Jindal plan changes the conversation

Gov. Bobby Jindal unveiled his proposal to swap state income taxes for higher sales taxes with little more than a vague outline sketched over four paragraphs. But that short declaration successfully shifted the state’s political conversation, steering it to topics Jindal can better control than the usual talk of budget cuts and state money woes.

Tax talk has all but replaced discussion of slashing funding to hospice, mental health and domestic violence programs on newspaper front pages, websites and editorials. It’s grabbed legislative focus as well.

The tax swap has overshadowed the governor’s dismantling of the state’s charity hospital system and the still-uncertain effects of the privatization effort on the state’s poor and uninsured.

And it’s dwarfed discussion, at least for now, of the next impending $1.2 billion state budget gap and the implications of looming cuts for the most-vulnerable residents of the state and the public colleges that have taken repeated hits to their funding.

Meanwhile, the bare minimum of a concept that Jindal has floated garnered widespread praise in conservative publications and political circles, continuing to draw him the attention he clearly craves on the national stage.

The change of topic has to be a welcome reprieve for a governor who’s been hammered — at least in Louisiana — with negative attention about slashing health-care programs for those on their deathbeds, abused women, children with behavioral problems and the poor who depend on the LSU-run hospitals for health care.

Jindal said he will propose to eliminate Louisiana’s personal and business income taxes in exchange for higher state sales taxes and the removal of some tax breaks currently on the books. The ideas are the centerpiece of the governor’s planned tax code rewrite for the next legislative session that begins in April.

He describes the proposal as a way to save Louisiana families money and make the state more appealing to business and industry. But as the cliché goes, the devil is in the details — and Jindal’s given none of those details.

The governor didn’t say how much sales taxes would need to be raised or which tax breaks he’s proposing to eliminate to fill the nearly $3 billion gap that would be left by eliminating income taxes.

Initial reviews would suggest that such a tax swap would raise taxes on low- to moderate-income families and give upper-income earners a tax break, because the sales tax hits everyone at the same rate, while income tax rates are higher for people who are paid more. Some low-income workers don’t earn enough to have to pay income taxes at all.

Tim Barfield, executive counsel for the Department of Revenue, is leading the tax code revamp for Jindal. He says the administration is considering ways, like a possible tax rebate, to help the poor shrink some of the increased costs of the sales tax hike. How that would work and who it would help are unknown.

The questions are many, but the idea of doing away with the state income tax seizes on a movement among Republican governors around the country, who are considering ways to shrink income taxes in favor of other tax types.

The governor won’t be able to keep attention solely on taxes — at least not locally — for long as new budget cuts loom and lawsuits continue over his financing choices and his education programs.

But as he allows speculation to roam about his tax revamp without offering many details, Jindal can at least split the conversation and keep some people thinking about their own tax bills and pocketbooks rather than the state services shutting down.

Melinda Deslatte covers the Louisiana Capitol for The Associated Press. Her email address is mdeslatte@ap.org


Please log in to comment on this story

Comments (8)


1) Comment by Vernonbrew22 - 22/01/2013

Jindal is quickly and effectively dismantling the state's historical pillars of education, government and welfare. It is not like others have not tried it before him. But look at their epic failures. Roemer was run from the gay house and Foster, who posed as a Demy, was just too John Wayne to make his views wreak havoc. Peeoosh is going to get this tax structure passed, continue to tally budget shortfalls and eventually get rid of all tenured professors, state workers and even Supryia. Rumor has it she has been dating a real man, either Chase Rimmer, Adolf White or Eddy Edwards. And oddly enough, people believe he has no chance of becoming 2016 President for the Rich. This state is in for some bad years. Told you not to buy sausage from That Republican meat market on Choctaw. You may be in the next batch.

2) Comment by Attila - 21/01/2013

I agree with zealer99. An increase in sales taxes would not disproportionately affect the poor because food, utilities, and prescription drugs are not taxed at the state level now....those items are necessities of life and while it is true that the poor pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes..percentages are irrelevant. Whatever money they have remaining after purchasing food, prescriptions, and utilities is discretionary. They should pay for discretionary spending just like the rest of us.

3) Comment by RODEO CLOWN - 21/01/2013

“The Jindal administration is working behind the scenes to prepare for the legislative session that starts in April, when the proposal will be debated”, what a pathetic joke. Jindal and the Jindanistas have absolutely no intention of debating any proposal. Jindal already knows what he wants changed. He will handle this proposal the same way he has handled every proposal for anything he wants or does not want through the legislature. The proposal will be “bullied” through the legislature by Jindal and the Jindanistas the same way every other piece of legislation he has or has not supported. Jindal's governorship can be best characterized/summed up in the following phrase: “of the privileged, by the privileged, for the privileged”. Instead of throwing the financial “baby out with the bath water”, a common administrative practice of Jindal's, Louisiana’s financial structure would be better served by an examination of the past four years of revenue mismanagement. For example, why has total state revenues decreased by over 2.50 billion dollars since 2008? (LA DEPT OF REVENUE REPORT 2008-11, PG 16) Before the current tax structure is “redesigned”, amended or abandoned, the state would be better served an analysis and evaluation of each and every source of revenue contributing to the Louisiana's revenue structure and why such source has either increased or decreased over the past four years. For example, 1. why has severance tax collections decreased by almost $300 million dollars since 2008? 2. Why has corporate income collections decreased in excess of $500 million dollars for the same period of time. 3. Or why has corporate franchise tax collections decreased by over $182 million dollars over the same period of time? Why would state revenues from any source decrease when, at least according to Jindal, Louisiana has “enjoyed”, continues to enjoy such massive/expansive growth over the past four years? Before we amend or abolish Louisiana's current revenue system the following questions need to be answered honestly and accurately: A. What is wrong? B. Why is it wrong? C. How can it or if it can be fixed.

4) Comment by zealer99 - 21/01/2013

Undocumented pharmacists and undocumented guest workers would have to pay sales tax. I would imagine that lower income people spend a larger percent of their income of food, for which state sales taxes are not collected.

5) Comment by zealer99 - 21/01/2013

They need to raise enough revenue to hire some "planners" to plan ways to spend it.

6) Comment by 8point6 - 21/01/2013

Higher sales taxes would be paid by EVERYONE! That would be the only fair way.

7) Comment by Mygulfbleedsforu - 21/01/2013

Shorter article: Jindal's plan to screw the poor, the elderly and the middle to lower working class has taken the spotlight off his more recent efforts to screw the poor, the elderly and the middle to lower working class, plus education. And across the nation, conservative talking heads explode with joy.

8) Comment by morellok2 - 21/01/2013

the man will destroy our state and be off to his next government based job. Why oh why did he have to make being governor the one job he hold for more than a couple of years? I challenge him to remain in Louisiana after this term so he can be around to experience what his actions have brought.