CATS expected to approve April tax vote

Buses operated by the Capital Area Transit System, going in and out of the central terminal on Florida Boulevard.. Show caption
Buses operated by the Capital Area Transit System, going in and out of the central terminal on Florida Boulevard..

The parish bus system’s board of commissioners is expected to move forward with a tax election in April, rather than waiting until the fall as previously planned, board members said Tuesday.

The Capital Area Transit System, which has been plagued by budget shortfalls in recent years, could ask voters to approve a 10-year, 10.6-mill property tax to improve and expand the bus service.

The CATS board will meet at 11:15 a.m. Wednesday at a special meeting in the Shaw Center to approve the tax election.

Board member Jared Loftus said he expects his colleagues to approve the ballot item because for months they have been discussing the possibility of an April election.

“This isn’t just about fixing a broken-down bus system,” Loftus said. “It’s about the future of transportation in Baton Rouge.”

The property tax would apply only to property owners in the city limits of Baton Rouge, Baker and Zachary. Only those residents would vote on the tax proposal.

The proposed tax is expected to generate more than $18 million a year if voters in all three cities approve the tax: $16.6 million in Baton Rouge, $1.1 million in Zachary and $636,000 in Baker.

Loftus said if voters in Baker or Zachary reject the tax, CATS is not obligated to serve those cities; however, the bus service would likely provide limited access to the areas.

For an average home valued at $157,000, the tax would cost the property owner about $14 a month in Baton Rouge, $10 a month in Baker and $16 dollars a month in Zachary, Loftus said.

“If you look at other millage rates for the library, for BREC and for fire districts, it’s lower than the other dedicated revenues out there,” Loftus said.

The funding would enable CATS to implement the recommendations made last year by the Blue Ribbon Commission. Among the recommendations by the commissioners, appointed by the mayor-president, are more buses and more routes, and ultimately reducing wait times from 75 minutes to 15 to 20 minutes.

The chief recommendation the Blue Ribbon Commission made in the fall to Mayor-President Kip Holden and the Metro Council requires going to the state Legislature to create a special taxing district to allow CATS to ask voters to approve a sales tax.

The commission recommended seeking a quarter-cent sales tax and a 4-mill property tax in a fall election.

Without the legislative changes, CATS can call only for a property tax, not a sales tax.

Loftus said several members of the CATS board are concerned about waiting until November to ask for a tax. He said it became apparent it is necessary to move forward with just a property tax proposal in the spring election to address CATS’ immediate funding shortfalls.

CATS is experiencing a budget shortfall of $2.1 million that threatens to shutter its operations in July. Last year, CATS had a $1.4 million budget shortfall, but the agency was saved midyear by a private donation and some federal grants.

“April makes the most sense as far as moving forward right now,” Loftus said. “We’ve made a very large effort to reach out to many groups of people and get their input and see if there is support. And because the support is there, we feel like this can be successful this time around.”

In October 2010, voters rejected a 3.5-mill property tax for CATS, 53 to 47 percent.

If the April tax passes, CATS would not begin to collect funds until next year.

Board President Thomas Govan said if CATS secures a dedicated source of revenue, the agency could apply to the state bond commission for a tax anticipation note, which would act as a bridge loan to get CATS through the end of the year.

If the tax is passed, Loftus said, CATS could begin implementing some of its less expensive improvements, such as adding shelters and more-informative signs to the bus stops.

It would take at least a year for CATS to implement dramatic changes like increasing service from 19 to 37 routes and increasing the number of buses on the roads during peak hours from 32 to 57, he said.

CATS officials still intend to ask the Legislature in the summer for autonomy from the Metro Council, which was another recommendation from the Blue Ribbon Commission.

Loftus said the Metro Council would still appoint CATS board members, but it wouldn’t have “veto power over route and fare changes as they’ve had in the past.”

Baton Rouge Area Chamber president Adam Knapp said he supports the decision to move forward with the April election.

BRAC was involved with the Blue Ribbon Commission last year and assisted in assembling a new civic group in recent weeks to push forward the commission’s recommendations.

“Long-term funding is necessary to support a system with reliability and predictability,” Knapp said.

He noted that CATS is following through with almost all of the commission’s recommendations, but acknowledged that the immediate funding problems make it necessary to move up the election.

Board member Isaiah Marshall said a year of conversations about transportation, and working with different organizations, has better positioned CATS for a tax election than it was in 2010, when it had virtually no organized support.

“We’ll see more third-party groups this time that will come out and support it,” Marshall said. “That gives us a sense of confidence, but as it is with any election, you never know. It’s in the hands of the people as to how it turns out.”


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (28)


1) Comment by 8point6 - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

@Chucky: I've got 28. "But, 8.6. It's only another $14 a month more for property owners in Baton Rouge! You are so greedy! You just don't want to help po people!" April just can't get here fast enough so we taxpayer/property owners can once and for all kill this tax proposal.

2) Comment by tradewinns - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

no, no, a thousand times no! we are taxed to death and regardless of how much they get, they have to have more. i suggest they figure out how many routes and how many repetitions they can run on the budget they will have without any addittional monies. if it is only one route, one time. thats it, run it. the taxpayers do need to add a "law" that any tax proposal turned down by the electorate can not be presented in any form for the same purpose for 5 years. otherwise they will place it on the ballot every time there is a ballot and/or change it around so much you'll not know if voting for it means you are against it or vice versa.

3) Comment by willianm34@yahoo.com - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

I do not believe that CATS is requesting another tax vote. There are too many taxes now that many of us do not even benefit from but yet we must pay. I do not support CATS at all for the following reasons, 1) routes are un-organized, 2) long wait times when other states have bus routes pass in the SAME route every 15 minutes or less, and 3) sounds like mis-management of money which caused the down fall. I will not support this tax or vote YES. When I was riding the public transportation services I literally hated the long wait periods and lets not discuss the wait areas and the conditions that they are in. I say get another person who could properly manage the funds and we may not have to keep supporting CATS.

4) Comment by Chucky - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

I have 23 mmillaged-based tax charges,it mounts up people, enough.

5) Comment by DMJ - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Do the right thing! Vote to properly fund public transit!! After all...what would Jesus do? Would he yell catch phrases from the '80s like "No new taxes!!" or would he vote to fund public transit, the patrons of which are mostly elderly, disabled or poor. Yeah, I know....guilt trips don't work on those without empathy but I think most people are good people who care about their city and the less fortunate more than a little stinking money. I guess we'll find out in April...

6) Comment by Duckyluve - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Wake up people....NO NEW TAXES FOR ANY REASON!!!!!!!!!!!

7) Comment by ZacharyPatriot - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

As long as CATS management is making the incredibly high salaries they make and continue to mis-manage CATS, there will NOT be a tax increase approved by the voters. CATS can't even stay afloat with FEDERAL GRANTS obtained by the Capital Region Planning Commission. Just how many times to we have to go to the expense of voting and, voting DOWN a tax for CATS before it sinks in and they make the cuts required to run a business???? NO MEANS NO KIP

8) Comment by phil - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Look at other cities that are also having issues with funding their own transit systems and also having budget problems. Look at the TriMet website for example, and the fact that they are having budget deficits now even though they already collect a lot in taxes. Also look at the budgets ot the peer cities on the CATS study and do an Internet search of how many are now having budget problems.

9) Comment by phil - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Sorry I do not compare 2 or more bad things to make one bad thing look better. A GIGANTIC tax increase and a gerrymandered new tax district are not good for Baton Rouge, in my opinion. For example. a property tax will probably be passed on to poor working people who rent homes, so you end up hurting a majority of the poor while possibly helping a few of them. Also for people who do have money, you will end up with poor people subsidizing them to ride the bus. Yes this proposed tax is basically a free (or subsidized) ride for a few, but just a large expense for most others.

10) Comment by Elderly Man - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Phil, what then is the problem? Compare what we spend on public transit and what we spend on other public services and then tell me where we have a problem? We were once asked to spend half a billion dollars on another museum downtown, one that served no need at all. The entire DDD is something of a strange expense. We wrecked two private enterprise newsstands downtown but supported a third one with tax dollars. That is the sort of thing to question. Public transit is part of but only part of a comprehensive city/parish transportation system. It is not a free ride service. The free rides are the tax supported parking spaces all over the city.

11) Comment by phil - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Think about this and the possibilities for the future. In the future, a tax proposition could be presented to the people and the people actuallly vote against the tax. Then the governement could use the actual tax results by voting district to form a new gerrymandered district to manipulate the outcome of a new tax vote. Does this sound right to you?

12) Comment by Chucky - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Tax money that could be spent on the many than the few. Transporting people for ‘free” makes them ask for more for nothing

13) Comment by phil - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

The city-parish general-fund now gives CATS about $2.9 million a year plus other existing TAX (not fares) funds come from hotel/motel taxes, federal grants, and parish transportation funds. If you assume the $2.9 million general-fund subsidy would continue, then that would make LOCAL taxes a total of about $20.9 million with the proposed $18 million tax increase, and does not include the other sources of tax revenue. This appears to be about a 7 times increase in the LOCAL tax contribution. If the $2.9 million general-fund subsidy is actually discontinued sometimes in the future, then you just gave someone in government $2.9 million to use for pet projects. Of course that never happens around here, right? Then you can add to that the fact that this will basically be a gerrymandered new tax district with less total taxpayers, so less people will have to pay even more in taxes to get the $18 million, if this passes. To sum it up, I think this is way, way too much of a tax increase, and the creation of a new tax district is not acceptable. It seems like the only method used to propose a tax proposition around here now is to hit the public with a gigantic tax, possibly gerrymander the voting district, and hope the tax passes. I hope voters are smarter than that.

14) Comment by nimby? - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

a yes or no vote , no options . when the measure is prepared so voters can examine , for those allowed to vote , be sure and read it carefully before just voting yes or no . you may change your mind . sorry , but I still have trust issues w/local government ...

15) Comment by DMJ - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

I think exempting Central from the tax is a good idea. This will help get the proposal passed. Sure, there are anti-tax yahoos who vill vote "no" on just about anything, but I think most people are unselfish and civic-minded. Hopefully, this will pass.

16) Comment by 8point6 - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

"10 year, 10.6 mill property tax" Why doesn't this board of commissioners just propose a 30 mill property tax? That way, CATS CEO, et al, could get fat yearly bonuses for their "hard" work. "The property tax will only apply to property owners in the city limits of Baton Rouge, Baker and Zachary. Only residents in those three areas will be permitted to vote on the proposal." WHY!?? ALL of EBR parish should be able to vote on this. Nevermind. The more property owners who are excluded, the better chance of passing this unfair tax. This is one Cajun-American who will be voting NO on this tax.

17) Comment by arin - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

How about only property owners who are above the exemption are able to vote.

18) Comment by arin - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Just like BREC, They will overspend then ask for more money.

19) Comment by CountryBoysCanSurvive - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Just say NO to drugs, Kip and Cats

20) Comment by nimby? - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

will this be he only issue on the ballot ? how much will this special election cost ? thanks for not involving me , yall enjoy ....

21) Comment by Duckyluve - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

NO NEW TAXES

22) Comment by Elderly Man - Wednesday, January 11, 2012

I think this is a clear issue now. Either we fund public transit or we do not. I think that whether I can remain here or have to leave depends on the outcome. I do think that public transit is a matter equal to water and sewer service, police service, streets, and libraries. It is not about getting a free ride. It I could bus downtown or other places and play a few dollars to be able to do that, I would gladly pay a few dollars for the service. It costs me to park, gas up, maintain the vehicle, and such and I gladly paid that. I calculated at one time what driving to and from work cost me but I don’t recall the numbers. Public transit is, I repeat, not free service but a vital one. I think a trip for the eight miles downtown from my home was about five dollars or so each way. Ten dollars round triip ought to cover a well run system.

23) Comment by arin - Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Then after 10 years, They will ask for more taxes to maintain and update the system. Then overpay the administrators and bus drivers. Give employees 100% healthcare coverage. All on the backs of property owners. People, it's a money pit and we need to stop it before it gets started.

24) Comment by anonomous - Tuesday, January 10, 2012

I support it and believe most citizens agree our city needs buses.

25) Comment by Elderly Man - Tuesday, January 10, 2012

This is a wise and fair way to provide a needed service. Thank you.

26) Comment by Whatchange - Tuesday, January 10, 2012

I am so glad I live outside the city limits of Zachary.

27) Comment by mdsgu - Tuesday, January 10, 2012

If you want to ride the bus, pay for it. Don't come asking me to buy your ticket just because I happen to own property.

28) Comment by Duckyluve - Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Little kippie must be running cats. One tax fails miserably so they just keep putting it on the ballot. NO NEW TAXES!!!