Vitter assails Obama, left on energy

Advocate Staff Photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCKU.S. Sen. David Vitter-R, La, speaks Monday to dozens of students at the LSU College of Engineering. The senator said the U.S. economy has been sparked by natural gas reserves found on private property and not subject to some government regulations. Show caption
Advocate Staff Photo by ARTHUR D. LAUCKU.S. Sen. David Vitter-R, La, speaks Monday to dozens of students at the LSU College of Engineering. The senator said the U.S. economy has been sparked by natural gas reserves found on private property and not subject to some government regulations.

U.S. Senator David Vitter told a group of engineering students Monday that domestic energy production is “under assault” from the Obama administration and left-wing environmentalists.

Their future job prospects, Vitter said, may depend on how policy debates take shape in Washington, D.C.

Speaking during the Dean’s Lecture Series at the LSU College of Engineering, Vitter said the U.S. economy has been thrown a lifeline with the cheap price of natural gas sparking a manufacturing boom across multiple industries.

Jobs in the chemical, paper and forestry industries used to go overseas before newer technology made domestic drilling more efficient, he said.

“It’s an accident of history or an accident of geology that most of the natural gas we have is on private land so the federal government doesn’t have as much control, like with oil,” the Republican senator said. “That makes a big difference.”

But President Barack Obama and the “environmental left” want the federal government to have more control over the natural gas industry, Vitter said, especially in the case of the drilling method known as fracking, or hydraulic fracturing. Fracking injects water into rock to release oil and natural gas.

The environmental community wants to cast fracking as potentially dangerous to groundwater supplies, but their arguments are not based on “sound science” he said.

Drilling opponents have never proven that fracking has directly led to any underground contamination, the senator said.

“Fracking debates are going to have a lot to say if we continue down a productive path or if we turn that spigot off,” Vitter said.

The United States should be focusing on expanding natural gas uses into the transportation industry, rather than trying to limit it, he added.

Those in favor of heavy government regulation in the oil and gas industries have “no realistic plan” to phase out existing energy sources in the next few decades, Vitter said.

During a speech that went just over 30 minutes, the Metairie native also touched on his work to pass the federal RESTORE Act.

The legislation currently making its way through the U.S. Congress guarantees 80 percent of the fines collected from the April 2010 BP oil disaster, an amount that could reach $20 billion, would be distributed for coastal restoration to Gulf states.

“Louisiana would get the plurality, because clearly we suffered the most impact,” Vitter said.

The senator also touched on climate change, calling himself “a big cynic.

“I don’t believe human industrial activity has been a major factor,” he said.


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (11)


1) Comment by RedStickNative - 01/05/2012

I truly hope those engineering students laughed the sorry excuse for a U.S. Senator out of the building.

2) Comment by Tea_Slayer - 01/05/2012

The dangers of Fracking And before you dismiss the article because it was published in the NYT, you should follow the links to the documents that the journalist obtained from the EPA. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/us/27gas.html?_r=2

3) Comment by Whatnow - 01/05/2012

Thank you, Senator Vitter.

4) Comment by janiea - 01/05/2012

A certain person who has posted on this site should listen and watch the media carefully and research what is said. Find out the truth for yourself before you make comment. Please learn how to spell it will certainly help you appear to have some intelligence. Only in LA does one vote for an official no matter how immoral or idiotic the candidate is. Blinders need to be taken off or this state will never recover.

5) Comment by jobo - 01/05/2012

Such delicious irony that he advocates deregulation of oil/gas and mentions the BP spill in the same speech. As if one did not cause the other. Oh, but yes, I'm sure companies will take the responsibility upon themselves to be completely safe, that always happens.

6) Comment by AKA - 01/05/2012

"Not sound science," says Vitter. He's not a scientist, just an agenda pusher. And to diminish the truth that the climate is indeed warming by not being willing to do our part to fix it is just solipsistic. He's bought and sold by Big Oil, plain and simple.

7) Comment by DMJ - 01/05/2012

Jesus Christ, I hate Vitter. What a callous, immoral man.

8) Comment by pseudonymous - 01/05/2012

'LIMIT' and 'REGULATE' DO NOT mean the same thing! It's politics of fear and recklessness like this that continue to hamstring the mindset of ignorant people like "julwood" below...

9) Comment by warreni - 01/05/2012

What a dirtbag. Yes, anthropogenic climate change is real, whoremonger, just like the dangers posed to aquifers from which our drinking water is drawn by hydraulic fracturing. I guess you don't "believe in" evolution, either, do you? Go back to your paid-for mistresses and leave governing to the grown-ups.

10) Comment by Whatnow - 01/05/2012

@julwood, You must like playing stupid, and you're winning.

11) Comment by julwood - 01/05/2012

Everbody knows Obama and his communist libs cawsed the oil spill thats ruining our marshes. Of corse Louisiana should get the fines to pay for clening it up. Besides that Obama polisy is cawsing us to loose the coast line we got. We gotta get rid of the muslims and get back to Christian liven.