Opponents say BREC move to roll forward raises taxes

Advocate staff photo by HEATHER MCCLELLAND Police officer Lionel Freeman walks with Liberty Lagoon employees Iquesha Newell, 19, left, and Maisha Williams as they carry a cash tray from concessions to the office Friday.  BREC officials have said that park security could be cut if the millage roll forward is not granted. Show caption
Advocate staff photo by HEATHER MCCLELLAND Police officer Lionel Freeman walks with Liberty Lagoon employees Iquesha Newell, 19, left, and Maisha Williams as they carry a cash tray from concessions to the office Friday. BREC officials have said that park security could be cut if the millage roll forward is not granted.

The board that oversees East Baton Rouge Parish’s park system will consider Thursday whether to roll forward the system’s property millage tax, a move opponents have called a “backdoor approach to raising taxes.”

Parish residents pay a 14.463-mill property tax for BREC operations. But because 2012 is a reassessment year, that will automatically roll back to 14.038 mills unless two-thirds of the nine commissioners vote to roll it forward.

The East Baton Rouge Parish Recreation and Park Commission needs the extra $1.488 million that rolling the millage forward will bring, BREC Superintendent Carolyn McKnight said.

“Our costs have continued to increase,” McKnight said. “In order to stay on track with inflation, we choose to roll forward.”

Leaders of the parish Republican Party, however, said they plan to attend Thursday’s BREC meeting and urge commissioners to reject the proposal by BREC administrators to roll forward the millage tax.

“It’s a pretty significant increase, a tax increase without voter approval,” said Republican Party Chairman Woody Jenkins. “BREC already gets a significant increase in revenue because of new property going on the tax rolls.”

McKnight said that in addition to inflation, BREC is facing increasing costs in other areas, including its contribution to employee retirement programs.

“We are talking about another $250,000 on that alone,” she said. “Our water and sewer rates also went up.”

In addition, McKnight said, security expenses at some new community parks, like Howell and Greenwood, increased by $80,000 in 2012.

Meanwhile, the new Central sports complex, expected to open in the fall, will cost between $150,000 and $250,000 to operate in 2013, McKnight said.

In total, BREC will have $1.7 million in extra expenses next year, according to information provided by Kristi Barnett Williams, a BREC spokeswoman.

McKnight noted that BREC has taken steps to cut costs, including freezing employee salaries and leaving several administrative positions unfilled. Further cuts may be required if the roll forward isn’t approved, she said.

“We are probably talking about a hiring freeze,” she said. “I will have to pull back and take a real hard look at what we are doing.”

McKnight said BREC would take such steps as suspending executive car allowances and having employees fill out mileage sheets. Other steps could include reducing operating hours at some parks and cutting back on mowing schedules, she said.

Jenkins, who has called rolling forward millages a “backdoor approach to raising taxes,” said he and others in the parish Republican Party are mounting a campaign called “Operation Stop the Roll Forward” to stop BREC and others from rolling millages forward.

Dan Kyle, a Republican Party member and former member of BREC’s governing board, said: “We are going to be researching how much property has been added (to the tax rolls) and how much (BREC) is going to receive” in additional funds as a result.

Kyle was Louisiana’s Legislative Auditor from 1989 until 2003.

Kenneth Riche, BREC’s board chairman, said Friday he had yet to decide how he would vote.

“I really want to cover all my bases before I make a decision,” Riche said. “I am aware that this is taxpayer dollars and we have to be prudent with that.”

Craig Freeman, also a board member, said he supports rolling the millage forward.

“BREC’s work improves property values,” Freeman said. “I hope that we will be able to roll forward so that we can reap some of the benefits for the community,” Freeman said.

Freeman disputed the argument that rolling forward is a “backdoor” tax increase.

“It is fundamentally flawed to say I bought a house at $40,000 and now it’s worth $100,000, my taxes should be frozen at $40,000,” he said. “This is not a raise in taxes; everybody’s paying their fair share.”

Riche and Freeman agreed that Thursday’s meeting could be contentious.

“I expect a long meeting,” Riche said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (14)


1) Comment by The_Host - 26/06/2012

Roll it up and up in smoke it goes. Just like every other dollar sent to government. It is true great leadership isn't the ability to simply spend more and more money it is spending less and less while getting more out of it. But then it's not your money why bother right. All these government agencies and state workers would shat in their pants if they were suddenly dealt the same type of environment I work in daily. They would be screaming to high heaven but the goals set which must be met otherwise our jobs could be gone will be met. There is no such thing present in the Public Sector. You have a captive consumer who is going to pay you one way or the other and you know it so why bother to improve and innovate with efficient idea's. Let's just blame things costing more and roll the tax forward so we can spend more money, the thing they do the best. Like no one else has had their costs go up also. This is what I don't get about you folks that say oh its just a little bit. All those little bits add up. How many times can you pay 1 more % before you have nothing left? Not many!

2) Comment by gary - 25/06/2012

@StraightShooter - how right you are about Woody J., besides his newsletter - watch Baton Rouge News Today cable 19 - when Dan Richey interviews P.J. Mills - they don't attempt to hide their racist views. Mike Walker had better run as fast as he can away from Brother Woody - that would be a sight - Mike moving fast.

3) Comment by Being_Stupid - 25/06/2012

When will the Republican Party, Tax Busters, and Woody Jenkins start attacking "Crime Prevention" Taxing Districts passed onto property owners by overzealous Self-Appointed Neighborhood Associations? What about the "Crime Prevention" Property Taxes passed by the Republican State Legislators like Dan Claitor, Steve Carter, Franklin Foil, and Hunter Greene. Will those property taxes be challenged too by the local Republican and TaxBusters Leadership? Or will they only target the BREC and CATs Property Taxes? I would like them to start attacking all unfair property taxes, including those passed by the local Republicans serving in the State Legislature.

4) Comment by Being_Stupid - 25/06/2012

How much money did these BREC goons waste on that waterpark they built to compete with Blue Bayou? Liberty Lagoon = Government Goons stealing your liberty to pay for their waterpark = Socialism.

5) Comment by Straight Shooter - 25/06/2012

It amazes me that the EBR Republican Party has led Woody Jenkins to believe that he can be relevant again in local or state politics. I sincerely hope that the local party does not succumb to the bigotry and hate that this man shows in his local newsletter. If so, I would seriously have to consider moving out of the area rather than watch the City-Parish be lead by backward thinking radicals.

6) Comment by 8point6 - 25/06/2012

“Our costs have continued to increase,” McKnight said. “In order to stay on track with inflation, we choose to roll forward.” And, the property owner/taxpayers' costs have NOT increased?! Did you forget the CATS property tax increase? Plus, the 28 other taxes being paid by the BR property owners?

7) Comment by no1zson - 25/06/2012

“I will have to pull back and take a real hard look at what we are doing.” McKnight said BREC would take such steps as suspending executive car allowances and having employees fill out mileage sheets. Wow. That does sound unreasonable. Taking a look at what you are doing? Executive car allowances? Filling out mileage sheets?!! How dare we expect such things! <sarcasm> Just wondering, shouldn't all that be looked at anyways and shouldn't BREC have to account for money BEFORE they spend it? Seems like bad business when you build all these new things, and then hope to pay for it later. Then again, I do not operate with all that free government money, so I wouldn't know.

8) Comment by phil - 25/06/2012

What surprises me is that anyone is surprised by this. Every time we have a reassessment year the same thing happens and everyone seems to be surprised AGAIN. I believe we have some very hungry political subdivisions of the state (like BREC) in EBR Parish that feed on taxpayer funds and never have enough to eat no matter how much we feed them. Maybe someone needs to contact their representatives in the LA Legislature to get this problem fixed. By the way, I bought a less expensive home years ago just because the property taxes would be lower so I could afford it. Over the years the value of my home has gone up, additional taxes have been added and this happens again and again. Pretty soon BR will price me out of the BR market and I will probably have to look for another parish to live in. However, I imagine the RDA will be happy to take over my property when I have to leave. I think it's a common BR cycle that repeats itself often.

9) Comment by Chucky - 25/06/2012

Over the years we have been very generous with BREC in passing taxes on our selves, now in these hard times would be a good time for them to show us some generosity.

10) Comment by Being_Stupid - 25/06/2012

I rent my property from the Government.

11) Comment by LawyerDan65 - 25/06/2012

The roll=forward issue is a red herring...we the people voted to tax ourselves at a set rate..."roll-forward" only keeps the rate at exactly the same level that we voted on...

12) Comment by arin - 25/06/2012

Why does BREC need more money when a tax was passed on property owners not that long ago. Just goes to show you that it's easy to spend money but to spend it wisely requires people who are not in it for the money. Don't think these commissioners are doing this for free. There is corruption

13) Comment by lovemykids - 25/06/2012

Good comment, Mr. T

14) Comment by Mr. T - 25/06/2012

As I appreciate this, individual property owners wouldn't pay any additional taxes, but would pay exactly the same rate that they paid for the last four years. So it is silly for Woody J. to call it a tax increase. The real issue in my mind is whether our assessor is going to adjust home valuations to reflect the drop in property values that has occurred here in EBR since 2008. They have had to adjust assessnts downward in most areas of the country; the big question is whether our assessor Brian Wilson is going to do his job and lower them here. We all know our homes aren't worth what they were a few years ago.