School Board rolls forward tax

The East Baton Rouge Parish School Board voted 8-3 Thursday to “roll forward” a property tax millage for the 2012 tax year, a move that could raise as much as $3.7 million more for the system’s budget.

This decision required a two-thirds vote of the board.

Board members David Tatman, Vereta Lee, Kenyetta Nelson-Smith, Tarvald Smith, Evelyn Ware-Jackson, Craig Freeman, Barbara Freiberg and Randy Lamana voted in favor of rolling forward the property tax millage, while board members Jill Dyason, Jerry Arbour and Connie Bernard opposed the measure.

The issue is one many taxing authorities across the parish are dealing with this year.

Property in the state gets reassessed every four years, which means the value of some properties go up. Taxing authorities can “roll back” their tax rate levels to raise the same amount of money as the previous year, or “roll forward” and generate more money.

Superintendent Bernard Taylor Jr. said the extra money is needed for a school system that welcomed 43,000 students back to class last week but had to pass a budget that cut $28 million and 100 positions from the school system.

Although the school system has been able to keep the cuts from being felt in the classroom for the most part, that won’t last forever, he said.

“What we’re trying to do is avoid cuts that impact students in his or her classroom,” Taylor said.

The 43.45 mills approved Thursday evening will mean an increase of $3 a year for a home valued at $100,000 or $15 more a year for a house valued at $200,000, the school system’s chief budget officer, Catherine Fletcher, told the board.

“The type of increase we’re talking about is the price of a movie ticket,” Taylor said. “What I’m asking you to do is sacrifice a Starbucks or a lunch hour.”

Belinda Davis, president of One Community One School District, said she watched the School Board struggle with budget cuts, and if the board didn’t roll the tax forward, it would be like saying the crisis wasn’t real.

“And I know that’s not the truth,” Davis said.

She said the board’s job is to serve the best interest of the students, “not to serve the best interest of Woody Jenkins.”

Woody Jenkins, chairman of the East Baton Rouge Parish Republican Party, said rolling the millage forward amounts to a $15 million new tax over the next four years.

“All the talk of movie ticket is irrelevant,” Jenkins said. He said any increase will fall on the backs of property owners who will again have to pay more money in tough economic times.

People don’t have the money, he said.

Several people told the board they home school their children and didn’t use the public schools, or that the increases put another burden on property owners that they couldn’t afford.

However, other speakers said rolling the millage forward is the price everyone pays for the privileges we have.

Tania Nyman said she and her husband live a comfortable life because he’s been successful and they both believe it’s because of the availability of public education. It’s important for people who have been fortunate with a standard of living not available to everyone, it’s important to give back, she said.

Steven Cook, who is with a group called Stand for Children, said it’s his responsibility as the parent of two daughters in the public school system to make sure his daughters reach their full potential. He urged the board to vote in favor of rolling forward the tax millage and presented the board with 1,000 signatures of parents and community members in support of the roll forward vote.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (46)


1) Comment by nimby? - 18/08/2012

Chucky , unless they've committed a felony it is almost impossible to keep discipline problems out . several years back I injured a student taking a knife from him , his mother attempted to press charges , file a civil suit against me . this was the reason I "retired" ...

2) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 18/08/2012

Phil, I've been using the 990s for years now... hence my common ending to a post... Follow the Money! Says a heck of a lot! I have been a leading opponent of the privatization for years and years... ever since I first started writing about it around 20 years ago. And Chucky, just for the record.... in almost every case I know the courts have made clear that the criminals have a right to an education in their local schools. In many cases we can (if we are notified) ensure that they are placed in our alternative schools, but we don't always know about them!

3) Comment by Chucky - 18/08/2012

"consequence " nimby?, think that you might be on the right track, have we seen it ? No, students who have raped but sill in school ?

4) Comment by phil - 18/08/2012

Noel: I realize you know more about the actual schools than I do from your experience. But common sense seems to lead us to many of the same conclusions. Now for a hint - look up the IRS 990 forms for some of the non-profit organizations involved in the push of charter and voucher schools. Check out their salaries and I think that by itself says a lot.

5) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 18/08/2012

I don't know, Sidney Poitier IS a great speaker, and that Bahamian accent is a killer, let's discuss it over a cup of coffee on your front porch. :) I heard him speak at a conference a few years ago... he is an excellent speaker! I like your thinking! The "reformers" somehow think they are thinking "out of the box" yet they are so tied to their failed accountability system (they have never, ever dared to try and defend it in a public forum against someone who has knowledge if its failures...) that they can't even understand your points... We need a plethora of venues and opportunities for students to succeed. What the State is doing is defunding and making incredibly difficult the tasks you and I would gladly take on. Making a difference in the lives of all Louisiana's children.

6) Comment by nimby? - 18/08/2012

Noel , watched To Sir with Love , again , last week . novel approach at dealing with young adults . could it work in real life ?

7) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 18/08/2012

Phil, nimby, we agree on most things! I'm with ya Phil, the vouchers and charters are costing Louisiana taxpayers a HUGE amount of money, and getting no better results. And nimby, you are so right. We cannot continue with the STATUS QUO. The problem is, the STATUS QUO is NOT "failing schools" but a totally failed accountability system that takes schools that are designed exactly for the students who are dropping out, failing, and resorting to violence often of of frustration with being forced to take tests that serve no purpose for them, for these students often KNOW theya re lost academically.... anyway, this state accountability system rates them in exactly the same was as they rank Baton Rouge High and other Magnets and Selective enrollment schools. Does it REALLY take a rocket scientist to know that expecting the same scores (ion the same length of time) from students selected for their higher than average academic performance and those who are sent to "alternative schools" that might, in fact help them, but cannot be expected to compete with those elite. selective students. By the way, Baton Rouge High, and Ben Franklin in New Orleans just happen to have the lowest percentage of students qualifying for free lunch in their respective districts, while the alternative schools are at the top. Phil, for less than the one-year cost of the high-priced, under-qualified leaders of this reform, we could provide every child in Baton Rouge with a library of high-quality books, for their home. Moving the average of "books in the home" from 3 to over 100 increases the predictions of these students scores in 4th grade by almost two years. Savings to the district and the taxpayer? In the neighborhood of $44 million by reducing the need for students to repeat fourth grade. Conservative estimate! Cost of the books, a one-time cost of $683,000. (We would include a book drive to collect high-quality used books as well to supplement new books.)

8) Comment by nimby? - 18/08/2012

teachers are forced to spend more time with student who don't want to learn than those who do . solution ; tie payment of government services with education , employment , workfare . if they choose not to educate themselves , seek employment , suspend services . call it incentive or consequence due to 'lack of motivation' . this may sound cruel , but time money and resources are being wasted on individuals not appreciative . there is no reason someone should have to support someone one half , one third their age who is stronger and just as smart . kids who want an education deserve a positive environment free from distraction ....

9) Comment by phil - 18/08/2012

Also what about the poor students who are left behind in the worse schools because they could not obtain a voucher? Tell me exactly how that comes out to be fair and equal treatment for all? The voucher system is so flawed it is really easy to argue against it.

10) Comment by phil - 18/08/2012

Noel: Sorry I am hard to keep up with. Sounds like we actually agree on some items. One thing I think that needs to be taught in public schools is more math, and one part of that is to educate kids in poverty that higher taxes often just creates even more poverty, and that tax money often ends up in the hands of greedy people who are in the business of making money and could care less about the poor or anyone else. I am not directing that at school teachers and others in the public school system but at others in this city who already know exactly who they are. Another lesson might be that you cannot fix a public- financed system by creating another system to compete with it. The original public system will just get worse. Finally I feel like I HAVE been rolled over again and again by the recent property reassessment and by these roll forwards of millages.

11) Comment by Get Real - 17/08/2012

Mr. Taylor the effects are being felt in the classroom at my child's school the classes are full and I'm hearing that because the teachers and administration work their butts off and have a decent school they are sending children from failing schools there. So now my child will be able to qualify for a voucher because the school will be in the bottom with these children coming. Not FAIR!!!

12) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 17/08/2012

For the truth about how charters destroy local school district budgets see http://educatorsforall.org/blog/2012/3/20/why-charter- schools-do-not-save-communities-money.html Would love people to comment, criticize or critique these!

13) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 17/08/2012

Phil, I can't keep up with you... I accidently responded to this on your other posting at late school busses. lol. lol... Phil. I was pointing out the amount of the tax increase due to both his reassessment and the roll forward of only the taxes they voted on last night. You pay many different property taxes, BREC, Library, and City taxes, some of which are not affected by homestead exemption. Again, we were discussing the impact of only the school taxes. You are so correct about vouchers and charters costing districts so much money! There are no real savings when only a few students leave a school. The "state" may actually save a few dollars.... but local districts will lose, big time. Private and parochial schools are just filling empty seats, great payoff for them! And Phil, I guess we could just let the kids drop out and pay for prison space... but prisons are so darn expensive! What I am calling for is a much more holistic approach to education, and I am not asking the government to take over all these things, rest assured!

14) Comment by phil - 17/08/2012

Public schools lose money because of the voucher system draining funds away from public schools and those schools are not run efficiently anyway. Public schools need more money as a result even though the number of students decrease. The public schools system has a meeting and rolls millages forward to collect more tax money. Private schools make more money because they are in business to make profits. GUESS WHO PAYS for all of these vouchers? Take a big guess! YOU DO! Then we will have to figure out how to get buses to take each student to their private school of choice. That is about as short and sweet as I can make this explanation.

15) Comment by phil - 17/08/2012

My home was reassessed at about $35,000 more and my taxes will go up over $350 per year. That sounds like a lot more than a meal to me. The only time that increase in value does you any real good is when you sell your home (or maybe when applying for a loan to pay your taxes), and assuming it actually did go up in value, then you will get probably more cash to get the heck out of dodge. Of course you will probably have to pay more capital gains taxes so some of that increased value is lost. If you plan on staying put, the increased taxes means you get nothing extra but a larger tax to pay and eventually you could get priced out of living in your own home. I bet the RDA loves this so they can take over more properties and "redevelop" your house for you and make some money in the process. (Maybe that is the real idea behind all of this?) By the way, did you know that redevelopment has been stopped in California (sorry, another topic). By the way, it's always the same old story that it is just a few bucks so what will it hurt. Give me a break!

16) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 17/08/2012

@Springer98: My apologies, you did not say you owned the house. The point about strong needs to take anecdotes and create patterns out of thin air is a reference to taking the experiences of one, in this case, yourself, and them making the jump to claiming that anyone (or everyone) can do the same ignores some important details. Just as I improperly made the assumption (and I apologize for it, but have to ask, did you own, or rent?) that you owned your 900 square foot house, we often assume that we know enough details about others to determine what they are capable of. You sound like someone who has lots of skills, and a knack for business. Both of these are really good things to have. But I have to go back to the kids... my point is not about adults, and their skills and attitudes, it is about children, and ensuring that their needs are met. You provided for your children, and obviously did a great job of it! I was quite serious when I pointed out that I was happy you came out of tough circumstances and made a life for yourself and your children. Back to my point, just as some have the ability to run a four- minute mile, I hope we don't assume anyone can. There are those children who DO NOT have someone like you, my question is, do we allow the lack of skills of the parent and their failure to provide for their children the way you did for yours, do we then just allow the child to fail for lack of resources?

17) Comment by phil - 17/08/2012

You can read it: - - §23. Adjustment of Ad Valorem Tax Millages Section 23.(A) First Adjustment. Prior to the end of the third year after the effective date of this constitution, the assessors and the Louisiana Tax Commission or its successor shall complete determination of the fair market value or the use value of all property subject to taxation within each parish for use in implementing this Article. Except as provided in this Section, the total amount of ad valorem taxes collected by any taxing authority in the year in which Sections 18 and 20 of this Article are implemented shall not be increased or decreased, because of their provisions, above or below ad valorem taxes collected by that taxing authority in the year preceding implementation. To accomplish this result, it shall be mandatory for each affected taxing authority, in the year in which Sections 18 and 20 of this Article are implemented, to adjust millages upwards or downwards without regard to millage limitations contained in this constitution, and the maximum authorized millages shall be increased or decreased, without further voter approval, in proportion to the amount of the adjustment upward or downward. Thereafter, such millages shall remain in effect unless changed as permitted by this constitution. (B) Subsequent Adjustments. Except as otherwise permitted in this Section, the total amount of ad valorem taxes collected by any taxing authority in the year in which the reappraisal and valuation provisions of Section 18, Paragraph (F) of this Article are implemented shall not be increased or decreased because of a reappraisal or valuation or increases or decreases in the homestead exemption above or below the total amount of ad valorem taxes collected by that taxing authority in the year preceding implementation of the reappraisal and valuation. To accomplish this result, the provisions of millage adjustments relative to implementation of Section 18 and Section 20 of this Article, as set forth in Paragraph (A) of this Section shall be mandatory. Thereafter, following implementation of each subsequent reappraisal and valuation required by Paragraph (F) of Section 18 of this Article, the millages as fixed in each such implementation shall remain in effect unless changed as permitted by Paragraph (C) of this Section. (C) Increases Permitted. Nothing herein shall prohibit a taxing authority from collecting, in the year in which Sections 18 and 20 of this Article are implemented or in any subsequent year, a larger dollar amount of ad valorem taxes by (1) levying additional or increased millages as provided by law or (2) placing additional property on the tax rolls. Increases in the millage rate in excess of the rates established as provided by Paragraph (B) above but not in excess of the prior year's maximum authorized millage rate may be levied by two-thirds vote of the total membership of a taxing authority without further voter approval but only after a public hearing held in accordance with the open meetings law; however, in addition to any other requirements of the open meetings law, public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of such hearing shall be published on two separate days no less than thirty days before the public hearing. Such public notice shall be published in the official journal of the taxing authority, and another newspaper with a larger circulation within the taxing authority than the official journal of the taxing authority, if there is one. (D) Application. This Section shall not apply to millages required to be levied for the payment of general obligation bonds. Amended by Acts 1980, 2nd Ex.Sess., No. 1, §1, approved Nov. 4, 1980, eff. Dec. 8, 1980; Acts 1997, No. 1496, §1, approved Oct. 3, 1998, eff. Nov. 5, 1998.

18) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 17/08/2012

@8point6: The 35,000 increase is of course something to take up with the Assessor. If it is accurate, then you just gained $35,000 in Net value on your assets, right? (I know, that and a couple of bucks will get you a coffee of the day at CC's...) But anyway, I have no idea how much your house is worth, but the increase for a house valued at half a million is around $61 extra this year. That includes a move to $535 K for your house. So that is a meal, and a fairly nice by by no means extravagant one! Thanks!

19) Comment by Springer98 - 17/08/2012

Mr. Hammatt, I never once said that I owned the house that I was raising my children in. If you'd have known me & my circumstances, you wouldn't have to guess about my definition of poverty! I have no idea what you are trying to say about "strong need to take anecdotes and create patterns out of thin air." Everything in my comment was fact. You seem to miss the point about how much hard work and extra hours of it, it took to send my children to private school and LSU! Also, It took years of said work to become a business owner. You might say that I built my business, not the government! I still believe that in this country, if an able bodied person has the desire to make something of their life, they can!

20) Comment by 8point6 - 17/08/2012

property taxes.

21) Comment by 8point6 - 17/08/2012

"“The type of increase we’re talking about is the price of a movie ticket,” Taylor said. “What I’m asking you to do is sacrifice a Starbucks or a lunch hour.”" Don't tell me. Let me guess. "It's for the children." It's been "for the children" for 50 plus years, and look at the failure of public education during this time. The assessed value of my property went up $35k from 2011 to 2012. Oh, Joy! I get to pay MORE

22) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 17/08/2012

Not sure how you are defining poverty, but there is no one claiming, for a moment, that kids from families in poverty can't learn. Of course, I don't know many families in poverty who own homes and their own business, and send their kids to private schools either. There is such a strong need to take anecdotes and create patterns out of thin air. Of course people can, and do work their way out of poverty. The patterns I have described here and elsewhere are real, and denying the patterns doesn't make them any less strong. As I have written many times, poverty is often a proxy for a set of underlying conditions, each of which impact student learning. On every national standardized test, every one, the patterns are the same. As incomes rise, scores go up, ON AVERAGE. Horatio Alger stories carry that name because they are NOT the norm. And knowing fifty people with the same pattern doesn't change patterns for millions. Often we think we had it bad, then we find out what real poverty looks like. It frightens us, so we choose not to see it. I am happy that you were able to overcome whatever challenges you faced!

23) Comment by Springer98 - 17/08/2012

I just love it when someone uses poverty as an excuse for children not learning or receiving decent grades! I raised my children in a 900 sq. ft. house & was one of the 'less fortunate' heads of a family in the neighborhood. I couldn't send my children to the school that I went to as a child, due to the deseg. order. I decided not to send my children to the school in the ghetto that I was mandated to! I worked daylight to dark, cutting lawns & cutting & selling firewood to send my children to private school, while at the same time paying taxes that went to support the public schools. My children didn't get a free lunch, free books, free ride to & from school, free uniform or anything else for free!! My daughter got her degree in business administration from LSU ( before there was such a thing as TOPS ). Many a night I sat & helped my children study, because I cared about their education. I am not saying this to toot my own horn! Just don't give me poverty as an excuse!!! I WORKED my way out of poverty & became a successful business owner. If you choose to remain in poverty, you will. If you have enough desire not to live in it, you don't have to!!

24) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 17/08/2012

@ tradewinns: "if kids can not read, write or perform simple math, all they need is a pencil, piece of paper, a book and a parent who cares about their education. our failing schools DO NOT NEED computers, internet or something to entertain the students. they DO NEED discipline, order, a parent who cares and a desk to sit at to learn. everything else is an excuse for failure!" Grammar, syntax along with punctuation, spelling and capitalization all fall victim when a community fails to support its public schools.... But seriously, if this were true, then why do we have so many Sylvan Learning Centers? Wealthy parents, just sit those kids at the kitchen table with a pencil, piece of paper, a book and you! Teach 'em! Please, someone, anyone, please tell me how you know a school is "failing" when you have never been inside? Do you REALLY think the LETTER GRADES MEAN ANYTHING? They actually do tell us something about the relative poverty in a school, but not much else!

25) Comment by tradewinns - 17/08/2012

what is needed in ebrss is discipline and holding the student's parent(s) fiscally responsible for thier children's educational opportunities. NOT MORE MONEY! if kids can not read, write or perform simple math, all they need is a pencil, piece of paper, a book and a parent who cares about their education. our failing schools DO NOT NEED computers, internet or something to entertain the students. they DO NEED discipline, order, a parent who cares and a desk to sit at to learn. everything else is an excuse for failure!

26) Comment by Noel Hammatt - 17/08/2012

A "few" general comments, and perhaps even Being_Stupid won't need the Cliff Notes for this. The public voted FOR the millages we have on the books today. After the vote, they are exactly the millages you voted on. The were first rolled back, and then the Board, as the law states, was able to roll them forward again. If your home assessement did not go up (and it did not go up for many) you will pay the same taxes this year as last. If it went up, and you think it was done incorrectly, talk to the Assessor's Office. (Another offical you voted for, as a whole body politic. If your home value went up, congratulations! Your new worth went up! I can't speak for the decorum or content of the meeting, but the outcome of this vote is the right thing for the citizens of this parish. As I mentioned in my comments when this issue was in the paper a few days ago, it is common to grouse about rolling the millages forward if the political entity doing it is not popular, and common to not hear grousing when the political entity IS popular. Now for the "taxation without representation" part. Hey guys, and gals, you voted for these people. These School Board Members were voted in by majority vote, and in the case of the Board Member who replaced me, by a very large super-majority. So you ARE represented. We do have a representative form of government, and the Board Represents that. They were all popular enough to get elected in a fair and open election, even if YOU didn't vote for your currently elected representative. And just think, Being_Stupid, how clever of me to get the support of the unions you hate so much, by voting three times against collective bargaining. And Barbara Freiberg, did NOT have the support of the unions when she ran and defeated me. (She ma=y now, but she didn't then!) So try and stick with the facts. Thanks!

27) Comment by spqr - 17/08/2012

I am not a fan of the school system either, but they cut $38 (?) million from the budget last year and another $28 million this year while increasing the number of students in the district and being forced to pay for government mandates. On top of that Gov. Piyush Jindal cut or froze dollars dedicated to public school districts. Believe what you will. But EBRP public schools are struggling to survive in a political climate that is engineering its demise, despite the districts efforts.

28) Comment by phil - 17/08/2012

And the redevelopment Authority will "redevelop" YOUR property.

29) Comment by phil - 17/08/2012

Future possible property (and other) taxes in EBR Parish - Infrastructure improvements, police protection, fire protection, traffic loop, passenger train to New Orleans, development district added taxes (and fees), Sewer fees that already go up 4 percent every year, MORE downtown improvements etc etc. We will soon all go broke supporting all of these taxes as a result. Baton Rouge will become a city of the very poor in HUD housing, and the very rich who can still afford to live here.

30) Comment by Chucky - 17/08/2012

Property tax's are not voted for by property owners

31) Comment by phil - 17/08/2012

Also go to the EBR Assessor's website and see if your property taxes have ALREADY gone up a lot without this addition. I already did, and mine have gone up a lot. I get to pay more every year now, and then if I sell my home I have to pay capital gains taxes. I think that is double taxation and very unfair. Anyone know of a good place to move to get away from Baton Rouge and all of these new property taxes?

32) Comment by phil - 17/08/2012

This is democracy today. We can go to a meeting and NOT vote and get to listen to board members announce a decision that they already have made. I personally think this is a form of taxation without representation. Regardless, I think it is obvious that people will almost always vote themselves or the group they represent a big raise whenever they can. Taxpayers do not have a chance in this battle and have already lost. We need to change a lot of Laws in LA. We have representatives who over the years have chipped away at our property and voting rights. You need to look into the new district that was recently approved by the council that gives 5 people almost complete control over a district including the right to add fees with no vote of the people in the district. Think we are becoming like China or Cuba. Just go back to sleep and let all of this happen.

33) Comment by Being_Stupid - 17/08/2012

Agree with Belinda Davis that the School Board is not here to serve Woody Jenkins or Property Owners. The School Board is here to serve the Teacher Union Thugs, Democrat Party Elites, ACLU, and fund Bernard Taylor's $225,000 Dollar Salary along with incentives. The School Board shall make certain that WE SACRIFICE to support a failed Government Monopoly on Public Education. Ignore the sacrifice of our children's future so that teacher union thugs can get paid and receive tenure regardless of performance. And by no means shall we allow a voucher system to unsurp the Throne of the Democrat Socialist Party Elites and their power to control the Government Monopoly on Public Education Tax Dollars. Sacrifice, Sacrifice, Sacrifice !!! Our School Board Democrat Socialist Party Elites depend on your SACRIFICE. Sacrifice your money. Sacrifice your property. Sacrifice your children and their education. Sacrifice your freedom. All in the name of Government Micromanaged Public Education.

34) Comment by MissCotillion - 17/08/2012

Thank you, Being Stupid. These people are acting like EBR schools are all outstanding, like Baton Rouge High, when the truth is that the school board takes in millions of tax dollars and gives back failing schools. Woody Jenkins, I'm right there with you. I am the best judge of how to spend my money, not these liberal fools.

35) Comment by foldgers - 17/08/2012

So, soon, the mosquito people will be saying they need to raise property taxes too!! It is good to be lower middle class and own a home! Thanks for making all my hard work worth it, government. All the while, give at least 70% of the money you TAKE from me every year to those who have never had a job nor intend to ever have a job. I am so glad I busted my butt all my life just so those lazy, I mean, less fortunate people can sleep all day, wake up and walk all the way to their porch to sit all afternoon and then at night go shopping with my money. I love socialism.

36) Comment by Being_Stupid - 17/08/2012

Barbara Freiberg = Noel Hammatt Part II = Teacher Union Pawn

37) Comment by Being_Stupid - 17/08/2012

Somebody needs to tell Steven Cook that these schools are not winning. Anybody who claims they are "winning" is usually losing. Unless of course, you are Charlie Sheen.

38) Comment by WhoCares - 17/08/2012

Edit you're

39) Comment by WhoCares - 17/08/2012

Tania, FYI no one cares that your rich.

40) Comment by WhoCares - 17/08/2012

It's not absurd its expected. If they are going I have a debate about it tell the people what it's for. It's absurd to think they shouldn't. I dont have a problem with it, Dan. If you watched that meeting last night and felt confidence in their ability to manage money than something is wrong. If you got the votes just sell it, don't act like your owed the money.

41) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 17/08/2012

The property tax millage was imposed by a vote of the people at an election called for that pupose. The "roll-forward" as it is known, is just the act of maintaining the same tax rate as was voted for by the people. As costs of employee healthcare, fuel, and other costs increase, the notion that the school board should try to provide the same education in the next four years with the same amount of money that it had four years ago is absurd.

42) Comment by arin - 17/08/2012

I don't go to movies, too expensive. So I just got screwed again.

43) Comment by WhoCares - 17/08/2012

I watched this meeting last night and can't believe how awkward it was. These people need psychiatric help (all of you). Never once did they discuss what the money was for. It was just chalk filled emotion and rhetoric. The fact that this group is the one in charge of managing a 500 million dollar budget is laughable. People do not mind paying taxes just sell it. Quit all your side show antics, props, petty jabs, and crying. Get you stuff together and bring a level of professionalism that is sorely lacking. I think people on both sides of the issue did nothing but provide comic relief.

44) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 17/08/2012

To these do gooders who vote for these taxes....remember this the next time you fall for their lies. Once you feed the beast he will only expect more.

45) Comment by cbelse1 - 17/08/2012

Perhaps if they would make the necessary cuts in district-level administration, the money woes would subside a little. It is so frustrating when the EBRPSS leaders cut 200+ positions and whine about budget problems, and THEN turn around and create multiple district-level positions that pay over $100,000.

46) Comment by Being_Stupid - 17/08/2012

I rent my property from the local government.