AG won’t offer opinion on CATS tax

State Attorney General Buddy Caldwell’s office says he will not offer an opinion on the constitutionality of the parish bus tax passed in April.

The opinion was sought last month by state Sen. Dan Claitor, R-Baton Rouge, who argued that the tax elections violated equal protection laws because people outside the taxing district would receive bus service.

Capital Area Transit System officials have long contended that the vast majority of bus service is within the city limits. But limited service would extend outside the city limits to areas such as the Gardere Lane area, the Mall of Louisiana and Perkins Rowe.

In a July 30 letter to Claitor, assistant Attorney General Richard L. McGimsey writes that the office will not provide opinions on issues “where the matter is the subject of pending or imminent litigation.”

“Based on the public comments of various parties it is apparent that litigation is imminent,” McGimsey wrote.

Claitor said he understands the AG’s position, given that a lawsuit was filed Friday contesting the constitutionality of the election.

“The court system will make appropriate and fair rulings in this matter, if the litigants get the real facts before the court and establish a solid record at the trial level,” Claitor said.

On Friday, Milton Graugnard, executive vice president of Cajun Industries, filed a petition for the same reasons mentioned in Claitor’s request to the attorney general, asking a judge for a permanent injunction preventing the agency from receiving any revenue generated by the tax.

Voters in Baton Rouge and Baker approved the 10.6 mill property tax in April. It’s expected to generate an additional 16 million annually for the 12 million budget.

The tax was proposed to provide a dedicated source of revenue for the chronically broke bus system. The addition of funds are expected to expand and improve services.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (6)


1) Comment by phil - 02/08/2012

When I voted, I voted on a municipal tax that excluded the homestead exemption. The Attorney General's office already has determined (after the election) that that was not what I voted on. Seems like that alone should be reason enough to toss this entire tax. I do not think a second opinion is even needed from the Attorney General.

2) Comment by tradewinns - 02/08/2012

wouldn't it just be easier to vote to repeal this item?

3) Comment by Get Real - 02/08/2012

AG Buddy Coward I see

4) Comment by Being_Stupid - 01/08/2012

What about these "Crime Prevention" Municipal Taxing Districts passed by these RINO Legislators like Dan Claitor, Steve Carter, Franklin Foil, and Hunter Greene? Will these unconstitutional property districts also be ignored by the useless Attorney General's Office, which sits by and does absolutely nothing to protect the rights of property owners? Perhaps the AG's Office can declare the Neighborhood Property Collective Taxing District imposed on Shenandoah by Dan Claitor to be unconstitutional, instead, since this too was another unfair property tax imposed onto property owners by RINO Legislators and a Self-Appointed / Non-Elected Neighborhood Property Collective and Non-Municipal Federation of Greater Baton Rouge Civic Associations.

5) Comment by 8point6 - 01/08/2012

The $64 question is, will this be settled before we property owners have to pay our property taxes.

6) Comment by 8point6 - 01/08/2012

“Based on the public comments of various parties it is apparent that litigation is imminent,” This should get interesting.