Jindal, legislators differ on budget    

Advocate Staff Photo by Travis Spradling.State Rep. Jim Fannin, D-Jonesboro, left, seen here talking with Patrick Goldsmith, center,  director of the House Fiscal Division, and  Mary Quaid, right, director of House Legislative Services, Thursday in the House Chamber, said he will try to show legislators the impact of a push for further state government spending cuts. Show caption
Advocate Staff Photo by Travis Spradling.State Rep. Jim Fannin, D-Jonesboro, left, seen here talking with Patrick Goldsmith, center, director of the House Fiscal Division, and Mary Quaid, right, director of House Legislative Services, Thursday in the House Chamber, said he will try to show legislators the impact of a push for further state government spending cuts.

Use of one-time funds center of debate

Many legislators in the House are dismissing the Jindal administration’s warnings that key dollars need to stay in the state spending plan to protect health care and higher education from drastic cuts.

House Bill 1, the proposed $25 billion state operating budget for the fiscal year that starts July 1, is scheduled to be debated Thursday on the House floor, where high hurdles await.

At issue is a largely philosophical disagreement over the use of one-time money to balance the state budget during difficult financial times. Money from the sale of a hospital and other sources would be used to patch together a budget that pays for schools and prisons.

For the public, the dispute is significant because the alternative to using the one-time money could be significant cuts to hospitals, colleges and other state services.

State Rep. Brett Geymann, R-Lake Charles, thinks relying on money that is unlikely to materialize more than once is an irresponsible way to manage state government.

He said cuts can be made without crippling higher education and health care.

“That’s impossible,” said Commissioner of Administration Paul Rainwater, the governor’s chief budget aide.
Rainwater is warning legislators that hospitals would close and college funding would be slashed if they prevail in purging more than $300 million in one-time money from the proposed budget.

Some legislators believe the Jindal administration is exaggerating. “I find there are a lot of melodramatic characters in their group,” said state Rep. Joe Harrison, R-Napoleonville, referring to Gov. Bobby Jindal’s aides.

Geymann is not certain exactly where he would make further reductions. He said he still is studying the issue with the help of House staff.

State Rep. Franklin Foil, R-Baton Rouge, said he shares the concerns about the budget’s reliance on one-time money.

Foil said the Legislature may just have to live with it this year and look for long-term solutions.

“I don’t want to cut higher ed any further,” Foil said.

Relatively new rules mean the Legislative Fiscal Office will have to determine exactly how much one-time money is being used to balance the budget. The use of one-time money will require a two-thirds vote for the House to consider the budget.

State Rep. Jim Fannin, D-Jonesboro and the budget bill’s sponsor, said he is working with legislators who want to remove the nonrecurring dollars.

Fannin’s tactic is to show them where the reductions would fall.

“We will have to deal with the one-time money and let folks know where cuts would be,” he said.

Another wrinkle is the need to eliminate a shortfall in the remaining weeks of the current fiscal year.

Some House members considered using the state’s “rainy day” fund to resolve the shortfall. Formally called the Budget Stabilization Fund, the rainy day fund is designed to tide the state over during difficult budget times.

Fannin said he does not think he can get the necessary votes to use the rainy day fund.

The alternative, other than making reductions, is to kick the problem to next fiscal year, he said.

Southern University System President Ronald Mason Jr. came to the State Capitol on Thursday armed with a sheet of paper outlining the Baton Rouge campus’ precarious financial predicament.

Mason said he has a “heightened concern” about a faction of legislators pushing for further reductions in state government spending in the budget year that begins July 1. Those reductions could fall heavily on higher education and health care.

He said he wants to make sure legislators understand that the Baton Rouge campus already is struggling and added cuts would be crippling. The notion of Southern being able to do more with even less is unrealistic, he said.

“Some senators believe what they’re doing is motivational ... I want to make sure they realize the reality of the situation,” Mason said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (12)


1) Comment by The_Phoenix_Rises - 06/05/2012

Why can't they start cutting jobs from the top??? The state government is too top heavy, it will collapse upon itself. It seems like every 5 state worker that leaves or gets laid off from work, Jindal and crew creates an unclassified position that pays over $100,000 a year!!!

2) Comment by bettergovt - 06/05/2012

Once all the parents that care pull their kids out and send them to charter and private schools, the regular public schools will become prison preparatory schools anyway.

3) Comment by Concerned_Citizen - 06/05/2012

Society just might be moving backwards when you have to cut funding to schools so you can pay for more prisons. #1 in incarcerations per capita (800 inmates for every 100,000 residents)

4) Comment by 8.3 - 06/05/2012

Look up "Analysis: Louisiana revenue doesn't match Jindal's picture". apparently conservative doesn't mean with the truth and reality is whatever Jindal,as a duly represented servant of the people, says it is. Again and again, Louisianians are their own worst enemies. Good luck.

5) Comment by spqr - 06/05/2012

According to the state treasurer, this state has $5 billion more to spend than just five years ago. There is no reason or excuse for destroying public education at any level. But gov. piyush jindal (always lower-case) is the enemy of the people he is supposed to serve. He is not doing that. His political downfall is imminent.

6) Comment by bettergovt - 06/05/2012

Unfortunately the citizens cannot see what is happening because of the misinformation being put out. This is the biggest deliberate crash of a state ever. Regular tax payers may have seen their tax stay the same or gone down a little but the super rich and certain corporations have seen their tax drop to almost nothing. Some corporations are paying state tax on as little as 12 cents of every dollar. I am not saying they are paying 12 percent, I am saying they are paying 6% on only 12 percent of their profits because of all of the tax credits. We have crashed revenue from corporate taxes from $721 million in 2008 to $137 million in 2012. This while income taxes went from $3.1 billion to $2.4 billion. You do the math. Does that sound proportionate? Sales tax went from $2.8 billion to $2.7 billion. Every tax on business and the rich has dropped tremendously while taxes on common people have fallen a tiny fraction if any at all. Please wake up!

7) Comment by Crawdaddy - 06/05/2012

Across this country there continues to be a raging debate about what services should be provided (and paid for) by federal, state and local governments. The mantra of "read my lips, no new taxes" has been around for a couple of decades now, but the problem is that, even though citizens still want the services provided by public servants, many do not want to pay for the services. Jindal's approach to reform has been through suffocation based on increasingly less funding. He has stated that higher education in LA is a bad value for the students to justify higher ed cuts. He has stated similar things about other areas that were cut. We all know that our current lack of state revenue has relatively little to do with the national recession. Our loss of revenue was purposely originated by Jindal to decrease the size of state government. Trickle-down economics, where the largesse of companies will somehow enhance the riches of the public sector, simply has not worked.

8) Comment by jeffsadow - 06/05/2012

How many times must this be pointed out? There are plenty of revenues coming into state coffers, but they are being maldistributed because of the hundreds of revenue dedications. This is why we have "one-time" money, because it has to be swept out of all the low-priority places where it is being allowed to accumulate. Instead of bemoaning this, fix it by loosening the dedications. See http://jeffsadow.blogspot.com/2012/05/legislators-gripe-about-system-they.html.

9) Comment by lovemykids - 06/05/2012

The chickens can't come home to roost because Jindal and the legislature want to privatize the roost. To make it worse they sold all future eggs.

10) Comment by SuzanneMS - 06/05/2012

Jindal's chickens are coming home to roost. He has been so successful in convincing the legislature and many citizens that the state budget is "bloated" and must be "trimmed," that now that he's cut it completely to the bone, they won't believe him that any further cuts will not merely cripple but destroy.

11) Comment by LAAPSW - 06/05/2012

http://www.facebook.com/pension2012

12) Comment by LAAPSW - 06/05/2012

I understand if Governor Jindal doesn't want to raise taxes, but can he please stop giving the money we all pay away. Remember, 'business tax incentives' (a euphamism for corporate welfare) were supposed to pay for themselves when the jobs resulted in increased income and sales tax revenue. Well, it hasn't because the amount of the tax break (credit, exemption or rebate) far exceeds and realistic offset. If you have a few hours to read this, please do. http://www.revenue.louisiana.gov/forms/publications/TEB(2011).pdf