Educator: Study’s premise flawed

The president of the state’s community and technical college system condemned Monday a report by a Washington D.C. firm that concluded Pell Grants and other forms of financial aid for low-income students don’t have a significant impact on their success.

The study entitled “Can Financial Aid Improve Student Success at Louisiana’s Community Colleges,” found that academic preparation is a stronger predictor of success than financial aid.

The Louisiana Board of Regents spent about $50,000 last year to help pay for the study, said Meg Casper, the regents’ associate commissioner of public affairs. She said the regents hoped to find ways the state could better package financial aid to impact student achievement.

Louisiana Community and Technical College System President Joe May called the report by the American Institutes for Research, “politically motivated” with a “predetermined outcome.”

“The intent was to create confusion for something so many people need, and to incite rather than inform,” May said.

Kevin Crockett, president of the Noel-Levitz consulting firm which helped prepare the study, said the intent was to examine whether financial aid affects student retention and completion at two-year colleges, and whether financial aid can be used more efficiently to increase student success rates.

Crockett said the report focused primarily on federal Pell Grant recipients to study students with similar socioeconomic backgrounds.

Nationally, more than one-third of all college students receive some type of Pell award, intended to help bridge the cost of higher education for lower-income and some middle-class families.

Pell Grant funds will go to more than 100,000 Louisiana recipients this year.

Researchers defined “success,” Crockett said, as whether students earned a certificate, an associate’s degree or transferred to a four-year Louisiana college within three years.

“The big question was whether aid has any impact on students’ persistence,” Crockett said.

The study found students required to take remedial courses before moving on to college-level classes have less than a one in 10 chance of succeeding. The report also says that boosting financial aid to Louisiana community college students does not correlate to increased academic success.

In pushing back at the study, May said the study’s premise is “off-base” and its definition of “success,” is flawed.

Need-based financial aid, such as Pell Grants have always been about giving people access to higher education, May said.

A majority of community college students enroll without ever intending to graduate, May added. Also some students often enroll in two-year programs to learn a specific skill to make themselves more employable, May said.

The study, he said, counted people who learned a skill and then left school when they found a job using that skill, as failures, May said.

“They defined success so narrowly. Education is not always some idyllic dream. For some people, it’s a practical necessity,” May said. “And they only counted people who able to finish in three years; that’s not our population.

All they wanted to say with this study is that giving financially needy people access is a bad idea. There was obviously an agenda to this study.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (5)


1) Comment by yankyny - 08/05/2012

The intent of the study was clearly stated by the group, "whether financial aid affects student retention and completion at two-year colleges, and whether financial aid can be used more efficiently to increase student success rates." So the answer was no, so if financial aid is not the reason for dropping out, then what is the reason? Of course educational institutions will say the contrary, they want student to remain in school over the allotted time simply because they continue to make money from students. I seen student with over 120 credits and not have enough to graduate because of the major changes. Bottom line, academic preparedness is what improves retention, not money. Poor students that are academically capable will get the money they need to continue. On the other hand, poor student will unstable academic foundation will drop out....seem rather simple to me.

2) Comment by squiggly - 08/05/2012

I also went to college on a pell grant and come from a very poor family, where my parents worked, but could not afford to send me to college. I likewise, now make too much money for my kids to qualify for one. I personally know dozens of people who have come from the same background as myself, and are now living a middle class and above life now. The pell grant gave me an opportunity that I would not have been able to have on my own. I also know of dozens of kids who had to quit college because they could not afford to go, even when working full-time jobs, which in a country as wealthy as the US is a disgrace.

3) Comment by tradewinns - 08/05/2012

well joe may, you actually have at your disposal all the data to support statistically your statements. where are they? this sounds more like sour grapes that the study does not justify your position and you know it.

4) Comment by HMaltravers - 08/05/2012

Finally, someone is waking up and smelling the coffee. Since, I'm using cliches, does the old cliche, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink, apply here?

5) Comment by Pakistani - 08/05/2012

I received Pell grants while at UNO and then went on to graduate from Medical school. Coming from a very poor family, pell grants helped me to help myself. My kids now wouldn't qualify for a pell grant, but I support them for helping poor kids get through college.