Perkins Rowe developer must pay $201 million

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Baton Rouge developer J.T. “Tommy” Spinosa and three of his companies must pay $201.9 million to an Ohio lender for loans and interest owed on the Perkins Rowe mixed-use project.

U.S. District Judge James J. Brady added in his final judgment that Spinosa and his firms also must pay Cleveland-based KeyBank National Association an additional $32,510 in interest for each day the debt remains unpaid.

Brady ruled last month that KeyBank could foreclose on the development, but he did not specify the total debt until Tuesday.

Mark R. Beebe, a New Orleans attorney who serves as Spinosa’s lead counsel in the 37-month-old case, said Tuesday the developer and his Perkins Rowe companies will ask the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse Brady’s decision.

“The Perkins Rowe defendants disagree with the court’s judgment in several respects,” Beebe said. Beebe said the most significant of those disagreements is over a 21-year-old decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that shows the dispute should have been litigated in state district court rather than federal court.

Brady has now rejected that argument three times.

The judge, Beebe insisted, “is without the authority to enter this judgment and wrest Perkins Rowe from the defendants.”

KeyBank representatives in Cleveland and New York were asked in telephone and email messages for comment, but did not issue any statement.

KeyBank first sued Spinosa in July 2009, alleging that the developer had not made a payment on the unfinished project since October 2008.

Spinosa and his Perkins Rowe Associates LLC, Perkins Rowe Associates II LLC, and Perkins Rowe Block A Condominiums LLC, had filed written objections to KeyBank’s request for the final judgment in specific dollar amounts. But those objections were filed under seal, meaning they are withheld from public view.

Brady dismissed Spinosa’s public allegation that Chicago-based management firm Jones Lang LaSalle Americas Inc., appointed by the judge in 2009 as Perkins Rowe’s operator, had mismanaged the mixed-use development since that time.

Laura J. Mimura, spokeswoman for KeyBank, said last month: “Things are going well (at Perkins Rowe), and we expect that to continue.”

Brady has noted in court records that Perkins Rowe has turned a profit under Jones Lang LaSalle’s management.

The $201.9 million and the $32,510 in additional daily interest are not the only sums owed to KeyBank by Spinosa and his three companies, Brady ruled Tuesday. The judge ordered Spinosa and his firms to pay all of KeyBank’s court costs and attorney fees.

Court records show KeyBank loaned Spinosa’s companies $170 million to develop Perkins Rowe near the intersection of Bluebonnet Boulevard and Perkins Road.

More than $8 million of that debt had been retired before payments ceased in October 2008.

But Brady’s ruling showed that interest owed on the remaining principal of $161.4 million expanded the debt to $201.9 million by Aug. 15.

The judge added that Spinosa, who personally guaranteed the debt, and his Perkins Rowe companies owe KeyBank another $32,510 in interest for each day the loan remains unpaid after Aug. 15.

Spinosa’s ambitious project included space for 229 apartments, 88 condominiums, more than 60 shops and restaurants, a movie complex, grocery store, pharmacy, a book store, two parks and business offices.

Some of the available space has yet to be finished, but many of the restaurants, shops and stores appear to attract significant crowds on a daily basis.

However, Spinosa still controls the supply of chilled water that provides air conditioning for the residential and commercial tenants at Perkins Rowe.

A dispute between Spinosa and KeyBank over control of that chilled water remains pending in Brady’s court.

Both Spinosa and Beebe have stated in the past that chilled water will not be denied to any Perkins Rowe tenant who continues to pay his or her monthly bill for that service.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (16)


1) Comment by NewsReader - 05/09/2012

TommyRucker, Spinosa (not unsurprisingly) sits on both sides of the fence in his past political contributions. You can always check these facts for ANYONE with opensecrets.org by just searching his name and all cycles. This is a link to it (it's a preview before you go there so y'all don't have to worry about nasty misdirects and clearly shows where the link will take you before you click) http://preview.tinyurl.com/cp6ep6y

2) Comment by TommyRucker - 05/09/2012

He needs to get on the Obama mob bandwagon and get some of our taxpayer money to bail him out. He must be on the wrong side of the political war. These developers, if they are on the wrong side of Obama, will be severely punished as it is not enough that they go broke, they need to be crucified. We are going to see fewer and fewer of such 'risk takers' in America in the future unless they are risking OUR MONEY and backed by the Obama mob.

3) Comment by TommyRucker - 05/09/2012

He needs to get on the Obama mob bandwagon and get some of our taxpayer money to bail him out. He must be on the wrong side of the political war. These developers, if they are on the wrong side of Obama, will be severely punished as it is not enough that they go broke, they need to be crucified. We are going to see fewer and fewer of such 'risk takers' in America in the future unless they are risking OUR MONEY and backed by the Obama mob.

4) Comment by TommyRucker - 05/09/2012

He needs to get on the Obama mob bandwagon and get some of our taxpayer money to bail him out. He must be on the wrong side of the political war. These developers, if they are on the wrong side of Obama, will be severely punished as it is not enough that they go broke, they need to be crucified. We are going to see fewer and fewer of such 'risk takers' in America in the future unless they are risking OUR MONEY and backed by the Obama mob.

5) Comment by Being_Stupid - 05/09/2012

@ foldgers, The zoning for Perkins Rowe was already established by Jimmy Swaggert during the 1980s for his Bible College that never happened. As for Rouzan, if anyone had an under-table envelope handed to them, it could have been somebody with the Planning and Zoning Dictatorship. Spinosa must of have been a good spokesman to convince the P&Z Dictatorship and Previous Metro Council to allow him to rezone for Rouzan in the middle of Southside against the mandate of the Southside Civic Gestapo and FGBRCA to not allow any commercial zoning south of Perkins Highway. Tommy Spinosa obtained rezoning that is usually denied to other smaller developers in this location or south of Perkins. Definitely a double standard by the P&Z Dictatorship. Seems that some developers are politically connected, while the others are not.

6) Comment by eastta - 05/09/2012

If Brady really had balls, he'd split the assets evenly or fairly, & cancel the original contract (fiat fractional reserve).

7) Comment by foldgers - 05/09/2012

@being-stupid, I apologize. I was wrong about Smokie being for Rouzan. I made an assumption and I admit my incorrectness, BUT, I do not think the council acted correctly. All this came up years ago when Perkins Rowe was not even complete yet. They knew of this HUGE issue. His personal finances may not be of concern, but how he is obviously conducting business should be. When the whole Rouzan project was still being debated, his debt to these banks that he was NOT paying came to light. I believe the council should have delayed their approval until this was all settled. I mean, why would Baton Rouge want a so called businessman who does this in this city? I am sure there is another developer out there who has a clean record and can do the job just as well. I just hope the houses he builds at Rouzan are of higher quality than those condos at Rouzan.

8) Comment by Being_Stupid - 05/09/2012

@foldgers, just for the record... Smokie B. is like the only Metro Council Rep. that has consistently opposed Tommy Spinosa and has tried to foil his plans for future development. The other Metro Council Reps that allowed him to go forward with his plans for Rouzan, not Smokie. The Metro Council does not consider if a developer or property owner has the funds or not to complete a new development. The Metro Council only grants or denies the rezoning to allow for development that may not be consistent with the current zoning. The Metro Council as a whole made the right decision to allow Spinosa to move forward with Rouzan. His finances are not any of their concern. Spinosa had some good ideas and built a very fine TND. Unfortunately the economy did not go his way at the end of 2008 thanks to the Community Reinvestment Act enacted and empowered by the Democrat / RINO Congress, Bill Clinton, and Jimmy Carter.

9) Comment by phil - 05/09/2012

Gee, I hope nobody moves out of this development as a result of all of this. If they do, maybe we should just use one of those buildings for a new library instead of risking that the other site will be a good one and will actually be completely developed. But after all, since it is just YOUR tax money being used for a new library, who really cares anyway?

10) Comment by foldgers - 05/09/2012

I wonder now if he will be able to finish the Rouzan project...or just increase the sales price of the houses to make up for it, kind of like the WAY OVER PRICED and cheaply built condos in Perkins Rowe. I still can't believe the city council allowed him to develop Rouzan with all this going on... one reason I am voting Smokie B. out of office this year... I am sure the council members had some under the table envelopes handed to them.

11) Comment by BoiledCrabs - 05/09/2012

Some developers that undertake projects like this do so never intending to repay loans. The loans are their profit if they manage to keep from spending too much on construction and hide it from the courts.

12) Comment by Duckyluve - 04/09/2012

You mean he has to pay his bills? What a crime

13) Comment by Hello Baton Rouge - 04/09/2012

Its ridiculously thought out. Hey, lets have a ton of stores here that all close at night right about the time that the crowd is arriving for dinner and drinks! Retarded

14) Comment by Preppy6917 - 04/09/2012

Agreed. I left in Baton Rouge in 2008...has Perkins Rowe done well? The last I was there, all of the perimeter stores were doing well, but the main street was half empty at best.

15) Comment by BRmoderate - 04/09/2012

deserved

16) Comment by BRmoderate - 04/09/2012

J.T. got what he deserves