Ad for library director places pay at top of scale

An online ad soliciting applications for director of the East Baton Rouge Parish library system lists the “starting salary” as more than $100,000, which is the maximum salary for the position under the current pay structure.

A candidate paid $100,202 would be at the top of the approved pay range, making him ineligible for raises, said Rhonda Pinsonat, the library system’s finance director.

The Library Board of Control, at the recommendation of a national search firm, has asked that the library director’s pay scale be boosted by more than 50 percent to attract highly qualified applicants. However, the Metro Council deferred action on the proposal until July 25 and it’s unclear whether it will be approved.

Under the proposal, the minimum salary would be $115,000 and the maximum would be $160,000. If the Metro Council rejects the proposal, the minimum salary for the position will remain at $72,388 and the maximum at $100,202.

“It’s splitting hairs,” Mary Stein, the library system’s Co-director, said of the pay listing in the online ad. “Technically, we can offer them more than $100,000.”

The firm the library board hired to conduct a national search for a new director helped craft the ad, according to Stanford O. Bardwell, a member of the board who is on the search committee.

“It’s truthful, but probably a little misleading,” Bardwell said. “They were deliberately vague” when they wrote it, he said.

Compensation for the position will be “commensurate with qualifications and experience,” and will include “an attractive benefits package,” according to the ad.

Benefits include use of a laptop, cellphone and car or $4,800 yearly auto allowance, Bardwell said.

The deadline for applying for the position was extended to July 27 to allow the Metro Council’s time to vote on the proposal to increase the pay scale for the position, Bardwell said. The original deadline was July 15.

At least two council members — Mayor Pro-Tem Mike Walker and Chandler Loupe — said Tuesday they opposed the proposal.

“I don’t think we need to be in a hurry to give pay increases to anybody,” Walker said, a sentiment shared by Loupe.

Loupe said he understands the desire to attract qualified applicants but said he thought the library board could probably get a good candidate with pay at current levels.

The increased salary is necessary to attract top-flight talent for the position, library officials and board members have said.

Bardwell said the pay issue needs to be resolved for the search process to be effective.

“I would imagine it’s difficult to get any significant interest when the first question is how much does it pay and we say we don’t know,” Bardwell said.

The library is seeking a replacement for David Farrar, who resigned late last year after information became public about a 15-year-old criminal case in Alabama in which he was accused of sexual abuse and impersonating a police officer.

A judge threw out the jury’s conviction on the two sex abuse charges but let stand the impersonating conviction, for which Farrar received a three-year suspended sentence.

Farrar earned about $89,000.

The Library Board has hired Kansas City, Mo., search firm Bradbury Associates/Gossage Sager Associates to conduct the search on their behalf.

A criminal background check, credit check and drug screening are part of the application process, the job ad says. Similar checks were not performed when Farrar was hired.

The search firm had received 24 applications through July 15, said Dan Bradbury, managing partner with the firm.

“A good many are not qualified — or are not fully qualified,” Bradbury said in an email.

The firm will narrow the applicant pool to “five-to-seven” semifinalists, whose names will be forwarded to the Library Board of Control, Stein said.

Semifinalist interviews could be held in mid to late August, she said.

Library board members and administrators have said that the hiring of the search firm was necessary to help vet potential replacements for Farrar.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (6)


1) Comment by phil - 19/07/2012

The cheap man pays twice, but does the clueless man pay triple?

2) Comment by misterfalcon - 18/07/2012

In this situation, it's good to spend. As the old adage goes, the cheap man pays twice. The library advertised at the low end for comparable systems last time around, got no response resulting in a bad pick and a PR black eye. It was controversial then how low the salary was, and how few people applied for it. It was even reported as such in the papers. The system is now in the position of the cheap man paying the second time, can you blame them if they want to spend a little more for a higher quality outcome?

3) Comment by Whatnow - 18/07/2012

@phil, you are so right. This is ridiculous! “A good many are not qualified — or are not fully qualified,” but, they are going to narrow the applicant pool to “five-to-seven” semifinalists anyway. What a bunch of dolts!

4) Comment by phil - 18/07/2012

Also these salary levels go up every year because people keep getting raises based on national averages. One person gets a raise and then everyone in the industry is jealous and wants to top that salary. Everyone else gets a raise and then the average goes up. Then someone asks for a raise based on the new average and the entire process starts over. At some point someone has to say - Look enough is enough. This same process applies to many different things like football coaches and professional athletes etc etc. We are all being taken to the cleaners in my opinion.

5) Comment by phil - 18/07/2012

I think they have too much of our taxpayer money and are determined to spend it. From past experience maybe they should pay the top rate at the beginning and then deduct money every year until they get to the level of what the person and the position are really worth.

6) Comment by tradewinns - 18/07/2012

anyone who would come just for the money, isn't worth having.