Judicial Journeys

City Court judges’ frequent travel, absences adding up

Five Baton Rouge City Court judges have collectively taken 101 publicly funded trips for seminars and conferences since 2007, often staying at plush resorts in locations such as Hawaii, Jamaica, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

The total cost for the trips was $135,465 for the 51/2 -year period, according to The Advocate’s examination of city-parish travel reimbursements.

A review of the judges’ leave documents also shows the combination of business travel, paid vacation and unlimited sick days sometimes took judges away from the bench for months each year.

The judges’ absences since Jan. 1, 2007, when they began their current six-year terms, have cost a total of $424,577 — as much as $87,000 in one calendar year — to hire ad hoc, or substitute, judges to fill in while the City Court judges are away.

One judge, Yvette Alexander, was absent 82 and 84 days in 2010 and 2011, respectively, amounting to 16 work weeks or four months’ leave each year.

The judges, who responded individually via phone calls, said they were abiding by the city-parish’s travel rules and noted all leave was approved by the state Supreme Court.

“The value we get of it is that we are not an island,” Alexander said. “We learn from other jurisdictions and they learn from us. It gives us an opportunity to compare and see what’s going on. I’m able to assess judges and lawyers around the country.”

The trips taken by Alexander, who first took office in 1995, account for 37 percent of the trips by the City Court judges since 2007. Alexander traveled farther and more frequently than her peers, taking 37 trips since 2007 that cost a total of $52,704 , records show.

Of Alexander’s trips, 19 were out of state and eight were outside the continental U.S. The other 10 trips were within the state.

Since 2007, she’s visited Hawaii twice, Jamaica twice, Puerto Rico, St. Maarten, the Virgin Islands and the West Indies.

Her 2007 Jamaica trip lasted seven days, and her room at the Ritz-Carlton Golf & Spa Resort cost $488 a night.

On one Destin, Fla., trip, which cost the city-parish $2,951, she brought five people along , but upgraded her room at her own expense to house the additional people.

City Court has an annual travel-and-special expenses budget of $49,000, split among the five judges for $9,800 each per year.

From 2007 to 2011, Alexander spent an average of $9,500 per year in travel, taking about seven trips per year. She exceeded the individual travel budget in 2011, spending $10,135.

Alexander is the chairwoman of the National Bar Association’s judicial council, which requires her involvement in seminars across the country, she said.

“It’s an honor and I’m very proud. It brings prestige for Baton Rouge and Baton Rouge City Court,” she said. “In order to be chair, you can’t walk up and say, ‘Look, I’m going to chair.’ You have to be working hard for it.”

As chair of the organization, Alexander said, she feels obligated to travel to four board meetings per year.

Alexander traveled to St. Maarten in January for the National Bar Association for a five-day trip costing $1,418. In the coming weeks, she will travel to Las Vegas for another conference for the organization, she said.

Alexander’s peers rarely spent more than $5,000 per year on travel, with the exception of Judge Alex “Brick” Wall, who spent an average of $6,586 per year on travel.

Continuing education

The judges said they travel to meet their annual requirement of 12.5 hours of continuing legal education and to participate in various organizations.

Many of the out-of-state seminars and conferences were held in tourist destinations that boast luxurious hotels and opportunities for a variety of daily activities and evening entertainment.

Classes and seminars often ended by lunchtime so those attending could spend their afternoons and evenings enjoying the resorts’ amenities.

The judges regularly took their spouses or other family members to enjoy the trips. Guests’ expenses were paid for personally by the judges.

In 2007, Wall attended the Wyoming Trial Lawyers Association’s Ski and Continuing Legal Education Seminar in Jackson Hole, Wyo., spending $2,800 of public funds.

Seminars ended by 12:15 p.m. every day for a “FREE AFTERNOON FOR SKIING AND FUN,” according to the seminar brochure.

Judges regularly attended an annual summer school seminar in Destin at the Sandestin Golf and Beach Resort, which, according to travel documents, offered the judges “complimentary unlimited health club access for adults and 4-hour bicycle rental daily for two. Also included is 1-hour of boogie board and 1-hour of tennis courts each day per unit.”

The Destin trips taken by judges ranged between $1,000 and $3,500 per trip, records show.

Another popular annual event for the judges was a Bench Bar Conference held at resorts on the Alabama Gulf Coast. The annual conference agendas featured tennis, golf and volley ball tournaments and late-night shuttles to the FloraBama Lounge, a beach bar on the Alabama-Florida state line.

A 2008 email inviting judges to the Gulf Coast conference reads: “In addition to the 9.0 hours of (Continuing Legal Education) offered, there are endless opportunities to relax with friends and colleagues, meet new members of the bar association and the judiciary and even improve your athletic skills!”

Judges are required by state law to receive 12.5 hours of Continuing Legal Education every year. Classes are offered locally by the Baton Rouge Bar Association.

City Court judges are paid a salary of $136,550 per year — of which $93,290 comes from the city-parish budget and the remainder from the state.

By case volume, Baton Rouge City Court is the largest in the state, with more than 400,000 cases filed in 2011, according to the Supreme Court of Louisiana’s 2011 annual report.

City Court judges hear civil claims, including personal injury, property damage, contract and landlord-tenant cases up to $35,000 and small-claims cases of $3,000 or less. City Court also handles misdemeanor cases with penalties not exceeding $1,000.

About half of the City Court’s $9.1 million budget comes from a city-parish general fund allocation and the rest from self-generated fees, fines and court costs.

The five City Court judges are elected to six-year terms; all five judges are up for re-election this November.

The judges all stressed that they were staying within their allocated travel budget and complying with city-parish finance rules.

Judge Laura Davis, with the second-highest number of trips, took 24 trips costing a total of $24,000, far below the 37 trips Alexander logged. Wall took fewer trips than Davis, but his 20 trips totaled $36,000.

Davis said she’s mindful her trips are funded with public money, “which is why I never miss a minute of educational programs when at the conferences.”

“I take it very seriously,” she said. “We’re careful not to abuse it.”

Wall said he tries to take trips where he can learn something that will directly benefit the court.

“I know I’ve been to Las Vegas a couple times,” he said. “They specifically deal with DWIs and had some excellent seminars.”

Judge Kelli Temple took office in 2009, replacing now state District Judge Trudy White, and since then has taken 10 trips costing a total of $17,800.

Judge Suzan Ponder, who took the bench in 1993, took significantly fewer trips than her colleagues — typically one per year and never any farther than Alabama’s Gulf Coast. Her 10 trips cost a total of $5,400.

“Between the (continuing legal education) that I do and going to the Bench Bar Conference, I get all the CLE credits that I need,” Ponder said. “That meets my travel needs.”

Absentee judges

City Court judges also get 30 days of paid vacation as well as unlimited sick days. Unused vacation days roll over, and when judges leave the bench, the city-parish pays them for unused days.

When Judge White left City Court in 2009, she received $36,227 for 607 hours of unused leave, according to the city-parish finance department.

Trips taken for seminars and conferences do not count against paid time off, meaning judges are sometimes out of the office for multiple months of the year for a combination of vacation, sick leave and conference and business trips.

In 2010, Alexander took 37 sick days, 25 days of vacation and 22 days for business travel — meaning she was out an equivalent of almost 17 business weeks, according to City Court leave forms. Last year, she was out a total of 82 days: 30 sick, 21 vacation and 31 for business travel.

“I can’t explain that except that I was sick,” she said. “We only take sick leave when we’re sick. The Supreme Court approves our sick leave.”

Since 2007, Alexander has missed at least 58 days, or almost 12 weeks, per year.

Alexander has already been away from the bench at least 50 days so far this year.

The leave forms do not account for weekend days judges are expected to work. Judges are required to work one Saturday every five weeks as a duty judge for bond reductions and probable-cause hearings.

Wall was away from the bench 54 days in 2011 — or almost 11 weeks — for sick, vacation and business travel.

The fewest number of days Wall was away from the bench in any one of the past five years was in 2009, with 42 days off.

“We don’t know what days we’re going to be sick or not sick,” Wall said. “If I took 50 days off, it was a combination of vacation, sick days and administrative conferences. But we’re here the vast majority of the time.”

Ponder took fewer days away from the bench than the other judges, with an average of about 23 days per year, mostly for vacation and sick leave.

Davis had the fewest sick leave days, with no more than two sick days in any year.

Temple said that as long as the judges met the parameters set for leave by the state Supreme Court and the city-parish, then the judges’ leave is justified.

Temple was away from the bench 30 days last year and 45 in 2010, which was her first full year as judge.

“I’m a wife, a mother, and I’m myself, so as it relates to sick leave then sometimes there are instances we need to take off,” she said. Temple had 40 sick days in the two-year period. “The public is served even if there is a reason we’re not here on that day,” she said.

When judges are away, the City Court always pays ad hoc judges to fill in for them.

Since 2007, City Court has spent between $56,624 and $87,033 per year for the substitute judges.

City Court has exceeded its line-item budget for ad hoc judges and other contracted temporary employees since 2007 by at least $24,000 every year, records show.

But City Court Administrator Lon Norris said the department stays within its overall budget every year because it can cover the costs of ad hoc employees with its savings from other areas, like not filling employee vacancies.

Baton Rouge City Court judges have been scrutinized in the past for their travel.

The Advocate, in 1998, reviewed the judges’ travel and found that over a 26-month period, Alexander logged more travel than her peers, with more than $16,000 worth of expenses.

She came under fire again in 2002 when the Metro Council tried to cap foreign travel in response to some Caribbean trips and a trip to Italy taken by Alexander. The trip to Italy cost the city-parish about $800.

“I have broken no rules and I continue to do my job,” Alexander said.

“The Supreme Court must approve everything we do. I’m following the rules and regulations and I do a great job on the bench.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (26)


1) Comment by LetsGeaux2 - 09/07/2012

Is the Advocate targeting Judge Alexander? It seems to me to make a bigger story than what it is...they come up with this craziness! The story seems to focus on her most of the time...in total the average cost for travel over the 5 year period is on $24k. Do you want competent judges or fools...Someones friend must be running for judge against on of there people...that would be interesting to see...this is non news!

2) Comment by Elderly Man - 09/07/2012

I would like seeing a report on travel expenditures for executives at Entergy, AT&T, local hospitals, our local physicians, and other people who depend on our paying for their services. //This article suggests abuse without showing any abuse. It simply implies abuse but without proof.

3) Comment by Elderly Man - 09/07/2012

The article would be helpful were it to compare travel with other courts and with other parts of city government. The amounts reported are trivial. Each judge is a sort of manager of his or her court. These are courts that deal with large volume and often minor matters thought domestic violence, many driving offenses, and what we used to call petty theft are serious matters in their way. These travel events do not seem out of line with what one does in private enterprise.

4) Comment by Terd Handler - 09/07/2012

This whole article is structured to make things look worse than they actually. Why does it focus just on trips taken since 2007? One of the judges wasn't in office for two of those years, and the one that was in office for those two years wasn't even mentioned? The totals that are mentioned are for 5 1/2 years, which seems kind of a weird time frame. Also, the article references substitute judges that are hired in case of sickness and vacation as well as business trips. I would wager that most of those costs are associated with illness and vacation time that the judges are entitled to, but this "nice reporting" job doesn't go into that. I would hope there would have been some effort to determine how much was business-related travel, but that apparently wasn't even attempted.

5) Comment by Mr. T - 09/07/2012

I don't think advocate employees like ScotB should be allowed to comment in this space. They are basically misrepresenting themselves as members of the public. This is another cheesy travel expose by the advocate that focuses on a relatively minuscule amount of public money in an attempt to make certain public servants look bad. The probem is that they are ignoring much worse offenders in higher levels of government, as well as real waste in order to grab a few cheap headlines.

6) Comment by ScotB - 08/07/2012

The article said she missed 17 weeks of work in 2010. She averages missing 12 weeks every year since 2007. 17 weeks!!! You call that good people who work hard? God, I hope someone runs against her that actually IS willing to work hard! Once again, I commend Ms. Allen for her reportage. This is what the fourth estate is supposed to do to help the public good.

7) Comment by Elderly Man - 08/07/2012

These are not necessarily abuses. The context is more complex than that article defines. I do not know about travel from the 19th Judicial District or the Court of Appeals. The city does not pay large salaries. It does not offer immense perks other than basic ones. When one compares this with what executives in private enterprises receive in enormous perks and salaries, our local officials are poorly paid. My old doctor used to receive enormous benefits from the drug companies that produced the drugs she prescribed for me. She got trips, free meals at fine restaurants, free bottles of expensive wines, and free golf trips. //The judges stand for reelection and everyone has a right to vote them out if one is foolish enough to rid us of good people who work hard.

8) Comment by tradewinns - 08/07/2012

one of the reasons our judicial system is a failure is that judges DO NOT WORK! if any worker performed their duties as judges do theirs, that worker would be fired within a month. however, our judicial system is based primarily on making money for lawyers. everything, and i mean everything, generates money for the legal field. that's why whenever you read about a criminal going to court, they go over, and over, and over, etc etc, if the legal field was run as any profitable business functions, our cost would be substancially reduced. and, by the way, when the judges do "work", they usually come up with some pinheaded "right" or reason to expand the work of other lawyers (and themselves). the ONLY way to reign in these self appointed demi gods is to vote them OUT! and/or set minimum working standards they must meet to maintain their position.

9) Comment by Abused Citizen - 08/07/2012

The entire judicial hierarchy needs to be examined for its abuse of travel and absenteeism. By permitting the Supreme Court to set travel, sick leave, and other absenteeism is tantamount to permitting the fox to make rules for the hens. A real, in-depth, examination of the travel, travel expenses of the First Circuit Court of Appeal wouls appall and sicken the working public. It is beyond time for this newspaper to examine and expose not only the City Court, but the 19th District Court and the First Circuit Court of Appeal. Any private enterprise which would permit such excesses would soon be out of business. A federal court of appeal is being highly criticized for one conference in Hawaii. By the standards of our City Court, District Court and Appeals Court, the federal court of appeal judges are mere pikers in taking lavish vacations(disguised as conferences) at the public expense.

10) Comment by ScotB - 08/07/2012

Nice reporting Rebekah, by the way!

11) Comment by ScotB - 08/07/2012

If someone was looking for an opportunity to run against judge Alexander, here is a good talking point to run on. How can we rely on her judgement, when she cannot see that taking advantage of the taxpayers this way is wrong?

12) Comment by Elderly Man - 08/07/2012

Yes, I know that about the airlines. I just could have gotten cheaper flights if I had booked them but the entire process was efficient, professional, and fair. I could get by on a fraction of the per diem.. I did not give back money but I did account for all that I spent with receipts. I got very high level academic work in summer school in Utah that greatly improved my work. i received this three times over 18 years of service. I did a lot of extra work for which the court could not reward me and the study helped make up for that fact. I was not allowed to make my flight plans but that was many years ago--the last trip was in 1997. I did not mean to be unfair. At the time, I could not book my own flights. I did opt for the cheapest room (a dorm room, not a hotel). I rented a car one year but paid for that with my own funds, not city money. I think that we tried hard to respect the city government with what we spent. I think that the judges do the same. I was paid a straight per diem and did not ask for as much as the city paid me. Again, this was in 1989, 1992, and 1997 for that specific travel. I did other travel in state with other members of our staff and in the city itself for some conferences. I paid my own way to several professional conferences.

13) Comment by Rebel Yell - 08/07/2012

The City-Parish travel rules do not require the use of one specific Airline for travel. A per diem of up to $44 per day is allowed but the individual has the option of claiming a lower amount. Employees and elected officials have the option of making their own travel arrangements and receiving reimbursement or having items such as registration paid directly. Stating that City-Parish travel rules are responsible for driving up costs is not really a fair statement.

14) Comment by Elderly Man - 08/07/2012

Judge Alexander is also a fine jurist and a fine person. Her travel expenses make sense. I apologize for the scatter posts.

15) Comment by Elderly Man - 08/07/2012

I think this is an important issue and fair for criticism. We do not pay our judges excessively, however.

16) Comment by Elderly Man - 08/07/2012

delete the "that" //

17) Comment by Elderly Man - 08/07/2012

Judge Davis is a fine jurist and I very much respect Judge Ponder. //City Parish has rules about travel that drive up cost. I could always have done my travel cheaper than what the travel and training cost but we had to use Delta Airlines and follow per diem rules. I stayed in dorms when I travelled and took my means in university dining halls. The court travels much more economically than do other city officials.

18) Comment by Chucky - 08/07/2012

We followed the rules, and took the citizens money as we are allowed to do.

19) Comment by Elderly Man - 08/07/2012

They were a tad stingy with training for professional staff during the years I worked there but training is important—very important. I think that we used that privilege responsibly and well when we got to use it. Training is vital. //Further, the men and women who serve as our ordinary court judges work hard. Their work is extremely difficult and tedious. They adjudicate an immense number of cases and are not paid immense salaries—good salaries but not large ones. There are few perks and travel in this case is fair and necessary. //The quality of many of our city judges is extremely high. //I have high regard for these folks. //Cutting down our public servants is not helpful.

20) Comment by MissCotillion - 08/07/2012

Judge Suzan Ponder certainly has a different work ethic than these other judges. This looks terrible for them the economy is so poor, people laid off, other areas of the city- parish in dire need, and these misdemeanor judges are giving themselves airs and traveling in luxury on our dime. Remember this when elections roll around.

21) Comment by spqr - 08/07/2012

The above is our leadership along with horrible traffic, pollution, high crime and insurance rates, few jobs even though the Baton Rouge Chamber insists we are moving forward (yea, right), a squabbling city council, major litter issues, the worst governor in state history, a state superintendent of education exposed by one newspaper as a liar, the gutting of education budgets, a state citizenry brainwashed to hate their teachers and state workers, and too many public school students with an entitlement mentality refusing learn, and a braindrain of our best and brightest. Does it ever stop in this banana republic? Texas anyone?

22) Comment by Whatnow - 08/07/2012

Unlimited sick days??? The public is not served when our courts are so backed up. This is just abuse of the system. Remember these abusers at the voting booths.

23) Comment by TommyRucker - 08/07/2012

Does this really surprise anyone with two brain cells?? Corruption is alive and well in America and gaining momentum every day. This is what anyone who deals in TRUTH would call 'legalized stealing'. These people along with their friends in the other aspects of government have broken the system, a system set up and defended by our forefathers. America cannot continue to abandon God and be governed solely by men. This is the result and it is getting worse.

24) Comment by Mr. T - 08/07/2012

I have to wonder why the state district court judges weren't included in this expose. The city court judges are peons compared to them, and I think their travel budgets will reflect that. Oh, that's right, a couple of the 19th JDC judges are friends with the Manships, whack makes the immune from investigations like this. So the paper goes after the peons instead.

25) Comment by stopnthink - 08/07/2012

"Since 2007, she’s visited Hawaii twice, Jamaica twice, Puerto Rico, St. Maarten, the Virgin Islands and the West Indies." if someone just showed me this one line, i would've figure it related a young hollywood celebrity. but, heck at least they pay their own travels. the saddest parts are their attempts to justify the lavish use of our tax $. its like they honestly see nothing wrong with it.

26) Comment by Cousin Dave - 08/07/2012

And we are giving these leaches an extra $50,000 to keep their city jail open 24/7? Seems like they could do away with their travel and fund the jail themselves.