AVOIDING ‘CARMAGEDDON’

BR’s traffic problems in sharp focus in race for mayor

On Aug. 22 — a Wednesday — an early morning traffic accident brought Baton Rouge to a halt for 27 hours.

Authorities were forced to close Interstate 10 in both directions before morning rush hour after one of the three vehicles in the accident began leaking highly flammable isobutane. The closure sent about 100,000 vehicles onto Baton Rouge’s already full surface streets.

The Aug. 22 crash and subsequent “carmageddon” highlighted what for many is one of Baton Rouge’s most pressing problems — getting around the capital city. It’s one of the top issues in the Nov. 6 mayoral election, and each of the four candidates has thoughts on how it should be improved.

Baton Rouge traffic is among the nation’s worst for cities of its size, according to a 2011 report by the Texas Transportation Institute at Texas A&M University.

In the Baton Rouge Area Chamber’s annual economic outlook survey, businesses consistently cite transportation as a major obstacle to economic development, said Meg Mahoney, the BRAC’s senior vice president of economic competitiveness.

The August crash underscored the problem, she said.

“I think it was a big issue because so many people use our interstates to commute to and from work,” Mahoney said. “That kind of a shut down at that time of day was significant.”

The problems that face those getting around the city are multifaceted, she said.

“We also have to look at issues of connectivity, planning for a street grid and improving our (public) transit system so that it’s a real alternative,” she said.

In the aftermath of the tanker crash, many wondered if a long-proposed traffic loop around Baton Rouge might have alleviated the problems caused when I-10 was shut down. But even strong, vocal supporters of the loop, such as Mayor-President Kip Holden, say it wouldn’t have helped much in the Aug. 22 crash because of its location and the unusual circumstances that were involved.

Holden has long been a proponent of the Baton Rouge Loop project, a proposed 85- to 90-mile, $4.5-billion, toll-funded beltway surrounding the capital and passing through five parishes — Ascension, Iberville, Livingston, and East and West Baton Rouge.

Holden has said routing some traffic around Baton Rouge would help lessen traffic in the city.

Leaders of three of the five parishes have pulled out of the authority overseeing the project.

Some community residents in areas along the proposed route, such as Watson and Central, have strongly opposed any loop route through their communities.

“I don’t think it’s dead,” Holden said. “I think at some point, the naysayers will come to reality and say we are going to have to have this.”

Holden said a northern bypass — the envisioned first phase of the loop — would have helped alleviate the traffic problems in February, when an 18-wheeler overturned on Interstate 12, prompting dozens of smaller accidents in Livingston Parish and snarling traffic for hours.

It would have had less of an impact on the I-10 closure because that occurred in the southeast part of the city, he said.

Holden said work on the loop permitting process is ongoing.

“We are moving forward,” he said.

Holden’s best-financed opponent, Metro Councilman Mike Walker, argued that the parish and region would be better served by allowing private toll companies to build a series of bypasses around the city.

Deciding where those bypasses should go should be left up to leaders in the respective parishes, he said.

“A loop does not have to be a complete circle,” he said. “Let’s look at the example that Ascension and Livingston are going to show us.”

Officials in the two parishes are forming a toll road authority to explore building a bypass north of Port Vincent. The proposed bypass will “move traffic” in the area, lessening volume on streets in East Baton Rouge Parish, Walker said.

Such bypasses could be used to form an “inner loop” around Baton Rouge, Walker said. An “outer loop” could be formed using existing roads, such as La. 10 and Interstate 55, he said.

Independent candidate Gordon Mese said a loop was the wrong approach to tackle the problem.

“At this point, a loop is a 20th-century solution to a 21st-century problem,” Mese said.

He said technological changes within the next 15 to 20 years, such as self-driving cars, could render an expensive traffic loop obsolete before it could be built and paid for.

Steve Myers, who is also running as a no-party candidate, said a loop would just further spread the residential population of Baton Rouge.

“A loop, any loop, would not solve the No. 1 traffic problem we face in EBR right now, which is that our interstate system has become a local road system,” he said.

Many cars, too few streets

Baton Rouge streets are already at capacity, Ingolf Partenheimer, the city’s chief traffic engineer, has said. That’s what made the Aug. 22 situation so bad: 100,000 cars from the interstate were diverted onto already full Baton Rouge streets, he said.

Holden said the city’s streets are too small to handle the influx of people to the parish after Hurricane Katrina.

“In one week, we exceeded our 25-year traffic projections,” he said.

That influx combined with infrastructure that is “50 or 60 years behind” make Baton Rouge’s traffic problem even worse, Holden said.

Holden said the parish’s Green Light Plan, which finances road projects through a voter-approved, half-cent sales tax, is making a difference. To date, 28 Green Light Plan projects have been completed and eight remain under construction.

“You build the roads, you alleviate problems,” Holden said. “You now have roads that were two lanes, now they are four lanes. You are getting people home and to work faster.”

Holden has lauded the benefits of widening access to key roads in the parish, such as Harrell’s Ferry Road and O’Neal Lane, at numerous public meetings held to discuss the Green Light Plan.

Walker agrees that the Green Light Plan has been effective.

“I think it was a way for us to get improved roads,” he said. “It’s something that the public can see, feel, touch, taste every day, drive all over it.”

But the program might have reached its limit, he said.

“We have bonded all that the public will allow us to bond,” he said. “That needs to be re-addressed.”

And, he said, the Green Light Plan only addresses half the problem.

“As we increase capacity, we must decrease volume,” he said.

He said the Green Light Plan “was never designed” to reduce the number of cars on the streets.

“Are we taking any of those vehicles off those same streets?” Walker asked. “Today, we are not.”

Walker suggested creating corridors within Baton Rouge, like Central Thruway, which would help relieve congestion on streets such as Sherwood Forest Boulevard.

Independent candidate Gordon Mese said the city must upgrade its entire road system.

“ ‘Carmageddon’ didn’t exist here,” Mese said, referring to his Garden District Nursery on Government Street.

Mese said the reason is simple: Much of Baton Rouge north of Government is laid out in a grid, which makes it easier to find alternate routes and navigate around accidents. He said that grid pattern needs to be extended to the southeastern portion of the parish.

“The magic word is connectivity,” Mese said.

Connecting streets in certain areas must be widened, he said, echoing Holden.

Fellow no-party candidate Steve Myers said increasing street capacity should be the first priority.

“In the short term, moving traffic is the key, not necessarily eliminating it,” Myers said.

Increasing street capacity would reduce congestion on the interstates, Myers said.

Myers said widening Lee Drive and making Nicholson Drive a thoroughfare from downtown to Gonzales are projects that should be investigated.

The bus route

One way to get cars off the streets is to provide public transportation.

All four candidates say viable public transportation is important to East Baton Rouge Parish, but each offered a critique of the Capital Area Transit System.

“First, you have got to have efficiency and attractive routes to get people involved,” said Holden, who described himself as a CATS supporter. “They are going to have to do an effective job of marketing.e_SDRq

Holden said CATS needs to consider using alternate-fuel vehicles and using smaller buses for less-traveled routes.

“Baton Rouge can be a city that relies on public transit, but we should have started decades ago,” Holden said. “When you look at successful cities, they have been running transportation, in many cases, effectively for a number of years.”

Walker said the city-parish should have followed the example of LSU and put the transit contract out for bid. LSU ended its contract with CATS in 2009 after students complained about poor service.

“We should have allowed a private company to come in, run it, be liable for it, be financially responsible for it and make it parishwide,” he said. “I have no faith in this bus company.”

LSU pays First Transit $3.5 million per year, $1.1 million more than when the university’s contract was with CATS.

Walker said he questioned the legality of the recent CATS tax election, in which only voters in Baton Rouge, Baker and Zachary were permitted to vote. The tax measure passed in Baton Rouge and Baker but failed to win approval in Zachary.

CATS was created by a special act of the Louisiana Legislature and historically has received a subsidy from the city-parish.

“One thing that election did is make it so we don’t have to subsidize them any more,” Walker said.

A lawsuit has been filed in 19th District Judicial court asking a judge to block CATS from collecting any tax revenue.

Myers said population density should be studied to determine where public transit should be offered.

“It needs to be a system that makes sense both financially and in terms of our transportation needs,” he said, adding it should “start small” and build.

“If it does not work in areas in south Baton Rouge from downtown to LSU through the Perkins Road corridor … then it certainly won’t work on Hoo Shoo Too Road or in Central,” Myers said.

Myers said other strategies such as carpooling should be incorporated into a public transportation policy.

Mese said he supported the CATS tax.

“It was not perfect,” he said. But “if you have less vehicles on the roads, the roads will last longer.”

Solving Baton Rouge’s traffic and transportation problems is not something that will happen overnight, Mahoney said.

“I don’t think any one solution will solve the problem,” she said. “You have to look at all of it.”

But improving the transportation systems in Baton Rouge would improve the quality of life of its residents, Mahoney said.

“Not having to spend that time commuting, and being able to be productive at work or spend time with their families, will have an impact,” she said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (27)


1) Comment by Lacking_Perspective - 05/10/2012

(Even if we are not paying to improve the roads, we are paying in lost time and gas equivalent of building the roads anyway...)

2) Comment by Lacking_Perspective - 05/10/2012

Louisiana drivers are paying a congestion tax, as well as wasting time and money on sitting in traffic that is caused, in part, by Louisiana’s failure to adequately fund transportation, says Ken Perret, president of the Louisiana Good Roads and Transportation Association (http://www.louisianagoodroads.org/index.html Baton Rouge has the worst traffic congestion in the nation among mid-sized cities, according to the Texas Transportation Institute’s (TTI) Urban Mobility Report 2010 (http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility_report_2010.pdf). The College Station, Texas-based organization is a part of Texas A&M University system and a Texas state agency. PERRETThe cost to Louisiana’s capital city drivers is equivalent to 37 hours, 30 gallons of gasoline and $1,003 spent sitting in traffic every year. New Orleans-area drivers aren’t doing much better. They spend an extra 31 hours, 23 gallons of gasoline and $772 each year due to traffic congestion.

3) Comment by MBW - 01/10/2012

Agree with BRModerate: We need a regional transit authority. People who commute from Livingston and Ascension need good roads and transportation too and should have to have a stake in this (in terms of both input AND cost).

4) Comment by MBW - 01/10/2012

A toll road is nothing more than a huge TAX INCREASE on the people who need to drive on those roads. If we pay for new roads with taxes, everyone pays a little bit....rather than a smaller group of people shouldering the entire cost of the road with toll fees.

5) Comment by MBW - 01/10/2012

To those in favor of toll roads: Have you ever stopped to consider that it will probably cost you MORE money in tolls than it would cost you if the road were paid for with taxes?? C'mon people...think.

6) Comment by MBW - 01/10/2012

Just say NO to toll roads. Ridiculous. I lived for a few years in the Northeast (NYC, NJ, etc) where toll roads are everywhere...and it's a real pain in the a**.

7) Comment by BRmoderate - 01/10/2012

Wow, Not one of the candidates expressed a solution that I could back... We need a regional transportation authority. Do not set up toll roads...Instead place a road usage fee on any car registered in acsension,EBR,WBR, and livingston parishes. Use those funds to build accessways. expressways, HOV Lanes, and possibly a loop.....WIDEN NICHOLSON TO MAKE IT ANOTHER DOWNTOWN ACCESSWAY

8) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 01/10/2012

The ideas are short-term fixes at best. This growth of vehicles on the road is simply not sustainable. Good ideas necessarily have to include severely reducing or reversing the growth rate or else they have to include increasing the size of Earth.

9) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 01/10/2012

Your Bus system in action. Last Friday I followed a brand new (white) bus heading North on I-110 with only 1 passenger and the driver on board. The bus was driving 68 mph. Way to go Kippie.

10) Comment by redavaw1 - 30/09/2012

Some of these ideas are really good. Building another bridge from South Harrells Ferry across the Amite R into Livingston and reducing the number of lights on Airline and Florida is another great idea. Thinking outside of the box is what we need. Getting rid of the old ways of thinking and open our minds to new possibilities. Personally I have issues with the way accidents are handled in our town. There is no one person who is responsible for accident reponse time and investigation. I was recently in Chicago where they have designated accident investigation areas on their interstates. People can pull off the roadway into this area to get traffic flowing quickly. We need designated towing companies who can respond quickly. What we have now is a joke! Why does clearing the accident take so long? No one is in a rush to take control and manage response times. Accountability! Accountability!!!

11) Comment by ABayouBoy - 30/09/2012

MBW is correct. Get rid of approximately 50% of the traffic signals at once. Assign primary traffic flow uncontested right of way, 24/7, and the affected side streets must yeild. Assign Airline Hwy. a primary right of way, with any remaining signals fully syncronized and automated. If BR / LA. drivers are too stupid to yeild as required, then let them pay the consequences. Also GET RID OF ALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL CAMERAS!!!!!!!!!!!!. These only force sudden stops in oreder to avoid a costly ticket. And, they cause more harm than good. My two cents, for what its worth......

12) Comment by Attila - 30/09/2012

@LawyerDane, MBW, and wadeP66: You three yahoo's do not have a clue. Have you studied the reams of information available on Kip Holden's boondoggle? Obviously not. If you had you would have found out that the only people who will profit from this fantasy is the "private partners" who will be guaranteed a 12% profit on their investment. The projected tolls at, 15 cents a mile will never cover the debt service on the road. The taxpayers of the state will have to make up the difference which will be in multiple tens of millions annually. The loop implementation plan states that construction on the loop were started as a whole that the tolls would provide only 29 - 64% of the revenue needed.The state will never get title to the road. The investors will keep it in perpetuity and keep on making money....IF THE PEOPLE WILL USE IT AS THE TOLLS CONTINUE TO RISE. The inner loop in Houston is 38 miles in circumference. Holden's Folly is 85 to 105 miles. Holden is quoted as saying that a loop would not have had any affect on "Carmeggadon". Lawyer Dan, the state will NEVER raise taxes and dedicate it to a loop for B. R., so you may be right that if this fiasco is ever to be built you will to tax yourself. Good luck with that. Last time I checked this was still America and people have a right to live wherever they please. MBW: see comment to Lawyer Dane. Kip Holden nor any citizen of EBR parish have a right to dictate what goes on in neighboring parishes. wadep66: those "nimby's" have the same rights to express their opinion as you. I don't think you would want to get face to face with one of and tell the to shut up. .

13) Comment by Phideaux - 30/09/2012

I disagree with these "experts." The reason, IMO, why people use the interstates rather surface streets is that, absent days where there are accidents and breakdowns, the limited access nature of interstates (no intersections; no red lights). If we want to divert local traffic off of the interstates, we need more limited access expressways. If Florida Blvd was a limited access roadway, it would flow better and would serve as viable alternate route to I-12/I-10. The same is true for Old Hammond/Jefferson, and Greenwell Springs. To help I- 12, build a much needed bridge across the Amite from 4H Club to South Harrell's Ferry and make S. Harrell's Ferry limited access. If we want to build a loop, build it from the old Mississippi River bridge to I-10, west of the river and make Airline a limited access roadway. It would be much cheaper, much quicker and much more efficient.

14) Comment by Lacking_Perspective - 30/09/2012

Please, Work with surrounding Parishes to develop consensus/ Success on infrastructure solution-we are sacrificing millions in GDP in loss of productivity and gas costs sitting in traffic! How is it that there have been hundreds of miles in four lane highways to Ruston, Monroe, the "Arklatex", US171, six lanes from Lake Charles to the Texas border, and we cannot even PLAN and Properly Engineer 15 mile radius of Baton Rouge???????? In light of severe short term alarming needs for traffic solution(s), why have'nt we acted "smarter" like Houston with HOV lanes that could be directed in either Inbound or Outbound lanes for efficiency. I do not understand the lack of funding at a Fed level, as La infrastructure provides massive amounts of the nation's energy needs, Yet, other States/cities are Clearly have acted much more timely on inner city outer city growth patterns that has been develping concurrently for multiple decades...!

15) Comment by nimby? - 30/09/2012

LawyerDan65 , there are reasons people left the parish . another option to consider ; fix what's wrong with BR , get the people to move back ...

16) Comment by wadep66 - 30/09/2012

We don't have leaders with enough courage to do what is needed, which includes telling the nimbys to shut up. Fixing traffic problems isn't rocket science. Declare imminent domain and build what we've been knowing for 40 years needs to be built, including widening I-10 through the perkins overpass area. How the whining of a few residents and small businesses who usually predict a negative result that never comes to pass kills a major project proves we don't have any leaders with guts.

17) Comment by tball - 30/09/2012

Baton Rouge layout of highways and surface streets are a nightmare. You have the I-10 one lane blunder and the surface streets do run N/S and E/W along the interstate. If you are heading West on I-10, try getting off at Essen Lane and find a route to get to the I-10 river bridge. What a MESS!!!!!!!!!!!!! When heading to New Orleans I take La. 1 South via the Sunshine Bridge!!!

18) Comment by zealer99 - 30/09/2012

The Blame Thrower comes to Baton Rouge but I suppose it has always been here. One of the reasons that there is not a loop around Baton Rouge now is this little game that has been in progress for 60 to 70 years. Either work together or 40 years from now Baton Rouge is going to be Slumsville with protected islands growing smaller each year.

19) Comment by DMJ - 30/09/2012

There was traffic light synchronization included in the last bond proposal which voters voted down. Something to think about...

20) Comment by MBW - 30/09/2012

People need to stop whining about the CATS referendum. How about fixing the darn traffic lights? Spend your energy complaining about THAT. What a stupid problem to have when the technology already exists to fix it.

21) Comment by MBW - 30/09/2012

How about the fact that our traffic lights are not in sync and are not traffic-sensitive??? I remember that day and remember watching countless traffic lights mindlessly go through their timed cycles while the traffic backed for miles.

22) Comment by MBW - 30/09/2012

Hey Baton Rouge--- If you want to fix traffic problems, you have to elect leaders who will stop killing road construction projects and will stop listening to the NIMBY complainers around the parish.

23) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 30/09/2012

Why not do something stupid like making people who use the service actually pay instead of homeowners who don't use the service. I realize we'd be taking money out of their pockets and forcing them to go without iPhones which is a problem. You see, the bus company spent a couple million bucks on a satellite tracking system that will allow riders (the ones who are too strapped to pay an extra dollar a day to ride) to be able to track the buses in real time using their smart phones. You know the smart phones that cost $200-$500.00 and $100.00 a month to keep turned on? Those poor people. I feel so bad.

24) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 30/09/2012

One more note, if you don't want to pay taxes for the out of parish commuters, live closer to where you work...

25) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 30/09/2012

Carmageddon was caused or at least aggravated by the thousands of people who have chosen to live in Ascension or Livingston or elsewhere and commute daily to EBR. Everyone agrees that the streets of EBR are insufficient for all of those poeple. A loop will not help them commute into EBR (they are not trying to get around EBR), so that is why those parishes have pulled out of the loop commission. From their standpoint, why should they pay taxes to inprove our road system, when they can just keep driving in every day and wait for us to get so frustrated that we tax ourselves to make their commute easier.

26) Comment by 8point6 - 30/09/2012

“We should have allowed a private company to come in, run it, be liable for it, be financially responsible for it and make it parishwide,” he said. “I have no faith in this bus company.” Amen, Mr. Walker.

27) Comment by Terd Handler - 30/09/2012

So mr walker wants us to follow the lead of ascension and livingston, who are looking at building a loop around Port Vincent? If we listened to those people, we would all still be riding horses.