Vehicle rental, lease tax bill passes

Advocate Staff Photo by Travis SpradlingState Rep. Patricia Smith, left, D-Baton Rouge, talks Monday with Rep Hunter Greene, right, talk just after the vote accepting the conference report on Senate Bill 350. Show caption
Advocate Staff Photo by Travis SpradlingState Rep. Patricia Smith, left, D-Baton Rouge, talks Monday with Rep Hunter Greene, right, talk just after the vote accepting the conference report on Senate Bill 350.

The Louisiana Legislature gave final approval Monday to legislation that would allow six parishes, including East Baton Rouge, to levy a tax on automobile rentals and leases.

An East Baton Rouge delegation fight in the final hours of the session over the distribution of the tax proceeds threatened to derail chances of getting about $750,000 in estimated new revenues.

But last minute negotiations resulted in a compromise that was then approved by the House and the Senate before the session’s end.

Without the deal not only East Baton Rouge’s effort was in jeopardy, but the ability of Lafayette and Caddo parishes to tap into the automobile tax as a revenue source as well.

The dispute came as a conference committee report on Senate Bill 350 came up for a vote in both chambers.

The Senate Bill 350 conference committee report expanded the number of parishes in which voters could approve the 3 percent automobile rental or lease tax to include East Baton Rouge, Lafayette and Caddo parishes along with Orleans, Jefferson and Calcasieu.

The addition of East Baton Rouge did not create the problem. It was the disposition of tax receipts that prompted objections and moves in the Senate and House to return the bill to conference to change it. The effort in the Senate failed, but the House opted to send conferees back to the negotiating table.

The compromise version ultimately approved and shipped to the governor’s desk would earmark 40 percent of the tax proceeds to the Arts Council of Baton Rouge, 15 percent to the Shaw Center for the Arts and 15 percent each to the city-parish, sheriff’s office and the district attorney’s office.

The Senate approved the multi-parish auto rental tax 34-1 and the House 72-9.

The original conference committee version of SB350 would have sent 60 percent of the tax receipts to the Arts Council, 23 percent to the Shaw Center and 17 percent to city-parish government.

State Sen. Bodi White, R-Central, said the legislation requires parish government to direct 83 percent of the funds to arts entities. “We don’t have an arts problem in this parish. We have a crime problem,” he said.

“I like the arts and support the arts. But this is public money going to the arts where here in East Baton Rouge Parish we have a problem with crime, with roads,” said state Sen. Dan Claitor, R-Baton Rouge.

In the House, state Rep. Hunter Greene said he has a problem with taxpayer money going to non-governmental organizations like the Arts Council and the Shaw Center.

“To carve out 83 percent and say it will automatically go to these entities is the wrong way to do that,” said Greene, R-Baton Rouge. He said he would rather give the money to the East Baton Rouge Metro Council to use at their discretion.

State Rep. Regina Barrow called the complaints over the bill “political retaliation” by White and Claitor who she said are upset over the failure last week of proposal that would have created a new public school district in southeast Baton Rouge.

Barrow sponsored a separate bill, House Bill 971, that would have allowed East Baton Rouge Parish voters to consider the tax had earlier been sent to a conference committee over a Senate change to allow 20 percent of the funds to go to the sheriff’s and district attorney’s office.

Before the session adjourned, the Legislature approved a version of it that inserted the new auto rental tax distribution formula and added the potential of Ouachita and Rapides parish voters approving such a tax. That legislation also goes to the governor’s desk.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (7)


1) Comment by 8point6 - 05/06/2012

I just emailed Jindal urging him to veto this bill.

2) Comment by foldgers - 05/06/2012

Is it me, or would this lead to open the door for more taxes... such as apartment rental/lease tax or Office lease/rental tax?? Yeah, some will say it is only 3%, but they need to seriously sit down one day and add up every single tax they pay every month. Check you phone bill, cable bill, internet bill, cell phone bill, water bill, electric bill... it is getting insane.

3) Comment by NewsReader - 05/06/2012

Jindal had better veto this seeing as he keeps saying he's against all new taxes and it will be primarily businesses who bear the brunt of this moneygrab.

4) Comment by foldgers - 05/06/2012

40 percent of the tax proceeds to the Arts Council of Baton Rouge, 15 percent to the Shaw Center for the Arts and 15 percent each to the city-parish, sheriff’s office and the district attorney’s office??? --- REALLY?!?! Although I do not agree with this NEW tax, if it goes through, I believe it should be all applied to Law, education and roads/bridges!!! ARTS!?!?!? Really? Also, what happened to the PEOPLE voting on all these taxes? We get to vote on CATS but not stuff like this? A lease tax? Before you know it, there will be a breathing tax, a swimming tax for all those that choose to hoard water in their yards, a tire tax for all those that feel they want larger than normal tires... JEEZ!! WHY DON'T PEOPLE VOTE FOR ALL TAXES????

5) Comment by tradewinns - 05/06/2012

how long do you think it will take before the taxpayers will finally scream enough? how high do you believe taxes must go before they stop? if you think just others pay this tax you're incorrect. when you travel to other destinations and need a rental car, you will pay this. if you lease a car/truck, you will pay this. and then for the tax to go primarily to arts? while the sheriff dept. is included an a much lower level as to be insignificant. if you support the arts (i don't), support them! send your money in and leave mine alone.

6) Comment by lovemykids - 05/06/2012

Is Jindal going to veto this tax?

7) Comment by The_Host - 05/06/2012

Nothing another TAX can't fix right.