Tax exemption review starts

Advocate Staff Photo by Arthur D. Lauck State Sens. Neil Riser, R- Columbia, left, and Dan Clatior, R- Baton Rouge confer Monday during a meeting of the Revenue Study Commission. Show caption
Advocate Staff Photo by Arthur D. Lauck State Sens. Neil Riser, R- Columbia, left, and Dan Clatior, R- Baton Rouge confer Monday during a meeting of the Revenue Study Commission.

Details fill 400-page document

Legislators began taking a crack Monday at reviewing a myriad of tax exemptions responsible for reducing state income during tough economic times.

For members of the Revenue Study Commission, the maiden meeting was similar to the first day of school. They got a fat stack of reading material, an overview of the objectives and a warning that a lot of work lies ahead.

“We will try to decide the best method to attack this,” state Rep. Joel Robideaux, R-Lafayette, told fellow commission members. Robideaux is the commission’s newly elected chairman.

The Legislature just completed a session marred by disagreements on the best way to balance the state operating budget without adequate money to keep services at their current level. At the same time, the state grants several billion dollars a year in tax exclusions, suspensions, deductions, credits, refunds, rebates and preferential tax calculation methods.

The commission’s task is to decide which tax credits and other exemptions are worth keeping.

Preceding the meeting was a question-and-answer session on recent deep cuts to the Medicaid program that provides health care insurance to the poor.

The Jindal administration warned that the governor favors a fair, flatter and lower tax base.

Jason El Koubi, assistant secretary at the state Department of Economic Development, said any changes should be offset so that they are budget neutral and not an attempt to raise taxes.

Recently, Gov. Bobby Jindal declared an effort to renew an existing cigarette tax as a move to raise taxes. The Legislature temporarily can suspend tax breaks without the governor’s approval.

The commission’s main reading material will be a 402-page book. Issued by the state Department of Revenue, the book details more than 400 tax credits and other exemptions that divert at least $4 billion that could be used to fund hospitals, colleges and other state services.

El Koubi said the state’s tax exemptions actually totaled $6.8 billion in the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2011.

Of those, he said those managed by his agency represent five percent.

El Koubi said the $6.8 billion in exemptions is comprised of:

  • 37 percent in sales tax exemptions.
  • 27 percent in personal income tax exemptions.
  • 24 percent in corporate income and franchise tax exemptions.
  • Seven percent in other tax exemptions.
  • Five percent in economic development tax exemptions.

El Koubi said the entire tax system determines a state’s tax burdens and economic development competitiveness.

Like El Koubi, Greg Albrecht, chief economist for the Legislative Fiscal Office, came to the commission meeting armed with charts.

Albrecht guided commission members through the process of determining state revenue levels before diving into the number of corporation income and franchise and individual income tax credits processed during a recent fiscal year.

Part of Albrecht’s daily job includes estimating state revenue levels and predicting the fiscal impact of legislation.

“State tax collections are rarely well behaved,” he said.

Albrecht said there are always distortions and aberrations. He said credit programs can exhibit rapid growth and erratic surges and drop-offs.

State Sen. Neil Riser, R-Columbia, suggested that the commission should try to separate the high-performing exemptions from the sub-performing exemptions. “We have a short period of time,” Riser said.

The commission must make recommendations to House Speaker Chuck Kleckley, R-Lake Charles, and Senate President John Alario, R-Westwego, by Feb. 1


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (12)


1) Comment by phil - 24/07/2012

DMJ - I agree and now that we have identified part of the problem,,,,

2) Comment by DMJ - 24/07/2012

"Picking winners" as you put it, is as old as government itself.

3) Comment by phil - 24/07/2012

Generally speaking if we are going to be taxed then everyone should be taxed equally or nobody should be taxed at all. There should be very few if any exceptions to that rule in my opinion When did the government get in the business of picking winners and paying people/companies (or concerts) to play?

4) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 24/07/2012

But once again, at least as I am reading it, the admin is not wanting to balance the budget with exemption reductions. The admin wants to reduce taxes somewhere else to correspond with any tax increase from reducing an exemption. *Revenue* neutral, not budget neutral.

5) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 24/07/2012

But once again, at least as I am reading it, the admin is not wanting to balance the budget with exemption reductions. The admin wants to reduce taxes somewhere else to correspond with any tax increase from reducing an exemption. *Revenue* neutral, not budget neutral.

6) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 24/07/2012

DMJ, you can probably find your answer here: http://revenue.louisiana.gov/forms/publications/TEB(2011).pdf

7) Comment by DMJ - 24/07/2012

Well, it took 5 years of a Jindal administration to realize there are two ways to balance the budget. Better late than never, i guess. I'm curious....just who is getting personal income tax exemptions? And only 5% of these exemptions are for economic development? Sounds like there's some room for serious reform here. Hope they don't blow it.

8) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 24/07/2012

WhoCares clearly doesn't care to learn the difference between levying taxes and the delivering services.

9) Comment by WhoCares - 24/07/2012

This cold be productive. Put a cap on how many babies Medicaid will pay for from someone (I understand it's a federal law required). One or two is completely understandable 5 or more is complete *****

10) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 24/07/2012

Well, when you are *warned* by the Jindalistas to offset any reduced exemption with a corresponding tax decrease, and if you are a sheep instead of a horse, it hardly matters when the barn door is closed. My hope is that most exemptions, deductions and credits are eliminated. The tax rates can be reduced for ALL, plus some funding can be returned to the more critical needs. There is enough room for both of those things to happen.

11) Comment by Traveler - 24/07/2012

Shouldn't this discussion have taken place BEFORE the recent legislative session?! My father would have described this new meeting thus: "This is closing the barn door AFTER the horses have run out!"

12) Comment by lovemykids - 24/07/2012

Still waiting for the "trickle down"!!!!