Council dissects mayor’s budget

The East Baton Rouge Parish Metro Council broke apart Mayor-President Kip Holden’s $11.1 million budget supplement Wednesday, approving all public safety appropriations, including police and fire academies.

However, it killed a contract with a Washington D.C., lobbying firm the administration says has secured tens of millions of dollars of grants for the city-parish.

The council also nearly rejected $705,000 worth of downtown improvements that were to be funded by dedicated dollars that, by law, can only be spent on downtown riverfront projects

Holden’s mid-year budget supplement included 11 line items with the vast majority of the money allocated to the Police Department, Fire Department, Sheriff’s Office and Coroner’s Office.

The budget supplement, funded through savings and surplus funds, also included money for public works, an aviation maintenance program for Baton Rouge Community College, the Mayor’s Office of Homeland Security, two FutureBR projects, downtown improvements and the $200,000 Patton Boggs lobbyist contract.

The Metro Council debated the budget supplement for the majority of its four-hour meeting, with several members criticizing the mayor’s spending choices, saying the mayor did not go far enough to address law enforcement needs.

“It turned into some people trying to turn this into politics and some people trying to criticize the Mayor’s Office,” Holden said of the council’s reaction to the supplement after the meeting.

“When you get through it and all the smoke clears, what we have is something that will do something for public safety, and do more than we’ve been doing.”

Patton Boggs, a top-rated federal lobbying firm that employs former U.S. Sens. John Breaux and Trent Lott, has represented Baton Rouge since 2005. It says it has secured $40 million in direct funding for the city-parish for transportation, infrastructure, law enforcement and small-business development.

Patton Boggs also has provided tens of millions of dollars worth of additional money for the city-parish, benefiting programs such as Head Start, energy efficiency and conservation initiatives, emergency shelters and the Sheriff’s Office, according to a report prepared by the firm.

Holden said the firm recently helped tweak the city-parish’s application process for funds needed for Operation BRAVE, a police program targeting violent crime in Baton Rouge.

Councilman Ulysses “Bones” Addison criticized the administration for bringing the lobbying contract back for consideration after the Metro Council had rejected it, and for allowing the firm to continue to operate without an approved contract in the hopes it would later be compensated.

The council recently rejected the mayor’s proposal to pay for the Patton Boggs contract from the council’s discretionary fund.

Chief Administrative Officer John Carpenter said the contract was brought back for the council’s consideration because the council had indicated it would consider approving the contract if it was paid for using other funds

Council Chiarman Mike Walker had said in April, “If it’s that important and means that much for the mayor, then he ought to come up with his own money and let us use our $200,000 for fighting crime.”

Walker made the motion Wednesday to delete the Patton Boggs contract from the budget supplement, saying it was not as important as crime-fighting.

The council voted, 7-4, to delete the contract from the agenda with Trae Welch, Joel Boé, Tara Wicker and Alison Gary voting against deleting the contract.

Voting to kill the contract were Walker, Addison, Scott Wilson, Ronnie Edwards, Donna Collins-Lewis, C. Denise Marcelle and Rodney “Smokie” Bourgeois. Chandler Loupe was absent.

Holden said it’s much more difficult for cities now to receive earmarks from the federal government compared with previous years, so having a savvy lobbying firm to help compete for grants against other cities is important.

“It will take away our competitive edge,” Holden said after the meeting. “We are operating from a position of weakness rather than from a position of strength.”

The Metro Council also initially voted against spending $705,000 of state sales tax rebates dedicated to downtown for projects included in the budget supplement.

“I understand it’s dedicated money,” Bourgeois said, referring to the downtown funds. “I call it dedicated waste.”

The downtown funds included plans for lighting on the Galvez Plaza stage canopy, signs in Town Square, some street enhancements and an additional $325,000 for ongoing renovations of Repentance Park, adjacent to City Hall.

Bourgeois took issue with spending additional money on Repentance Park, noting $3.5 million already had been appropriated. Department of Public Works officials said the money is needed because of unforeseen underground obstructions.

Wicker asked the council to reconsider, and approve the time-sensitive funds for Repentance Park while deferring the remaining downtown items until the next council’s next meeting.

The council supported Wicker’s request, 7-4, with Addison, Wilson, Marcelle and Bourgeois voting against it.

The approval of the budget supplement means the police will get 30 additional officers from a police academy that begins July 30 and the Fire Department will get 35 new firefighters from an academy beginning Aug. 11.

Before approving the public safety items, Metro Council members admonished the administration for not including funds for the District Attorney’s Office, summer youth programs and for more officers in the police academy to address its staff shortage.

Police Chief Dewayne White said he has 59 vacancies, and 35 more officers will retire in the next 18 months. He said he will ask the Mayor’s Office for 75 more officers in 2013.

When asked by the council if he would grant White’s request, Holden said the request would be considered, but “no department that comes into the process gets 100 percent of their requests.”

In other matters, the council deferred action on a request to raise the pay scale of the East Baton Rouge Parish Library System director, a move a search firm has recommended to attract better qualified candidates.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (20)


1) Comment by No1Equalizer - 29/06/2012

And as far as solving crime in BR, just put electric fences around Gardere and North Blvd to keep the crime enclosed in these areas.

2) Comment by No1Equalizer - 29/06/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

3) Comment by NewsReader - 29/06/2012

MEM, just what we want, every fool with a gun going out and imposing their justice without regard for every citizen's right to a fair trial. I thought you were always pro the constitution? Also I suspect if you ever do use your gun to defend yourself that little statement you just made will come back to haunt you. It really conveys the sense that your opinion is shoot first, ask second.

4) Comment by anonomous - 28/06/2012

I know about the sewer project. I also know that $1.5 billion shared equally among 400k residents is $3750 each. Thats not going to work. Neither is raising the cost of policing $11 million every couple years. That does not include courts, or corrections. Similar to health care these costs need drastic reduction. How much money can we continue to spend?

5) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 28/06/2012

If fighting crime is your true goal and you're looking for an investment with a return, buy a gun and USE it.

6) Comment by movingon - 28/06/2012

If you don't know about the sewer project it's your own fault. There have been several informational meetings held that were reported in this paper, with more to come.

7) Comment by phil - 28/06/2012

Also somewhat related - what about that $1.5 billion sewerage project that keeps getting more expensive and the associated bonds and bond swaps? Anyone want to talk about that?

8) Comment by anonomous - 28/06/2012

We are not really increasing the number of officers or firemen. The new academy will only balance the retirement/attrician of the police and fire. So an additional $11 million is needed every 2 years to maintain the current levels. This is not sustainable.

9) Comment by phil - 28/06/2012

Another blunder in general in my opinion. What is this money for? Some projects previously listed included Smiley Heights Urban Village Development Project and Mid-City Urban Renewal. OK why do we have to build Smiley Heights and support the RDA with up to $200,000 in addition to what has already been spent? Follow the money? Another project is Repentance Park and other Riverfront Master Plan Projects ($325,000). How much MORE money do taxpayers have to spend on downtown parks? Next - Town Square signage. We already have spent about $5.9 Million on PHASE ONE of the Town Square and now we have to pay about $30,000 more for signage? Also, how much more are the future PHASES going to cost us? Next is Galvez Plaza Stage Canopy Lighting for $50,000. Doesn't everyone remember how expensive that stage canopy already is? Next is Lafayette Street Pedestrian Improvements for $200,000. OK exactly WHAT is being done for $200,000? Next is Riverfront Gateway Enhancements for $100,000. What is the world is that really for? Sounds like a lot of wasted money to me. By the way, what happened to all of those terrible bridges around the parish that are supposed to be in need of repairs? By the way, what will happen to the approx $3 million that was previously dedicated to CATS? By the way, if this are really dedicated funds just for downtown then how about just change the law so those funds can be used for projects that are really needed. I believe if taxpayers do not say anything more about this, nothing will ever change.

10) Comment by Being_Stupid - 28/06/2012

The only way to fix crime is to fix the education system first.

11) Comment by Being_Stupid - 28/06/2012

Patton Boggs = Parasite on the Taxpayer both at a Federal Level and Local Level. We shouldn't give them a dime. Patton Boggs is an evil company made of lawyer elites, lobbyists, and corrupt ex-politicians. $200,000 is pocket change to Patton Boggs, a company that makes $310,000,000 a year. They will not miss our $200K.

12) Comment by Being_Stupid - 28/06/2012

****Comment Removed for Violation of Terms of Use****

13) Comment by DMJ - 28/06/2012

Honestly, what's $200K gonna do for fighting crime? Hire 3 or 4 cops for a year? Buy 4 patrol cars? White is asking for 75 cops. $200K for law enforcement is chump change in a city this size. I'd rather it be spent on something that might show some return. As much as we all hate lobbyists, as long as that's how the game is played, why not have someone playing for us??

14) Comment by Woody - 28/06/2012

you are right lovemykids, there is NO CRIME in Baton Rouge. Mike Walker is just trying to scare us all.

15) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - 28/06/2012

I watched the whole meeting on TV and "Smokie" is an embarrassment to his district. Al tho I am often accused of being a racist (chuckle) I think Mr Addison is a breath of fresh air on the council. He calls it like he sees it and does not fall for any double talk. I hope he stays on the council for a long time.

16) Comment by lovemykids - 28/06/2012

CRIME CRIME CRIME!!!!!! Walker's election motto and scare tactic?

17) Comment by Elderly Man - 28/06/2012

For me, development of the waterfront has taken too much money for too long when basic needs such as crosswalks and pedestrian lights do not exist. Spending to make our city better tourist destination is not a high priority for me. The recent report about how our city trails in recovery from the depression indicates we misspend our resources.

18) Comment by markedwardmarchiafava - 28/06/2012

Were there any monies included to compensate EMS paramedics permanently injured and disabled on the job? Are public safety personnel REALLY the mayor's top priority?

19) Comment by gtinla - 28/06/2012

It's difficult to believe that "Smokie" represents one of the most educated districts in the city.

20) Comment by Chucky - 28/06/2012

I thought the tax failed. How come we have all this money ?

21) Comment by Mr. T - 28/06/2012

I would have some information about the public safety stuff that did pass, including a breakdown of the police spending. All this article talks about didn't pass and what almost didn't pass. Ain't that kind of bass ackwards?