EBR Coroner to charge families for cremains 

Families that turn over the bodies of loved ones to the East Baton Rouge Parish coroner for a pauper’s cremation will have to pay if they want the ashes returned.

Coroner Dr. Beau Clark said his office will begin enforcing state laws that kick in when family members agree to a pauper’s burial, which means they sign over the rights of the body to the state because they cannot afford or refuse to pay funeral costs, Clark said.

Once the agreement is signed, the Coroner’s Office can cremate the body or donate it to science, Clark said.

Burials rarely take place, he said, because they are too costly.

If the Coroner’s Office chooses to cremate a body, “there’s a cost that goes with that,” Clark said.

Clark said it costs the city-parish $390 to cremate a body — $330 for cremation and another $60 for a body bag.

“That’s 300 something bucks of taxpayer money,” Clark said.

State law says that after the Coroner’s Office cremates or buries a body, the person overseeing the deceased person’s succession must “provide for the payment of the burial expenses out of the assets of the decedent,” assuming the decedent had “known assets” to pay for burial costs.

The law applies to cremations as well as burials, Clark said.

Clark said while he was making his transition into office, he and his staff discovered that ashes were being returned to family members for free. Now, Clark said, the Coroner’s Office will try to recoup the money spent performing cremations.

“We have had a few circumstances where the family has come back and inquired if they (their loved ones) have been cremated,” Clark said.

If the Coroner’s Office performs a cremation, the office holds onto the ashes for 60 days, Clark said.

If the ashes go unclaimed, they are spread at a Baton Rouge area cemetery, Clark said. Family members are welcome to attend that spreading, he said.

Clark said he decided to begin enforcing the law after funeral homes approached him with a concern that people were choosing what they thought was a free cremation over paying a funeral home when families could afford funeral or cremation costs.

“Somewhere along the way, people were researching the law and maybe using it to their advantage,” Clark said.

Clark said people started coming to his office under the assumption that it serves as a crematorium. While the office occasionally performs cremations, it doesn’t want it to be a regular service, Clark said.

“We by no means want to be in the cremation business,” Clark said. “That is what funeral homes and funeral directors do.”

Dr. Shannon Cooper, the coroner for eight years before Clark was elected in 2011, acknowledged the law existed during his tenure but said he did not remember “exactly how we enforced it.”

“As I recall, we tried to enforce it at one point,” he said.

Don Moreau, Cooper’s former chief of operations, said Cooper’s administration decided it would be too costly to pursue people for the costs if they had said they could not pay.

“I personally felt it would not be cost-effective to pursue them,” Moreau said.

Cooper said his office had no way of knowing if people who claimed they could not pay either did not have the funds or simply decided they did not want to pay the costs. Cooper said the city-parish does incur costs when the Coroner’s Office cremates a body.

“If some of that cost can be recouped, then it’s less expense to the Coroner’s Office,” he said.

However, he said his office did not withhold ashes if the family could not or would not pay.

“It doesn’t seem like very fertile territory to raise money and keep the ashes of their loved ones if they can’t afford it,” Cooper said.

Clark said he’s choosing to enforce the law because the parish has to pay for the costs when his office cremates a body.

“The parish is paying for it. It’s not a free service,” he said. “I’m trying to be a good steward of your tax dollars.”

East Baton Rouge Parish Attorney Mary Roper said the decision to pursue the fees is up to the Coroner’s Office and not the city-parish.

“They’re certainly authorized to do it under the law,” Roper said. “It is just a policy decision as to whether they want to do it or not.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (14)


1) Comment by LSUinVail - 28/08/2012

I agree with TommyRucker...although one does not have to be Christian necessarily to have compassion for those less fortunate. Some of these posters here have been reading too much Ayn Rand.

2) Comment by Being_Stupid - 27/08/2012

I hope after I die that somebody hangs my skeleton in a science classroom or uses my skeleton for Halloween decoration. That way I can still hang around with the living after I am dead. I also have plans to become a ghost capable of haunting houses or graveyards, and look forward to scaring people or little kids after I die.

3) Comment by tradewinns - 27/08/2012

another cost to be bourne by the taxpayer that isn't right. why does it cost more to "bury" a body than to cremate one? in jacksonville, fl they dig a long trench and every month or two, they put the paupers or unclaimed bodies in a pine casket, no embalming, laying them in the trench, one on top of the other then cover the trench. they keep them the required amount of time for anyone to claim them that wants or can afford it. if you can not afford a funeraL, you shouldn't be "given" one at taxpayers expense.

4) Comment by Chucky - 27/08/2012

Oh no you can not have your family ashes back We will scatter them to the four winds unless you pay the King his money it is the Law and the Demand of the Funeral Homes that I do so.

5) Comment by TommyRucker - 27/08/2012

I disagree with the approach that they now 'own' the bodies and can do whatever they want with them. Are they going to start selling body parts in the future?? I do not think it is right for the state to distribute ashes on the property of some local cemetery. These ashes should be treated with dignity attributed to all humans and they need to be placed in a specific area in every cemetery. Each cemetery needs to be required to have such a specific area for the ashes of these people and they need to be treated with the same basic dignity that everyone else receives. It is a sign of a deterioration in our society to treat the bodies and ashes of anyone who dies without this basic dignity. I have no problem with the state trying to re-coop some of its costs (when possible) and having families pay for ashes but when the ashes aren't purchased then these ashes need more than just being 'spread out over the property of some cemetery'-as this is not consistent with our Christian heritage and we need to treat these ashes with dignity and not institute some 'less than' procedure in order to threaten and extort money from poor people who cannot afford to pay. We are going to see more and more bodies sent to the state as the economy is going to only get worse (with 16 Trillion in debt) and unfortunately we have less and less regard for human life and the remains of humans.

6) Comment by phil - 27/08/2012

I agree the law needs to be followed and that is why we have laws. However, there are many laws that need to be changed because they just are not feasible (and in some cases maybe not even legal under the constitution of the USA and/or the state). I am not saying this is the case here, but sometimes laws need to be reviewed and changed. If you actually read some of the bills that are created in the LA Legislature that end up being revised statutes, then you might understand why I say this.

7) Comment by justicematters - 27/08/2012

I looked it up: LRS 9:1551 (B) LRS 9:1552 These Louisiana laws dictate what happens in these cases. It looks like Mr. Clark has no choice, and could be attaching liens to the estates of the ones cremated, according to the law. The atricle doesnt indicate he plans to do that. I think this is a much more reasonable alternative, and any body who complains should be extremely careful what they wish for. Read the law on it before you decide.

8) Comment by phil - 27/08/2012

This appears to me to mainly be about what to do with the ashes after a cremation. Did I read this incorrectly? This does not seem to be about the actual costs of the cremation. If this is only about charging for the ashes, then I suggest that the coroner tell people that if they want the ashes they will have to pay for a container and any extra costs associated with obtaining the ashes of their loved one vs what it would cost the government otherwise. Do we want to be in the business of selling ashes of a loved family member to the family? Of course, if the deceased person had assets, then I agree that those assets should be used to pay for the cremation itself.

9) Comment by zealer99 - 27/08/2012

This is a difficult decision, It is human nature for most people not to pay if they know it is not required.

10) Comment by Chucky - 27/08/2012

Shows that death really has no meaning in East Baton Rouge but for what it cost in $. Also, what about the law-suite that the funeral company's have with the Abby Monks building caskets, what ever happened to that ?

11) Comment by rdm41234 - 27/08/2012

U Geaux Beau. There's a vote I can really be proud of. This is yet another article, though, that just shows that the previous person that held this position was clueless and still will not take responsibility. 'As I recall, we tried to enforce it at one point' and acknowledged the law existed during his tenure but said he did not remember 'exactly how we enforced it.' This guy should have his license revoked. If I 'recall' correctly, it was one of his 'deputies' that was killed at TJ Ribs on S. Acadian and then it was discovered that this person had been stealing drugs on cases he investigated.

12) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 27/08/2012

Why not cremate them for free. We have given them free stuff all of their lives, why make them pay now?

13) Comment by dday198 - 27/08/2012

i thought conservatives oppose death taxes.

14) Comment by Pakistani - 27/08/2012

I think the surrounding parishes charge already.