Suit seeks to stop eatery driveway

A group of homeowners has asked a judge to prevent the owners of Sammy’s Grill on Highland Road from adding a driveway behind the restaurant, something owner Sammy Nagem says is needed for safety.

In a petition for declaratory judgment filed in 19th District Judicial Court Tuesday, the Magnolia Woods Civic Association asks a judge to order Nagem and his wife Mary T.T. Nagem to rescind the subdivision of a residential lot behind the restaurant and to stop using the lot to store restaurant supplies.

Nagem, who bought the lot in 2010, said the lawsuit was a “necessary step” for him to be able to rezone the lot so that he could add the driveway, which would also add about 30 parking spaces.

“If we would have passed (a rezoning request) through the city council, we probably still would have gotten sued,” he said.

Nagem said the driveway was needed for safety reasons, because people who try to park in one of the two lots at his restaurant are forced to back out onto Highland Road if there are no spaces in the lot.

The suit alleges that the planned driveway would encroach on the Laurel Lea subdivision and that the subdivision of lots violates building restrictions of the subdivision, which were filed in 1954.

“In my mind, the deed restrictions have been abandoned,” Nagem said. “I didn’t know about these restrictions when I bought the property.”

He subdivided another adjacent lot in 2000 to expand his parking lot without objection, Nagem said.

“There is no subdivision association created to enforce the restrictions, no architectural committee to study the plans,” said Nagem’s attorney, David Cohn. “It’s been a situation where everybody just got along.”

Efforts to reach representatives of the Magnolia Woods Civic Association or its attorney were unsuccessful.

Nagem originally submitted a rezoning request to the Metro Council in October of last year, but withdrew the request after the council voted to defer the issue.

“We wanted to make a driveway that would go behind the building and connect the two parking lots for safety reasons,” Nagem said. “We got a lot of opposition through that process.”

Nagem said he worked with homeowners in the neighborhood to find an acceptable compromise, but was unsuccessful.

Nagem’s original plan had been to put an exit from his parking lot onto Kimbro Drive, which runs behind the restaurant, but after homeowners objected, he withdrew the idea, he said. He had also moved the line of the driveway to accommodate homeowner’s requests, he said.

“I have done everything I could do,” Nagem said.

The suit also accuses Nagem of using the lot behind his restaurant to store supplies for the restaurant, a violation of the neighborhood’s single family use requirement.

“I could be storing some stuff I use at work, but I am not conducting any business,” Nagem said. “I live there when I am in town.”

Nagem’s primary residence is in Monroe, but he stays in Baton Rouge 2-3 nights per week, he said.

The suit asks a judge to declare that the building restrictions in Laurel Lea subdivision remain in effect and to order Nagem to undo the subdivision of the lot behind the restaurant and stop “activity inconsistent with single family use on said lot.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (9)


1) Comment by Being_Stupid - 05/05/2012

The year is 2012, not 1954.

2) Comment by Being_Stupid - 05/05/2012

Deed Restrictions have to be enforced uniformly. If Sammy can prove that he or somebody was able to do this already on another lot in the neighborhood and get away with it for over 5 years, then it becomes too late to enforce that particular part of deed restrictions. Especially on a deed restriction from 1954, that only until recently is all the sudden being enforced, when for many years it wasn't or parts of it enforced on all original lots since 1954. Sammy will have a strong case if he has already done this on another lot since 2000 (well over the 5 year limit in accordance with Louisiana Revised Statute LRS 9:5625 ).

3) Comment by Cousin Dave - 05/05/2012

Where's Councilman Smokie Bourgeois? This is a great opportunity for him to put a competing restaurant put of business, like he tried to do with the food trucks.

4) Comment by Whatchange - 05/05/2012

its real simple, if the subdivision let it rules expire or they have not followed their own rules the rules are void, there they do not exist. if there is no subdivision association created to enforce the restrictions, or no architectural committee to study the plans,how can there be subdivision rules to follow. So like a bunch of people who just want to make trouble. As for the comments, sounds like you all live in the subdivision. This is the very reason I live in the country, subdivision people.

5) Comment by Mr. T - 05/05/2012

I hope Faimon Roberts and his buddies at the advocate enjoy all the free beer and crawfish that they're going to get from Sammie's in exchange for running this slanted article. I have a friend who used to work at the advocate, and she said the reporters pay is so low that some of them make "deals" like this to supplement their income. Just ome question - how do you sleep at night?

6) Comment by bmacon - 05/05/2012

One last comment: The safety issue is a moot point. Mr. Nagem had plenty of property on which to provide adequate parking and a turnaround, but he has chosen to clutter that property with outbuildings and miscellaneous equipment in the area behind his restaurant. By his own disorganization, he is responsible for any safety issue that arise on his property.

7) Comment by bmacon - 05/05/2012

This reporter did not attempt to contact anyone in the neighborhood until late yesterday afternoon. Several misrepresentations appear in this item, including the fact that the lot AND HOUSE in question is, and since 1954, has been zoned A-1 single-family residential. As for the deed restrictions, that will be handled in court. As several members of the Metro Council pointed out to Mr. Nagem in his failed attempt to bulldoze his way through the zoning issue, he is responsible, as all homeowners are, of getting a copy of the deed restrictions BEFORE he buys a property in a subdivision. He could have easily done so but didn't. As for his staying in Baton Rouge two or three nights a week, Mr. Nagem also owns another house in Baton Rouge--not in the Laurel Lea neighborhood. The neighbors in Laurel Lea who live next to the house in question have NEVER seen anyone stay overnight in the house.

8) Comment by Terd Handler - 05/05/2012

How do you print an article about a lawsuit without talking to the attorney who filed it and his clients? This doesn't even identify who they are! It's as one-sided as you can get, but that's the advocate for you.

9) Comment by Elderly Man - 05/05/2012

I do not blame the home ownders at all.