Vitter blocking nominee

Sen. David Vitter plans to block the federal judge nomination of Baton Rouge lawyer Shelly D. Dick, of Baton Rouge, at least until after the presidential election in November.

Dick is the only federal judge nominee stalled, out of five nominations President Barack Obama made at the same time in April.

Vitter, R-La., declined interview requests Monday, but did respond in a prepared statement.

“By any measure, I’ve bent over backwards to cooperate regarding President Obama’s Louisiana nominees, which has resulted in all 10 before this being confirmed in record time,” Vitter stated. “Now that it’s a few months before a presidential election, however, I’m going to let the people speak before supporting any others.”

Dick is a founding partner in Forrester & Dick, a Baton Rouge law firm specializing in litigation. In November, she was one of three possible nominees recommended to Obama by Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La, to replace the late Chief U.S. District Judge Ralph E. Tyson.

Dick said she has failed in her efforts to contact Vitter.

“I have reached out to Sen. Vitter but have not had the opportunity to speak with him, and I don’t know what his intentions are,” Dick said Monday.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is meeting Wednesday to consider the other four nominees Obama made April 25.

“He (Vitter) hasn’t contacted me about it, so you’d have to get his reasons why,” Landrieu said Monday.

In the Senate, each senator is given a “blue slip” by the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee on nominations in their state for federal judge, U.S. attorney and U.S. marshal.

Only once the two senators from the state of the nominee return the slips showing their approval is the confirmation hearing held.

White House spokeswoman Joanna Rosholm said Monday in an email response, “The president has complete confidence in Shelly Deckert Dick, and hopes that she will proceed toward confirmation soon, becoming the first woman to ever serve on the Middle District of Louisiana District Court.”

University of Richmond law professor Carl Tobias said Dick “seems to be qualified” and that Vitter appears to be stalling.

“There are 16 people (federal judge nominees) on the (Senate) floor now waiting for votes and some of them have been waiting for quite awhile,” Tobias said.

Vitter and Landrieu also have some history of feuding over blue slips on federal nominees.

last month, Vitter stalled two appointments to the Federal Reserve Board before they were ultimately pushed through.

In 2010, Vitter held up two Louisiana nominations — one for then-nominated federal Judge Brian Jackson of Baton Rouge and a U.S. marshal candidate in New Orleans — in an effort to ensure that the U.S. attorney he supports in the Eastern District, Jim Letten, remained. Vitter relented once Letten was reappointed with the support from Landrieu.

Similarly, in 2007, Landrieu successfully blocked the nomination of U.S. Attorney David Dugas for a federal judgeship, citing concerns about some of the cases Dugas handled. That was the only hold that Landrieu used during the eight years of the Bush administration.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., does not comment on pending nominees before his committee. But his staff pointed to comments he made last month complaining about Republicans blocking federal nominations.

“I hope that Senate Republicans will stop blocking prompt confirmation of consensus nominees,” Leahy said at the time. “That is a destructive development and new practice that has contributed to keeping the Senate behind the curve, keeping federal judicial vacancies unfilled, overburdening the federal courts and keeping Americans from securing prompt justice. The American people deserve better.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (20)


1) Comment by gofigger - 07/06/2012

@Straight Shooter - Sorry, I may have jumped the gun on this one. Time will tell.

2) Comment by Straight Shooter - 06/06/2012

@gofigger More credible than what? And please enlighten me about what facts you base your opinion that this particular nominee is liberal.

3) Comment by gofigger - 06/06/2012

Is it more credible to do favors for the poor in other countries?

4) Comment by Straight Shooter - 06/06/2012

@DMJ As disgraceful as Vitter is, the misinformed comments in support of Vitter's move is even more disgraceful. I'm assuming that the "keep this liberal off the bench" is solely made out of fear of the boogeyman, a.k.a. the President. Let me educate the uneducated: Ms. Dick and her firm for the most part represent insurance companies and corporations, including railroad companies. Judges that come out of defense practice tend to be conservative judges. In fact, there were a lot of members of the plaintiffs' bar that were not happy with Senator Landrieu's recommendation of Ms. Dick. Having been on opposing sides as Ms. Dick, I can say that she is very competent, meticulous and cordial. Moreover, she has volunteered in construction projects for the poor in South Africa, Kenya and Cambodia. At the very least, she appears to be a decent human being, which is much more than can be said about Senator Vitter. In sum, Senator Vitter's block on this nomination is pure party and scare tactic politics. Senator Landrieu knew that she could not get a liberal judge on the bench with Senator Vitter in Washington. So she went for the safe bet and recommended 3 attorneys that were non-controversial and highly respected among their peers. When President Obama picked one, Senator Vitter choose to take the low road and block the nomination no justifiable reason. What an embarrassment to the State of Louisiana.

5) Comment by gofigger - 06/06/2012

@DMJ - I did not say I agree with what he does in his personal life. When elected officials have to account for their private lives to stay employed, we may have to outsource these government jobs!

6) Comment by Grannee - 06/06/2012

Tradewins, she leans the way cash flows.

7) Comment by Grannee - 06/06/2012

For the record, I am not a Vitter supporter or fan. On the other hand, I have first hand knowledge of this woman. I am happy her nomination is being delayed for reasons I can't state in the paper. Anyway Ms. Dick, God does not like the things you allow and look who He's using to stop you. I always said God has a sense of humor. Wow!

8) Comment by DMJ - 06/06/2012

Vitter is a disgrace. Using his office to purposefully clog up the courts in the name of ideology? Absolutely disgraceful. And gofigger..."what you do with your personal life is between you and God"? I'm glad to see you're now pro-choice and in favor of gay marriage. Welcome to the right side of history.

9) Comment by gofigger - 06/06/2012

Thanks for your attempt to keep this liberal out Mr. Vitter! What you do with your personal life is between you and God. I'm not sure what the "old man" has against you, but he sure is relentless.

10) Comment by DUH - 05/06/2012

Thank you Mr Vitter! The conservative voice of the people are finally being heard. Also, congratulations to the people of Wisconsin! Great day!!

11) Comment by tradewinns - 05/06/2012

the one thing La. nor the nation needs is yet another liberal judge, for life.

12) Comment by twinkie1cat - 05/06/2012

Yall are talking crazy. The one who needs to go is Vitter. He is a sorry, immoral obstructionist of the low caliber of Newt Gingrich. Mary Landrieu is not perfect. She is too conservative in some ways, meaning that she supports Jindal's school debacle. Now he is admitting to being a proud obstructionist by refusing to allow this judge to be appointed. When does this do-do come up for re-election.

13) Comment by Whatnow - 05/06/2012

At least Vitter didn't lie under oath. Thank you, Senator Vitter, for listening to your constituents. And yes, we do need to replace Mary for someone who won't be paid off for their vote.

14) Comment by BRmoderate - 05/06/2012

I love how people back this guy. The same voices that thought it appropriate to impeach clinton cast their ballot for vitter in the last election...

15) Comment by Elderly Man - 05/06/2012

Filthy man who has not shame.

16) Comment by Being_Stupid - 05/06/2012

Once these Democrat Party Elite Trial-Litigation Lawyers become judges there is lot of winking, hanky-panky, back room deals, and golf course transactions that go on behind the scenes away from the courtroom with their attorney buddies still practicing to make certain their lawsuits go a certain way. Cha-Ching $$. Frivilous Lawsuits = Big Money = $$$ = Wink Wink = Rising Insurance Costs on everybody to pay for these big bills and excessive regulation imposed by the lawyers in the courtroom and the lawyers in the legislature.

17) Comment by Being_Stupid - 05/06/2012

We need to replace Mary Landrieu with another Conservative like David Vitter.

18) Comment by 8point6 - 05/06/2012

Thank you, Senator Vitter for keeping my "progressive" friends on their toes, and for aggravating the media. Did mary get any taxpayer money from hussein, for recommending dick?

19) Comment by tradewinns - 05/06/2012

if the advocate would give examples of her legal leanings (liberal, conservative, etc) it would be eaiser for the public to understand the process. once they are in, they are in! you can not get rid of them.

20) Comment by lovemykids - 05/06/2012

Vitter, what a @$*(&%$. With his past, the big bad conservative should be a little more ... Never mind, he will be our next governor.