Jindal finds way to pay more to appointee

To hire Gov. Bobby Jindal’s former aide, Tim Barfield, as the state’s new revenue secretary at more than double the normal pay, the Jindal administration had to create a new position in state government.

Along with the title of acting secretary, Barfield will add executive counsel to his business cards. The Jindal administration created the counsel position to circumvent limitations that would have prevented Barfield from being paid more than his predecessor.

“We wanted to bring Tim in as soon as possible,” Commissioner of Administration Paul Rainwater, the governor’s chief budget adviser, said Friday. “The Legislature’s going to have an opportunity to approve his salary. This was the quickest way to bring Tim in.”

The Jindal administration agreed to pay Barfield $250,000 a year for his combined roles, making him one of the governor’s highest-paid Cabinet secretaries.

The Revenue Department’s previous secretary, Cynthia Bridges, made $124,000 a year.

The problem with paying Barfield more than Bridges is that legislators only agreed to pay the revenue secretary $124,000 when they adopted the state’s $25.6 billion operating budget earlier this year.

One option was for the Jindal administration to hold off on hiring Barfield until the Legislature returns to the State Capitol next year. The new salary could then be included in next year’s state budget.

Rainwater said the Jindal administration did not want to wait that long.

Instead, the administration submitted paperwork with the state Department of Civil Service “activating” the position of executive counsel until the Legislature can approve Barfield’s appointment and salary.

The Revenue Department currently does not have an executive counsel.

“We’re simply using the existing authority,” Rainwater said.

Former Gov. Kathleen Blanco ran into a similar problem when she wanted to increase Cabinet secretaries’ salaries in 2004 in order to add several new hires to her administration.

Senate President John Alario, then a state representative, filed a resolution during a special session spelling out the problem.

“In the case of executive branch department officers appointed by the governor, including the secretaries of the cabinet departments, the Executive Reorganization Act generally provides that the salary of such officer shall be fixed by the governor and that such salary shall not exceed the amount approved for such position by the legislature while in session,” the resolution read.

The Legislature agreed to the resolution, raising the salaries of the secretaries of economic development and the state Department of Health and Hospitals.

Alario, R-Westwego, said Friday that he does not recall the resolution or the reasons for introducing it.

He said there is some grumbling among legislators about Barfield’s salary although it is not a groundswell of opposition.

Barfield said he plans to start work with the state in October after wrapping up his job as chief development officer for Baton Rouge-based Amedisys.

He said he did not pursue the Cabinet job despite previously serving as labor secretary and the governor’s executive counsel. “They approached me,” Barfield said.

He said the job is a unique opportunity.

Barfield is joining a Jindal administration grappling with deep financial problems. Health-care funding just was slashed by millions of dollars.

Despite the money woes, Rainwater said the state easily can find the extra dollars to pay Barfield.

“That’s one tenth of one percent of the (revenue) department’s budget,” Rainwater said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (35)


1) Comment by Stewieloves - 22/08/2012

Why doesn't "The Louisiana Dual Officeholding and Dual Employment Laws, R.S. 42:61, et seq.," apply to Tim Barfield? It is stated that he will not only hold the position of Secretary of LDR but also Executive Counsel. That is 2, correct? Also would seem those positions could possibly be in legal conflict of each other. We do still abide by the Constitution of the State of Louisiana ...right? and the Constitution of the United States? http://www.ag.state.la.us/Article.aspx?articleID=22&catID=10

2) Comment by IMVOR - 20/08/2012

It's a sad commentary on Louisiana state government that the governor can find a way to pay someone twice the budgeted salary for that position, when neither his cabinet nor the legislature can find a way to give even a 1% raise to loyal employees who have not had any raises in six years, and in some cases are now doing the work of two or more people because of budget cuts. If Barfield is "executive counsel," I'm guessing his records will also be shielded from public scrutiny the same as the governor's are. How convenient that Jindal can kill two birds with one stone that way.

3) Comment by KilgoreTrout - 18/08/2012

Here's 98 cents not from a Jindal hack: Keep your two cents.. The assertion that any of this is improving Louisiana is 100% non cents. There are of course the 0%ers who are taking the opportunity of exploiting the dismal educational systems in Louisiana to pillage the state and advance themselves at the expense of the remarkably naive Louisiana public. On a business call to a state up in the Midwest this week, the barely concealed assumption was that persons from Louisiana were dumb and an easy mark . Way to go, clowns.

4) Comment by Ozisawesome - 18/08/2012

Here is my two cents. Not only is Mr. Tim Barfield a smart man he's a good one too. This being said by a 99%er

5) Comment by gvm - 18/08/2012

@KPMorgan: hold your horses. If you take my words as I intended them you'd see that my point was to say that not one of the few exceptions, i.e. those few who don't have their noses up the Governors rear, are Republicans. Hope this clears it up.

6) Comment by ABayouBoy - 18/08/2012

I wish that he would appoint me as Dept. of Revenue counsel....I could certainly use the extra $250,000 per year. Just think, in four years I could actually be a millionaire! Just goes to show you that you can make off like a bandit in the govt.

7) Comment by KPMorgan - 18/08/2012

gvm - You said "Unfortunately, the same is true of almost the entire legislature - with but a few exceptions - none of them Republican." That's a mathematical impossibility. The majority of both chambers of the legislature are Republicans. Therefore, if you're talking about "almost the entire legislature", by definition, you have to be talking about quite a few Republicans. And given that it's the Republicans who, like Alario, have their noses up Jindal's butt, you can squarely lay a lot of our problems at their feet.

8) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 18/08/2012

THIS is what you all will see on the national level when you limply turn your government over to profiteers. And you think that's where your best interests lie?

9) Comment by gvm - 18/08/2012

Goodgovernance raises some very good points. Is that enough logic for you, jeffsadow?

10) Comment by goodgovernance - 18/08/2012

I'm also concerned about the potential politicization of the Revenue Department by the Jindal administration. I hope that Barfield will be a fair and effective tax administrator as Secretary and not a political catspaw for the governor. When tax agencies become politicized, public confidence in the tax system invariably suffers, along with revenue collections and private investment in the state or locality. It is troubling to me that the Deputy Secretary of the Department is a former longtime state legislator without any tax administration experience. Please note that I welcome the governor's efforts to reform the state's tax code. Major reforms are desperately needed to ensure stable and sustainable fiscal and economic environments, but those reforms should be debated and undertaken in a manner that insulates the Revenue Department from undue political pressures.

11) Comment by goodgovernance - 18/08/2012

Please note that I have nothing against Barfield or his appointment as Revenue Secretary. I don't know Barfield, but he strikes me as a smart and conscientious fellow, and the Revenue Department and the state may benefit greatly from the ideas and energy he brings. I do object, though, to the manner in which the governor chose to appoint him, which betrays both the letter and the spirit of the law. It suggests an arrogance by the governor that state laws and rules don't apply to him or his administration. In how many other ways is the governor strongarming people to look the other direction when he wants to do something that violates state law? This reminds me of the days when Edwin Edwards was governor.

12) Comment by goodgovernance - 18/08/2012

@jeffsadow: You've asked for logic; allow me to provide some. The position of Revenue Secretary is a full-time position, the salary for which is capped by legislative appropriation. The position of Executive Counsel is likewise a full-time position with its own salary limits. Under state law, a state employee cannot simultaneously hold and be paid for two full-time jobs with the state. How then is the Barfield arrangement legal? What legal contortions did Civil Service perform in an attempt to circumvent a state law intended to protect taxpayers against the cronyism of the past? Moreover, given the full-time nature of both jobs, Barfield cannot perform both jobs without short-changing his responsibilities for one or both of the jobs. Finally, I'm reminded of the old saying that a lawyer who chooses to represent himself has a fool for a lawyer. By creating this situation in which Barfield will serve as his own legal advisor, the governor has ensured that the Secretary will not receive the best legal advice (Barfield is not a tax attorney and does not have meaningful experience with the legal aspects of tax administration).

13) Comment by RiverRat - 18/08/2012

Piyush Jindal a Rhodes Scholar showing his true colors again. This does not surprise me!

14) Comment by Grannee - 18/08/2012

My dad use to say, "you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time", Jeff....

15) Comment by Grannee - 18/08/2012

Jeff did Bobbinhood get the correct size for your nose ring? Of course, you would want to have it fitted just so, so that you can move around during your brown nosing exercises. However, it appears it's not working for you because you are still stuck in your same little rut of ignorance.

16) Comment by jeffsadow - 18/08/2012

As usual, commenters are long on emotion and short on logic. One of the principles of superior public administration is to give the executive the authority to hire without undue interference by the legislature. The existing standard violates this. At the same time, there is a legislatively-sanctioned out provided as well, used by both Blanco and Jindal, so in an administrative and ethical sense there's nothing wrong with this. Salaries paid in the executive branch should not be a matter of legislative oversight, but are political issues: if you don't like Barfield working two jobs (keep in mind that long ago DSCS authorized this position, so upon review they could not prevent it from being filled this way) or Moret making $400,000 a year, impeach their boss, or vote against any elected executive who gives out salaries like that. Actually, if Barfield is instrumental in delivering tax reform touted at his hiring, he will be worth every penny. And, if you don't like the out that was taken and are comfortable with legislative micromanaging of executive branch personnel decisions, contact legislators to get it changed. Finally, when comparing salaries of classified and unclassified employees from the 2007-11 period, the change for each, around 6 percent, has been about the same.

17) Comment by timesright - 18/08/2012

MFP funds frozen four years in a row. Layoffs in departments across the state. Services reduced or eliminated. Offices closed. You know the list. Gov. Jindal sure proves the point: Where there is a will there is a way. His speed in accomplishing it beats all records. He'll find the money for those people and areas that are of most importance to him, the heck with the majority of the state's citizens.

18) Comment by gvm - 18/08/2012

The lie of course being Bobby Jindal's "reform" agenda. Just another penny ante politician "slopping at the public trough," as H.L. Mencken once observed.

19) Comment by gvm - 18/08/2012

The Bobby Brown-Noser hordes can't make their case on this one. A lie, no matter how ardently or passionately is defended, is still a lie at the end of the day. Jindal is as reprehensible as those he attacks - perhaps even more so.

20) Comment by gary - 18/08/2012

I'm with SuzanneMs - where are the Jindal defenders on this move? Make your case.

21) Comment by MissCotillion - 18/08/2012

Jindal guts higher education and blows off LASERS, and now Rainwater is bragging about how big the Revenue budget is-this guy's salary is trivial in a department so flush? How can people be so completely tone-deaf? Is Rainwater driving drunk again? What a racket. What an outrage.

22) Comment by gvm - 18/08/2012

That's what happens when government, on any level, gets occupied by "professional job seekers" as opposed to principled men and women who, presumably, are elected to serve their constituents. I mean, that's why they're called public servants isn't it?

23) Comment by Grannee - 18/08/2012

GVM, it is so sad. I have never seen a group of individuals incapable of individual thinking. They all should get bull rings in their noses so they can be led around by Bobbinhood. I can't wait to see who will have the audacity to break free from their nose ring to lead Louisiana out of this miriey clay. Hint, hint...Bobbinhood has been put in his place on the national level. This news should trickle down to someone in the legislature any day now. Come on and break free of that nose ring.

24) Comment by gvm - 18/08/2012

@Grannee: "John Alario is disgusting. His nose is so far up Jindal's rear until his gray hair is black again. Alario has given new meaning to "brown nosing". Wow!!! There's no mistaking your displeasure. I agree, by the way. Unfortunately, the same is true of almost the entire legislature - with but a few exceptions - none of them Republican.

25) Comment by Grannee - 18/08/2012

Jindal, robber of the poor to pay the rich...Bobbinhood!

26) Comment by Grannee - 18/08/2012

Shannon Templet should be fired. Civil Service is nothing but a rubber stamp for the governor and agency heads. It violates the very Louisiana Constitutional Rules that were designed to protect civil service employees and taxpayers from this type of thievery from the mafia boss. Shame on you Ms. Templet for allowing this to take place. What a great retirement check he's gonna receive. John Alario is disgusting. His nose is so far up Jindal's rear until his gray hair is black again. Alario has given new meaning to "brown nosing".

27) Comment by gvm - 18/08/2012

Cronyism?

28) Comment by warreni - 18/08/2012

This is the reality behind Louisiana's fiscal crisis: we only can't afford to pay for things when they're things that the governor doesn't actually want to pay for in the first place. How long will it be before something YOU care about makes its way onto this list?

29) Comment by warreni - 18/08/2012

Unless this guy craps gold bars, there's no way our conservative leader can claim that using this money to double his salary is better than funding merit increases for rank-and-file employees.

30) Comment by goodgovernance - 18/08/2012

The governor's action to have Barfield fill two positions in the Department as a means of increasing his pay is clearly a sham. The Department already has two "chief legal officers"--an unclassified Assistant Secretary for Legal Affairs appointed by the governor, and a General Counsel who is a classified civil service employee. There may be value in having a legal advisor position within the office of the Secretary (previous Revenue Secretaries have used an existing Confidential Assistant position in that capacity to good effect), but it is absurd to pay a Secretary for being his own legal advisor. Shame on the Civil Service Department for approving this obvious sham.

31) Comment by SuzanneMS - 18/08/2012

Just waiting for all of the Jindal apologists who applauded his reductions in the number of state employees, while closing their eyes to what he's doing with the money he's "saved." The salaries of all of the unclassified administrative-level employees has jumped under his regime -- and I do mean regime.

32) Comment by Bouncer - 18/08/2012

Unconscionable and insupportable. Simply unbelievable.

33) Comment by spqr - 18/08/2012

Whatever happened to having to "do more with less"? That is what Piyush Jindal told public schools, colleges and universities, state workers, state health and hospitals, college students, prison officials, etc. Why can't he play by his own rules? Simple. He is his own god.

34) Comment by spqr - 18/08/2012

Whatever happened to having to "do more with less"? That is what Piyush Jindal told public schools, colleges and universities, state workers, state health and hospitals, college students, prison officials, etc. Why can't he play by his own rules? Simple. He is his own god.

35) Comment by Grannee - 18/08/2012

Meanwhile back at the ranch, Revenue employees have not had merit increases in approximately four years. The Jindal administration is telling the taxpayers that rank and file civil service employees need their retirement benefits adjusted to pay more because the state can't afford to meet the obligation. However, another unclassified employee is added making a six figure salary to add to future retirement system woes. What a liar and a thief this mafia boss is. That billboard on I-12 in Livingston parish depicting Obama as Satan more accurately describes Jindal.