LAE threatens voucher schools with lawsuits

Letters: Accepting state funds illegal

“What we are telling them is they should be cautious. If the act is found unconstitutional they would be liable for turning that back to the state.” Michael Walker-Jones, executive director of the LAE

Attorneys for a teachers’ union Thursday threatened lawsuits against individual private and parochial schools that accept voucher payments.

Voucher backers denounced the maneuver as a bid to intimidate school officials and disrupt the program.

The letters to schools were sent on behalf of the Louisiana Association of Educators, which has challenged the voucher law in the 19th Judicial District Court. A hearing is set for October after LAE officials lost court bids to delay the program while the lawsuit plays out.

State Superintendent of Education John White announced earlier this week that vouchers have been authorized for about 5,600 students at 119 schools statewide.

But a letter sent to voucher schools by attorneys for the LAE, Blackwell & Associates of Baton Rouge, says that any such transfer of state dollars “would constitute an unconstitutional payment of public funds.

“We hope that you agree with us that proceeding with a program that is blatantly unconstitutional (and) does not benefit students, parents, public schools or non-public schools,” the letter says.

Unless the school agrees not to take the state aid, the letter says, “we will have no alternative other than to institute litigation” against the school, including a request for temporary restraining order to stop the flow of voucher dollars until the lawsuit is resolved.

The letter also asks school officials to provide a faxed response by Friday at 4 p.m.

“We are not telling them not to take students,” said Michael Walker-Jones, executive director of the LAE.

“What we are telling them is they should be cautious,” Walker-Jones said. “If the act is found unconstitutional they would be liable for turning that back to the state.”

State and local voucher backers denounced the letters, which they called a crude attempt to scare local school officials into bowing out of the program.

“This is a cheap scare tactic by the teachers’ union,” said Josh LeSage, administrator of Hosanna Christian Academy in Baton Rouge, which has been authorized to accept 299 voucher students, third most in the state.

“It’s a schoolyard bully tactic,” said LeSage, whose school was the site of registration activities by voucher students on Thursday.

Officials of the state Department of Education noted that, on Wednesday, the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for an injunction to stop the voucher program.

In a prepared statement, White said the letters represent “scare tactics” by teacher unions trying to have the voucher expansion law tossed out in court. “This is outrageous,” White said.

The issue stems from a state law approved in April that allows students attending C, D and F public schools, and who meet income rules, to qualify for vouchers to offset tuition and mandatory fees at private and parochial schools.

Gov. Bobby Jindal, who pushed the law, says the aid gives students a way out of failing public schools.

The LAE and other education groups contend that the way the measure was passed was unconstitutional.

Brian Blackwell, who signed the letters, said about 95 have been sent to schools so far.

In a telephone interview, he said that since a judge has declined to prevent the state from dispersing voucher dollars the letters are aimed at keeping schools from accepting them.

“The purpose of the letter is to give each of those schools the opportunity to do that on a voluntary basis rather than having to do it on a litigated basis,” Blackwell said.

Danny Loar, executive director of the Louisiana Conference of Catholic Bishops, said Thursday superintendents of Catholic schools that have agreed to accept voucher students have been told to ignore the LAE’s letter.

“We are not going to pay any attention to this,” Loar said. “They are just trying to intimidate us.”

Asked if Jindal would comment Kyle Plotkin, director of communications, issued a prepared statement from the governor that said teacher union leaders “are stooping to new lows and trying to strong-arm schools to keep our kids from getting a quality education.”

Eric Lewis, head of the Louisiana branch of the Black Alliance for Educational Options and a backer of vouchers, called the letters sophomoric.

Blackwell disputed the criticism.

“I mean the program is unconstitutional,” he added. “The lawyers for the bishops should know that. I know the governor knows that. And you know all we are doing is trying to prevent the spending of public dollars on unconstitutional programs.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (30)


1) Comment by 8.3 - 28/07/2012

"With no intellectual capital they always resort to the personal criticism of an individual...pretty standard." "Amusing to witness..." ad hominem tu quoque. Worse than no intellectual capital may be the pretense of it. Heartily concur with the assessment of 8.6.

2) Comment by Art Vandelay - 28/07/2012

Amusing to witness another libtard with no germane argument such as 8.6. With no intellectual capital they always resort to the personal criticism of an individual...pretty standard.

3) Comment by 8.3 - 28/07/2012

This has little to do with school performance, betterment of students, etc. This is about the ideology that capitalism is god and privatization for profit is the true intent of the founding fathers, who consulted Ayn Rand when they wrote the constitution. .

4) Comment by 8.3 - 28/07/2012

LSUinVail, given your nom de forum, abject proof of your assertions is quite in evidence in your writing. Skipped English for football, eh?

5) Comment by LSUinVail - 27/07/2012

And how long has Louisiana's public schools been in the toilet? The children deserve better, they deserve a choice, not a failing monopoly. Anytime the teacher's unions get upset, you know you're doing something right...they are not concerned about the children, they are concerned with thier own power and self-importance. Keep up the good work Louisiana!!!

6) Comment by Raspucia - 27/07/2012

Everyone who thinks that the teachers unions are attempting to strong arm the schools are completely blind or just don't want to see. Governor Jindal has attacked public school teachers and placed all the blame on them for student and school failures. Most of these schools that are failing are severely underfunded and student body consists of students from extremely low economic backgrounds. The schools in areas with adequate tax base do well and those that don't flounder. There are still brave teachers who go into these schools in attempt to make a difference and get hammered by the Governor and his attempts to make his charter school and private school buddies millions from taxpayer dollars. If he was so sincere about improving the lives of all students, why didn't he take the MFP funds and offer vouchers to every child in the state? One reason, he knows that the parents that don't support their children and don't put their education as priority would end up at these private schools causing them to fail eventually. He knows only the parents of good students will leave the public schools and transfer to the private or charters. Most would like to blame the teachers when they have no clue what they have to deal with and the conditions that they have to work in.

7) Comment by Traveler - 27/07/2012

To Mikedeshot: Brian Blackwell is indeed a highly intelligent, very competent attorney; I am quite sure that he was doing only what his client, LAE, asked him to do. And the letter that he sent out is perfectly legal. However, LAE has created a public relations nightmare for itself. The LAE leadership has failed to connect the strong ties between a parochial school and the congregation of the church that stands behind the school. It's one thing to file a lawsuit against the governor or state government----John Q. Public may approve, or disapprove, or be indifferent. It's quite another thing to file a legal action against the school (and that's what the letter says LAE intends to do) that John Q. Public's church sponsors (and probably at least partially supports). How would you feel if LAE filed a lawsuit against the parochial school that your own church supports? Exactly! So now, LAE is going to have church congregations all over the state mad at them. LAE ought to have a "Come to Jesus" meeting with whomever in LAE dreamed up this stunt!

8) Comment by Being_Stupid - 27/07/2012

Teacher's Union = Thugs

9) Comment by qwerty - 27/07/2012

upon further inspection...they may be wasting time and energy. http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_00_1751/

10) Comment by qwerty - 27/07/2012

I call ***** Did LAE sue the schools in New Orleans that already receive money from a voucher program? As a tax payer, I would rather my tax money go to a school that is not failing vs one that is.

11) Comment by mikedeshot - 27/07/2012

I am a member of LAE and I know Brian Blackwell the LAE attorney. He is an excellent lawyer and he just doing his job as dictated by normal legal practice. He is simply covering all the bases by notifying the voucher schools that by accepting vouchers they may be participating in an activity prohibited by the Louisiana constitution. This is not a scare tactic, it is a legal tactic if your position is that our tax dollars cannot be legally used to support private schools. The governor on the other hand has played real hardball by allowing the firing of state employees and the punishing legislators that have the nerve to disagree with his policies. For example we have seen the firing of an education official who had the nerve to report possible illegal activities of one of the Governor's favored charter schools. Later on the school was closed when the evidence could not be ignored by BESE.

12) Comment by phil - 27/07/2012

I am against vouchers. However, it seems like every time something happens in the public school system in EBR Parish, a bunch of attorneys get rich.

13) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 27/07/2012

Sure wish the founders could come back to life just to see government's unfounded involvement in education, they'd die a 2nd death.

14) Comment by Whatnow - 27/07/2012

@lovemykids, that is the individual taxpayers choice. If they want their child to learn religion, it's no one else's business. They can choose not to go to a school that does teach religion.

15) Comment by timesright - 27/07/2012

Whether LAE's actions are right or wrong, may I simply remind everyone that all of the contentiousness that the voucher program has caused would not be where it is if debate in the legislature would have been been more open and fair to the stakeholders involved. Gov. Jindal has problems with any true debate and discussion. Supt. John White follows close behind.

16) Comment by Traveler - 27/07/2012

LAE's threat to file lawsuits against private/parochial schools that accept voucher dollars from the state was a gutsy move, but not a WISE one. On the one hand, LAE says that they are simply warning the private/parochial schools that if LAE wins the lawsuit against the state (and it very well may win in federal court), those schools will have to return the money they've accepted. On the other hand, sending out the warning letter (which calls for an almost immediate response from the school administration) without giving the private/parochial schools sufficient time to consult their directing boards was "bad business." In the sense that "the big union" is perceived to be going after "the little school", this does appear to be intimidation----a tactic that the Jindal administration employs and that LAE should not be imitating. The threat of a lawsuit against each voucher school was unnecessary, is probably a drain on the union's resources, and is making enemies out of some members of the teaching profession and the general public. A simple letter reminding the voucher-accepting schools that they can be held liable for returning the money at some future date would have been adequate.

17) Comment by tradewinns - 27/07/2012

this is where a "loser pays" policy would stop frivilious lawsuits.

18) Comment by lovemykids - 27/07/2012

Are there any lawsuits being filed by individual taxpayers against their taxes being used for religious education? I personally do not have a problem with vouchers, as long as, the schools do not teach religion and follow all rules and regulations that are put upon public schools.

19) Comment by cbelse1 - 27/07/2012

The opinion of the unions does not equal the opinion of all teachers, and their actions don't always represent the wishes of teachers. This is precisely why countless others and I refused to be a member of these organizations.

20) Comment by dday198 - 27/07/2012

and the other way around right tommy

21) Comment by dday198 - 27/07/2012

it's fair warning if your business takes tax money before this issue is decided that your business could end up in court.

22) Comment by spqr - 27/07/2012

It would be nice if the union spoke with their membership before doing this. They did not. So many good people home for summer look bad and had no idea this was coming...And it is true, "vicwill", that all teachers are the enemy of the media and public. This Hitler propaganda is working and can be read in earlier posts. Fiction is truth and truth refuses questions en route to another speaking engagement out of state.

23) Comment by vicwill - 26/07/2012

Tommy Rucker, why shouldn't teachers be concerned about their pocketbooks? Last time I checked, they have families to take care of and bills to pay too. I also notice that you have taken a sip of the Governor's kool-aid by grouping all teachers and public schools together and using the teachers as the scape goats for poor schools. What about the parents? What about the community support? What about the lack of discipline?

24) Comment by vicwill - 26/07/2012

Redstickhornet, it doesn't matter, anything that they do to support public schools and teachers is viewed as opposing all reforms. I mean the Governor of the state pretty much used the teachers as the scape goats for the educational output of the state. Instead of improving the low-performing schools, he chose to just move a few of them to private schools while still not doing anything to improve their schools. You could argue that maybe this was too forceful of an action, but they should not be villanized because they want to challenge actions that they find to be unconstitutional. And it definitely isn't anything different than what Jindal did during the legislative session.

25) Comment by redstickhornet - 26/07/2012

Not a smart move for LAE. They are simply driving home the point that they oppose all reform at any costs.

26) Comment by Being_Stupid - 26/07/2012

These Teacher Union Thugs are typical bullies that will resort to fear tactics and intimidation to impose their tyranny. They don't care about education. They only care about the money they steal from taxpayers to fund their Political Lobby and Government Monopoly on Public Education. They know the end is near for their organization. The Elite Trial Lawyer Democrats that control the Democrat Socialist Party know that an educated people will cease to vote them into positions of power and money. TEAR DOWN THE WALL. WE DON'T NEED THEIR THOUGHT CONTROL. ALL in ALL THEY ARE JUST BRICKS IN THE WALL.

27) Comment by Whatnow - 26/07/2012

Right on, Tommy! When did the Teacher's Union ever care about the children?

28) Comment by zealer99 - 26/07/2012

"Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war " I would not have done that if i were the Teacher's Unions. They are not going to make any friends and there are a lot of enemies to be had.

29) Comment by TommyRucker - 26/07/2012

The broken down, miserable public school system will do anything and everything to keep the monopoly going. A monopoly that they have had ongoing and chronic FAILURE with for decades. It is time to try something new and better for the 5,600 students in this state that are set to get these vouchers. Why should not they have the opportunity for a better education, why should these teachers put themselves ahead of these parents who love their children and only want what is best for them. Fortunately for some of these kids, their parents actually care about the quality of education they are receiving and want more than a baby sitting service for their kids.

30) Comment by TommyRucker - 26/07/2012

These teachers' unions and their lawyers are only interested in the constitution when it will benefit THEM. Their 'ME" philosophy is one of the reasons we have all the problems we have in society today. If they are so concerned about taxpayer money going to private segments of our society, then they had better start going to court to stop all the tax money that goes to planned parenthood, ACORN, private liberal universities, grants supporting university students and teachers at private liberal universities, grants to private hospitals, grants to private medical researchers, etc. It is to bad these teachers don't spend their time TRYING TO LEARN HOW TO TEACH rather than focusing on their own pocket books.