in positive ways snub their noses at those who have a rough go of it.

40) Comment by bourbon-soda - 22/09/2012

SuszanneMS, you are right; when you have some combination of failure to finish hs or get a GED, illegitimacy, adolescent pregnancy (your own or parental), habituation or addiction (your own or parental), you will probably spend the rest of your life digging out from welfare or minimum wage.

41) Comment by bourbon-soda - 22/09/2012

Tinkle, actually I was up early for some exercise followed by work brought home and then time with traditional family. Your leap from illegitimacy and adolescent pregnancy to sex addiction is interesting. Is sex addiction the problem? Advice to get married and wait until 21 was predicated on possibility of self-control.

42) Comment by lovemykids - 22/09/2012

Come on Jindal!!!! You and your accessories can use tape and glue to hold the state together until 2016.

43) Comment by SuzanneMS - 22/09/2012

Who are the poor in Louisiana? 30% of the children in this state live in poverty. Shall we tell them to just "get a job?" Then there are the elderly; 13% of the elderly in Louisiana live in poverty. You want them to "get a job?" Minimum wage in Louisiana is $7.25 an hour. Working full time, That's $15,080 a year, before any deductions for SSN and Medicare -- taxes everyone pays. The Federal poverty level is about $23,000 for a family of four -- that's more than $11.00 an hour just to live in poverty. This means that practically everyone you see working in WalMart is living in poverty. It means that most of the people you see working in any retail setting are living at or below the poverty level. They have a job. Some of them have two. Unemployment is down in this state; so is income. Work that out -- the jobs that your beloved governor has brought to this state pay poverty-level wages. But you go ahead and write off the poor as lazy drug addicts; it's so much easier than facing the reality and trying to do something about it.

44) Comment by tball - 22/09/2012

Agree that a small percent is trying to work. Biggest problem no parental guidance, lack of education, lack of a trade, etc. There are lots of opportunities out there, like spgr stated they DO NOT want it. And BARRACKWARD will help keep them dependent on the government!!!

45) Comment by spqr - 22/09/2012

Twinkie, I think you are right and wrong. What you wrote about the working poor is true. But there is a great deal of truth to what your so-called "conservatives" write in previous posts. The welfare I-do-not-want-to-do-anything class is growing. As for the conservative insomnia you recognize, maybe they are up early because they are on their way to (drum roll) WORK.

46) Comment by twinkie1cat - 22/09/2012

Conservatism seems to create people who cannot sleep at night. 5 AM yall are up spreading your poison. Why do y'all assert that poor people are uneducated, drunks, criminals, and sex addicts? Bobby has been eliminating jobs by the hundreds with no remorse and then whining about how much a special session to undo his junk will cost. Many of the people out of work are real, experienced teachers and health care workers thanks to Bobby's destruction of the schools and hospitals. You all sound like a bunch of eugenicists who think that the poor are somehow defective. I live in one of the poorest neighborhoods in Baton Rouge. Most of the adults around here go to work every day. The trouble is that the jobs pay minimum wage and they have to have a car to get across town to access them. Poor people are not necessarily lazy and, if they drink, it is not in place of working. One of my neighbors only makes minimum. She goes to work every day, has some beer when she comes home and takes care of her grandkids until their mama gets off of work. Makes only about $8 per hour with no benefits and her husband is disabled. That is a better picture of the poor than what you elitist extremists paint.

47) Comment by twinkie1cat - 22/09/2012

Meanwhile Bobby persistently eliminates good career jobs that are often suited to people without a lot of education by closing prisons and hospitals, especially in rural areas where there are limited employment opportunities in the first place. Simultaneously he guts the colleges by cutting the budgets and closing down programs. Has he made some kind of deal with Texas to provide cheap, legal labor?

48) Comment by twinkie1cat - 22/09/2012

Meanwhile Bobby persistently eliminates good career jobs that are often suited to people without a lot of education by closing prisons and hospitals, especially in rural areas where there are limited employment opportunities in the first place. Simultaneously he guts the colleges by cutting the budgets and closing down programs. Has he made some kind of deal with Texas to provide cheap, legal labor?

49) Comment by bourbon-soda - 22/09/2012

Graduate from high school or get a GED (preferably the former). Do not procreate before age 21. Get married and stay married. Do not get addicted to a substance legal or otherwise. Jindal cannot do any of these things for you.

50) Comment by Cousin Dave - 22/09/2012

This article doesn't tell us what the income limits are for poverty in Louisiana, or how much they have increased from 2010 to 2011.

51) Comment by ScotB - 22/09/2012

70% births to single moms, 50% dropout rate, rampant drug use, one third of males going to prison in their lifetimes. Employers don't hire dropouts, drug users, or men with criminal records. A single income family is almost guaranteed to be poor, especially if the single parent doesn't have even a high school education. Bad choices, voluntary decisions - lead to the consequences that create poverty for the majority of the poor. You cannot buy pride, self discipline, and morals with government money and then inject it into poor people. They have to want it and they obviously do not. No one forces people to drop out of high school, use drugs, commit crimes, have unmarried sex.....they made those decisions themselves. Since Johnson launched his war on poverty, we have spent over $16 trillion and we have gotten even more poverty, not less.